The influence of image characteristics on image recognition: a comparison of photographs and line drawings

References

• Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 419–439. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G., & Kamide, Y. (2007). The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 502–518. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (1997). Guidelines for audiologic screening. Retrieved from http://www.asha.org/policy/GL1997-00199.htm
   Google Scholar
• Azouvi, P., Bartolomeo, P., Beis, J. M., Perennou, D., Pradat-Diehl, P., & Rousseaux, M. (2006). A battery of tests for the quantitative assessment of unilateral neglect. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 24, 273–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudoin, A. J., Fournier, B., Julien‐Caron, L., Moleski, L., Simard, J., Mercier, L., & Desrosiers, J. (2013). Visuoperceptual deficits and participation in older adults after stroke. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 60, 260–266. doi:10.1111/aot.2013.60.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benton, A. L., Smith, K. C., & Lang, M. (1972). Stimulus characteristics and object naming in aphasic patients. Journal of Communication Disorders, 5, 19–24. doi:10.1016/0021-9924(72)90025-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berryman, A., Rasavage, K., & Politzer, T. (2010). Practical clinical treatment strategies for evaluation and treatment of visual field loss and visual inattention. NeuroRehabilitation, 27, 261–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biederman, I., & Ju, G. (1988). Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 38–64. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(88)90024-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisiach, E. (1966). Perceptual factors in the pathogenesis of anomia. Cortex, 2, 90–95. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(66)80030-8
   Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2013). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.3.60) [computer program]. Retrieved December 8, from http://www.praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Bramão, I., Faísca, L., Petersson, K. M., & Reis, A. (2010). The influence of surface color information and color knowledge information in object recognition. The American Journal of Psychology, 123, 459–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramão, I., Inácio, F., Faísca, L., Reis, A., & Petersson, K. M. (2010). The influence of color information on the recognition of color diagnostic and noncolor diagnostic objects. The Journal of General Psychology, 138, 49–65. doi:10.1080/00221309.2010.533718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, A., Worrall, L., & McKenna, K. (2005). The relationship between specific features of aphasia-friendly written material and comprehension of written material for people with aphasia: An exploratory study. Aphasiology, 19, 693–711. doi:10.1080/02687030444000958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodeur, M. B. (2014). Bank of Standardized Stimuli [Images and image norms]. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/site/bosstimuli/home
   Google Scholar
• Brodeur, M. B., Dionne-Dostie, E., Montreuil, T., & Lepage, M. (2010). The Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS), a new set of 480 normative photos of objects to be used as visual stimuli in cognitive research. PloS ONE, 5, e10773. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie, E. E., Wallace, A. M., & Sharrat, B. (1991). Effect of surface characteristics and style of production on naming and verification of pictorial stimuli. The American Journal of Psychology, 104, 517–545. doi:10.2307/1422939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chainay, H., & Rosenthal, V. (1996). Naming and picture recognition in probable Alzheimer’s disease: Effects of color, generic category, familiarity, visual complexity, and shape similarity. Brain and Cognition, 30, 403–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, R. M. (1974). The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 84–107. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(74)90005-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahan, D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2001). Time course of frequency effects in spoken-word recognition: Evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 317–367. doi:10.1006/cogp.2001.0750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahan, D., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2005). Looking at the rope when looking for the snake: Conceptually mediated eye movements during spoken-word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 453–459. doi:10.3758/BF03193787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Graef, P., Christiaens, D., & d’Ydewalle, G. (1990). Perceptual effects of scene context on object identification. Psychological Research, 52, 317–329. doi:10.1007/BF00868064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, A., Hux, K., McKelvey, M. L., Beukelman, D. R., & Weissling, K. (2009). Reading comprehension by people with chronic aphasia: A comparison of three levels of visuographic contextual support. Aphasiology, 23, 1053–1064. doi:10.1080/02687030802635832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, A., McKelvey, M., & Beukelman, D. R. (2006). Visual Scene Displays (VSD): New AAC interfaces for persons with aphasia. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 13–17. doi:10.1044/aac15.1.13
   Google Scholar
• Fisk, G. D., Owsley, C., & Mennemeier, M. (2002). Vision, attention, and self-reported driving behaviors in community-dwelling stroke survivors. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, 469–477. doi:10.1053/apmr.2002.31179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, A. (1979). Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 316–355. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.108.3.316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallowell, B. (1999). A new way of looking at auditory linguistic comprehension. In W. Becker, H. Deubel, & T. Mergner (Eds.), Current oculomotor research: Physiological and psychological aspects (pp. 292–299). New York, NY: Plenum Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hallowell, B. (2012). Exploiting eye-mind connections for clinical applications in language disorders. In R. Goldfarb (Ed.), Translational speech-language pathology and audiology (pp. 335–341). San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Hallowell, B., Wertz, R. T., & Kruse, H. (2002). Using eye movement responses to index auditory comprehension: An adaptation of the revised token test. Aphasiology, 16, 587–594. doi:10.1080/02687030244000121
   Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks, N. (2002). Attention and neurological disorders. Seminars in Speech and Language, 23, 85–86. doi:10.1055/s-2002-24983
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). High-level scene perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 243–271. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M., Shinkareva, S. V., Wang, J., Luke, S. G., & Olejarczyk, J. (2013). Predicting cognitive state from eye movements. Plos One, 8, e64937. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0064937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. M., Weeks, P. A., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 210–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuer, S., & Hallowell, B. (2007). An evaluation of multiple-choice test images for comprehension assessment in aphasia. Aphasiology, 21, 883–900. doi:10.1080/02687030600695194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuer, S., & Hallowell, B. (2009). Visual attention in a multiple-choice task: Influences of image characteristics with and without presentation of a verbal stimulus. Aphasiology, 23, 351–363. doi:10.1080/02687030701770474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuer, S., & Hallowell, B. (2015). A novel eye-tracking method to assess attention allocation in individuals with and without aphasia using a dual-task paradigm. Journal of Communication Disorders, 55, 15–30. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2015.01.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig, F., & Altmann, G. (2005). Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: Semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm. Cognition, 96, B23–B32. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig, F., & Altmann, G. T. (2004). The on-line processing of ambiguous and unambiguous words in context: Evidence from head-mounted eyetracking. In M. Carreiras & C. Clifton Jr. (Eds.), The online study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERPs and beyond (pp. 187–207). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huettig, F., & Altmann, G. T. (2011). Looking at anything that is green when hearing “frog”: How object surface colour and stored object colour knowledge influence language-mediated overt attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 122–145. doi:10.1080/17470218.2010.481474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huettig, F., & McQueen, J. M. (2007). The tug of war between phonological, semantic and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 460–482. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hula, W. D., & McNeil, M. R. (2008). Models of attention and dual-task performance as explanatory constructs in aphasia. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29, 169–187. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1082882
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humphrey, G. K., Goodale, M. A., Jakobson, L. S., & Servos, P. (1994). The role of surface information in object recognition: Studies of a visual form agnosic and normal subjects. Perception, 23, 1457–1481. doi:10.1068/p231457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, G. W., Price, J., & Riddoch, M. J. (1999). From objects to names: A cognitive neuroscience approach. Psychological Research, 62, 118–130. doi:10.1007/s004260050046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanova, M. V., & Hallowell, B. (2012). Validity of an eye-tracking method to index working memory in people with and without aphasia. Aphasiology, 26, 556–578. doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.618219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. J., Paivio, A., & Clark, J. M. (1996). Cognitive components of picture naming. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 113–139. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.1.113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joos, M., & Weber, S. (2011). NYAN [Professional Edition software]. Dresden: Interactive Minds.
   Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1976). Eye fixations and cognitive processes. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 441–480. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90015-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, A., & LeBlanc, K. (2002). Motivating for infrastructure change: Toward a communicatively accessible, participation-based stroke care system for all those affected by aphasia. Journal of Communication Disorders, 35, 153–169. doi:10.1016/S0021-9924(02)00062-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmerer, D., & Tranel, D. (2000). Verb retrieval in brain-damaged subjects: 1. Analysis of stimulus, lexical, and conceptual factors. Brain and Language, 73, 347–392. doi:10.1006/brln.2000.2311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachapelle, J., Bolduc-Teasdale, J., Ptito, A., & McKerral, M. (2008). Deficits in complex visual information processing after mild TBI: Electrophysiological markers and vocational outcome prognosis. Brain Injury, 22, 265–274. doi:10.1080/02699050801938983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaPointe, L. L., & Erickson, R. J. (1991). Auditory vigilance during divided task attention in aphasic individuals. Aphasiology, 5, 511–520. doi:10.1080/02687039108248556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laws, K. R., & Hunter, M. Z. (2006). The impact of colour, spatial resolution, and presentation speed on category naming. Brain and Cognition, 62, 89–97. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2006.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LC Technologies. (2011). Superior Eye Tracking Technology [Brochure]. Fairfax, VA: LC Technologies. Retrieved from http://www.eyegaze.com/
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Jones, T. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Perceptual differentiation as a source of category effects in object processing: Evidence from naming and object decision. Memory & Cognition, 25, 18–35. doi:10.3758/BF03197282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, G. R., & Mackworth, N. H. (1978). Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 565–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manor, B., & Gordon, E. (2003). Defining the temporal threshold for ocular fixation in free-viewing visuocognitive tasks. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 128, 85–93. doi:10.1016/S0165-0270(03)00151-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. R., Doyle, P. J., Hula, W. D., Rubinsky, H. J., Fossett, T. R. D., & Matthews, C. T. (2004). Using resource allocation theory and dual-task methods to increase the sensitivity of assessment in aphasia. Aphasiology, 18, 521–542. doi:10.1080/02687030444000138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. R., Matthews, C., Hula, W. D., Doyle, P. J., Rubinsky, H. J., & Fossett, T. R. D. (2005). A dual-task tool for quantifying normal comprehension of aphasic connected speech production: A constructive replication. Aphasiology, 19, 473–484. doi:10.1080/02687030444000895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirman, D., Yee, E., Blumstein, S. E., & Magnuson, J. S. (2011). Theories of spoken word recognition deficits in aphasia: Evidence from eye-tracking and computational modeling. Brain and Language, 117, 53–68. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2011.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr, E. (2010). Colour and Naming in Healthy and Aphasic People ( Doctoral dissertation). Durham University. Retrieved from http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/394/
   Google Scholar
• Montanes, P., Goldblum, M. C., & Boller, F. (1995). The naming impairment of living and nonliving items in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 1, 39–48. doi:10.1017/S1355617700000084
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murray, L. L. (2002). Attention deficits in aphasia: Presence, nature, assessment, and treatment. Seminars in Speech and Language, 23, 107–116. doi:10.1055/s-2002-24987
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murray, L. L., Holland, A. L., & Beeson, P. M. (1997). Auditory processing in individuals with mild aphasia: A study of resource allocation. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 40, 792–808. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4004.792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naor-Raz, G., Tarr, M. J., & Kersten, D. (2003). Is color an intrinsic property of object representation? Perception, 32, 667–680. doi:10.1068/p5050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson, K. G., & Humphrey, G. K. (2001). Surface cues reduce the latency to name rotated images of objects. Perception, 30, 1057–1081. doi:10.1068/p3221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odekar, A., Hallowell, B., Kruse, H., Moates, D., & Lee, C. (2009). Validity of eye movement methods and indices for capturing semantic (associative) priming effects. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52, 31–48. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0100)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound, C., Parr, S. L. J., & Woolf, C. (2000). Beyond aphasia: Therapies for living with communication disability. Bicester: Speechmark.
   Google Scholar
• Price, C. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). The effects of surface detail on object categorization and naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 41, 797–828. doi:10.1080/14640748908402394
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robin, D. A., & Rizzo, M. (1988). The effect of focal cerebral lesions on intramodal and cross-modal orienting of attention. Clinical Aphasiology, 18, 61–74.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, T., Worrall, L., & McKenna, K. (2003). The effectiveness of aphasia‐friendly principles for printed health education materials for people with aphasia following stroke. Aphasiology, 17, 947–963. doi:10.1080/02687030344000319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossion, B., & Pourtois, G. (2004). Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart’s object pictorial set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception, 33, 217–236. doi:10.1068/p5117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, J. W., & Presnell, L. M. (1999). Color diagnosticity in object recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1140–1153. doi:10.3758/BF03207619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634. doi:10.1126/science.7777863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therriault, D. J., Yaxley, R. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2009). The role of color diagnosticity in object recognition and representation. Cognitive Processing, 10, 335–342. doi:10.1007/s10339-009-0260-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiessen, A., Beukelman, D., Ullman, C., & Longenecker, M. (2014). Measurement of the visual attention patterns of people with aphasia: A preliminary investigation of two types of human engagement in photographic images. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 120–129. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.905798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, C. H., McNeil, M. R., & Milenkovic, P. (1993). An investigation of attention allocation deficits in aphasia. Brain and Language, 45, 276–296. doi:10.1006/brln.1993.1046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uttl, B., Graf, P., & Santacruz, P. (2006). Object color affects identification and repetition priming. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47, 313–325. doi:10.1111/sjop.2006.47.issue-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitkovitch, M., & Tyrrell, L. (1995). Sources of disagreement in object naming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 48, 822–848. doi:10.1080/14640749508401419
   Google Scholar
• Waggoner, T. C. (1994). Color vision testing made easy. Gulf Breeze, FL: Home Care Vision.
   Google Scholar
• Wurm, L. H., Legge, G. E., Isenberg, L. M., & Luebker, A. (1993). Color improves object recognition in normal and low vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 899–911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, E., Blumstein, S. E., & Sedivy, J. C. (2008). Lexical-semantic activation in Broca’s and Wernicke’s aphasia: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 592–612. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, E., & Sedivy, J. C. (2006). Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zannino, G. D., Perri, R., Salamone, G., Di Lorenzo, C., Caltagirone, C., & Carlesimo, G. A. (2010). Manipulating color and other visual information influences picture naming at different levels of processing: Evidence from Alzheimer subjects and normal controls. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2571–2578. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar