2,289
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Aadhaar and social assistance programming: local bureaucracies as critical intermediary

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &

References

  • Aadil, A., Gelb, A., Giri, A., Mukherjee, A., Navis, K., & Thapliyal, M. (2019). Is Krishna a glimpse of the future? CGD Working Paper 512, Center for Global Development, Washington DC. https://www.cgdev.org/ publication/digital-governance-krishna-glimpse-future-working-paper
  • Arora, P. (2016). The bottom of the data pyramid: Big data and the global south. International Journal of Communication, 10, 1681–1699.
  • Barrientos, A., & Pellissery, S. (2015). Political factors in the growth of social assistance. In S. Hickey, K. Sen, & B. Bukenya (Eds.), The politics of inclusive development: Interrogating the evidence (pp. 146–174). Oxford University Press.
  • Bhatia, A., & Bhabha, J. (2017). India’s aadhaar scheme and the promise of inclusive social protection. Oxford Development Studies, 45(1), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600818.2016.1263726
  • Bhatnagar, S. C., & Singh, N. (2010). Assessing the impact of E-government: A study of projects in India. Information Technologies and International Development, 6(2), 109–127.
  • Chaudhuri, B. (2019). Paradoxes of intermediation in Aadhaar: Human making of a digital infrastructure. South Asian Studies, 42(3), 572–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2019.1598671
  • Chaudhuri, B. (2021). Distant, opaque and seamful: Seeing the state through the workings of Aadhaar in India. Information Technology for Development, 27(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2020.1789037
  • Chen, Y., Pereira, I., & Patel, P. (2021). Decentralized governance of digital platforms. Journal of Management, 47(5), 1305–1337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320916755
  • Cohen, L. (2019). The “social” De-duplicated: On the Aadhaar platform and the engineering of service. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 42(3), 482–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2019.1593597
  • Cordella, A., Paletti, A., & Shaikh, M. (2018). Renegotiating public value with co-production. In C. Tucci, A. Afuah, & G. Viscusi (Eds.), Creating and capturing value through crowdsourcing. Oxford University Press.
  • Devereux, S., & Sabates-Wheeler, R. (2004). Transformative social protection. Institute for Development Studies, Working Paper 232.
  • Dreze, J., Khalid, N., Khera, R., & Somanchi, A. (2017). Aadhaar and food security in Jharkhand: Pain without gain?. Economic and Political Weekly, 52(50), 50.
  • Effah, J., & Owusu-Oware, E. (2021). From national to sector level biometric systems: The case of Ghana. Information Technology for Development, 27(1), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2020.1818543
  • Evans, P., Heller, P. (2015). Chapter 37 of Human development, state transformation, and the politics of the developmental state. In S. Leibfried et al. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of transformations of the state. Oxford Handbooks Online.
  • Faguet, J. P., Fox, A. M., & Poschl, C. (2015). Decentralization for a deeper, more supple democracy. Journal of Democracy, 26(4), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2015.0059
  • Ghani, E. (2020). Will decentralisation help India? Financial Express 18th March.
  • GOI. (2016). Economic survey 2015-16. Ministry of Finance, Government of India.
  • Gorwa, R. (2019). What is platform governance? Information, Communication & Society, 22(6), 854–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573914
  • Henne, K. (2019). Surveillance in the name of governance: Aadhaar as a fix for leaking systems in India. In B. Haggart et al. (Ed.), Information, technology and control in a changing world. International Political Economy Series. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14540-8_11
  • Kallinikos, J. (2005). The order of technology: Complexity and control in a connected world. Information and Organization, 15(3), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2005.02.001
  • Kiran, G. R. (2014). Multipurpose nature of telecentres: The case of e-governance service delivery in Akshaya telecentres project (Doctoral dissertation). The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/935/1/Kiran_Multipupose-nature-of-telecentres.pdf
  • Krishna, S. (2021). Digital identity, datafication and social justice: Understanding aadhaar use among informal workers in south India. Information Technology for Development, 27(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2020.1818544
  • Madon, S. (1993). Introducing administrative reform through the application of computer-based information systems: A case study in India. Public Administration and Development, 13(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.4230130104
  • Madon, S. (2009). E-governance for development: A focus on rural India. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Mahapatra, S. (2018). SC: How many denied benefits due to Aadhaar authentication failure, The Economic Times, 23 March 2018.
  • Masiero, S., & Arvidsson, V. (2021). Degenerative outcomes of digital identity platforms for development. Information Systems Journal, https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12351
  • Masiero, S., & Maiorano, D. (2017). NGNREGA, power politics, and computerization in Andhra Pradesh. Forum for Development Studies, https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2017.1345785.
  • MicroSave. (2017). Assessment of AeFDS (Aadhaar enabled Fertilizer Distribution System) Pilot. Submitted to Government of India. Available at: http://www.microsave.net/files/pdf/Assessment_of_AeFDS_Aadhaar_enabled_Fertilizer_Distribution_System_Pilot.pdf
  • Mills, A. J., Durepos, G., & Wiebe, E. (2010). Encyclopedia of case study research. (Vols. 1–0). SAGE, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412957397
  • Mir, U. B., Arpan, K., Kar, N. P., & Gupta, R. S. (2019). Prioritizing digital identity goals – The case study of Aadhaar in India. In I. O. Pappas (Ed.), Digital Transformation for a sustainable society in the 21st century (Vol. 11701, pp. 489–501). Springer International. https://www.researchgate.net/deref/https%3A//doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29374-1_40
  • Mukhopadhyay, S., Bouwman, H., & Jaiswal, M. P. (2019). An open platform centric approach for scalable government service delivery to the poor: The Aadhaar case. Government Information Quarterly, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.001
  • Myers, M. D., & Avison, D. (2002). Qualitative research in information systems: A reader. Sage.
  • Nicholson, B., Nielsen, P., & Saebo, J. (2021). Editorial – digital platforms for development. Special Issue: Digital Platforms for Development, 31(6), 863–868. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12364
  • Prakash, A., & De, R. (2007). Importance of development context in ICT4D projects: A study of computerisation of land records. Information Technology & People, 20(3), 262–282. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840710822868
  • Ranjini, C. R. (2021). Controversial COVID-19 contact-tracing App in India: Digital self-defence, governance and surveillance. In C. Garvey & A. Hanemaayer (Eds.), Artificial intelligence and Its discontents: Histories of AI across the social sciences and humanities. Palgrave.
  • Rondinelli, D., Nellis, J., & Shabbir Cheema, G. (1983). Decentralization in developing countries: A review of recent experience, World Bank Staff Working Papers No. 581, Management and Development Series, No. 8, World Bank, Washington DC.
  • Singh, R. (2019). Give me a database and I will raise the nation-state. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2019.1602810.
  • Sud, M., & VanSandt, C. (2015). Identity rights: A structural void in inclusive growth. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(3), 589–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2359-5
  • The Hindu. (2019). 1,513 Farmers committed suicide since Mid-2014 in State, 1st June.
  • Totapally, S., Sonderegger, P., Rao, P., Gosselt, J., & Gaurav, G. (2019). State of Aadhaar Report 2019. Dalberg.
  • Walsham, G. (2006). Doing interpretive research. Journal of Information Systems, 15(3), 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000589