Questioning in conversations before and after communication partner training for individuals with traumatic brain injury

References

• Adamovich, B., & Henderson, J. (1992). Scales of cognitive ability for traumatic brain injury. Chicago, IL: The Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, S. (2012). ‘Planning’ talk and traumatic brain injury: An exploratory application of conversation analysis. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 3, 115. doi:10.1558/jircd.v3i2.115
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, S., & Ferguson, A. (2013). Conversation analysis applied to disordered speech and language. In N. Müller & M. J. Ball (Eds.), Research methods in clinical linguistics and phonetics: A practical guide (pp. 126–145). Chichester: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Beckley, F., Best, W., Johnson, F., Edwards, S., Maxim, J., & Beeke, S. (2013). Conversation therapy for agrammatism: Exploring the therapeutic process of engagement and learning by a person with aphasia. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48, 220–239. doi:10.1111/jlcd.2013.48.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeke, S., Beckley, F., Best, W., Johnson, F., Edwards, S., & Maxim, J. (2013). Extended turn construction and test question sequences in the conversations of three speakers with agrammatic aphasia. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 27, 784–804. doi:10.3109/02699206.2013.808267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeke, S., Beckley, F., Johnson, F., Heilemann, C., Edwards, S., Maxim, J., & Best, W. (2015). Conversation focused aphasia therapy: Investigating the adoption of strategies by people with agrammatism. Aphasiology, 29, 355–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behn, N., Togher, L., Power, E., & Heard, R. (2012). Evaluating communication training for paid carers of people with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 26, 1702–1715. doi:10.3109/02699052.2012.722258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddle, K. R., McCabe, A., & Bliss, L. S. (1996). Narrative skills following traumatic brain injury in children and adults. Journal of Communication Disorders, 29, 447–469. doi:10.1016/0021-9924(95)00038-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Body, R., & Parker, M. (2005). Topic repetitiveness after traumatic brain injury: An emergent, jointly managed behaviour. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 19, 379–392. doi:10.1080/02699200400027189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogart, E., Togher, L., Power, E., & Docking, K. (2012). Casual conversations between individuals with traumatic brain injury and their friends. Brain Injury, 26, 221–233. doi:10.3109/02699052.2011.648711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, F., & Godfrey, H. P. (1997). Conversation with traumatically brain-injured individuals: A controlled study of behavioural changes and their impact. Brain Injury, 11, 319–330. doi:10.1080/026990597123476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button, G., & Casey, N. (1985). Topic nomination and topic pursuit. Human Studies, 8, 3–55. doi:10.1007/bf00143022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, E., Hartelius, L., & Saldert, C. (2014). Communicative strategies used by spouses of individuals with communication disorders related to stroke-induced aphasia and Parkinson’s disease. International Journal of Langugae and Communication Disorders, 49, 722–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, C. A., Liles, B. Z., & Duffy, R. J. (1991). The use of discourse analyses for the evaluation of higher level traumatically brain-injured adults. Brain Injury, 5, 381–392. doi:10.3109/02699059109008111
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dahlberg, C., Hawley, L., Morey, C., Newman, J., Cusick, C. P., & Harrison-Felix, C. (2006). Social communication skills in persons with post-acute traumatic brain injury: Three perspectives. Brain Injury, 20, 425–435. doi:10.1080/02699050600664574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denman, A., & Wilkinson, R. (2011). Applying conversation analysis to traumatic brain injury: Investigating touching another person in everyday social interaction. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33, 243–252. doi:10.3109/09638288.2010.511686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedland, D., & Miller, N. (1998). Conversation analysis of communication breakdown after closed head injury. Brain Injury, 12, 1–14. doi:10.1080/026990598122818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayano, K. (2013). Question design in conversation. In J. S. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (1st ed., pp. 395–414). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (1989). Current developments in conversation analysis. In D. Roger & P. Bull (Eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 21–47). Avon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45, 1–29. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J., & Clayman, S. (2010). Talk in action: Interactions, identities, and institutions (Vol. 38). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, T., & Holland, A. L. (2005). Aphasia and learning in adults: Key concepts and clinical considerations. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation, 21, 315–322. doi:10.1097/00013614-200510000-00008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lener (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, A., Winckel, J., Black, S., Duchan, J. F., Simmons-Mackie, N., & Square, P. (2001). Training volunteers as conversational partners using Supported Conversation with Adults with Aphasia (SCA): A controlled trial. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 44, 624–638. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2001/051)
   Google Scholar
• Labov, W. (1978). Sociolinguistic patterns. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Nonterah, C. W., Jensen, B. J., Perrin, P. B., Stevens, L. F., Cabrera, T. V., Jiménez-Maldonado, M., & Arango-Lasprilla, J. C. (2013). The influence of TBI impairments on family caregiver mental health in Mexico. Brain Injury, 27, 1287–1293. doi:10.3109/02699052.2013.812243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68, 939–967. doi:10.2307/1519752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rispoli, M. J., MacHalicek, W., & Lang, R. (2010). Communication interventions for individuals with acquired brain injury. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 13, 141–151. doi:10.3109/17518420903468464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseaux, M., Vérigneaux, C., & Kozlowski, O. (2010). An analysis of communication in conversation after severe traumatic brain injury. European Journal of Neurology, 17, 922–929. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02945.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation (Vol. 1 and 2). Cambridge: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. doi:10.2307/412243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldert, C., Backman, E., & Hartelius, L. (2013). Conversation partner training with spouses of persons with aphasia: A pilot study using a protocol to trace relevant characteristics. Aphasiology, 27, 271–292. doi:10.1080/02687038.2012.710317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2006). Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 70–96). London: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382. doi:10.1353/lan.1977.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selting, M. (2000). The construction of units in conversational talk. Language in Society, 29, 477–517. doi:10.1017/s0047404500004012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim, P., Power, E., & Togher, L. (2013). Describing conversations between individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and communication partners following communication partner training: Using exchange structure analysis. Brain Injury, 27, 717–742. doi:10.3109/02699052.2013.775485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, N., & Kagan, A. (1999). Communication strategies used by ‘good’ versus ‘poor’ speaking partners of individuals with aphasia. Aphasiology, 13, 807–820. doi:10.1080/026870399401894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, N., Raymer, A., Armstrong, E., Holland, A., & Cherney, L. R. (2010). Communication partner training in aphasia: A systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91, 1814–1837. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.08.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T. (2010). An overview of the question–response system in American English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2772–2781. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher, L., Hand, L., & Code, C. (1997). Analysing discourse in the traumatic brain injury population: Telephone interactions with different communication partners. Brain Injury, 11, 169–190. doi:10.1080/026990597123629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher, L., McDonald, S., Code, C., & Grant, S. (2004). Training communication partners of people with traumatic brain injury: A randomised controlled trial. Aphasiology, 18, 313–335. doi:10.1080/02687030344000535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher, L., McDonald, S., Tate, R., Power, E., & Rietdijk, R. (2009). Training communication partners of people with traumatic brain injury: Reporting the protocol for a clinical trial. Brain Impairment, 10, 188–204. doi:10.1375/brim.10.2.188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher, L., McDonald, S., Tate, R., Power, E., & Rietdijk, R. (2010). TBI express: For people with TBI and their everyday conversational partners. Sydney: The Australian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment (ASSIBI).
   Google Scholar
• Togher, L., McDonald, S., Tate, R., Power, E., & Rietdijk, R. (2013). Training communication partners of people with severe traumatic brain injury improves everyday conversations: A multicenter single blind clinical trial. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 45, 637–645. doi:10.2340/16501977-1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher, L., Power, E., Tate, R., McDonald, S., Ylvisaker, M., & Rietdijk, R. (2010). Measuring the social interactions of people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners: The adapted Kagan scales. Aphasiology, 24, 914–927. doi:10.1080/02687030903422478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu, L. V., Togher, L., & Power, E. (2011). The impact of communication partner and discourse task on a person with traumatic brain injury: The use of multiple perspectives. Brain Injury, 25, 560–580. doi:10.3109/02699052.2011.571655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., Bryan, K., Lock, S., & Sage, K. (2010). Implementing and evaluating aphasia therapy targeted at couples’ conversations: A single case study. Aphasiology, 24, 869–886. doi:10.1080/02687030903501958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker, M. (1998). Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: Children and adolescents. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar