Conversation partner responses to problematic talk produced by people with aphasia: some alternatives to initiating, completing, or pursuing repair

References

• Aaltonen, T., & Laakso, M. (2010). Halting aphasic interaction: Creation of intersubjectivity and spousal relationship in situ. Communication & Medicine, 7, 95–106.
   Google Scholar
• Antaki, C. (1994). Explaining and arguing: The social organization of accounts. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. M., & Ferguson, A. (2010). Language, meaning, context, and functional communication. Aphasiology, 24, 480–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S. E. (2014). Moving on following unresolved problems with intersubjectivity. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47, 130–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S. E., Candlin, C. N., & Ferguson, A. (2013). Aphasia and topic initiation in conversation: A case study. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 48, 102–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeke, S., Maxim, J., & Wilkinson, R. (2007). Using conversation analysis to assess and treat people with aphasia. Seminars in Speech and Language, 28, 136–147.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bloch, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2009). Acquired dysarthria in conversation: Identifying sources of understandability problems. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 44, 769–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2013). The accomplishment of non-serious talk in severe speech disability: An examination of recipient uptake and delayed other-initiation of repair. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 4, 45–70.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (1987). Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics, 25, 219–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (1997). “Open” class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 28, 69–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A. (1993). Conversational repair of word-finding difficulty. In M. L. Lemme (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology (Vol. 21, pp. 299–310). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A. (1994). The influence of aphasia, familiarity and activity on conversational repair. Aphasiology, 8, 143–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. (2001). When listeners talk: Response tokens and listener stance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1995). Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 28, 233–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helasvuo, M., Laakso, M., & Sorjonen, M. (2004). Searching for words: Syntactic and sequential construction of word search in conversations of Finnish speakers with aphasia. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 37, 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2002). Oh-prefaced responses to assessments: A method of modifying agreement/disagreement. In C. E. Ford, B. A. Fox, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 196–224). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1987). On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 86–100). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2007). Preliminary notes on abdicated other-correction. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 445–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, A. (1999). Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: Methods and evaluation (Unpublished dissertation). University of Toronto, Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, C. (2013). Repair. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 229–256). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, M. (1997). Self-initiated repair by fluent aphasic speakers in conversation. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, M. (2003). Collaborative construction of repair in aphasic conversation: An interactive view on the extended speaking turns of persons with Wernicke’s aphasia. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 163–188). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, M., & Klippi, A. (1999). A closer look at the “hint and guess” sequences in aphasic conversation. Aphasiology, 13, 345–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, J., & Wilkinson, R. (1999). Repair sequences in aphasic talk: A comparison of aphasic-speech and language therapist and aphasic-spouse conversations. Aphasiology, 13, 305–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lock, S., Wilkinson, R., & Bryan, K. (2001). Supporting partners of people with aphasia in relationships and conversation (SPPARC): A resource pack. Bichester: Speechmark.
   Google Scholar
• Milroy, L., & Perkins, L. (1992). Repair strategies in aphasic discourse: Towards a collaborative model. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 6, 27–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norrick, N. R. (2003). Issues in conversational joking. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1333–1359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oelschlaeger, M. L., & Damico, J. S. (2003). Word searches in aphasia: A study of the collaborative responses of communication partners. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 211–227). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, L. (1995). Applying conversation analysis to aphasia: Clinical implications and analytic issues. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 30, 372–383.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perkins, L. (2003). Negotiating repair in aphasic conversation. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 147–162). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., & Berthier, M. L. (2008). Aphasia therapy on a neuroscience basis. Aphasiology, 22, 563–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhys, C. S. (2013). Choosing not to repair: Sorry as a warrant for interactional progress. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 46, 84–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. D. (2006). Managing trouble responsibility and relationships during conversational repair. Communication Monographs, 73, 137–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of “uh huh” and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 71–93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. The American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1295–1345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. The American Journal of Sociology, 102, 161–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2000). When “others” initiate repair. Applied Linguistics, 21, 205–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2001). Getting serious: Joke → serious “no”. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1947–1955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2006). Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language and the arena in which culture is enacted. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 70–96). London: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelt, L. (2007). Damage control: Closing problematic sequences in hearing-impaired interaction. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 34.1–34.15.
   Google Scholar
• Whitworth, A., Perkins, L., & Lesser, R. (1997). The conversation analysis profile for people with aphasia (CAPPA). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (1995). Aphasia: Conversation analysis of a non-fluent aphasic person. In M. Perkins & S. Howard (Eds.), Case studies in clinical linguistics (pp. 271–291). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (2007). Managing linguistic incompetence as a delicate issue in aphasic talk-in-interaction: On the use of laughter in prolonged repair sequences. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 542–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., Gower, M., Beeke, S., & Maxim, J. (2007). Adapting to conversation as a language impaired speaker: Changes in aphasic turn construction over time. Communication & Medicine, 4, 79–97.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., Lock, S., Bryan, K., & Sage, K. (2011). Interaction-focused intervention for acquired language disorders: Facilitating mutual adaptation in couples where one partner has aphasia. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 74–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar