Segments and syllables in the treatment of apraxia of speech: An investigation of learning and transfer effects

REFERENCES

• Aichert, I., Büchner, M., & Ziegler, W. (2011). Why is [‘ju:Do] easier than [ju’ve:l]? Perceptual and acoustic analyses of word stress in patients with apraxia of speech. Stem-, Spraak- en Taalpathologie, 17, 15.
   Google Scholar
• Aichert, I., & Ziegler, W. (2004). Syllable frequency and syllable structure in apraxia of speech. Brain and Language, 88, 148–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aichert, I., & Ziegler, W. (2008). Learning a syllable from its parts: Cross-syllabic generalisation effects in patients with apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 22, 1216–1229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard, K. J., Maas, E., & Robin, D. A. (2007). Treating control of voicing in apraxia of speech with variable practice. Aphasiology, 21, 1195–1217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2007). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.6) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org
   Google Scholar
• Bose, A., Square, P. A., Schlosser, R., & van Lieshout, P. (2001). Effects of PROMPT therapy on speech motor function in a person with aphasia and apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 15, 767–785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brendel, B., & Ziegler, W. (2008). Effectiveness of metrical pacing in the treatment of apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 22, 77–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd, D. (1996). Influences on articulatory timing in consonant sequences. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 209–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canter, G. J., Trost, J. E., & Burns, M. S. (1985). Contrasting speech patterns in apraxia of speech and phonemic paraphasia. Brain and Language, 24, 204–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., & Perea, M. (2004). Naming pseudowords in Spanish: Effects of syllable frequency. Brain and Language, 90, 393–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cholin, J., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2009). Effects of syllable preparation and syllable frequency in speech production: Further evidence for syllabic units at a post-lexical level. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 662–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cholin, J., Levelt, W. J. M., & Schiller, N. O. (2006). Effects of syllable frequency in speech production. Cognition, 99, 205–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabul, B., & Bollier, B. (1976). Therapeutic approaches to apraxia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 41, 268–276.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Bleser, R., Cholewa, J., Stadie, N., & Tabatabaie, S. (2004). LEMO—Lexikon modellorientiert. Einzelfalldiagnostik bei Aphasie, Dyslexie und Dysgraphie. München: Urban & Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds, L. A., & Marquardt, T. P. (2004). Syllable use in apraxia of speech: Preliminary findings. Aphasiology, 18, 1121–1134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, W., Poeck, K., Weniger, D., & Willmes, K. (1983). Aachener Aphasie Test (AAT). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, D. L., Rodriguez, A. M., Rosenbek, J. C., Conway, T., & Rothi, L. J. (2006). Influence of intensive phonomotor rehabilitation on apraxia of speech. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 43, 409–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knock, T. R., Ballard, K. J., Robin, D. A., & Schmidt, R. A. (2000). Influence of order of stimulus presentation on speech motor learning: A principled approach to treatment for apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 14, 653–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M. (2008). Is there a syllable frequency effect in aphasia or in apraxia of speech or both? Aphasiology, 22, 1191–1200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M., & Alario, F.-X. (2006). On the locus of the syllable frequency effect in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 178–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1998). The genetic perspective in psycholinguistics or Where do spoken words come from? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 167–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., & Wheeldon, L. R. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition, 50, 239–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, E., Barlow, J., Robin, D., & Shapiro, L. (2002). Treatment of sound errors in aphasia and apraxia of speech: Effects of phonological complexity. Aphasiology, 16, 609–622.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maas, E., Robin, D. A., Hula, S. N. A., Wulf, G., Ballard, K. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (2008). Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 277–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacNeilage, P. F., & Davis, B. L. (2000). On the origin of internal structure of word forms. Science, 288, 527–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacNeilage, P. F., & Davis, B. L. (2001). Motor mechanisms in speech ontogeny: Phyolgenetic, neurobiological and linguistic implications. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11, 696–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. R., Hashi, M., & Southwood, H. (1994). Acoustically derived perceptual evidence for coarticulatory errors in apraxic and conduction aphasic speech production. Clinical Aphasiology, 22, 203–218.
   Google Scholar
• Mooshammer, C., Hoole, P., & Kühnert, B. (1995). On loops. Journal of Phonetics, 23, 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odell, K. H. (2002). Considerations in target selection in apraxia of speech treatment. Seminars in Speech and Language, 23, 309–324.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Odell, K., McNeil, M., Rosenbek, J. C., & Hunter, L. (1990). Perceptual characteristics of consonant production by apraxic speakers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 345–359.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rochet-Capellan, A., & Ostry, D. J. (2011). Simultaneous acquisition of multiple auditory–motor transformations in speech. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 2657–2662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romani, C., & Galluzzi, C. (2005). Effects of syllabic complexity in predicting accuracy of repetition and direction of errors in patients with articulatory and phonological difficulties. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 817–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoor, A., Aichert, I., & Ziegler, W. (2012). A motor learning perspective on phonetic syllable kinships: How training effects transfer from learned to new syllables in severe apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 26, 880–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staiger, A., & Ziegler, W. (2008). Syllable frequency and syllable structure in the spontaneous speech production of patients with apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 22, 1201–1215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, E. R. (1989). Multiple input phoneme therapy. In P. Square-Storer (Ed.), Acquired apraxia of speech in aphasic adults (pp. 220–238). London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay, S., Houle, G., & Ostry, D. J. (2008). Specificity of speech motor learning. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 2426–2434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Merwe, A. (2011). A speech motor learning approach to treating apraxia of speech: Rationale and effects of intervention with an adult with acquired apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 25, 1174–1206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varley, R., & Whiteside, S. P. (2001). What is the underlying impairment in acquired apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 15, 39–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wambaugh, J. L. (2004). Stimulus generalization effects of sound production treatment for apraxia of speech. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 12, 77–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wambaugh, J. L., Doyle, P. J., Kalinyak, M. M., & West, J. E. (1996). A minimal contrast treatment for apraxia of speech. Clinical Aphasiology, 24, 97–108.
   Google Scholar
• Wambaugh, J. L., Kalinyak-Fliszar, M. M., West, J. E., & Doyle, P. J. (1998). Effects of treatment for sound errors in apraxia of speech and aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 725–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wambaugh, J. L., Martinez, A. L., McNeil, M. R., & Rogers, M. (1999). Sound production treatment for apraxia of speech: Overgeneralisation and maintenance effects. Aphasiology, 13, 821–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertz, R. T., La Pointe, L. L., & Rosenbek, J. C. (1984). Apraxia of speech in adults: The disorder and its management. Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteside, S. P., Inglis, A. L., Dyson, L., Roper, A., Harbottle, A., Ryder, J., … Varley, R. A. (2012). Error reduction therapy in reducing struggle and grope behaviours in apraxia of speech. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 22, 267–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K. M., Beukelman, D. R., Strand, E. A., & Bell, K. R. (1999). Management of motor speech disorders in children and adults. Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, W. (2005). A nonlinear model of word length effects in apraxia of speech. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 603–623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, W. (2008). Apraxia of speech. In B. Miller & G. Goldenberg (Eds.), Handbook of clinical neurology. 3rd series (Vol. 88, pp. 269–285). London: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, W., & Cramon, D. Y. V. (1985). Anticipatory coarticulation in a patient with apraxia of speech. Brain and Language, 26, 117–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, W., & Cramon, D. Y. V. (1986). Disturbed coarticulation in apraxia of speech: Acoustic evidence. Brain and Language, 29, 34–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zierdt, A. (2010). Universal Data Acquisition Program (UDAP). Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar