Frequency in lexical processing

References

• Adelman, J., Brown, G., & Quesada, J. (2006). Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science, 17 (9), 814–823. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01787.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcodia, G. F. (2007). Chinese: A language of compound words? In F. Montermini, G. Boyé, & N. Hathout (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 5th décembrettes: Morphology in Toulouse (pp. 79–90). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
   Google Scholar
• Arnon, I., & Priva, U. C. (2013). More than words: the effect of multi-word frequency and con- stituency on phonetic duration. Language and Speech, 56, 349–371. doi:10.1177/0023830913484891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnon, I., & Snider, N. (2010). More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 67–82. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H. (1996). The effect of lexical specialization on the growth curve of the vocabulary. Computational Linguistics, 22, 455–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H. (2001). Word frequency distributions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H. (2011). Demythologizing the word frequency effect: A discriminative learning perspective. The Mental Lexicon, 5, 436–461. doi:10.1353/lan.2005.0112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H. (2013). Multivariate statistics. In R. Podesva & D. Sharma (Eds.), Research methods in linguistics (pp. 337–372). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Feldman, L., & Schreuder, R. (2006). Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 496–512.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Filipović Đurđević, D., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M. (2011). An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review, 118, 438–481. doi:10.1037/a0023851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., & Moscoso Del Prado Martín, F. (2005). Semantic density and past-tense formation in three Germanic languages. Language, 81, 666–698. doi:10.1353/lan.2005.0112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (cd-rom). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Shaoul, C., Willits, J., & Ramscar, M. (2016). Comprehension without segmentation: A proof of concept with naive discriminative learning. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 31, 106–128. doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1065336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Tomaschek, F., Gahl, S., & Ramscar, M. (2015). The Ecclesiastes principle in language change. In M. Hundt, S. Mollin, & S. Pfenninger (Eds.), The changing English language: Psycholinguistic perspectives (to appear). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Van Halteren, H., & Tweedie, F. (1996). Outside the cave of shadows: Using syntactic annotation to enhance authorship attribution. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 11, 121–132. doi:10.1093/llc/11.3.121
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Wurm, L. H., & Aycock, J. (2007). Lexical dynamics for low-frequency complex words: A regression study across tasks and modalities. The Mental Lexicon, 2, 419–463. doi:10.1075/ml.2.3
   Google Scholar
• Balota, D., Cortese, M., Sergent-Marshall, S., Spieler, D., & Yap, M. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 283–316. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannard, C., & Matthews, D. (2008). Stored word sequences in language learning: The effect of familiarity on children’s repetition of four-word combinations. Psychological Science, 19, 241–248. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02075.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, H., Vergara, M., & Carreiras, M. (2004). Syllable-frequency effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from erps. Neuroreport, 15, 545–548. doi:10.1097/00001756-200403010-00032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroni, M., Bernardini, S., Ferraresi, A., & Zanchetta, E. (2009). The WaCky wide web: A collection of very large linguistically processed web-crawled corpora. Language Resources and Evaluation, 43, 209–226. doi:10.1007/s10579-009-9081-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barredo, J., Öztekin, I., & Badre, D. (2015). Ventral fronto-temporal pathway supporting cognitive control of episodic memory retrieval. Cerebral Cortex, 25, 1004–1019. doi:10.1093/cercor/bht291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, C., Hirsh, K., Johnston, R. A., & Williams, C. (2001). Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the locus of repetition priming of picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 350–375. doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, P. J., & Larkina, M. (2014). The onset of childhood amnesia in childhood: A prospective investigation of the course and determinants of forgetting of early-life events. Memory, 22, 907–924. doi:10.1080/09658211.2013.854806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekinschtein, P., & Weisstaub, N. (2014). Role of pfc during retrieval of recognition memory in rodents. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 108, 252–255. doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2014.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, D. (1989). A typology of English texts. Linguistics, 27, 3–44. doi:10.1515/ling.1989.27.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, J., Davis, C., & Hanley, D. (2005). Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a “hat” in “that”?. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 131–143. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brants, T., & Franz, A. (2006). Web 1t 5-gram version 1. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5–32. doi:10.1023/A:1010933404324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M. (1996). Word frequency affects naming latency in dutch when age of acquisition is controlled. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 8, 185–194. doi:10.1080/095414496383149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & Ellis, A. W. (2015). Aphasia and age-of-acquisition: Are early-learned words more resilient? Aphasiology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02687038.2015.1106439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., & New, B. (2011). Assessing the usefulness of google books’ word frequencies for psycholinguistic research on word processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 27. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., Lange, M., & Van Wijnendaele, I. (2000). The effects of age-of-acquisition and frequency-of-occurrence in visual word recognition: Further evidence from the Dutch language. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 65–85. doi:10.1080/095414400382208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–990. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnard, L. (1995). Users guide for the British National Corpus. Oxford: Oxford University Computing Service: British National Corpus consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Burrows, J. F. (1987). Word-patterns and story-shapes: The statistical analysis of narrative style. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 2, 61–70. doi:10.1093/llc/2.2.61
   Google Scholar
• Burrows, J. F. (1992). Computers and the study of literature. In C. S. Butler (Ed.), Computers and written texts (pp. 167–204). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., Alvarez, C. J., & De Vega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 766–780. doi:10.1006/jmla.1993.1038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B. (1970). An alternative to Juilland’s usage coefficient for lexical frequencies, and a proposal for a standard frequency index (sfi). Computer Studies in the Humanities and Verbal Behavior, 3, 61–65.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B., & White, M. N. (1973a). Age of acquisition norms for 220 picturable nouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 563–576. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80036-2
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B., & White, M. N. (1973b). Word frequency and age of acquisition as determiners of picture-naming latency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 85–95. doi:10.1080/14640747308400325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cholin, J., Schiller, N. O., & Levelt, W. (2004). The preparation of syllables in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 47–61. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chugani, H. T. (1996). Neuroimaging of developmental nonlinearity and developmental pathologies. In R. W. Thatcher, G. R. Lyon, J. Rumsey, & N. Krasnegor (Eds.), Developmental Neuroimaging: Mapping the Development of Brain and Behavior (pp. 187–195). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Church, K., & Gale, W. (1995). Inverse document frequency (IDF): A measure of deviations from Poisson. In D. Yarowsky & K. Church (Eds.), Third workshop on very large corpora (pp. 121–130). Cambridge, MA: ACL. MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, M. A. (2005). Memory and the self. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 594–628. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortese, M. J., & Khanna, M. M. (2007). Age of acquisition predicts naming and lexical-decision performance above and beyond 22 other predictor variables: An analysis of 2342 words. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1072–1082. doi:10.1080/17470210701315467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M. (2010). The corpus of contemporary American English as the first reliable monitor corpus of English. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 25, 447–464. doi:10.1093/llc/fqq018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Saussure, F. (1966). Course in general linguistics. New York, NY: McGraw.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, A., & Van Heuven, W. J. B. (2002). The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 5, 175–197. doi:10.1017/S1366728902003012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. W., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2000). Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflects loss of plasticity in maturing systems: Insights from connectionist networks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26, 1103–1123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernestus, M., Baayen, R. H., & Schreuder, R. (2002). The recognition of reduced word forms. Brain and Language, 81, 162–173. doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernald, A., Marchman, V. A., & Weisleder, A. (2013). Ses differences in language processing skill and vocabulary are evident at 18 months. Developmental Science, 16, 234–248. doi:10.1111/desc.12019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, P., Shallice, T., & Dolan, R. (1998a). The functional roles of prefrontal cortex in episodic memory. I. Encoding. Brain, 121, 1239–1248. doi:10.1093/brain/121.7.1239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, P., Shallice, T., & Dolan, R. (1998b). The functional roles of prefrontal cortex in episodic memory. II. Retrieval. Brain, 121, 1249–1256. doi:10.1093/brain/121.7.1249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1905/1953). Childhood and concealing memories. In A. A. Brill (Ed.), The basic writings of Sigmund Freud. New York, NY: The Modern Library.
   Google Scholar
• Gahl, S. (2008). Time and thyme are not homophones: The effect of lemma frequency on word durations in spontaneous speech. Language, 84, 474–496. doi:10.1353/lan.0.0035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahl, S., Yao, Y., & Johnson, K. (2012). Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 789–806. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, M. K., Rothkopf, E. Z., Lapan, R., & Lafferty, T. (1987). The word frequency effect in lexical decision: Finding a frequency-based component. Memory and Cognition, 15, 24–28. doi:10.3758/BF03197709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentry, J., Long, L., Gentleman, R., Falcon, S., Hahne, F., Sarkar, D., & Hansen, K. D. (2015). Rgraphviz: Provides plotting capabilities for r graph objects. R package version 2.4.0.
   Google Scholar
• Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 256–281. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.113.2.256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghetti, S., & Bunge, S. A. (2012). Neural changes underlying the development of episodic memory during middle childhood. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, 381–395. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2012.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghyselinck, M., Lewis, M. B., & Brysbaert, M. (2004). Age of acquisition and the cumulative- frequency hypothesis: A review of the literature and a new multi-task investigation. Acta Psychologica, 115, 43–67. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilhooly, K. J., & Gilhooly, M. L. M. (1980). The validity of age-of-acquisition ratings. British Journal of Psychology, 71, 105–110. doi:10.1111/bjop.1980.71.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimenes, M., & New, B. (2015). Worldlex: Twitter and blog word frequencies for 66 languages. Behavior Research Methods. Advance online publication. doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0621-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glanzer, M., & Bowles, N. (1976). Analysis of the word frequency effect in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 21–31.
   Google Scholar
• Good, I. J. (1953). The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika, 40, 237–264. doi:10.1093/biomet/40.3-4.237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, J. C., Dale, P. S., & Li, P. (2008). Does frequency count? Parental input and the acquisition of vocabulary. Journal of Child Language, 35, 515. doi:10.1017/S0305000907008641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, E., Maclagan, M., & Hay, J. (2007). The ONZE Corpus. In J. Beal, K. Corrigan, & H. Moisl (Eds.), Models and methods in handling of unconventional digital corpora (Vol. 2, pp. 82–104). London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, J. (1990). Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 228–244. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(90)90074-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518–565. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gries, S. T. (2008). Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13, 403–437. doi:10.1075/ijcl.13.4
   Google Scholar
• Gries, S. T. (2010). Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora: Further explorations. In S. Gries, S. Thomas, & M. Davies (Eds.), Corpus linguistic applications: Current studies, new directions (No. 71, pp. 197–212). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, Z., & Bock, K. (1998). Constraint, word frequency, and the relationship between lexical processing levels in spoken word production. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 313–338. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, T., & Bluck, S. (2000). Getting a life: The emergence of the life story in adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 748–769. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halgren, E., Dhond, R. P., Christensen, N., Van Petten, C., Marinkovic, K., Lewine, J. D., & Dale, A. M. (2002). N400-like magnetoencephalography responses modulated by semantic context, word frequency, and lexical class in sentences. Neuroimage, 17, 1101–1116. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halteren, H. V., Baayen, R. H., Tweedie, F., Haverkort, M., & Neijt, A. (2005). New machine learning methods demonstrate the existence of a human stylome. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 12, 65–77. doi:10.1080/09296170500055350
   Google Scholar
• Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491–528. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.3.491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heister, J., & Kliegl, R. (2012). Comparing word frequencies from different German text corpora. Lexical Resources in Psycholinguistic Research, 3, 27–44.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, P., Englert, C., Wubs, E., & Hoeks, J. (2008). Age differences in adults’ use of referring expressions. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 17, 443–466. doi:10.1007/s10849-008-9065-6
   Google Scholar
• Hendrix, P. (2015). Experimental explorations of a discrimination learning approach to language processing ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Henri, V., & Henri, C. (1895). On our earliest recollections of childhood. Psychological Review, 2, 215–216.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstetter, S., Tavor, I., Moryosef, S. T., & Assaf, Y. (2013). Short-term learning induces white matter plasticity in the fornix. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 12844–12850. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4520-12.2013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Højsgaard, S., Edwards, D., & Lauritzen, S. (2012). Graphical models with R. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Hothorn, T., Buehlmann, P., Dudoit, S., Molinaro, A., & Van Der Laan, M. (2006). Survival ensembles. Biostatistics, 7, 355–373. doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxj011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurtado, N., Marchman, V. A., & Fernald, A. (2008). Does input influence uptake? links between maternal talk, processing speed and vocabulary size in spanish-learning children. Developmental Science, 11, F31–F39. doi:10.1111/desc.2008.11.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacques, P. L. S., Kragel, P. A., & Rubin, D. C. (2011). Dynamic neural networks supporting memory retrieval. Neuroimage, 57, 608–616. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jescheniak, J. D., & Levelt, W. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 824–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. (2004). Massive reduction in conversational American English. In K. Yoneyama & K. Maekawa (Eds.), Spontaneous speech: Data and analysis. Proceedings of the 1st session of the 10th international symposium (pp. 29–54). Tokyo: The National International Institute for Japanese Language.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, N. L., & Kotz, S. (1977). Urn models and their application. an approach to modern discrete probability theory. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M., Curran, T., Mozer, M. C., & Wilder, M. H. (2013). Sequential effects in response time reveal learning mechanisms and event representations. Psychological Review, 120, 628–666. doi:10.1037/a0033180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2003). Memory enhancement for emotional words: Are emotional words more vividly remembered than neutral words?. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1169–1180. doi:10.3758/BF03195800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., Lacey, P., Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 287–304. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0118-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Brysbaert, M. (2015). Word knowledge in the crowd: Measuring vocabulary size and word prevalence in a massive online experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 1–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keune, K., Ernestus, M., Van Hout, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2005). Social, geographical, and register variation in Dutch: From written ‘mogelijk’ to spoken ‘mok’. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1, 183–223. doi:10.1515/cllt.2005.1.2.183
   Google Scholar
• Koesling, K., Kunter, G., Baayen, R. H., & Plag, I. (2012). Prominence in triconstituent compounds: Pitch contours and linguistic theory. Language and Speech, 56, 529–554. doi:10.1177/0023830913478914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler, R. (1986). Zur linguistischen Synergetik: Struktur und Dynamik der Lexik. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Kryuchkova, T., Tucker, B. V., Wurm, L., & Baayen, R. H. (2012). Danger and usefulness are detected early in auditory lexical processing: Evidence from electroencephalography. Brain and Language, 122, 81–91. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2012.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., & Bertram, R. (2013). Moving spaces: Spelling alternation in English noun-noun compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 939–966. doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.701757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Drieghe, D., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). How strongly do word reading times and lexical decision times correlate? Combining data from eye movement corpora and megastudies. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 563–580. doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.658820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Schreuder, R., Bertram, R., & Baayen, R. H. (2009). Reading of multimorphemic Dutch compounds: Towards a multiple route model of lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 876–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 978–990. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., & Van Dyke, J. (2011). Effects of individual differences in verbal skills on eye- movement patterns during sentence reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 42–73. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landauer, T., & Dumais, S. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211–240. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauritzen, S. L. (1996). Graphical models. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• LeDoux, J. (2007). The amygdala. Current Biology, 17, 868–874. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99001776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luciana, M., & Nelson, C. A. (1998). The functional emergence of prefrontally-guided working memory systems in four-to eight-year-old children. Neuropsychologia, 36, 273–293. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00109-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, S. G., & Christianson, K. (2011). Stem and whole-word frequency effects in the processing of inflected verbs in and out of a sentence context. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 1173–1192. doi:10.1080/01690965.2010.510359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, R. H. (1957). On the relative abundance of bird species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 43, 293–295. doi:10.1073/pnas.43.3.293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2000). The childes project. Tools for analyzing talk. Part, 1. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Mandelbrot, B. (1953). An information theory of the statistical structure of language. In W. E. Jackson (Ed.), Communication theory (pp. 503–512). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoni, G., Scoboria, A., & Harvey, L. (2010). Nonbelieved memories. Psychological Science, 21, 1334–1340. doi:10.1177/0956797610379865
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., & Ramscar, M. (2001). Testing the distributional hypothesis: the influence of context judgements of semantic similarity. In J. D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the cognitive science society. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., & Shillcock, R. (2001). Rethinking the word frequency effect: the neglected role of distributional information in lexical processing. Language and Speech, 44, 295–322. doi:10.1177/00238309010440030101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRae, K., Jared, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). On the roles of frequency and lexical access in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 43–65. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(90)90009-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meunier, F., & Segui, J. (1999). Frequency effects in auditory word recognition: The case of suffixed words. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 327–344. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milin, P., Filipović Đurđević, D., & Moscoso del Prado Martín, F. (2009). The simultaneous effects of inflectional paradigms and classes on lexical recognition: Evidence from Serbian. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 50–64. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milin, P., Ramscar, M., Baayen, R. H., & Feldman, L. B. (2015). Cornering segmentation: The perspective from discrimination learning. Manuscript submitted for publication, University of Tübingen.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A., Beckwith, R., Fellbaum, C., Gross, D., & Miller, K. J. (1990). Introduction to WordNet: An on-line lexical database. International Journal of Lexicography, 3, 235–244. doi:10.1093/ijl/3.4.235
   Google Scholar
• Miwa, K., Libben, G., Dijkstra, T., & Baayen, R. H. (2014). The time-course of lexical activation in Japanese morphographic word recognition: Evidence for a character-driven processing model. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 79–113. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.790910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, C. M., Chappell, T. D., & Ellis, A. W. (1997). Age of acquisition norms for a large set of object names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 50, 528–559. doi:10.1080/027249897392017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1995). Roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21, 116–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New, B., Brysbaert, M., Veronis, J., & Pallier, C. (2007). The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 661–677. doi:10.1017/S014271640707035X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. G. (2011). Van de “tu” trong tieng viet [the issues of “word” in vietnamese]. Ha Noi: Nha xuat ban Giao Duc.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, D. (2006). The Bayesian reader: Explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. Psychological Review, 113, 327–357. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D., & McQueen, J. (2008). Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. Psychological Review, 115, 357–395. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nusbaum, H. C. (1985). A stochastic account of the relationship between lexical density and word frequency ( Research on Speech Perception, Progress Report #11). Bloomington: Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Oostdijk, N. (2002). The design of the Spoken Dutch Corpus. In P. Peters, P. Collins, & A. Smith (Eds.), New frontiers of corpus research (pp. 105–112). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Pearl, J. (2009). Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G. J., David, C. N., Marcus, M. D., & Smith, D. M. (2013). The medial prefrontal cortex is critical for memory retrieval and resolving interference. Learning & Memory, 20, 201–209. doi:10.1101/lm.029249.112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, H. (2014). Visual processing of Vietnamese compound words: A multivariate analysis of using corpus linguistic and psycholinguistic paradigms ( PhD dissertation). University of Alberta, Edmonton.
   Google Scholar
• Pham, H., & Baayen, R. H. (2015). Vietnamese compounds show an anti-frequency effect in visual lexical decision. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, to Appear, 30, 1077–1095. doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1054844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, E., & LeDoux, J. (2005). Contributions of the amygdala to emotion processing: From animal models to human behavior. Neuron, 48, 175–187. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.09.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitt, M., Johnson, K., Hume, E., Kiesling, S., & Raymond, W. (2005). The Buckeye corpus of conversational speech: Labeling conventions and a test of transcriber reliability. Speech Communication, 45, 89–95. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2004.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pluymaekers, M., Ernestus, M., & Baayen, R. H. (2005). Lexical frequency and acoustic reduction in spoken Dutch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 2561–2569. doi:10.1121/1.2011150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Ramscar, M., Dye, M., & McCauley, S. M. (2013). Error and expectation in language learning: The curious absence of mouses in adult speech. Language, 89, 760–793. doi:10.1353/lan.2013.0068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramscar, M., & Gitcho, N. (2007). Developmental change and the nature of learning in childhood. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 274–279. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramscar, M., Hendrix, P., Love, B., & Baayen, R. H. (2013). Learning is not decline: The mental lexicon as a window into cognition across the lifespan. The Mental Lexicon, 8, 450–481. doi:10.1075/ml.8.3.08ram
   Google Scholar
• Ramscar, M., Hendrix, P., Shaoul, C., Milin, P., & Baayen, R. H. (2014). Nonlinear dynamics of lifelong learning: The myth of cognitive decline. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6, 5–42. doi:10.1111/tops.12078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramscar, M., Smith, A., Dye, M., Futrell, R., Hendrix, P., Baayen, R. H., & Starr, R. (2013). The ‘universal’ structure of name grammars and the impact of social engineering on the evolution of natural information systems. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th meeting of the cognitive science society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Ramscar, M., Yarlett, D., Dye, M., Denny, K., & Thorpe, K. (2010). The effects of feature-label-order and their implications for symbolic learning. Cognitive Science, 34, 909–957. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01092.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14, 191–201. doi:10.3758/BF03197692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York, NY: Appleton Century Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Sadat, J., Martin, C. D., Costa, A., & Alario, F. (2014). Reconciling phonological neighborhood effects in speech production through single trial analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 68, 33–58. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., & Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarf, D., Gross, J., Colombo, M., & Hayne, H. (2013). To have and to hold: Episodic memory in 3- and 4-year-old children. Developmental Psychobiology, 55, 125–132. doi:10.1002/dev.v55.2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, G. G., O’Donnell, P. J., Leuthold, H., & Sereno, S. C. (2009). Early emotion word processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Biological Psychology, 80, 95–104. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.03.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scutari, M. (2010). Learning Bayesian networks with the bnlearn R package. Journal of Statistical Software, 35, 1–22. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v35/i03/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423. doi:10.1002/bltj.1948.27.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaoul, C., Baayen, R. H., & Westbury, C. F. (2015). N-gram probability effects in a cloze task. The Mental Lexicon, 9, 437–472. doi:10.1075/ml.9.3.04sha
   Google Scholar
• Shaoul, C., & Westbury, C. (2010). Exploring lexical co-occurrence space using hidex. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 393–413. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.2.393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaoul, C., Westbury, C. F., & Baayen, R. H. (2013). The subjective frequency of word n-grams. Psihologija, 46, 497–537. doi:10.2298/PSI1304497S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaoul, C., Willits, J., Ramscar, M., Milin, P., & Baayen, R. H. (2015). A discrimination-driven model for the acquisition of lexical knowledge in auditory comprehension. under revision.
   Google Scholar
• Somerville, L. H., & Casey, B. (2010). Developmental neurobiology of cognitive control and motivational systems. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 20, 236–241. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2010.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Davis, C. J. (2006). The Bristol norms for age of acquisition, imageability, and familiarity. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 598–605. doi:10.3758/BF03193891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemberger, J. P., & MacWhinney, B. (1986). Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms. Memory and Cognition, 14, 17–26. doi:10.3758/BF03209225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolarova, M., Brielmann, A. A., Wolf, C., Rinker, T., & Baayen, R. H. (2015). Assessing gender, bilingualism, type and duration of early care as potential predictors of vocabulary size and composition at two years of age. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Strange, D., & Hayne, H. (2013). The devil is in the detail: Children’s recollection of details about their prior experiences. Memory, 21, 431–443. doi:10.1080/09658211.2012.732722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobl, C., Malley, J., & Tutz, G. (2009). An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychological Methods, 14, 323–348. doi:10.1037/a0016973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271–294. doi:10.1080/01690969408402120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57, 745–765. doi:10.1080/02724980343000477
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tagliamonte, S., & Baayen, R. H. (2012). Models, forests and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change, 24, 135–178. doi:10.1017/S0954394512000129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, L., & LaBar, K. (2005). Emotional arousal enhances word repetition priming. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 1027–1047. doi:10.1080/02699930500172440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson-Schill, S. L., Ramscar, M., & Chrysikou, E. G. (2009). Cognition without control when a little frontal lobe goes a long way. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 259–263. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01648.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorndike, E. L., & Lorge, I. (1944). A teacher’s word book of 30.000 words. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomaschek, F., Tucker, B. V., Wieling, M., & Baayen, R. H. (2014). Vowel articulation affected by word frequency. In S. Fuchs, M. Grice, A. Hermes, L. Lancia, & D. Mücke (Eds.), Proceedings of 10th ISSP, Cologne (pp. 429–432). Köln: University of Cologne.
   Google Scholar
• Tomaschek, F., Wieling, M., Arnold, D., & Baayen, R. H. (2013). Word frequency, vowel length and vowel quality in speech production: An EMA study of the importance of experience. In F. Bimbot, C. Cerisara, C. Fougeron, G. Gravier, L. Lamel, F. Pellegrino, & P. Perrier (Eds.), 14th Annual conference of the international speech communication association, August 25–29, Lyon (pp. 1302–1306). ISCA Archive. https://protect-us.mimecast.com/s/rx4mBRUoE6MLhW
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2009). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay, A., & Baayen, R. H. (2010). Holistic processing of regular four-word sequences: A behavioral and ERP study of the effects of structure, frequency, and probability on immediate free recall. In D. Wood (Ed.), Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication (pp. 151–173). London: The Continuum International Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Tremblay, A., Derwing, B., Libben, G., & Westbury, C. (2011). Processing advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Language Learning, 61, 569–613. doi:10.1111/lang.2011.61.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsamardinos, I., Aliferis, C. F., & Statnikov, A. R. (2003). Algorithms for large scale Markov blanket discovery. In I. Russell & S. Haller (Eds.), FLAIRS conference (Vol. 2). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Abbema, D., & Bauer, P. (2005). Autobiographical memory in middle childhood: Recollections of the recent and distant past. Memory, 13, 829–845. doi:10.1080/09658210444000430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Heuven, W. J., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). Subtlex-uk: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1176–1190. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.850521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 1191–1207. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisleder, A., & Fernald, A. (2013). Talking to children matters: Early language experience strengthens processing and builds vocabulary. Psychological Science, 24, 2143–2152. doi:10.1177/0956797613488145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, C., Morrison, C. M., & Conway, M. A. (2014). Adult recollections of childhood memories: What details can be recalled?. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1249–1261. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.856451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westbury, C. (2014). You can’t drink a word: Lexical and individual emotionality affect subjective familiarity judgments. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 43, 631–649. doi:10.1007/s10936-013-9266-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A. (1968). Effect of frequency on identification and naming of objects. American Journal of Psychology, 81, 226–234. doi:10.2307/1421267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, S. N. (2006). Generalized additive models. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, C. (1979). Duration differences between rare and common words and their implications for the interpretation of word frequency effects. Memory & Cognition, 7, 411–419. doi:10.3758/BF03198257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurm, L. H. (2007). Danger and usefulness: An alternative framework for understanding rapid evaluation effects in perception?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1218–1225. doi:10.3758/BF03193116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurm, L. H., & Vakoch, D. A. (1996). Dimensions of speech perception: Semantic associations in the affective lexicon. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 409–423. doi:10.1080/026999396380204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurm, L. H., Vakoch, D. A., Aycock, J., & Childers, R. R. (2003). Semantic effects in lexical access: Evidence from single-word naming. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 547–565. doi:10.1080/02699930302302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, R. (2008). Well-known and influential corpora. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kyto (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook [volume 1] (pp. 383–457). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Young, M. P., & Rugg, M. D. (1992). Word frequency and multiple repetition as determinants of the modulation of event-related potentials in a semantic classification task. Psychophysiology, 29, 664–676. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1992.tb02044.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yule, G. U. (1944). The statistical study of literary vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Huang, C.-R., & Yu, S. (2004). Distributional consistency: As a general method for defining a core lexicon. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on language resources and evaluation (pp. 1119–1122). Lisbon: European Language Resources Association.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., & Jurafsky, D. (2009). The effect of lexical frequency and Lombard reflex on tone hyper-articulation. Journal of Phonetics, 37, 231–247. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2009.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zipf, G. K. (1929). Relative frequency as a determinant of phonetic change. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 40, 1–95. doi:10.2307/310585
   Google Scholar
• Zipf, G. K. (1935). The psycho-biology of language. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of the least effort. an introduction to human ecology. New York, NY: Hafner.
   Google Scholar