518
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Forum: Commentary

A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: Obstacles, risks, and benefits

, &

REFERENCES

  • Borsboom, D. (2006). When does measurement invariance matter? Medical Care, 44, S176–S181. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000245143.08679.cc
  • Cantrill, J. A., Sibbald, B., & Buetow, S. (1996). The Delphi and nominal group techniques in health services research. International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 4, 67–74. doi:10.1111/j.2042-7174.1996.tb00844.x
  • Gregorich, S. E. (2006). Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework. Medical Care, 44, S176–S181. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000245454.12228.8f
  • Hula, W. D., Cherney, L. R., & Worrall, L. E. (2013). Setting a research agenda to inform intensive comprehensive aphasia programs. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 20, 409–420. doi:10.1310/tsr2005-409
  • Keeney, S., Hasson, F., & McKenna, H. P. (2001). A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 38, 195–200. doi:10.1016/S0020-7489(00)00044-4
  • Long, A. F., Dixon, P., Hall, R., Carr-Hill, R. A., & Sheldon, T. A. (1993). The outcomes agenda: Contribution of the UK clearing house on health outcomes. Quality in Health Care, 2, 49–52. doi:10.1136/qshc.2.1.49
  • Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543. doi:10.1007/BF02294825
  • Robey, R. R., & Schultz, M. C. (1998). A model for conducting clinical-outcome research: An adaptation of the standard protocol for use in aphasiology. Aphasiology, 12, 787–810. doi:10.1080/02687039808249573
  • Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 20, 637–648. doi:10.1016/0021-9681(67)90041-0
  • Theuns, P., Hofmans, J., Mazaheri, M., Van Acker, F., & Bernheim, J. L. (2010). Cross-national comparability of the WHOQOL-BREF: A measurement invariance approach. Quality of Life Research, 19, 219–224. doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9577-9
  • Treweek, S., & Zwarenstein, M. (2009). Making trials matter: Pragmatic and explanatory trials and the problem of applicability. Trials, 10, 37. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-10-37
  • Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Rose, T., & Le Dorze, G. (2014). Measuring outcomes in aphasia research: A review of current practice and an agenda for standardisation. Aphasiology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.930262
  • Whyte, J., Gordon, W., & Gonzalez Rothi, L. J. (2009). A phased developmental approach to neurorehabilitation research: The science of knowledge building. Archives of Physical Medicine And Rehabilitation, 90, S3–S10. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.07.008
  • Zhang, B., Fokkema, M., Cuijpers, P., Li, J., Smits, N., & Beekman, A. (2011). Measurement invariance of the center for epidemiological studies depression scale (CES-D) among Chinese and Dutch elderly. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 74. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-74

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.