Towards a process framework to guide the development of ICT4D programs: a South African perspective

References

• Andoh-Baidoo, F. K. (2017). Context-specific theorizing in ICT4D research. Information Technology for Development, 23(2), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1356036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashraf, M., Grunfeld, H., Hoque, M. R., & Alam, K. (2017). An extended conceptual framework to understand information and communication technology-enabled socio-economic development at community level in Bangladesh. Information Technology & People, 30(4), 736–752. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-03-2016-0067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieber, M., McFall, B., Rice, R., & Gurstein, M. (2007). Towards systems design for supporting enabling communities. The Journal of Community Informatics, 3(1, Special Issue: Community Informatics and System Design). https://doi.org/10.15353/joci.v3i1.2383
   Google Scholar
• Bourgeois, D., & Horan, T. (2007). A design theory approach to community informatics: Community-centered development and action research testing of online social networking prototype. The Journal of Community Informatics, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.15353/joci.v3i1.2384
   Google Scholar
• Dé, R., Pal, A., Sethi, R., Reddy, S. K., & Chitre, C. (2018). ICT4D research: A call for a strong critical approach. Information Technology for Development, 24(1), 63–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1286284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dearden, A., & Kleine, D. (2019, January 4–7). Ethical standards for the ICTD/ICT4D community: A participatory process and a co-created document. Proceedings of the tenth international conference on information and communication technologies and development. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287098.3287134
   Google Scholar
• Dearden, A., & Tucker, W. D. (2016). Moving ICTD research beyond bungee jumping: Practical case studies and recommendations. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 35(3), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2016.2593267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodson, L. L., Sterling, S. R., & Bennett, J. K. (2012). Considering failure: Eight years of ITID research. ICTD '12: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development, 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1145/2160673.2160681
   Google Scholar
• Donner, J., Gandhi, R., Javid, P., Medhi, I., Ratan, A., Toyama, K., & Veeraraghavan, R. (2008). Stages of design in technology for global development. Computer, 41(6), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2008.203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreschler, A., & Hevner, A. R. (2016, May 23–25). A four-cycle model of IS design science research: Capturing the dynamic nature of IS artifact design. Breakthroughs and emerging insights from ongoing design science projects: Research-in-progress papers and poster presentations from the 11th international conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST), St. John, Newfoundland, Canada (pp. 1–8). http://hdl.handle.net/10468/2560
   Google Scholar
• Duncombe, R. (2006). Using the livelihoods framework to analyze ICT applications for poverty reduction through microenterprise. Information Technologies and International Development, 3(3), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1162/itid.2007.3.3.81
   Google Scholar
• Edlmann, R. F. P., & Grobbelaar, S. (2021). A framework of engagement practices for stakeholders collaborating around complex social challenges. Sustainability, 13(19), 10828. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigler, B.-S. (2011). ‘Informational capabilities’ – the missing link for the impact of ICT on development. E-transform knowledge platform working paper (1). World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/19011
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, R., & Gould, E. (2010). The “cool factor” of public access to ICT: Users’ perceptions of trust in libraries, telecentres and cybercafés in developing countries. Information Technology & People, 23(3), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593841011069158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. R. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 37(2), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunfeld, H. (2007, December 15–17). Framework for evaluating contributions of ICT to capabilities, empowerment and sustainability in disadvantaged communities. Proceedings of the CPRsouth2 conference on empowering rural communities through ICT policy and research (Vol. 1, p. 21), Chennai, India.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (2002). Information systems and developing countries: Failure, success, and local improvisations. The Information Society, 18(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240290075039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (2009). The ICT4D 2.0 Manifesto: Where next for ICTs and international development? Development Informatics Working Paper (No. 42). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3477369.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. (2010). Do information and communication technologies (ICTs) contribute to development ? Journal of International Development, 22(5), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hevner, A. R. (2007). A three cycle view of Design Science Research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 19(2), 87–92. https://aisel.aisnet.org/sjis/vol19/iss2/4
   Google Scholar
• Hevner, A. R., & Chatterjee, S. (2010). Design research in information systems. In Ramesh Sharda & Stefan Voß (Eds.), Design research in information systems. Integrated series in information systems (Vol. 22, pp. 9–22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5653-8_2.
   Google Scholar
• Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 28(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hlongwane, S., & Grobbelaar, S. (2022). A practical framework for value creation in health information systems from an ecosystem perspective: Evaluated in the South African context. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 637883. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.637883
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johri, A., & Pal, J. (2012). Capable and convivial design (CCD): A framework for designing information and communication technologies for human development. Information Technology for Development, 18(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2011.643202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleine, D. (2010). ICT4What? Using the choice framework to operalitionalise the capability approach to development. Journal of International Development, 22(5), 674–692. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, K. E. M. (2013). Ethical ICT research practice for community engagement in rural South Africa [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Pretoria. https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/39923
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, K. E. M. (2018). A confessional account of community entry: Doing critically reflexive ICT4D work in a deep rural community in South Africa. Information Technology for Development, 24(3), 482–510. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1323306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maarsingh B., Grobbelaar, S. S., Uriona-Maldonado, M. & Herselman, M. (2021). Exploring functional dynamics of innovation for inclusive development: Event history analysis of an ICT4D project. Innovation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2021.1956712e
   Google Scholar
• Mamba, M. S. N., & Isabirye, N. (2015). A framework to guide development through ICTs in rural areas in South Africa. Information Technology for Development, 21(1), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2013.874321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marais, R., Grobbelaar, S. S., & de Kock, I. H. (2021). Healthcare technology transfer in sub-saharan Africa: Conceptual framework evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3109445
   Google Scholar
• Mozelius, P., Hansson, H., Kigozi Kahiigi, E., & Ekenberg, L. (2009). Important aspects in ICT4D projects: Towards a model for quality assessment. Revista de investigaciones UNAD, 8(1), 29–42. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-33452
   Google Scholar
• Mthoko, H., & Khene, C. (2018). Building theory in ICT4D evaluation: A comprehensive approach to assessing outcome and impact. Information Technology for Development, 24(1), 138–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1315359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mthoko, H. L., & Pade-Khene, C. (2013). Towards a theoretical framework on ethical practice in ICT4D programmes. Information Development, 29(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666912449456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okoli, C., & Schabram, K. (2010). A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. Working Papers on Information Systems, 10(26). http://sprouts.aisnet.org/10-26
   Google Scholar
• Osah, J. U., Pade-Khene, C., & Foster, G. (2017). Critical themes of process assessment in rural ICT4D projects: An analysis of assessment approaches. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 60(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2014.tb00425.x
   Google Scholar
• Pade-khene, C., & Sewry, D. (2011). Towards a comprehensive evaluation framework for ICT for development evaluation – an analysis of evaluation frameworks. Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Management & Evaluation (pp. 360–369).
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, V., & Gupta, S. (2017). A comprehensive four-stage framework for evaluation of Information Communication Technologies for Development interventions. Information Technology for Development, 24(3), 511–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1371108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pather, S., & Uys, C. (2010). A strategy for evaluating socio-economic outcomes of an ICT4D programme. 2010 43rd Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 1–11). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2010.34.
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi, S. (2019). Perspectives on development: Why does studying information and communication technology for development (ICT4D) matter? Information Technology for Development, 25(3), 381–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2019.1658478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratshidi, L., Grobbelaar, S., & Botha, A. (2020). Categorization of factors influencing community health workers from a socio-technical systems perspective. In M. Hattingh, M. Matthee, H. Smuts, I. Pappas, Y. K. Dwivedi, & M. Mäntymäki (Eds.), Responsible design, implementation and use of information and communication technology (pp. 84–95). Lecture Notes in Computer Science (12067). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45002-1_8.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, T. (2015, May 20–22). Critical intent & practice in ICT4D : A typology of ICT4D initiatives. Proceedings of the 13th international conference on social implications of computers in developing countries, Negombo, Sri Lanka.
   Google Scholar
• Scribante, N. P., Pretorius, L., & Benade, S. (2019). The design of a research tool for conducting research in a complex socio-technical system. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 30(4), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.7166/30-4-2191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sein, M. K., & Harindranath, G. (2004). Conceptualizing the ICT artifact: Toward understanding the role of ICT in national development. The Information Society, 20(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240490269942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, H., Díaz Andrade, A., & Techatassanasoontorn, A. A. (2018). The practice of ICT-enabled development. Information Technology for Development, 24(1), 37–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1283284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takavarasha, S., Hapanyengwi, G., & Kabanda, G. (2017). Using livelihood profiles for assessing context in ICT4D resarch: A case study of Zimbabwe’s highveld prime communal. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 79(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2017.tb00582.x
   Google Scholar
• Talantsev, A., Larsson, A., Kivunike, F. N., & Sundgren, D. (2014). Quantitative scenario-based assessment of contextual factors for ICT4D projects: Design and implementation in a web based tool. In New perspectives in information systems and technologies (Vol. 1, pp. 477–490). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05951-8_45
   Google Scholar
• Taylor-Powell, E. (2005, June 8–10). Logic models: A framework for program planning and evaluation. Nutrition, food safety and health conference (Vol. 31), Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, M. A., Li, Y., & Oliveira, T. (2017). Nuances of development contexts for ICT4D research in least developed countries: An empirical investigation in Haiti. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1093–1112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2019). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Uys, C. S. (2015). Framework for evaluating information technology benefits in local communities [Doctoral dissertation]. Cape Peninsula University of Technology. http://ir.cput.ac.za/bitstream/20.500.11838/2283/1/207028346_Uys_CS_Dtech_Informatics_FID_2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vaidya, R. (2016). Trust formation in information systems implementation in developing countries: The role of emancipatory expectations. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 14(2), 182–199. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-10-2015-0032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Reijswoud, V. (2009). Appropriate ICT as a tool to increase effectiveness in ICT4D: Theoretical considerations and illustrating cases. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 38(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2009.tb00272.x
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, D. (2011). The importance of capabilities in the sustainability of information and communications technology programs: The case of remote Indigenous Australian communities. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-011-9269-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, M., & Heeks, R. (2011). Can a process approach improve ICT4D project success? Development Informatics Working Paper, 47. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3477344.
   Google Scholar
• Waugaman, A. (2016). From principle to pratice: Implementing the principles for digital development. Perspectives and recommendations from the practitioner community. The Principles for Digital Development Working Group. https://digitalprinciples.org/wp-content/uploads/From_Principle_to_Practice_v5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wayi, N., & Huisman, M. (2010). A system development methodology framework for development of rural community based information systems in South Africa. 4th IDIA conference. 3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Yamagishi, T., Kikuchi, M., & Kosugi, M. (1999). Trust, gullibility, and social intelligence. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00030
   Google Scholar
• Yim, M., & Gomez, R. (2021). Strengthening ICT4D evaluation: Lessons from the fields of program evaluation, IS/IT evaluation, and aid/development evaluation. Information Technology for Development, 27(1), 381–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2021.1876619
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., Hatakka, M., Sahay, S., & Andersson, A. (2018). Conceptualizing development in information and communication technology for development (ICT4D). Information Technology for Development, 24(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1396020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuppo, C. M. (2012). Defining ICT in a boundaryless world: The development of a working hierarchy. International Journal of Managing Information Technology (IJMIT), 4(3), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijmit.2012.4302
   Google Scholar