The multifaceted norm of objectivity in intelligence practices

Bibliography

• Bellaby, R. “What’s the Harm? the Ethics of Intelligence Collection.” Intelligence and National Security 27, no. 1 (2012): 93–117. doi:10.1080/02684527.2012.621600.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, R. K. “The New Politics of Intelligence: Will Reforms Work This Time?” Foreign Affairs 83, no. 3 (2004): 2. doi:10.2307/20033970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjerknes, O. T., and I. A. F. E. Prinsipper. Metoder Og Praksis [Investigation. Principles, Methods and Practices]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Born, H., and A. Wills. “Beyond the Oxymoron: Exploring Ethics through the Intelligence Cycle.” In Ethics of Spying: A Reader for the Intelligence Professional, edited by J. Goldman 2, 34-57. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C. “Data Flakes: An Afterword to ‘Raw Data ‘Is an Oxymoron.” In ‘Raw Data’ Is an Oxymoron, edited by L. Gitelman, 167-171. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Brayne, S. “Big Data Surveillance: The Case of Policing.” American Sociology Review 82, no. 2 (2017): 977–1008. doi:10.1177/0003122417725865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, J. B., and R. Z. George. “Intelligence Analysis – The Emergence of a Discipline.” In Introduction in Analyzing Intelligence. Origins, Obstacles and Innovations, edited by R. George and J. B. Bruce, 55-70. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Burch, M., and K. Furman. “Objectivity in Science and Law: A Shared Rescue Strategy.” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 64 (2019): 60–70. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.02.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo, M., R. Gervais, and J. Sprenger. “Introduction: Objectivity in Science.” Synthese 194 (2017): 4641–4642. doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1582-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. “Intelligence Analysts and Policy-makers: Benefits and Dangers of Tensions in the Relationship.” Intelligence and National Security 21, no. 6 (2006): 999‒ 1021. doi:10.1080/02684520601046325.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, H. “The Irreducible Complexity of Objectivity.” Synthese 138 (2004): 453–473. doi:10.1023/B:SYNT.0000016451.18182.91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egbert, S., and M. Leese. Criminal Futures. Predictive Policing and Everyday Police Work. London, New York: Routledge, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Elgin, C. Z. True Enough. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Folker, R. D., Jr. Intelligence Analysis in Theater Joint Intelligence Centers: An Experiment in Applying Structured Methods. Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic Intelligence Research, Joint Military College, 2000. January.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, M. Epistemic Injustice. Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H. G. Truth and Method. New York: The Continuum Publishing Company, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, J. A. “The ‘Professionalization’ of Intelligence Analysis: A Sceptical Perspective.” International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence 29, no. 4 (2016): 643–676. doi:10.1080/08850607.2016.1177393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitelman, L., and V. Jackson. “Introduction: Raw Data Is an Oxymoron.” In Introduction to “Raw Data” Is an Oxymoron, edited by L. Gitelman, 1-14. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Gundhus, H. I. ‘Smart Politiarbeid? Når Skillene Mellom Etterretning, Forebygging Og Etterforskning Viskes Ut” [Smart Policing: When the Lines between Investigative, Detective an Intelligence Work are Blurred] in Ret SMART. Om Smart Teknologi Og Regulering, edited by A. Rønne and H. Stevnsborg. Copenhagen: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Hedley, J. H. “Learning from Intelligence Failures.” International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence 18, no. 3 (2005): 435–450. doi:10.1080/08850600590945416.
   Google Scholar
• Hedley, J. H. “The Evolution of Intelligence Analysis.” In Analyzing Intelligence. Origins, Obstacles and Innovations, edited by R. George and J. B. Bruce. Chapter 1, 19-34. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hestehave, N., and Kirchhoff. “Coppers Chasing Usual Suspects. A Sociological Search for the Drama of Proactive Investigation and the Detective Métier.” PhD Thesis, Aalborg: Aalborg University, Department of Sociology, (2021).
   Google Scholar
• Heuer, R. “The Psychology of Intelligence, Center for the Study of Intelligence.” 1999. Available at: https://www.cia.gov/static/9a5f1162fd0932c29bfed1c030edf4ae/Pyschology-of-Intelligence-Analysis.pdf. Accessed May 12 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, M., N. Fielding, and N. Cope. ““The Appliance of Science?”: The Theory and Practice of Crime Intelligence Analysis.” The British Journal of Criminology 45, no. 1 (2005): 39–57. doi:10.1093/bjc/azh053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, K. K., U. Stridbeck, and Å. Langballe. “Objektivitet i avhør: Avhør av fornærmede i Norge.” Tidsskrift for Strafferett 18, no. 2 (2018): 74–101. doi:10.18261/.0809-9537-2018-02-02.
   Google Scholar
• Jervis, R. “Reports, Politics, and Intelligence Failures: The Case of Iraq.” Journal of Strategic Studies 29, no. 1 (2006): 3–52. doi:10.1080/01402390600566282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, B. M. Foreign Intelligence: Research and Analysis in the Office of Strategic Services 1942–1945. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, M. “The Co-construction of Crime Predictions: Dynamics between Digital Data, Software and Human Beings.” In Moral Issues in Intelligence-led Policing, edited by F. N. R, H. I. Gundhus, and K. V. Rønn, 141-160. London, New York: Routledge, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kolflaath, E. “Litt om vitenskapeliggjøringen av etterforskningsfaget.” In Straff og frihet. Til vern om den liberale rettsstat. Festskrift til Tor-Aksel Busch, K. A. Kvande edited by, 435–444. Oslo: 2019. [On the Scientification of detective’s work] in Knut Erik Sæther, Runar Torgersen, Ulf Stridbeck og. Oslo: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Marrin, S. Improving Intelligence Analysis. Bridging the Gap between Scholarship and Practice. London, New York: Routledge, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Marrin, S. “Analytic Objectivity and Science: Evaluating the US Intelligence Community’s Approach to Applied Epistemology.” Intelligence and National Security 35, no. 3 (2020): 350–366. doi:10.1080/02684527.2019.1710806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moen, R. “Anbefalinger I Politiets Etterretningsprodukter – Et Dilemma.” [Recommendations in the Police Intelligence Products – A Dilemma.” Nordic Journal of Studies in Policing 7, no. 3 (2020): 176–198. doi:10.18261/.2703-7045-2020-03-02.
   Google Scholar
• Omand, D., and M. Phythian. Principled Spying: The Ethics of Secret Intelligence. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Pherson, R. H., and R. Heuer. Structured Analytic Techniques for Intelligence Analysis. Washington D.C.: CQ Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Phythian, M. “Policing Uncertainty: Intelligence, Security and Risk.” Intelligence and National Security 27, no. 2 (2012): 187–205. doi:10.1080/02684527.2012.661642.
   Google Scholar
• Phythian, M., ed. Understanding the Intelligence Cycle. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Pili, G. “Intelligence and Social Epistemology – Toward a Social Epistemological Theory of Intelligence.” Social Epistemology 33, no. 6 (2019): 574–592. doi:10.1080/02691728.2019.1658823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Politiet [Norwegian Police]. “Etteretningsdoktrine for Politiet Version 1.0.” [Norwegian Police’s Doctrine of Intelligence] available at: https://www.politiet.no/globalassets/05-om-oss/03-strategier-og-planer/etterretningsdoktrine.pdf. Accessed May 12, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Räsänen, M., and M. N. James. “The Raw Is Cooked: Data in Intelligence Practice.” Science, Technology & Human Values 38, no. 5 (2013): 655–677. doi:10.1177/0162243913480049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasch-Olsen, A. Politiets bruk av informanter – Et nødvendigt onde [Police’s use of informants]. Bergen: Fakbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Rathmell, A. “Towards Postmodern Intelligence.” Intelligence and National Security 17, no. 3 (2002): 87–104. doi:10.1080/02684520412331306560.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, J., and J. Sprenger. “Scientific Objectivity.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/scientificobjectivity/&#x003E. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Riste, O. “The Intelligence–Policy Maker Relationship and the Politicization of Intelligence.” In National Intelligence Systems Current Research and Future Prospects, edited by G. F. Treverton and W. Agrell, 179-209. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139174541.009.
   Google Scholar
• Rønn, K. V. “(Mis-) Informed Decisions? on Epistemic Reasonability of Intelligence Claims.” International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence 27, no. 2 (2014): 351–367. doi:10.1080/08850607.2014.842813.
   Google Scholar
• Rønn, K. V. “Intelligence Ethics: A Critical Review and Future Perspectives.” International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence 29, no. 4 (2016): 760–784. doi:10.1080/08850607.2016.1177399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rønn, K. V., and K. Lippert-Rasmussen. “Out of Proportion? on Surveillance and the Proportionality Requirement.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 23, no. 1 (2020): 181–199. doi:10.1007/s10677-019-10057-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, J. “How Do We Know? What Intelligence Analysis Can Learn from the Sociology of Science.” Intelligence and National Security 32, no. 5 (2017): 663–674. doi:10.1080/02684527.2017.1311473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treverton, G. “Intelligence Analysis: Between Politicization and Irrelevance.” In Analyzing Intelligence. Origins, Obstacles and Innovations, edited by G. R. Z and J. B. Bruce, 91-104. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Treverton, G. “The Future of Intelligence: Changing Threats, Evolving Methods.” In The Future of Intelligence: Challenges in the 21st Century, edited by I. D. J. Duyvesteyn, and J. van Reijn, 27–38. London & New York: Routledge, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• UK Ministry of Defence. “Understanding Intelligence Support to Joint Operations.” (2011), available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/jdp-2-00-understanding-and-intelligence-support-to-joint-operations. Accessed May 12, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, H. J. “The Myth of Objectivity: Is Medicine Moving Towards a Social Constructivist Medical Paradigm?” Family Practice 17, no. 2 (2000): 203–209. doi:10.1093/fampra/17.2.203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wippl, J. W., and D. D’Andrea. “The Qualities that Make a Great Collection Management Officer.” International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence 27, no. 4 (2014): 806–814. doi:10.1080/08850607.2014.924821.
   Google Scholar
• Woodard, N. “Tasting the Forbidden Fruit: Unlocking the Potential of Positive Politicization.” Intelligence and National Security 28, no. 1 (2013): 91–108. doi:10.1080/02684527.2012.749066.
   Google Scholar