Usage-based approaches to aphasia

References

• Altmann, G. T. M., & Steedman, M. (1988). Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition, 30, 191–238. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(88)90020-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Burgess, G. C., Cortese, M. J., & Adams, D. R. (2002). The word-frequency mirror effect in young, old, and early-stage Alzheimer’s disease: Evidence for two processes in episodic recognition performance. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 199–226. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? Journal of Memory & Language, 24, 89–106. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(85)90017-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R., Bouma, G., & Post, W. (2009). Linguistic complexity and frequency in agrammatic speech production. Brain and Language, 109, 18–28. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2008.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R., Koekkoek, J., & van Zonneveld, R. (2003). Object scrambling in Dutch Broca’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 86, 287–299. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00545-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R., & Thompson, C. K. (2003). Verb and auxiliary movement in agrammatic Broca’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 84, 286–305. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00553-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R., & van Zonneveld, R. (1998). On the relation between verb inflection and verb position in Dutch agrammatic patients. Brain and Language, 64, 165–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R., & Van Zonneveld, R. (2005). Sentence production with verbs of alternating transitivity in agrammatic Broca’s aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 18, 57–66. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2004.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, E., & Goodman, J. C. (1997). On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition, aphasia and real-time processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 506–584. doi:10.1080/016909697386628
   Google Scholar
• Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation and language learning. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 157–193). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bencini, G. M. L. (2013). Psycholinguistics. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0021
   Google Scholar
• Berndt, R. S., Haendiges, A. N., Mitchum, C. C., & Sandson, J. (1997). Verb retrieval in aphasia 2. Relationship to sentence processing. Brain and Language, 56, 107–137. doi:10.1006/brln.1997.1728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bever, T. G. (1970). The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 279–362). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bod, R., Hay, J., & Jannedy, S. (Eds.). (2003). Probabilistic linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boland, J. E., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1991). The role of lexical representations in sentence processing. In G. B. Simpson (Ed), Understanding word and sentence. Advances in psychology, No. 77 (pp. 331–366). Oxford, England: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, D. (2003). Caramazza and Zurif’s (1976) studies of aphasic patients with syntactic comprehension deficits. In C. Code, C.-W. Wallesch, Y. Joanette, & A. Roch Lecours (Eds.), Classic cases in neuropsychology (Vol. 2, pp. 83–100). Hove, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., Michaud, J., & Hufford, R. (2013). Dissociations and associations of performance in syntactic comprehension in aphasia and their implications for the nature of aphasic deficits. Brain and Language, 127, 21–33. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Zurif, E. B. (1976). Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 3, 572–582. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(76)90048-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapey, R., Duchan, J. F., Elman, R. J., Garcia, L. J., Lyon, J., & Simmons Mackie, N. (n.d.). Life participation approach to aphasia: A statement of values for the future. Retrieved January 15, 2015, from http://www.asha.org/public/speech/disorders/LPAA/
   Google Scholar
• Chater, N., & Manning, C. D. (2006). Probabilistic models of language processing and acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 335–344. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, M. H., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). A usage-based approach to recursion in sentence processing. Language Learning, 59, 126–161. doi:10.1111/lang.2009.59.issue-s1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeDe, G. (2012). Lexical and prosodic effects on syntactic ambiguity resolution in aphasia. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 41(5), 387–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeDe, G. (2013a). Effects of verb bias and syntactic ambiguity on reading in people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 27, 1408–1425. doi:10.1080/02687038.2013.843151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeDe, G. (2013b). Verb transitivity bias affects on-line sentence reading in people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 27, 326–343. doi:10.1080/02687038.2012.725243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey, M. W., & Warren, T. (2015). The influence of event-related knowledge on verb-argument processing in aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 67, 63–81. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, R. J. (2011). Social and life participation approaches to aphasia intervention. In L. LaPointe (Ed.), Aphasia and related neurogenic language disorders (pp. 171–184). New York: Thieme.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G. D., & Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 11–15. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Friederici, A. (1991). On deriving the properties of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language, 40, 51–66. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(91)90116-I
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N. (2000). Moving verbs in agrammatic production. In R. Bastiaanse & Y. Grodzinsky (Eds.), Grammatical disorders in aphasia: A neurolinguistic perspective (pp. 152–170). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Gahl, S. (2002). Lexical biases in aphasic sentence comprehension: An experimental and corpus linguistic study. Aphasiology, 16, 1173–1198. doi:10.1080/02687030244000428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahl, S., Menn, L., Ramsberger, G., Jurafsky, D. S., Elder, E., Rewega, M., & Audrey, L. (2003). Syntactic frame and verb bias in aphasia: Plausibility judgments of undergoer-subject sentences. Brain & Cognition, 53, 223–228. doi:10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00114-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnsey, S. M., Pearlmutter, N. J., Myers, E., & Lotocky, M. A. (1997). The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory & Language, 37, 58–93. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gennari, S. P., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). Linking production and comprehension processes: The case of relative clauses. Cognition, 111, 1–23. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. (2006). The interaction of top-down and bottom-up statistics in the resolution of syntactic category ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 363–388. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. E., & Bencini, G. M. L. (2005). Support from processing for a constructional approach to grammar. In A. E. Tyler, M. Takada, Y. Kim, & D. Marinova (Eds.), Language in use: Cognitive and discourse perspectives on language and language learning (pp. 3–18). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1982). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.
   Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y. (1990). Theoretical perspectives on language deficits. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, J. (2003). The information conveyed by words in sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 101–123. doi:10.1023/A:1022492123056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haskell, T. R., Thornton, R., & MacDonald, M. C. (2010). Experience and grammatical agreement: Statistical learning shapes number agreement production. Cognition, 114, 151–164. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, A. L., & Forbes, M. M. (1993). Aphasia treatment: World perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Howes, D. H., & Solomon, R. L. (1951). Visual duration threshold as a function of word-probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 401–410. doi:10.1037/h0056020
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jurafsky, D. (2003). Probabilistic modeling in psycholinguistics: Linguistic comprehension and production. In R. Bod, J. Hay, & S. Jannedy (Eds.), Probabilistic linguistics (pp. 39–95). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kapatsinski, V. (2014). What is grammar like? A usage-based constructionist perspective. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology, 11, 1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (1982). The Western Aphasia Battery. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Kittredge, A. K., Dell, G. S., Verkuilen, J., & Schwartz, M. F. (2008). Where is the effect of frequency in word production? Insights from aphasic picture-naming errors. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 463–492. doi:10.1080/02643290701674851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krug, M. (1998). String frequency: A cognitive motivating factor in coalescence, language processing, and linguistic change. Journal of English Linguistics, 26, 286–320. doi:10.1177/007542429802600402
   Google Scholar
• Lalami, L. (1997). Frequency in sentence comprehension ( Ph.D. thesis). Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (2013). A history of Psycholinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, R. (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106(3), 1126–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. C. (1993). The interaction of lexical and syntactic ambiguity. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, 692–715. doi:10.1006/jmla.1993.1035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. C. (1994). Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Language & Cognitive Processes, 9, 157–201. doi:10.1080/01690969408402115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. C. (1999). Distributional information in language comprehension, production, and acquisition: Three puzzles and a moral. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), The emergence of language (pp. 177–196). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. C. (2013). How language production shapes language form and comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–16. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676–703. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B., & Bates, E. (1989). The crosslinguistic study of sentence processing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, J., Pring, T., Chiat, S., & Robson, J. (2001). When ottoman is easier than chair: An inverse frequency effect in jargon aphasia. Cortex, 37, 33–53. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70556-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. C., Vuong, L. C., & Crowther, J. E. (2007). Sentence-level deficits in aphasia. In G. Gaskell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 425–439). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Menn, L. (2000). It’s time to face a simple question: Why is canonical form simple? Brain and Language, 71, 157–159. doi:10.1006/brln.1999.2239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menn, L., Gahl, S., Ramsberger, G., Jurafsky, D., Elders, E., Rewega, M., & Holland, A. (2003). Beyond canonical form: Verb-frame frequency affects verb production and comprehension. Brain and Language, 87, 23–24. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00178-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1994). A capacity approach to syntactic comprehension disorders: Making normal adults perform like aphasic patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 671–717. doi:10.1080/02643299408251989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, N. W., & Butler, K. G. (2007). Life participation approaches to aphasia therapy: Theory and practical applications [special issue]. Topics in Language Disorders, 27, 295–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C., & Wingfield, A. (1965). Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17, 273–281. doi:10.1080/17470216508416445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack, I., & Norman, D. A. (1964). A non-parametric analysis of recognition experiments. Psychonomic Science, 1, 125–126. doi:10.3758/BF03342823
   Google Scholar
• Preston, K. A. (1935). The speed of word perception and its relation to reading ability. The Journal of General Psychology, 13, 199–203. doi:10.1080/00221309.1935.9917878
   Google Scholar
• Roland, D., Dick, F., & Elman, J. (2007). Frequency of basic English grammatical structures: A corpus analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 348–379. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, K. D., Peach, R. K., & Shapiro, L. (1998). Verb preference effects in the sentence comprehension of fluent aphasic individuals. Aphasiology, 12, 537–545. doi:10.1080/02687039808249556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabourin, L., & Stowe, L. (2004). Memory effects in syntactic ERP tasks. Brain and Cognition, 55, 392–395. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, L. P., & Levine, B. A. (1990). Verb processing during sentence comprehension in aphasia. Brain and Language, 38, 21–47. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(90)90100-U
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus, M. K., Carlson, G., & Trueswell, J. C. (1989). The role of thematic structures in interpretation and parsing. Language & Cognitive Processes, 4, SI211–SI234. doi:10.1080/01690968908406368
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. K. (2003). Unaccusative verb production in agrammatic aphasia: The argument structure complexity hypothesis. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16, 151–167. doi:10.1016/S0911-6044(02)00014-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueswell, J. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1994). Toward a lexicalist framework of constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution. In C. Clifton Jr. & L. Frazier, et al. (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 155–179). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Kello, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 528–553. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.3.528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, M., & Garnsey, S. M. (2004). Making simple sentences hard: Verb bias effects in simple direct object sentences. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar