How to explain the value of intelligence analysis: external consequences or internal characteristics?

Bibliography

• The 9/11 Commission Report, “National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States.” 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Aquinas, T. Commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics, Vol 1-2, Translated by C. I. Litzinger. Chicago, IL: Henry Regnery Company, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. “Nichomachean Ethics.” Reprint Works of Aristotle, Vol. 9, edited by W. D. Ross, 1–246. London, UK: Oxford University Press, 1925.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Department of NationalDefence. “Aide Memoire on Intelligence Analysis Tradecraft.” 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Central Intelligence Agency. “Directorate for Analysis.” A Tradecraft Primer: Structured Analytic Techniques for Improving Intelligence Analysis. CIA: Sherman Kent School, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• “Could 7/7 Have Been Prevented? A Review of the Intelligence on the London Terrorist Attacks On. 7 July 2005“Intelligence and Security Committee. UK Parliament, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Defence Intelligence (UK). Quick Wins for Busy Analysts. Professional Head of Defence Intelligence.
   Google Scholar
• Defense Intelligence Agency, Directorate for Analysis. A Tradecraft Primer: Basic Structured Analytic Techniques. DIA: Directorate for Analysis, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Epicurus. The Epicurus Reader: Selected Writings and Testimonia, Translated and Edited byB. Inwood and L. P. Gerson. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishers, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, P. “Theories of Intelligence.” In The Oxford Handbook of National Security Intelligence, edited by L. Johnson, 43–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrickson, N. “Critical Thinking in Intelligence Analysis.” International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence 21, no. 4 (2008): 679–693. doi:10.1080/08850600802254749.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrickson, N. “Critical Thinking.” In The Encyclopedia of US Intelligence, edited by G. Moore, 213–219. Boca Raton, FL: Auerbach Publications, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrickson, N. Reasoning for Intelligence Analysts. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Heuer, R. J., Jr. The Psychology of Intelligence Analysis. CIA: Center for the Study of Intelligence, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Heuer, R. J., Jr., and R. Pherson. Structured Analytic Techniques for Intelligence Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L. K. “Sketches for a Theory of Strategic Intelligence.” In Intelligence Theory: Key Questions and Debates, edited by P. Gill, S. Marrin, and M. Phythian, 33–53. Abingdon: Routledge, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. The Thinker’s Toolkit. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, I. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Edited by M. Gregor and J. Timmermann. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lipton, P. “Inference to the Best Explanation.” In A Companion to the Philosophy of Science, edited by W. H. Newton-Smith, 184–193. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Lipton, P. Inference to Best Explanation. New York, NY: Routledge, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Lipton, P. “Precis of Inference to the Best Explanation, 2nd Edition.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74, no. 2 (2007): 421–423. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00027.x.
   Google Scholar
• Machiavelli, N. The Prince, Edited and Translated by P. Bondadella. Oxford,UK: Oxford University Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Marrin, S. “Intelligence Analysis Theory: Explaining and Predicting Analytic Responsibilities.” Intelligence and National Security 22, no. 6 (2007): 821–846. doi:10.1080/02684520701770634.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. “Utilitarianism. A System of Logic.” Reprint The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Vol. 10, 203-260, Indianapolis, IN: The Liberty Fund, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D. T. Critical Thinking and Intelligence Analysis. Washington, D.C: JMIC Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Director of National Intelligence. “Principles of Professional Ethics for the Intelligence Community”. Accessed February 12, 2022. https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/CLPO/Principles%20of%20Professional%20Ethics%20for%20the%20IC.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Intelligence Community Directive 203. Analytic Standards, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Phythian, M. “Intelligence Theory and Theories of International Relations.” In Intelligence Theory: Key Questions and Debates, edited by P. Gill, S. Marrin, and M. Phythian, 54–72, Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Sims, J. “A Theory of Intelligence and International Politics.” In National Intelligence Systems: Current Research and Future Prospects, edited by G. F. Treverton and W. Agrell, 58–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Treverton, G. F., S. G. Jones, S. Boraz, and P. Lipscy, eds. Toward a Theory of Intelligence: Workshop Report. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. “Intelligence as Risk Shifting.” In Intelligence Theory: Key Questions and Debates, edited by P. Gill, S. Marrin, and M. Phythian, 16–32. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2009.
   Google Scholar