Modelling confrontation naming and discourse performance in aphasia

References

• Armstrong, E. (2000). Aphasic discourse analysis: The story so far. Aphasiology, 14, 875–892. doi:10.1080/02687030050127685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelrod, B. N., Ricker, J. H., & Cherry, S. A. (1994). Concurrent validity of the MAE visual naming test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 9, 317–321. doi:10.1093/arclin/9.4.317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equation modeling with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. (2014). Test–retest stability of word retrieval in aphasic discourse. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 57, 966–978. doi:10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, R. M., Wambaugh, J. L., & Mauszycki, S. C. (2010). Individual variability on discourse measures over repeated sampling times in persons with aphasia. Aphasiology, 24, 671–684. doi:10.1080/02687030903443813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlomagno, S., Giannotti, S., Vorano, L., & Marini, A. (2011). Discourse information content in non-aphasic adults with brain injury: A pilot study. Brain Injury, 25, 1010–1018. doi:10.3109/02699052.2011.605097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 462–494. doi:10.1177/0049124108314720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho-Reyes, S., & Thompson, C. K. (2012). Verb and sentence production and comprehension in aphasia: Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences (NAVS). Aphasiology, 26, 1250–1277. doi:10.1080/02687038.2012.693584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruice, M., Worrall, L., Hickson, L., & Murison, R. (2003). Finding a focus for quality of life with aphasia: Social and emotional health, and psychological well-being. Aphasiology, 17, 333–353. doi:10.1080/02687030244000707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, P. J., Tsironas, D., Goda, A. J., & Kalinyak, M. (1996). The relationship between objective measures and listeners’ judgments of the communicative informativeness of the connected discourse of adults with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5, 53. doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0503.53
   Google Scholar
• Fergadiotis, G., Wright, H. H., & West, T. M. (2013). Measuring lexical diversity in narrative discourse of people with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22, S397. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0083)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• German, D. J. (1990). Test of adolescent/adult word finding. Allen, TX: DLM.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., & Wingfield, A. (1997). Anomia: Neuroanatomical and cognitive correlates. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grimes, N. (2005). Walt Disney’s Cinderella. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, R., Hickin, J., Howard, D., Osborne, F., & Best, W. (2008). Do picture‐naming tests provide a valid assessment of lexical retrieval in conversation in aphasia? Aphasiology, 22, 184–203. doi:10.1080/02687030701262613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickin, J., Best, W., Herbert, R., Howard, D., & Osborne, F. (2001). Treatment of word retrieval in aphasia: Generalisation to conversational speech. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 36, 13–18. doi:10.3109/13682820109177851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (2001). Boston naming test (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmerer, D., & Tranel, D. (2000). Verb retrieval in brain-damaged subjects: 2. Analysis of errors. Brain and Language, 73, 393–420. doi:10.1006/brln.2000.2312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (1982). Western aphasia battery test manual. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (2007). Western aphasia battery—R. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolenikov, S., & Bollen, K. A. (2012). Testing negative error variances: Is a Heywood case a symptom of misspecification? Sociological Methods & Research, 41, 124–167. doi:10.1177/0049124112442138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed., Vol. 1). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B., Fromm, D., Forbes, M., & Holland, A. (2011). AphasiaBank: Methods for studying discourse. Aphasiology, 25, 1286–1307. doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.589893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, A., Andreetta, S., del Tin, S., & Carlomagno, S. (2011). A multi-level approach to the analysis of narrative language in aphasia. Aphasiology, 25, 1372–1392. doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.584690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, K. A., & Borsboom, D. (2013). Frontiers of test validity theory: Measurement, causation, and meaning. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuoka, K., Kotani, I., & Yamasato, M. (2012). Correct information unit analysis for determining the characteristics of narrative discourse in individuals with chronic traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 26, 1723–1730. doi:10.3109/02699052.2012.698789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, J., & Murray, L. (2003). Functional measures of naming in aphasia: Word retrieval in confrontation naming versus connected speech. Aphasiology, 17, 481–497. doi:10.1080/02687030344000148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. R., Doyle, P. J., Fossett, T. R. D., Park, G. H., & Goda, A. J. (2001). Reliability and concurrent validity of the information unit scoring metric for the story retelling procedure. Aphasiology, 15, 991–1006. doi:10.1080/02687040143000348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menn, L., Reilly, K. F., Hayashi, M., Kamio, A., Fujita, I., & Sasanuma, S. (1998). The interaction of preserved pragmatics and impaired syntax in Japanese and English aphasic speech. Brain and Language, 61, 183–225. doi:10.1006/brln.1997.1838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mislevy, R. J., & Yin, C. (2009). If language is a complex adaptive system, what is language assessment? Language Learning, 59, 249–267. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00543.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas, L. E., & Brookshire, R. H. (1993). A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 36, 338. doi:10.1044/jshr.3602.338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas, L. E., Brookshire, R. H., MacLennan, D. L., Schumacher, J. G., & Porrazzo, S. A. (1989). Revised administration and scoring procedures for the Boston Naming test and norms for non-brain-damaged adults. Aphasiology, 3, 569–580. doi:10.1080/02687038908249023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashek, G. V., & Tompkins, C. A. (2002). Context and word class influences on lexical retrieval in aphasia. Aphasiology, 16, 261–286. doi:10.1080/02687040143000573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennell, R. (1968). The influence of communality and N on the sampling distributions of factor loadings. Psychometrika, 33, 423–439. doi:10.1007/BF02290161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prins, R., & Bastiaanse, R. (2004). Analysing the spontaneous speech of aphasic speakers. Aphasiology, 18, 1075–1091. doi:10.1080/02687030444000534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, K. B., & Wertz, R. T. (1999). Comparison of impairment and disability measures for assessing severity of, and improvement in, aphasia. Aphasiology, 13, 113–124. doi:10.1080/026870399402235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, E. M., Berndt, R. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (1989). The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: Procedure and data. Brain and Language, 37, 440–479. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(89)90030-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. Van Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variable analysis in developmental research (pp. 285–305). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514. doi:10.1007/BF02296192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. F., Dell, G. S., Martin, N., Gahl, S., & Sobel, P. (2006). A case-series test of the interactive two-step model of lexical access: Evidence from picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 228–264. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shewan, C. M. (1988). The Shewan Spontaneous Language Analysis (SSLA) system for aphasic adults: Description, reliability, and validity. Journal of Communication Disorders, 21, 103–138. doi:10.1016/0021-9924(88)90001-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreen, O., & Risser, A. (2003). Assessment of aphasia. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 893–898. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980, May 30). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Presented at the annual spring meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Velicer, W. F., & Fava, J. L. (1998). Affects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychological Methods, 3, 231–251. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.3.2.231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velicer, W. F., Peacock, A. C., & Jackson, D. N. (1982). A comparison of component and factor patterns: A Monte Carlo approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 17, 371–388. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr1703_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S. E., & Canter, G. J. (1982). The influence of situational context on naming performance in aphasic syndromes. Brain and Language, 17, 92–106. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(82)90007-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilshire, C. E., & McCarthy, R. A. (2002). Evidence for a context-sensitive word retrieval disorder in a case of nonfluent aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 165–186. doi:10.1080/02643290143000169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yochim, B. P., Kane, K. D., & Mueller, A. E. (2009). Naming test of the neuropsychological assessment battery: Convergent and discriminant validity. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 24, 575–583. doi:10.1093/arclin/acp053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K. M., & Beukelman, D. R. (1980). An analysis of connected speech samples of aphasic and normal speakers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 45, 27. doi:10.1044/jshd.4501.27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar