Discourse production in aphasia: a current review of theoretical and methodological challenges

References

• Andreetta, S. (2014). Features of narrative language in fluent aphasia ( Doctoral thesis). Università degli Studi di Udine, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Andreetta, S., Cantagallo, A., & Marini, A. (2012). Narrative discourse in anomic aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 50, 1787–1793. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreetta, S., & Marini, A. (2015). The effect of lexical deficits on narrative disturbances in fluent aphasia. Aphasiology, 29, 705–723. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.979394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. (1987). Cohesive harmony in aphasic discourse and its significance in listener perception of coherence. In R. H. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings (Vol. 17, pp. 210–215). Lake of the Ozarks, MO: BRK Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. (2000). Aphasic discourse analysis: The story so far. Aphasiology, 14, 875–892. doi:10.1080/02687030050127685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E., Ciccone, N., Godecke, E., & Kok, B. (2011). Monologues and dialogues in aphasia: Some initial comparisons. Aphasiology, 25, 1347–1371. doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.577204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E., & Ferguson, A. (2010). Language, meaning, context, and functional communication. Aphasiology, 24, 480–496. doi:10.1080/02687030902775157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E., & Ulatowska, H. (2007). Making stories: Evaluative language and the aphasia experience. Aphasiology, 21, 763–774. doi:10.1080/02687030701192364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. M. (1992). Clause complex relations in aphasic discourse: A longitudinal case study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 7, 261–275. doi:10.1016/0911-6044(92)90018-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakheit, A., Carrington, S., Griffiths, S., & Searle, K. (2005). High scores on the Western Aphasia Battery correlate with good functional communication skills (as measured with the Communicative Effectiveness Index) in aphasic stroke patients. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27, 287–291. doi:10.1080/09638280400009006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S., & Ferguson., A. (2015). Conversation partner responses to problematic talk produced by people with aphasia: some alternatives to initiating, completing, or pursuing repair. Aphasiology, 29(3), 315–336. doi:10.1080/02687038.2013.874547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R. (2013). Why reference to the past is difficult for agrammatic speakers. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 27, 244–263. doi:10.3109/02699206.2012.751626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R., Bamyaci, E., Hsu, C.-J., Lee, J., Duman, T. Y., & Thompson, C. K. (2011). Time reference in agrammatic aphasia: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 24, 652–673. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2011.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R., Edwards, S., & Kiss, K. (1996). Fluent aphasia in three languages: Aspects of spontaneous speech. Aphasiology, 10, 561–575. doi:10.1080/02687039608248437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R., Koekkoek, J., & Van Zonneveld, R. (2003). Object scrambling in Dutch Broca’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 86, 287–299. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00545-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, E., Hamby, S., & Zurif, E. (1983). The effects of focal brain damage on pragmatic expression. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 37, 59–84. doi:10.1037/h0080695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, E., & Wulfeck, B. (1989). Crosslinguistic studies of aphasia. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 328–371). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, E., Wulfeck, B., & MacWhinney, B. (1991). Cross-linguistic research in aphasia: An overview. Brain and Language, 41, 123–148. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(91)90149-U
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeke, S., Beckley, F., Johnson, F., Heilemann, C., Edwards, S., Maxim, J., & Best, W. (2015). Conversation focused aphasia therapy: Investigating the adoption of strategies by people with agrammatism. Aphasiology, 29, 355–377. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.881459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeke, S., Maxim, J., & Wilkinson, R. (2007). Using conversation analysis to assess and treat people with aphasia. Seminars in Speech and Language, 28, 136–147. doi:10.1055/s-2007-970571
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beeke, S., Wilkinson, R., & Maxim, J. (2003). Exploring aphasic grammar 2: Do language testing and conversation tell a similar story? Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 17(2), 109–134. doi:10.1080/0269920031000061786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrns, I. (2009). Aphasia and the Challenge of Writing ( Doctoral thesis). University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Behrns, I., Wengelin, Å., Broberg, M., & Hartelius, L. (2009). A comparison between written and spoken narratives in aphasia. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 23(7), 507–528. doi:10.1080/02699200902916129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, R. A. (1997). Narrative theory and narrative development: The Labovian impact. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 235–244. doi:10.1075/jnlh.5.4.01nar
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beveridge, M. E. L., & Bak, T. H. (2011). The languages of aphasia research: Bias and diversity. Aphasiology, 25, 1451–1468. doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.624165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomert, L., Kean, M. L., Koster, C., & Schokker, J. (1994). Amsterdam-Nijmegen Everyday Language Test: Construction, reliability and validity. Aphasiology, 8, 381–407. doi:10.1080/02687039408248666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomert, L., Koster, C., & Kean, M.-L. (1995). Amsterdam-Nijmegen Test voor Alledaagse Taalvaardigheid: Handleiding [Amsterdam-Nijmegen Everyday Language Test: Manual]. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, R. L. (1994). Hemispheric responsibility and discourse production: Contrasting patients with unilateral left and right hemisphere damage. In R. L. Bloom, L. K. Obler, S. De Santi, & J. S. Ehrlich (Eds.), Discourse analysis and applications: Studies in adult clinical populations (pp. 81–94). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, R. L., Borod, J. C., Santschi-Haywood, C., Pick, L. H., & Obler, L. K. (1996). Left and right hemispheric contributions to discourse coherence and cohesion. International Journal of Neuroscience, 88, 125–140. doi:10.3109/00207459608999818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boles, L. (1998). Conversational discourse analysis as a method for evaluating progress in aphasia: A case report. Journal of Communication Disorders, 31, 261–274. doi:10.1016/S0021-9924(98)00005-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, L. S., Dragoy, O., Avrutin, S., Iskra, E., & Bastiaanse, R. (2014). Understanding discourse-linked elements in aphasia: A threefold study in Russian. Neuropsychologia, 57, 20–28. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.02.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. (2011). Discourse treatment for word retrieval impairment in aphasia: The story so far. Aphasiology, 25, 1308–1326. doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.596185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookshire, R. H., & Nicholas, L. E. (1994). Speech sample size and test-retest stability of connected speech measures for adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 37, 399–407. doi:10.1044/jshr.3702.399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. (2001). Working with spoken discourse. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cannito, M. P., Jarecki, J. M., & Pierce, R. S. (1986). Effects of thematic structure on syntactic comprehension in aphasia. Brain and Language, 27, 38–49. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(86)90003-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capilouto, G. J., Wright, H. H., & Wagovich, S. A. (2006). Reliability of main event measurement in the discourse of individuals with aphasia. Aphasiology, 20, 205–216. doi:10.1080/02687030500473122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chafe, W. L. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, deniteness, subjects, topics and points of view. In C. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. pp. 25–56). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, S. B., & Ulatowska, H. K. (1989). Discourse in aphasia: Integration deficits in processing reference. Brain and language, 36(4), 651–668. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(89)90092-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1971). Deep structure, surface structure and semantic interpretation. In D. Steinberg & L. Jakobovits (Eds.), Semantics, an interdisciplinary reader in linguistics, philosophy and psychology (pp. 183–216). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, J. A. (1995). Coherence violations and propositional usage in the narratives of fluent aphasics. Brain and Language, 51, 291–317. doi:10.1006/brln.1995.1062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, C., & Flewellyn, L. (2003). Longitudinal assessment of coherence in an adult with fluent aphasia: A follow-up study. Aphasiology, 17, 173–182. doi:10.1080/729255216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, C. A. (2002). Story narratives of adults with closed head injury and non-brain-injured adults: Influence of socioeconomic status, elicitation task, and executive functioning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 1232–1248. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2002/099)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, C. A., Liles, B. Z., Duffy, R. J., Clarkson, J., & Elia, D. (1994). Longitudinal assessment of narrative discourse in a mildly aphasic adult. Clinical Aphasiology, 22, 145–155. Retrieved from http://aphasiology.pitt.edu/archive/00000164/
   Google Scholar
• Damico, J. S., Oelschlaeger, M., & Simmons-Mackie, N. (1999). Qualitative methods in aphasia research: Conversation analysis. Aphasiology, 13, 667–679. doi:10.1080/026870399401777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damico, J. S., Tetnowski, J., Lynch, K., Hartwell, J., Weill, C., Heels, J., & Simmons-Mackie, N. (2015). Facilitating authentic conversation: An intervention employing principles of constructivism and conversation analysis. Aphasiology, 29, 400–421. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.945388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Riesthal, M. R. (2011). Influence of the stimulus on verbal and nonverbal responses by individuals with and without aphasia. In Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings (Vol. 41). Fort Lauderdale, FL: BRK Publishers. Retrieved from http://aphasiology.pitt.edu/archive/00002301/.
   Google Scholar
• Dipper, L., Cocks, N., Rowe, M., & Morgan, G. (2011). What can co-speech gestures in aphasia tell us about the relationship between language and gesture?: A single case study of a participant with conduction aphasia. Gesture, 11, 123–147. doi:10.1075/gest.11.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dipper, S., Götze, M., Stede, M., & Wegst, T. (2004). ANNIS: A linguistic database for exploring information structure. Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure (ISIS), 1, 245–279. Retrieved from http://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/files/721/isis01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, P. J., McNeil, M. R., Park, G., Goda, A., Rubenstein, E., Spencer, K., … & Szwarc, L. (2000). Linguistic validation of four parallel forms of a story retelling procedure. Aphasiology, 14(5–6), 537–549. doi:10.1080/026870300401306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, P. J., Goda, A. J., & Spencer, K. A. (1995). The communicative informativeness and efficiency of connected discourse by adults with aphasia under structured and conversational sampling conditions. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 4, 130–134. doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0404.130
   Google Scholar
• Early, E. A., & VanDemark, A. A. (1985). Aphasic speakers’ use of definite and indefinite articles to mark given and new information in discourse. In Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings (Vol. 15, pp. 248–254). Ashland, OR: BRK Publishers. Retrieved from http://aphasiology.pitt.edu/archive/00000861/
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. (1981). A cross-linguistic study of Broca’s aphasia ( Master’s thesis). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Elvevåg, B., Foltz, P. W., Weinberger, D. R., & Goldberg, T. E. (2007). Quantifying incoherence in speech: An automated methodology and novel application to schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 93, 304–316. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2007.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fergadiotis, G., Kapantzoglou, M., & Wright, H. H. (2011, May). Discourse coherence in adults with aphasia. In Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings (Vol. 41). Fort Lauderdale, FL: BRK Publishers. Retrieved from http://aphasiology.pitt.edu/archive/00002277/.
   Google Scholar
• Fergadiotis, G., & Wright, H. H. (2011). Using latent semantic analysis to capture global coherence in aphasic discourse. Platform presentation at the New Trends in Experimental Psycholinguistics Conference, Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A., & Harper, A. (2010). Contributions to the talk of individuals with aphasia in multiparty interactions. Aphasiology, 24, 1605–1620. doi:10.1080/02687038.2010.493296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foka-Kavalieraki, P., Kakavoulia, M., Economou, A., Varlokosta, S., Routsis, C., Kasselimis, D., … Protopapas, A. 2008. A comprehensive approach to the analysis of narrative discourse production by Greek speakers with aphasia. Poster presented at the science of aphasia IX conference.
   Google Scholar
• Foltz, P. W. (2007). Discourse coherence and LSA. In T. K. Landauer, D. S. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 167–184). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, M. M., Fromm, D., & MacWhinney, B. (2012). AphasiaBank: A resource for clinicians. Seminars in Speech and Language, 33, 217–222. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1320041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, B. (1987). Discourse structure and anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frattali, C. M., Holland, A. L., Thompson, C. K., Wohl, C., & Ferketic, M. A. (1995). ASHA functional assessment of communication skills for adults (ASHA FACS). Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Fridriksson, J., Nettles, C., Davis, M., Morrow, L., & Montgomery, A. (2006). Functional communication and executive function in aphasia. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 20, 401–410. doi:10.1080/02699200500075781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N. (2006). Speech production in Broca’s agrammatic aphasia: Syntactic tree pruning. In Y. Grodzinsky & K. Amunts (Eds.), Broca’s region (pp. 63–82). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, D., Forbes, M., Holland, A., & MacWhinney, B. (2014). AphasiaBank: 7-year interest rate index and yield. Paper presented at 44th clinical aphasiology conference.
   Google Scholar
• Fromm, D., Holland, A., Armstrong, E., Forbes, M., MacWhinney, B., Risko, A., & Mattison, N. (2011). “Better but no cigar”: Persons with aphasia speak about their speech. Aphasiology, 25, 1431–1447. doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.608839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gernsbacher, M. A., & Givón, T. (Eds.). (1995). Coherence in spontaneous text (Vol. 31). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Giora, R. (1985). Notes towards a theory of text coherence. Poetics Today, 6, 699–715. doi:10.2307/1771962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleason, J. B., Goodglass, H., Obler, L., Green, E., Hyde, M. R., & Weintraub, S. (1980). Narrative strategies of aphasic and normal-speaking subjects. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 23(2), 370–382. doi:10.1044/jshr.2302.370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glosser, G. (1993). Discourse production patterns in neurologically impaired and aged populations. In H. H. Brownell & Y. Joanette (Eds.), Narrative discourse in neurologically impaired and normal aging adults (pp. 191–211). San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Glosser, G., & Deser, T. (1991). Patterns of discourse production among neurological patients with fluent language disorders. Brain and Language, 40, 67–88. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(91)90117-J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., Christiansen, J. A., & Gallagher, R. (1993). Comparison of morphology and syntax in free narrative and structured tests: Fluent vs. nonfluent aphasics. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 29, 377–407. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80250-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2000). Gesture, aphasia, and interaction. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 84–98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., Goodwin, M. H., & Olsher, D. (2002). Producing sense with nonsense syllables: Turn and sequence in conversations with a man with severe aphasia. In C. Ford, B. Fox, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 56–80). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. K. (2006). A quantitative production analysis of picture description. Aphasiology, 20, 188–204. doi:10.1080/02687030500472777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosz, B. J., & Sidner, C. L. (1986). Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12, 175–204. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=12458
   Google Scholar
• Gundel, J. K., & Fretheim, T. (2004). Topic and focus. In L. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 175–196). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gundel, J. K., Hegarty, M., & Borthen, K. (2003). Cognitive status, information structure, and pronominal reference to clausally introduced entities. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 12(3), 281–299. doi:10.1023/A:1024102420659
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics, 3, 199–244. doi:10.1017/S0022226700016613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London, UK: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, R. (1985). The texture of a text. In M. A. K. Halliday & R. Hasan (Eds.), Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (pp. 70–96). Geelong, VC: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hengst, J. A. (2003). Collaborative referencing between individuals with aphasia and routine communication partners. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 831–848. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2003/065)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs, J. R. (1979). Coherence and coreference. Cognitive Science, 3, 67–90. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0301_4
   Google Scholar
• Holland, A. L. (1982). Observing functional communication of aphasic adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 50–56. doi:10.1044/jshd.4701.50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holland, A. L., Frattali, C., & Fromm, D. (1999). Communication activities of daily living – second edition (CADL-2). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Hough, M. S. (1990). Narrative comprehension in adults with right and left hemisphere brain-damage: Theme organization. Brain and Language, 38, 253–277. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(90)90114-V
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, W. (1990). Text comprehension and production in aphasia: Analysis in terms of micro-and macroprocessing. In Y. Joanette & H. H. Brownell (Eds.), Discourse ability and brain damage (pp. 154–179). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Im, E. J., Kwon, M., & Sim, H. S. (2001). The informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech samples in Korean fluent aphasics. Communication Sciences & Disorders, 6, 374–391. Retrieved from http://www.e-csd.org/journal/view.php?number=137
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, W. H., Wertz, R. T., & Avent, J. R. (2002). Relationships among language impairment, functional communication, and pragmatic performance in aphasia. Aphasiology, 16, 823–835. doi:10.1080/02687030244000086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, B. J. (2001). Social validity of changes in informativeness and efficiency of aphasic discourse following linguistic specific treatment (LST). Brain and Language, 78, 115–127. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keenan, J. M., Baillet, S. D., & Brown, P. (1984). The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 115–126. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90082-3
   Google Scholar
• Kehler, A. (2002). Coherence, reference, and the theory of grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kehler, A. (2004). Discourse coherence. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kempler, D., & Goral, M. (2011). A comparison of drill- and communication-based treatment for aphasia. Aphasiology, 25, 1327–1346. doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.599364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klippi, A. (2015). Pointing as an embodied practice in aphasic interaction. Aphasiology, 29, 337–354. doi:10.1080/02687038.2013.878451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, A. P.-H., & Law, S.-P. (2004). A Cantonese linguistic communication measure for evaluating aphasic narrative production: Normative and preliminary aphasic data. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders, 2, 124–146. doi:10.1080/14769670310001659708
   Google Scholar
• Kong, A. P.-H., & Law, S.-P. (2009). A linguistic communication measure for monitoring changes in Chinese aphasic narrative production. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 23, 255–269. doi:10.1080/02699200802673234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korpijaakko-Huuhka, A.-M., & Lind, M. (2012). The impact of aphasia on textual coherence: Evidence from two typologically different languages. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 3, 47. doi:10.1558/jircd.v3i1.47
   Google Scholar
• Koutsoftas, A., Wright, H. H., & Capilouto, G. (2009). Discourse coherence in healthy younger & older adults. Poster presented at the ASHA Convention, New Orleans, LA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Krifka, M. (2008). Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55, 243–276. doi:10.1556/ALing.55.2008.3-4.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laakso, M. (2015). Collaborative participation in aphasic word searching: Comparison between significant others and speech and language therapists. Aphasiology, 29, 269–290. doi:10.1080/02687038.2013.878450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Laine, M., Laakso, M., Vuorinen, E., & Rinne, J. (1998). Coherence and informativeness of discourse in two dementia types. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 11, 79–87. doi:10.1016/S0911-6044(98)00006-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanyon, L., & Rose, M. L. (2009). Do the hands have it? The facilitation effects of arm and hand gesture on word retrieval in aphasia. Aphasiology, 23(7–8), 809–822. doi:10.1080/02687030802642044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenk, U. (1998). Marking discourse coherence: Functions of discourse markers in spoken English. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Liles, B. Z. (1985). Cohesion in the narratives of normal and language-disordered children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 28(1), 123–133. doi:10.1044/jshr.2801.123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liles, B., & Coelho, C. (1998). Cohesion analyses. In L. Cherney, B. Shadden, & C. Coelho (Eds.), Analyzing discourse in communicatively impaired adults. Gainsburg, MD: Aspen Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Linebaugh, C. W., Kryzer, K. M., Oden, S., & Myers, P. S. (2006). Reapportionment of communicative burden in aphasia: A study of narrative interaction. Aphasiology, 20, 84–96. doi:10.1080/02687030500369452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomas, J., Pickard, L., Bester, S., Elbard, H., Finlayson, A., & Zoghaib, C. (1989). The communicative effectiveness index: Development and psychometric evaluation of a functional communication measure for adult aphasia. The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 113–124. doi:10.1044/jshd.5401.113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Long, A., Hesketh, A., Paszek, G., Booth, M., & Bowen, A. (2008). Development of a reliable self-report outcome measure for pragmatic trials of communication therapy following stroke: The Communication Outcome after Stroke (COAST) scale. Clinical Rehabilitation, 22, 1083–1094. doi:10.1177/0269215508090091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorch, R. F. E., Jr, & O’Brien, E. J. (1995). Sources of coherence in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Macwhinney, B., Fromm, D., Forbes, M., & Holland, A. (2011). AphasiaBank : Methods for studying discourse. Aphasiology, 25, 1286–1307. doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.589893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B., Fromm, D., Holland, A., & Forbes, M. (2013). AphasiaBank: Data and methods. In N. Mueller & M. Ball (Eds.), Research methods in clinical linguistics and phonetics: A practical guide (pp. 268–287). New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, W. C., & Thompson, S. A. (1988). Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8(3), 243–281. doi:10.1515/text.1.1988.8.3.243
   Google Scholar
• Manochiopinig, S., Sheard, C., & Reed, V. A. (1992). Pragmatic assessment in adult aphasia: A clinical review. Aphasiology, 6, 519–533. doi:10.1080/02687039208249489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, A., Andreetta, S., Del Tin, S., & Carlomagno, S. (2011). A multi-level approach to the analysis of narrative language in aphasia. Aphasiology, 25, 1372–1392. doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.584690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, A., Boewe, A., Caltagirone, C., & Carlomagno, S. (2005). Age-related differences in the production of textual descriptions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 439–463. doi:10.1007/s10936-005-6203-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, A., Carlomagno, S., Caltagirone, C., & Nocentini, U. (2005). The role played by the right hemisphere in the organization of complex textual structures. Brain and Language, 93, 46–54. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, A., Spoletini, I., Rubino, I. A., Ciuffa, M., Bria, P., Martinotti, G., … Spalletta, G. (2008). The language of schizophrenia: An analysis of micro and macrolinguistic abilities and their neuropsychological correlates. Schizophrenia Research, 105, 144–155. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2008.07.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullough, K., McCullough, G., Ruark, J., & Rainey, J. (2006). Pragmatic performance and functional communication in adults with aphasia. The Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 164–178. doi:10.1037/h0100193
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. R., Doyle, P. J., Fossett, T. R. D., Park, G. H., & Goda, A. J. (2001). Reliability and concurrent validity of the information unit scoring metric for the story retelling procedure. Aphasiology, 15, 991–1006. doi:10.1080/02687040143000348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menn, L., Obler, L. K., & Miceli, G. (Eds.). (1990). Agrammatic aphasia: A cross-language narrative sourcebook (Vol. 2). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Meuse, S., & Marquardt, T. P. (1985). Communicative effectiveness in Broca’s aphasia. Journal of Communication Disorders, 18, 21–34. doi:10.1016/0021-9924(85)90011-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli, G., Silveri, M. C., Romani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1989). Variation in the pattern of omissions and substitutions of grammatical morphemes in the spontaneous speech of so-called agrammatic patients. Brain and Language, 36, 447–492. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(89)90079-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirman, D., Strauss, T. J., Brecher, A., Walker, G. M., Sobel, P., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2010). . A large, searchable, web-based database of aphasic performance on picture naming and other tests of cognitive function. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 6, 132–133. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.08.066
   Google Scholar
• Mol, L., Krahmer, E., & Van De Sandt-Koenderman, M. (2012). Gesturing by aphasic speakers, how does it compare? Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 56(4), 1224–1236. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0159).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, M., & Moore, J. D. (1996). Towards a synthesis of two accounts of discourse structure. Computational Linguistics, 22, 410–419. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=239904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muò, R., Cancialosi, P., Galimberti, L., Carrubba Cacciola, B., Gilardone, M., & Schindler, A. (2015). Validation of the Italian version of the American Speech-Language and Hearing Association—Functional Assessment of Communication Skills for adults (I-ASHA-FACS). Aphasiology, 1–21. (ahead of print). doi:10.1080/02687038.2015.1010475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas, L. E., & Brookshire, R. H. (1993). A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 36, 338–350. doi:10.1044/jshr.3602.338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas, M., Obler, L. K., Albert, M. L., & Helm-Estabrooks, N. (1985). Empty speech in Alzheimer’s disease and fluent aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 28(3), 405–410. doi:10.1044/jshr.2803.405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oelschlaeger, M. L., & Thorne, J. C. (1999). Application of the correct information unit analysis to the naturally occurring conversation of a person with aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 42, 636–648. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4203.636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olness, G. S. (2006). Genre, verb, and coherence in picture-elicited discourse of adults with aphasia. Aphasiology, 20, 175–187. doi:10.1080/02687030500472710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olness, G. S. (2007, May 22–26). Narrative structure in aphasia: Impact of task and aphasia severity. In Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings (Vol. 37), Scottsdale, AZ. BRK Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Olness, G. S., & Gober, J. M. (2013). Mild conduction aphasia and narrative functionality:beyond the assessment of impairment (A case study). In Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings (Vol. 43). Tucson, AZ: BRK Publishers. Retrieved from http://aphasiology.pitt.edu/archive/00002478/
   Google Scholar
• Olness, G. S., Matteson, S. E., & Stewart, C. T. (2010). “Let me tell you the point”: How speakers with aphasia assign prominence to information in narratives. Aphasiology, 24, 697–708. doi:10.1080/02687030903438524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olness, G. S., & Ulatowska, H. K. (2011). Personal narratives in aphasia: Coherence in the context of use. Aphasiology, 25, 1393–1413. doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.599365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olness, G. S., Ulatowska, H. K., Wertz, R. T., Thompson, J. L., & Auther-Steffan, L. L. (2002). Discourse elicitation with pictorial stimuli in African Americans and Caucasians with and without aphasia. Aphasiology, 16, 623–633. doi:10.1080/02687030244000095
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, P. M., Vinter, K., & Olsen, T. S. (2001). The Communicative Effectiveness Index: Psychometric properties of a Danish adaptation. Aphasiology, 15, 787–802. doi:10.1080/02687040143000195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penn, C., Frankel, T., & Wilkinson, R. (2015). Problems with the understandability of aphasic talk: Mentions of persons as a trouble source in interaction. Aphasiology, 29, 291–314. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.986632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, L. (1995). Applying conversation analysis to aphasia: Clinical implications and analytic issues. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 30, 372–383. doi:10.3109/13682829509021449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, L., & Goodwin, C. (2003). Negotiating repair in aphasic conversation. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 147–162). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piehler, M. F., & Holland, A. L. (1984). Cohesion in aphasic language. In Clinical aphasiology conference proceedings (Vol. 14), Seabrook Island, SC. BRK Publishers. Retrieved from http://aphasiology.pitt.edu/archive/00000813/
   Google Scholar
• Porch, B. (1967). Porch Index of Communicative Ability. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prins, R., & Bastiaanse, R. (2004). Review. Aphasiology, 18, 1075–1091. doi:10.1080/02687030444000534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, M., Dipper, L., Morgan, G., & Cocks, N. (2015). Language and iconic gesture use in procedural discourse by speakers with aphasia. Aphasiology, 29, 826–844. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.993912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prutting, C. A., & Kirchner, D. M. (1987). A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 105–119. doi:10.1044/jshd.5202.105
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramsberger, G., & Rende, B. (2002). Measuring transactional success in the conversation of people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 16, 337–353. doi:10.1080/02687040143000636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redeker, G. (1990). Ideational and pragmatic markers of discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 367–381. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(90)90095-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redeker, G. (2000). Coherence and structure in text and discourse. In W. Black & H. Bunt (eds.), Abduction, belief and context in dialogue. Studies in computational pragmatics (pp. 233–263). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhart, T. (1980). Conditions for text coherence. Poetics Today, 1, 161–180. doi:10.2307/1771893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, C. (1996). Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. In J.-H. Yoon & A. Kathol (Eds.), OSU working papers in linguistics, 49: Papers in semantics (pp. 91–136). Columbus: The Ohio State University Department of Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Rogalski, Y., Altmann, L. J., Plummer-D’Amato, P., Behrman, A. L., & Marsiske, M. (2010). Discourse coherence and cognition after stroke: A dual task study. Journal of Communication Disorders, 43, 212–224. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, E., & Bastiaanse, R. (2008). Spontaneous speech in Italian agrammatic aphasia: A focus on verb production. Aphasiology, 22(4), 347–362. doi:10.1080/02687030701407093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruigendijk, E., Vasić, N., & Avrutin, S. (2006). Reference assignment: Using language breakdown to choose between theoretical approaches. Brain and Language, 96, 302–317. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2005.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiter, M. B., Kolk, H. H. J., Rietveld, T. C. M., Dijkstra, N., & Lotgering, E. (2011). Towards a quantitative measure of verbal effectiveness and efficiency in the Amsterdam-Nijmegen everyday language test (ANELT). Aphasiology, 25, 961–975. doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.569892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. (1972). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 31–74). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldert, C., Johansson, C., & Wilkinson, R. (2015). An interaction-focused intervention approach to training everyday communication partners: A single case study. Aphasiology, 29, 378–399. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.948803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, T., & Spooren, W. (2001). Text representation as an interface between language and its users. In W. Spooren, T. Sanders, & J. Schilperoord (Eds.), Text representation: Linguistic and psycholinguistic aspects (pp. 1–25). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, T. J., Spooren, W. P., & Noordman, L. G. (1992). Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes, 15, 1–35. doi:10.1080/01638539209544800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharp, V. L., Tompkins, C. A., & Iverson, J. M. (2007). Gesture and aphasia: Helping hands? Aphasiology, 21, 717–725. doi:10.1080/02687030701192273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to discourse (Vol. 8). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sherratt, S. (2007). Multi-level discourse analysis: A feasible approach. Aphasiology, 21, 375–393. doi:10.1080/02687030600911435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherratt, S., & Bryan, K. (2012). Discourse production after right brain damage: Gaining a comprehensive picture using a multi-level processing model. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 25, 213–239. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2012.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, J. A. (2010). Content analysis of the fairy tale Cinderella – A longitudinal single case study of narrative production: “From rags to riches”. Aphasiology, 24, 709–724. doi:10.1080/02687030903524729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taboada, M. T. (2004). Building coherence and cohesion: Task-oriented dialogue in English and Spanish (Vol. 129). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tanskanen, S. K. (2006). Collaborating towards coherence: Lexical cohesion in English discourse (Vol. 146). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ulatowska, H., Olness, G., Wertz, R., Samson, A., Keebler, M., & Goins, K. (2003). Relationship between discourse and Western Aphasia Battery performance in African Americans with aphasia. Aphasiology, 17, 511–521. doi:10.1080/0268703034400102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulatowska, H. K., Allard, L., & Chapman, S. B. (1990). Narrative and procedural discourse in aphasia. In Y. Joanette & H. H. Brownell (Eds.), Discourse ability and brain damage (pp. 180–198). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ulatowska, H. K., & Chapman, S. B. (1994). Discourse macrostructure in aphasia. In R. L. Bloom, L. K. Obler, S. De Santi, & J. Ehrlich (Eds.), Discourse analysis and applications: Studies in adult clinical populations (pp. 29–46). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ulatowska, H. K., Chapman, S. B., Johnson, J., & Branch, C. (1999). Macrostructure and inferential processing in discourse of aphasic patients. Psychology of Language and Communication, 3, 3–20. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254947976_Macrostructure_and_inferential_processing_in_discourse_of_aphasic_patients
   Google Scholar
• Ulatowska, H. K., Freedman-Stern, R., Doyel, A. W., Macaluso-Haynes, S., & North, A. J. (1983). Production of narrative discourse in aphasia. Brain and Language, 19, 317–334. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(83)90074-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulatowska, H. K., North, A. J., & Macaluso-Haynes, S. (1981). Production of narrative and procedural discourse in aphasia. Brain and Language, 13, 345–371. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(81)90100-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulatowska, H. K., & Olness, G. S. (1997). Some observations on narratives by aphasics and their contributions to narrative theory. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 259–264. doi:10.1075/jnlh
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulatowska, H. K., & Olness, G. S. (2000). Discourse revisited: Contributions of lexico-syntactic devices. Brain and Language, 71, 249–251. doi:10.1006/brln.1999.2261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulatowska, H. K., Olness, G. S., & Williams, L. J. (2004). Coherence of narratives in aphasia. Brain and Language, 91, 42–43. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.06.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulatowska, H. K., Reyes, B., Santos, T. O., Garst, D., Mak, K., & Graham, K. (2013). Production and comprehension in aphasia: Gains and pitfalls in using macrostructure tasks in Aesop’s fables. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 634–642. doi:10.3109/17549507.2013.794476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulatowska, H. K., Reyes, B., Santos, T. O., Garst, D., Vernon, J., & McArthur, J. (2013). Personal narratives in aphasia: Understanding narrative competence. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 20, 36–43. doi:10.1310/tsr2001-36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulatowska, H. K., & Sadowska, M. (1992). Some observations on aphasic texts. In S. J. Hwang & W. R. Merrifield (Eds.), Language in context: Essays for Robert E. Longacre (pp. 51–66). Arlington: The Summer institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Meulen, I., Van De Sandt-Koenderman, W. M. E., Duivenvoorden, H. J., & Ribbers, G. M. (2010). Measuring verbal and non-verbal communication in aphasia: Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the scenario test. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders/Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists, 45, 424–435. doi:10.3109/13682820903111952
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Text and context: Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1976). Narrative macro-structures. PTL: A Journal for Descriptive Poetics and Theory of Literature, 1, 547–568. Retrieved from http://www.discourses.org/OldArticles/Narrative%20macrostructures.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.). (1997). Discourse as structure and process: Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction. London: SAGE Publications. doi:10.4135/9781446221884
   Google Scholar
• Van Leer, E., & Turkstra, L. (1999). The effect of elicitation task on discourse coherence and cohesion in adolescents with brain injury. Journal of Communication Disorders, 32, 327–349. doi:10.1016/S0021-9924(99)00008-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeulen, J., Bastiaanse, R., & Van Wageningen, B. (1989). Spontaneous speech in aphasia: A correlational study. Brain and Language, 36, 252–274. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(89)90064-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Heusinger, K. (1999). Intonation and information structure. Doctoral thesis. Germany: University of Konstanz.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, E., Snow, C., & Prins, R. (1975). Spontaneous speech of aphasic patients: A psycholinguistic analysis. Brain and Language, 2, 281–303. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(75)80071-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinrich, M., Mccall, D., Boser, K. I., & Virata, T. (2002). Narrative and procedural discourse production by severely aphasic patients. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 16, 249–274. doi:10.1177/154596802401105199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertz, R. T., Collins, M. J., Weiss, D., Kurtzke, J. F., Friden, T., Brookshire, R. H., Pierce, J., … Resurrection, E. (1981). Veterans administration cooperative study on aphasia: A comparison of individual and group treatment Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 24, 580–594. doi:10.1044/jshr.2404.580.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Westerhout, E. N., & Monachesi, P. (2006). A pilot study for a Corpus of Dutch Aphasic Speech (CoDAS). In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, A. Gangemi, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, J. Odijk, & D. Tapias (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Ressources and Evaluation (LREC) (pp. 1648–1653). Paris: ELRA.
   Google Scholar
• Westerhout, E. N. (2006). A corpus of Dutch aphasic speech: Sketching the design and performing a pilot study ( Doctoral thesis, Master’s thesis). Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., (Ed.). (2015). Conversation and aphasia: Advances in analysis and intervention [Special Issue]. Aphasiology, 29, 257–268. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.974138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., Beeke, S., & Maxim, J. (2010). Formulating actions and events with limited linguistic resources: Enactment and iconicity in agrammatic aphasic talk. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43, 57–84. doi:10.1080/08351810903471506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, F., & Gibson, E. (2005). Representing discourse coherence: A corpus-based study. Computational Linguistics, 31, 249–287. doi:10.1162/0891201054223977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, H., & Capilouto, G. J. (2012). Considering a multi-level approach to understanding maintenance of global coherence in adults with aphasia. Aphasiology, 26, 656–672. doi:10.1080/02687038.2012.676855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, H. H. (Ed.). (2011a). Discourse in aphasia [Special issue]. Aphasiology, 25. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/paph20/25/11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, H. H. (2011b). Discourse in aphasia: An introduction to current research and future directions. Aphasiology, 25, 1283–1285. doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.613452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, H. H., Capilouto, G. J., & Koutsoftas, A. (2013). Evaluating measures of global coherence ability in stories in adults. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48, 249–256. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, H. H., Capilouto, G. J., Wagovich, S. A., Cranfill, T., & Davis, J. (2005). Development and reliability of a quantitative measure of adults’ narratives. Aphasiology, 19, 263–273. doi:10.1080/02687030444000732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, H. H., Koutsoftas, A., Fergadiotis, G., & Capilouto, G. (2010). Coherence in stories told by adults with aphasia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 6, 111–112. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.08.056
   Google Scholar
• Wulfeck, B., Bates, E., Juarez, L., Opie, M., Friederici, A., Macwhinney, B., & Zurif, E. (1989). Pragmatics in aphasia: Crosslinguistic evidence. Language and Speech, 32, 315–336. doi:10.1177/002383098903200402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xi, Y. (2010). Cohesion studies in the past 30 years: Development, application and chaos. The International Journal-Language Society and Culture, 31, 139–147. Retrieved from www.aaref.com.au/attachment.aspx?id=2014
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K. M., & Beukelman, D. R. (1980). An analysis of connected speech samples of aphasic and normal speakers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 45, 27–36. doi:10.1044/jshd.4501.27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar