Justifying enterprise resource planning adoption

REFERENCES

• Alvarez, R. (2000) Examining an ERP implementation through myths: a case study of a large public organization. In Americas Conference on Information Systems, Los Angeles. Published on CD-ROM, pp.1655-1661.
   Google Scholar
• Axley, S.R. (2000) Communicating change: questions to consider. Industrial Management. July-August, 18- 21.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, C.J. (1992) The use of decision criteria in selecting information systems/technology investments. MIS Quarterly, 16 (3) 355-60.
   Google Scholar
• Ballantine, J.A., Galliers, R.A. and Stray, S.J. (1999) In Information Systems/Technology: Evaluation Practices. Beyond The IT Productivity Paradox, Willcocks, L.P. and Lester, S. (eds) (John Wiley).
   Google Scholar
• Bell, J. (1993) Doing Your Research Project: A Guide for First Time Researchers in Education and Social Science (Open University Press, Milton Keynes).
   Google Scholar
• Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. and Mead, M. (1987) The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11 (3), 369-86.
   Google Scholar
• Bingi, P., Sharma, M.K. and Godla, J.K. (1999) Critical issues affecting an ERP implementation. Information Systems Management, Summer, 7-14.
   Google Scholar
• Boudreau, M. and Robey, D. (1999) Organizational transition to enterprise resource planning systems: theoretical choices for process research. In International Conference on Information Systems, Charlotte, NC.
   Google Scholar
• California State University (1999) Chancellors recent speeches - www.calstatc.edu/tcir3/Exccutivc/spccchcs/ EDUCAUSE10-27-99.html.
   Google Scholar
• Central Queensland University (1999a) UniNews WEEKLY, 256
   Google Scholar
• Central Queensland University (1999b) UniNews WEEKLY, 266.
   Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. (1992) In Disciplinary Power in the Modern Corporation. Critical Management Studies, Alvesson, M. and Willmott. H. (eds) (Sage), pp. 21-45.
   Google Scholar
• Duke University (1996) Report of the Strategic Planning Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhart, K.M. (1989) Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), 532-50.
   Google Scholar
• Farbey, B., Land, F. and Targett, D. (1992) Evaluating investments in IT. Journal of Information Technology, 7, 109-22.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1979) Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison (trans. A. Sheridan) (Vintage, New York).
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H.G. (1993) Truth and Method (Continuum, New York).
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1983) Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology (Basic Books, New York).
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E.G. and Lincoln, Y.S. (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation (Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1971) Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics (Heinemann, London).
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and The Rationalization of Society (Beacon Press, Boston).
   Google Scholar
• Hall. R.H. (1977) Organizations: Structure and Process (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
   Google Scholar
• Hanseth, O., Ciborra, C.U. and Braa, K. (2001) The control devolution: ERP and the side effects of globalization. The DATA BASE far Advances in Information Systems, 32 (4), 34-46.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, S. (1988) The Tragedy of Technology: Human Liberation Venus Domination in the Late Twentieth Century (Pluto Press, London).
   Google Scholar
• Hochstrasser, B. and Griffiths, C. (1991) Controlling IT Investment Strategy and Management (Chapman & Hall).
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, S. and Kling, R. (2001) Computerization movements: the rise of the Internet and distant forms of work. In Information Technology and Organizational Transformation: History, Rhetoric, and Practice, Yates, J. and Van Maanen, J. (eds) (Sage Publications), pp. 93 135.
   Google Scholar
• Isenherg, D.J. (1988) In I law Senior Managers Think. Decision Making Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Interactions, Bell, D.E., Raiffa, H. and Tversky, A. (eds) (Cambridge University Press), pp. 525-39.
   Google Scholar
• Jenson, R.L. and Johnson, R.I. (1999) The enterprise resource planning system as a strategic solution. Information Strategy, 15 (4), 28-33.
   Google Scholar
• Jurison, J. (1996) Toward more effective management of information technology benefits. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 5, 263-74.
   Google Scholar
• Keats, B.W. (1991) Research notes and communications: an empirical investigation of strategic decision models. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 243-50.
   Google Scholar
• Khazanchi, D. and Munkvold, B. (2000) Is information systems a science? An inquiry into the nature of the information systems discipline. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 31 (3), 24-42.
   Google Scholar
• King, M. and McAulay, L. (1997) Information technology investment evaluation: evidence and interpretations. Journal of Information Technology, 12, 131-43.
   Google Scholar
• Kling, R. and Iacono, S. (1984) The control of information systems developments after implementation. Communications of the ACM, 27 (12), 1218-26.
   Google Scholar
• Kling, R. and Scacchi, W. (1982) In The Web of Computing: Computer Technology as Social Organization. Advances in Computers, Vol. 21, Yovits, M. (ed.) (Academic Press, New York), pp. 1 -90.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorf, K. (1980) Content Analysis (Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, K. and Van Hillegersberg, J. (2000) ERP experiences and evolution. Communications of the ACM, 43 (4), 22-26.
   Google Scholar
• Langley, A. (1989) In search of rationality: the purposes behind the use of formal analysis in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 598-631.
   Google Scholar
• Laudon, K.C. and Laudon, J.R. (1984) Management Information Systems - Organization and Technology (Macmillan, New York).
   Google Scholar
• Lee, A.S. (1989) A scientific methodology for MIS case studies. MIS Quarterly, 13 (1), 33-50.
   Google Scholar
• Lyytinen, K.J. and Klein, H.K. (1985) The critical theory of Jurgen Habermas as a basis for a theory of information systems. In Research Methods in Information Systems, Mumford, E., Hirschheim, R., Fitzgerald, G. and WoodHarper, T. (eds) (Elsevier Science Publishers BV, North-Holland, pp. 219-36.
   Google Scholar
• McClure, J. (1991) Explanations, Accounts, arid Illusions: A Critical Analysis (Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• March, J.G. (1988) Rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. In Decision Making: Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Interactions, Bell, D.E., Raiffa, H. and Tversky, A. (eds) (Cambridge University Press), pp. 33 57.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H. (1970) One Dimensional Man (Sphere Books, London).
   Google Scholar
• Markus, M.L. (1983) Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Communications of the ACM, 26 (6), 430-44.
   Google Scholar
• Markus, M.L., Petrie, D. and Axline, S. (2000) Bucking the trends: what the future may hold for ERP packages. Information Systems Frontiers, 2 (2), 181-93.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977) Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83 (2), 340-63.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C.W (1940) Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review, 5, 904-13.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D. and Theoret, A. (1976) The structure of 'unstructured' decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 246-75.
   Google Scholar
• Mumby, D.K. (1988) Communication and Power in Organizations: Discourse, Ideology - and Domination (Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ).
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, C. (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16 (1), 145-79.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W.J. and Baroudi, J. (1991) Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2 (1), 1-28
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. (1981) Management as symbolic action: the creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 3, 1 -52.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, P. (1992) Information technology evaluation: is it different? Journal of the Operational Research Society, 43 (1), 29-42.
   Google Scholar
• Rands, T. (1992) The key role of applications software makeor-buy decisions. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 1 (4), 215 23.
   Google Scholar
• Remenyi, D., Williams, B., Money, A. and Swam, F. (1998) Doing Research in Business and Management: An Introduction to Process and Method (Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J.W. (1999) The ERP Revolution: Surviving Versus Thriving (Sloan School of Management, Center for Information Systems Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
   Google Scholar
• Sarker, S. and Lee, A.S. (2000) Using a case study to test the role of three key social enablers in ERP implementation. In 21st International Conference on Information Systems, Brisbane, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Schramm, W. (1971) Notes on Case Studies of Instructional Media Projects (Academy for Educational Development. Washington, DC).
   Google Scholar
• Schroyer, T. (1975) The Critique of Domination (Beacon Paperback, Boston).
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, J (1990) The strategic management of IT investment decisions: a research note. British Journal of Management, 1, 171-81.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, G. (1979) Strategic Planning (Free Press, New York).
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (1991) Language, training and information systems assessment. Accounting Management and Information Technologies, 1 (1), 91-108.
   Google Scholar
• Sumner, M. (1999) Critical Success Factors in Enterprise Wide Information Management Systems Projects (ACM SIGCPR, New Orleans).
   Google Scholar
• Symons, V. (1990) Evaluation of information systems: IS development in the processing company. Journal of Information Technology, 5, 194-204.
   Google Scholar
• University of Colorado (1998) Administrative Streamlining Project Business Plan. http://www.cusys.edu/asp/busplan/ Master.html
   Google Scholar
• University of Michigan (1995) Strategic Data Plan Report. http://www. mpathways.umich.edu/overview/pplsoft.html
   Google Scholar
• University of Minnesota (2000) HRMS Project Charter, http:// www.umn.edu/enterprise/hrms/chobjectives.shtml
   Google Scholar
• University of Nebraska (1996) Administrative Systes Project.
   Google Scholar
• University of New South Wales (1998) Request for Information for the Supply of an Integrated Administrative System.
   Google Scholar
• Vitale, M. and Johnston, K. (1997) Management processes: evaluating IT investments. In Managing the Introduction of Technology in the Delivery and Administration of Higher Education, Yetton, P. (ed.) (DEETYA), pp 81-99.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, J. (1994) A Portfolio Approach to Evaluating Information Systems Investments and Setting Priorities. Information Management: The Evaluation of Information Systems Investments (Chapman & Hall).
   Google Scholar
• Weill, P. and Olson, M. (1989) Managing investment in information technology: mm case examples and implications. 13 (1), 2-17.
   Google Scholar
• Willcocks, L. and Smith, G. (1995) IT-enabled business process reengineering: organizational and human resource dimensions. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 4 (3), 279-301.
   Google Scholar
• Willcocks, L.P. and Sykes, R. (2000) The role of the CIO and IT function in ERP. Communications of the ACM, 43 (4), 32 38.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L. (1998) Wives, Mistresses and Matriarchs (Allen & Unwin, St Leonards, NSW, Australia).
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Sage Publications).
   Google Scholar