No effect of orthographic neighbourhood in treatment with two cases of acquired dysgraphia

References

• Andrews, S. (1996). Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 775–800. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.0040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H.1995. The CELEX Lexical Database. Release 2 (CD-ROM). Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania
   Google Scholar
• Beeson, P. M. (1999). Treating acquired writing impairment: Strengthening graphemic representations. Aphasiology, 13, 767–785. doi:10.1080/026870399401867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson, P. M. (2004). Remediation of written language. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 11, 37–48. doi:10.1310/D4AM-XY9Y-QDFT-YUR0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beeson, P. M., Hirsch, F. M., & Rewega, M. A. (2002). Successful single-word writing treatment: Experimental analyses of four cases. Aphasiology, 16, 473–491. doi:10.1080/02687030244000167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson, P. M., & Rapcsak, S. Z. (2002). Clinical diagnosis and treatment of spelling disorders. In A. E. Hillis (Ed.), The handbook of adult language disorders: Integrating cognitive neuropsychology, neurology and rehabilitation (pp. 101–120). New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beeson, P. M., Rising, K., & Volk, J. (2003). Writing treatment for severe aphasia: Who benefits? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 1038–1060. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2003/083)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, W. M., & Nickels, L. A. (2000). From theory to therapy in aphasia: Where are we now and where to next? Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10, 231–247. doi:10.1080/096020100389147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breining, B., Nozari, N., & Rapp, B. (2016). Does segmental overlap help or hurt? Evidence from blocked cyclic naming in spoken and written production. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 500–506. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0900-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunsdon, R., Coltheart, M., & Nickels, L. (2005). Treatment of irregular word spelling in developmental surface dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 213–251. doi:10.1080/02643290442000077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchwald, A., & Falconer, C. (2014). Cascading activation from lexical processing to letter-level processing in written word production. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31, 606–621. doi:10.1080/02643294.2014.951609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchwald, A., & Rapp, B. (2009). Distinctions between orthographic long-term memory and working memory. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26, 724–751. doi:10.1080/02643291003707332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Miceli, G. (1990). The structure of graphemic representations. Cognition, 37, 243–297. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(90)90047-N
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., Miceli, G., Villa, G., & Romani, C. (1987). The role of the graphemic buffer in spelling: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognition, 26, 59–85. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(87)90014-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colenbrander, D., Kohnen, S., & Nickels, L. (2011). Diagnostic reading test for nonwords (DiRT). Retrieved from www.motif.org.au
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, V., Laxon, V. J., & Keating, C. (1988). Effects of word imageability and age of acquisition on children’s reading. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 1–12. doi:10.1111/bjop.1988.79.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. (2005). N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 65–70. doi:10.3758/BF03206399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falconer, C., & Buchwald, A. (2013). Do activated letters influence lexical selection in written word production? Aphasiology, 27, 849–866. doi:10.1080/02687038.2013.781114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fieder, N., Nickels, L., Biedermann, B., & Best, W. (2015). How ‘some garlic’ becomes ‘a garlic’ or ‘some onion’: Mass and count processing in aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 75, 626–645. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.06.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folk, J. R., Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2002). The interaction of lexical and sublexical information in spelling: What’s the point? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 653–671. doi:10.1080/02643290244000184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., Folk, J. R., & Rapp, B. (2010). Mrs. Malaprop’s neighborhood: Using word errors to reveal neighborhood structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 113–134. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, R. A., & Caramaza, A. (1985). The Johns Hopkins University Dysgraphia Battery. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, R. A., & Caramazza, A. (1986). Aspects of the spelling process: Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 263–296. doi:10.1080/01690968608404678
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, J. (1990). Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 228–244. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(90)90074-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., O’Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., & Segui, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 189–195. doi:10.3758/BF03210696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, L., Olson, A., & Humphreys, G. (2012). Rehabilitation of spelling in a participant with a graphemic buffer impairment: The role of orthographic neighbourhood in remediating the serial position effect. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 22, 890–919. doi:10.1080/09602011.2012.709872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D., Best, W., & Nickels, L. (2015). Optimising the design of intervention studies: Critiques and ways forward. Aphasiology, 29, 526–562. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.985884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D., & Patterson, K. E. (1992). Pyramids and palm trees. Bury, St. Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Company
   Google Scholar
• Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1992). Psycholinguistic assessments of Language Processing in Aphasia (PALPA). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kohnen, S., Colenbrander, D., Krajenbrink, T., & Nickels, L. (2015). Assessment of lexical and non-lexical spelling in students in Grades 1–7. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 20(1), 15–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohnen, S., Nickels, L., & Castles, A. (2009). Assessing spelling skills and strategies: A critique of available resources. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 14, 113–150. doi:10.1080/19404150902783450
   Google Scholar
• Kohnen, S., Nickels, L., Coltheart, M., & Brunsdon, R. (2008). Predicting generalization in the training of irregular word spelling: Treating lexical spelling deficits in a child. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 343–375. doi:10.1080/02643290802003000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajenbrink, T., Nickels, L., & Kohnen, S. (2015). Generalisation after treatment of acquired spelling impairments: A review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 25, 503–554. doi:10.1080/09602011.2014.983135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajenbrink, T., Nickels, L., & Kohnen, S. (2016). Characteristics of graphemic buffer impairment: A case of rapid decay of activation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 978–990. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, L., Kohnen, S., Nickels, L., & McArthur, G. (2015). The Letter-Sound Test (LeST): A reliable and valid comprehensive measure of grapheme-phoneme knowledge. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 20, 129–142. doi:10.1080/19404158.2015.1037323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavidor, M., & Ellis, A. W. (2002). Word length and orthographic neighborhood size effects in the left and right cerebral hemispheres. Brain and Language, 80, 45–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laxon, V. J., Coltheart, V., & Keating, C. (1988). Children find friendly words friendly too: Words with many orthographic neighbours are easier to read and spell. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 103–119. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1988.tb00882.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey, M., Macaruso, P., & Rapp, B. (2006). Grapheme-to-lexeme feedback in the spelling system: Evidence from a dysgraphic patient. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 278–307. doi:10.1080/02643290442000518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels, L. A. (1995). Getting it right? Using aphasic naming errors to evaluate theoretical models of spoken word production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 13–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels, L. (2002). Improving word finding: Practice makes (closer to) perfect? Aphasiology, 16, 1047–1060. doi:10.1080/02687040143000618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels, L., & Cole-Virtue, J. (2004). Reading tasks from PALPA: How do controls perform on visual lexical decision, homophony, rhyme, and synonym judgements? Aphasiology, 18, 103–126. doi:10.1080/02687030344000517-633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panton, A., & Marshall, J. (2008). Improving spelling and everyday writing after a CVA: A single-case therapy study. Aphasiology, 22, 164–183. doi:10.1080/02687030701262605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B. (2002). Uncovering the cognitive architecture of spelling. In A. E. Hillis (Ed.), The handbook of adult language disorders: Integrating cognitive neuropsychology, neurology and rehabilitation (pp. 47–69). New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, B. (2005). The relationship between treatment outcomes and the underlying cognitive deficit: Evidence from the remediation of acquired dysgraphia. Aphasiology, 19, 994–1008. doi:10.1080/02687030544000209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., & Caramazza, A. (1997). From graphemes to abstract letter shapes: Levels of representation in written spelling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1130–1152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., Epstein, C., & Tainturier, M.-J. (2002). The integration of information across lexical and sublexical processes in spelling. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 1–29. doi:10.1080/0264329014300060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, 460–499. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., & Kane, A. (2002). Remediation of deficits affecting different components of the spelling process. Aphasiology, 16, 439–454. doi:10.1080/02687030244000301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymer, A., Cudworth, C., & Haley, M. (2003). Spelling treatment for an individual with dysgraphia: Analysis of generalisation to untrained words. Aphasiology, 17, 607–624. doi:10.1080/02687030344000058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renvall, K., Nickels, L., & Davidson, B. (2013a). Functionally relevant items in the treatment of aphasia (part I): Challenges for current practice. Aphasiology, 27, 636–650. doi:10.1080/02687038.2013.786804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renvall, K., Nickels, L., & Davidson, B. (2013b). Functionally relevant items in the treatment of aphasia (part II): Further perspectives and specific tools. Aphasiology, 27, 651–677. doi:10.1080/02687038.2013.796507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roux, S., & Bonin, P. (2009). Neighborhood effects in spelling in adults. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 369–373. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.2.369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sage, K., & Ellis, A. (2004). Lexical influences in graphemic buffer disorder. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 381–400. doi:10.1080/02643290342000438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sage, K., & Ellis, A. (2006). Using orthographic neighbours to treat a case of graphemic buffer disorder. Aphasiology, 20, 851–870. doi:10.1080/02687030600738945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmalzl, L., & Nickels, L. (2006). Treatment of irregular word spelling in acquired dysgraphia: Selective benefit from visual mnemonics. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 16, 1–37. doi:10.1080/09602010443000218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shallice, T. (1981). Phonological agraphia and the lexical route in writing. Brain, 104, 413–429. doi:10.1093/brain/104.3.413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinburn, K., Porter, G., & Howard, D. (2004). The comprehensive aphasia test. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., & Yap, M. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 971–979. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.5.971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar