Optimising the ingredients for evaluation of the effects of intervention

References

• Abel, S., Schultz, A., Radermacher, I., Willmes, K., & Huber, W. (2005). Decreasing and increasing cues in naming therapy for aphasia. Aphasiology, 19(9), 831–848. doi:10.1080/02687030500268902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audley, R. J., & Jonkheere, A. R. (1956). The statistical analysis of the learning process. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 9, 87–94. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1956.tb00176.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeke, S., Beckley, F., Johnson, F., Heilemann, C., Edwards, S., Maxim, J., & Best, W. (2014). Conversation focused aphasia therapy: Investigating the adoption of strategies by people with agrammatism. Aphasiology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.881459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson, P. M. (2015). Primary and secondary analyses of single-subject data have complementary value: Commentary in response to “Optimising the design of intervention studies: Critiques and ways forward”. Aphasiology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.987042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg, C. B., Cho, M. K., Eastwood, S., Horton, R., Moher, D., Olkin, I., & Simel, D. (1996). Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: The CONSORT statement. Journal of the American Medical Association, 276, 637–639. doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540080059030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, W. (2005). Investigation of a new intervention for children with word-finding problems. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 40(3), 279–318. doi:10.1080/13682820410001734154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, W., Grassly, J., Greenwood, A., Herbert, R., Hickin, J., & Howard, D. (2011). A controlled study of changes in conversation following aphasia therapy for anomia. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(3), 229–242. doi:10.3109/09638288.2010.534230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, W. M., & Nickels, L. A. (2000). From theory to therapy in aphasia: Where are we now and where to next?. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10, 231–247. doi:10.1080/096020100389147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutron, I., Moher, D., Altman, D., Schulz, K., & Ravaud, P. (2008). Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 148, 295–310. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-148-4-200802190-00008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. (2010). Semantic feature analysis treatment for aphasic word retrieval impairments: What’s in a name? Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 17(6), 411–422. doi:10.1310/tsr1706-411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brossart, D. F., Vannest, K., Davis, J., & Patience, M. (2014). Incorporating nonoverlap indices with visual analysis for quantifying intervention effectiveness in single-case experimental designs. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24, 464–491. doi:10.1080/09602011.2013.868361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, C., & Howard, D. (1987). Computer-generated phonemic cues: An effective aid for naming in aphasia. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 22(3), 191–201. doi:10.3109/13682828709019862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byng, S., & Coltheart, M. (1986). Aphasia therapy research: Methodology requirements and illustrative results. In E. Hjelmquist & L.-G. Nilsson (Eds.), Communication and handicap: Aspects of psychological compensation and technical aids. New York, NY: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. (1983). Aphasia therapy research: A single case study approach. In C. Code & D. C. Muller (Eds.), Aphasia therapy (pp. 193–202). London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• de Partz, M.-P. (1986). Re-education of a deep dyslexic patient: Rationale of the method and results. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 149–177. doi:10.1080/02643298608252674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fillingham, J. K., Sage, K., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2005). The treatment of anomia using errorless learning vs. errorful learning: Are frontal executive skills and feedback important? International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 40, 505–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer-Baum, S. (2015). How much better? The challenge of interpreting interactions in intervention studies, Aphasiology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.987050
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, S. E. (1997). Designing single case treatment studies for aphasic patients. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 7, 401–418. doi:10.1080/713755544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, H. (2015). Throwing the baby out with the bathwater: Pitfalls of misrepresenting single-case experimental designs. Aphasiology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.987045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillis, A. E. (2015). Steam, broil, or bake: Good recipes for language treatment studies. Aphasiology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.987044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, T. C., Glasziou, P. P., Boutron, I., Milne, R., Perera, R., Moher, D., … Michie, S. (2014). Better reporting of interventions: Template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. British Medical Journal, 348, g1687. doi:10.1136/bmj.g1687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D. (1986). Beyond randomised controlled trials: The case for effective case studies of the effects of treatment in aphasia. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 21, 89–102. doi:10.3109/13682828609018546
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Howard, D. (2000). Cognitive neuropsychology and aphasia therapy: The case of word retrieval. In I. Papathanasiou (Ed.), Acquired neurogenic communication disorders: A clinical perspective. London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, D., Best, N., & Nickels, L. (2015). Optimising the design of intervention studies: Critiques and ways forward. Aphasiology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.985884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D., Patterson, K. E., Franklin, S. E., Orchard-Lisle, V. M., & Morton, J. (1985). The treatment of word retrieval deficits in aphasia: A comparison of two therapy methods. Brain, 108, 817–829. doi:10.1093/brain/108.4.817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. P., & Kiran, S. (2015). Preserving the flexibility of single-subject experimental design: A commentary on “Optimising the design of intervention studies: Critiques and ways forward”. Aphasiology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.987047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearns, K. P. (2015). Mythology and shape shifters in clinical research: False taxonomies and erroneous conclusions: Commentary on ‘Optimizing the Design of Intervention Studies: Critiques and Ways Forward.’ Aphasiology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.987046
   Google Scholar
• Kiran, S., & Johnson, L. (2008). Semantic complexity in treatment of naming deficits in aphasia: Evidence from well-defined categories. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology / American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 17, 389–400. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2008/06-0085)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved from What Works Clearinghouse website: http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/wwc_scd.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34(1), 26–38. doi:10.1177/0741932512452794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., & Levin, J. R. (2010). Enhancing the scientific credibility of single-case intervention research: Randomization to the rescue. Psychological Methods, 15(2), 124–144. doi:10.1037/a0017736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M. (2015). Optimizing the design of intervention studies: Should we test if people require treatment or which intervention has the best outcome? Aphasiology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.986966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M., Di Pietro, M., & Schnider, A. (2006). Computerised treatment of anomia in acute aphasia: Treatment intensity and training size. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 16, 630–640. doi:10.1080/09602010543000064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, J., & Gast, D. L. (2014). Visual analysis in single case experimental design studies: Brief review and guidelines. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24, 445–463. doi:10.1080/09602011.2013.815636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, N., Fink, R. B., Renvall, K., & Laine, M. (2006). Effectiveness of contextual repetition priming treatments for anomia depends on intact access to semantics. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12, 853–866. doi:10.1017/S1355617706061030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, N., & Kalinyak-Fliszar, M. (2015). The case for single case studies in treatment research: Comments on Howard, Best and Nickels “Optimising the design of intervention studies: Critiques and ways forward”. Aphasiology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.987049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, C., Nickels, L., McDonald, B., Moses, M., Makin, K., & Taylor, C. (2011). Treatment of word retrieval impairments in aphasia: Evaluation of a self-administered home programme using personally chosen words. Aphasiology, 25(2), 245–268. doi:10.1080/02687038.2010.489258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, J. N., Altman, D. G., Campbell, M. J., & Royston, P. (1990). Analysis of serial measurements in medical research. British Medical Journal, 300(6719), 230–235. doi:10.1136/bmj.300.6719.230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S. (2015). Facing the challenges of single case experimental methodology. Aphasiology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.987051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirman, D. (2014). Growth curve analysis and visualization using R. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nickels, L. A. (1992). The autocue? Self-generated phonemic cues in the treatment of a disorder of reading and naming. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9, 155–182. doi:10.1080/02643299208252057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels, L. A. (2002a). Improving word finding: Practice makes (closer to) perfect? Aphasiology, 16(10–11), 1047–1060. doi:10.1080/02687040143000618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels, L. A. (2002b). Therapy for naming disorders: Revisiting, revising, and reviewing. Aphasiology, 16(10–11), 935–979. doi:10.1080/02687030244000563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels, L. A., & Best, W. M. (1996). Therapy for naming disorders (Part II): Specifics, surprises and suggestions. Aphasiology, 10, 109–136. doi:10.1080/02687039608248401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., Caplan, D., Edwards, S., Visch-Brink, E., & Thompson, C. (2013). Neuroimaging in aphasia treatment research: Issues of experimental design for relating cognitive to neural changes. NeuroImage, 73, 200–207. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, P. M., Code, C., & McNeil, M. R. (2003). Describing participants in aphasia research: Part 1. Audit of current practice. Aphasiology, 17, 911–932. doi:10.1080/02687030344000328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, C., Sage, K., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2010). How many words should we provide in anomia therapy? A meta-analysis and a case series study. Aphasiology, 24, 1064–1094. doi:10.1080/02687030903372632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate, R., Mcdonald, S., Perdices, M., Togher, L., Schultz, R., & Savage, S. (2008). Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: Introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) scale. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18(4), 385–401. doi:10.1080/09602010802009201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate, R. L., Perdices, M., McDonald, S., Togher, L., & Rosenkoetter, U. (2014). The design, conduct and report of single-case research: Resources to improve the quality of the neurorehabilitation literature. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24, 315–331. doi:10.1080/09602011.2013.875043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate, R. L., Perdices, M., Rosenkoetter, U., Wakim, D., Godbee, K., Togher, L., & McDonald, S. (2013). Revision of a method quality rating scale for single-case experimental designs and n-of-1 trials: The 15-item Risk of Bias in N-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 23, 619–638. doi:10.1080/09602011.2013.824383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. K. (2006). Single subject controlled experiments in aphasia: The science and the state of the science. Journal of Communication Disorders, 39, 266–291. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2006.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. K. (2015). Establishing the effects of treatment for aphasia using single subject controlled experimental designs. Aphasiology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.987043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmes, K. (2015). The curse of serial dependency in single-case data- Commentary on Howard, Best, & Nickels “Optimising the design of intervention studies: Critiques and ways forward”. Aphasiology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.987048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar