The contemporary security vetting landscape

Bibliography

• Andrew, C. The Defence of the Realm: The Authorized History of MI5. London: Allen Lane, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bochel, H., A. Defty, and J. Kirkpatrick. Watching the Watchers: Parliament and the Intelligence Services. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Brazier, R. “Qualifying as a Minister.” Anglo-American Law Review 18 (1989): 124–150. doi:10.1177/147377958901800202.
   Google Scholar
• Brazier, R. 1994. “It Is a Constitutional Issue: Fitness for Ministerial Office in the 1990s.” Public Law, 431–450.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. Triennial Review of the Security Vetting Appeals Panel, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. HMG Personnel Security Controls – version 4.0, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Conference of Privy Councillors. Statement of the Findings of Conference of Privy Councillors on Security, Cmd. 9715, 1956.
   Google Scholar
• Fredman, S., and G. Morris. The State as Employer: Labour Law in the Public Services. London: Mansell Publishing Limited, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessy, P., and G. Brownfeld. “Britain’s Cold War Security Purge: The Origins of Positive Vetting.” The Historical Journal 25 (1982): 965–974. doi:10.1017/S0018246X0002135X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Her Majesty’s Government. Statement on the Recommendations of the Security Commission, Cmnd 8540, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Her Majesty’s Government. Developed Vetting (DV) Questionnaire, Form NSV002, revised August 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Her Majesty’s Government. Security Check (SC)/Counter-Terrorist Check (CTC) Questionnaire, NSV001, revised August 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth, M., and R. Norton-Taylor. Blacklist: The inside Story of Political Vetting. London: The Hogarth Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons Public Administration Select Committee. 2003. Public Administration - Minutes of Evidence, April 10.
   Google Scholar
• Intelligence and Security Committee. Annual Report 2004–2005, Cm 6510, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Intelligence and Security Committee. “Frequently Asked Questions (faqs).” http://isc.independent.gov.uk/FAQ
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. C. “Individual Rights and National Security.” Modern Law Review 20 (1957): 364–380. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.1957.tb00449.x.
   Google Scholar
• Leigh, I., and L. Lustgarten. “Employment, Justice and Détente: The Reform of Vetting.” Modern Law Review 54 (1991): 613–642. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.1991.tb02659.x.
   Google Scholar
• Leigh, I., and L. Lustgarten. 1992. “The Security Commission: Constitutional Achievement or Curiosity?” Public Law, 215–232.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, I. Application Refused: Employment Vetting by the State. London: The Civil Liberties Trust, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Lomas, D. “Crocodiles in the Corridors’: Security Vetting, Race and Whitehall, 1945–1968.” The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History (2019). doi:10.1080/03086534.2019.1648231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. “Civil Liberties in Britain during the Cold War: The Role of Central Government.” American Journal of Legal History 33 (1989): 53–100. doi:10.2307/845786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEvoy, K., and C. White. “Security Vetting in Northern Ireland: Loyalty Redress and Citizenship.” Modern Law Review 61 (1999): 341–361. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00147.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, A. 2018. “Is the ‘deep State’ Trying to Undermine Corbyn?” The New Statesman, September 19.
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. Investigation into National Security Vetting (HC 2017–19, 1500), 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Norton-Taylor, R. In Defence of the Realm? the Case for an Accountable Security Services. London: Civil Liberties Trust, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Pickard, J. 2018. “Corbyn Aides Work in Parliament without Security Clearance.” Financial Times, September 12.
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, L. Security Procedures in the Public Service, Cmnd 1681, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, L. Report of the Tribunal appointed to Inquire into the Vassall Case and Related Matters, Cmnd 2009, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, P. 2018. “The Vetting Files: How the BBC Kept Out ‘subversives’.” BBC News, April 22.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P. F. “Hybrid Institutions in the National Security Constitution: The Case of the Commissioners.” Legal Studies 39 (2019): 432–454. doi:10.1017/lst.2018.44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Security Commission. Report of The Security Commission May 1973, Cmnd 5362, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Security Commission. Report of the Security Commission July 1973, Cmnd 5367, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Security Commission. Report of the Security Commission May 1983, Cmnd 8876, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Security Commission. Report of the Security Commission May 1985, Cmnd 9514, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Security Commission. Report of the Security Commission July 1995, Cmnd 2930, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Security Commission. Report of the Security Commission February 2000, Cm 4578, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Security Commission. Report of the Security Commission May 2004, Cm 6177, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Security Vetting Appeals Panel. “About Us.” https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/security-vetting-appeals-panel/about
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, H. 2018. “Commons Launches Investigation over Corbyn Aide without Security Clearance.” The Guardian, September 13.
   Google Scholar
• Tomkins, A. “Justice and Security in the United Kingdom.” Israel Law Review 47 (2014): 305–329. doi:10.1017/S0021223714000119.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, M. 2019. “Home Office under Fire for Blocking New Spy Watchdog.” The Observer, January 20.
   Google Scholar
• Waugh, P. 2018. “Exclusive: Jeremy Corbyn’s Close Aide Routinely Working in Parliament without Required Security Clearance.” Huffington Post, September 11.
   Google Scholar
• White, C. 1999, “Security Vetting, Discrimination and the Right to a Fair Trial.” Public Law, 406–418.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. Not in the Public Interest: The Problem of Security in Democracy. London: Hutchinson and Co, 1965.
   Google Scholar