A comparison of visual scene and grid displays for people with chronic aphasia: a pilot study to improve communication using AAC

References

• Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, A., Bock, S., Thompson, J., & Kosuwan, K. (2002). Influence of communicative competence and augmentative and alternative communication technique on children’s attitudes toward a peer who uses AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 217–227. doi:10.1080/07434610212331281301
   Google Scholar
• Beck, A. R., Thompson, J. R., Clay, S. L., Hutchins, M., Vogt, W. P., Romaniak, B., & Sokolowski, B. (2001). Preservice professionals’ attitudes toward children who use augmentative/alternative communication. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 255–271. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23879979
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., Hux, K., Dietz, A., McKelvey, M., & Weissling, K. (2015). Using visual scene displays as communication support options for people with chronic, severe aphasia: A summary of AAC research and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 234–245. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1052152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Biederman, I., Mezzanotte, R. J., & Rabinowitz, J. C. (1982). Scene perception: Detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 143–177. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(82)90007-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, M., & Franklin, E. (1980). Dialogue with preschoolers: A cognitively-based system of assessment. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 127–150. doi:10.1017/S0142716400000801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braisby, N., & Gellatly, A. (2012). Cognitive psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, J. (2003). Natural scenes upset the visual applecart. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 7–9. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00008-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, K., Koul, R., & Corwin, M. (2012, November). Facilitating discourse in persons with aphasia using AAC. Oral Presentation at the American Speech, Language, Hearing Association Conference, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Cisco Systems-Flip Video Recorder. (2007). San Jose: Cisco Systems.Retrieved from http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/index.html. [space]
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, A., Weissling, K., Griffith, J., McKelvey, M., & Macke, D. (2014). The impact of interface design during an initial high-technology AAC experience: A collective case study of people with aphasia. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 314–328. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.966207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fei-Fei, L., VanRullen, R., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2005). Why does natural scene categorization require little attention? Exploring attentional requirements for natural and synthetic stimuli. Visual Cognition, 12, 893–924. doi:10.1080/13506280444000571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, L., & Fried-Oken, M. (1996). AAC aphasiology: Partnership for future research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 257–271. doi:10.1080/07434619612331277718
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, K., & Kimelman, M. (2000). AAC and aphasia: Cognitive‐linguistic considerations. In D. Beukelman, K. Yorkston, & J. Reichle (Ed.), Augmentative and alternative communication for adults with acquired neurologic disorders (pp. 339–374). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Haarmann, H. J., Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1997). Aphasic sentence comprehension as a resource deficit: A computational approach. Brain and Language, 59, 76–120. doi:10.1006/brln.1997.1814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hula, W.D., McNeil, M.R., & Sung, J.E. (2007). Is there an impairment of language-specific attentional processing in aphasia?. Brain and Language, 103, 240–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hula, W.D., & McNeil, M.R. (2008). Models of attention and dual-task performance as explanatory constructs in aphasia. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29, 169–187.
   Google Scholar
• Hux, K., Buechter, M., Wallace, S., & Weissling, K. (2010). Using visual scene displays to create a shared communication space for a person with aphasia. Aphasiology, 24, 643–660. doi:10.1080/02687030902869299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Movie Database (2014). I Love Lucy TV Series. Retrieved from http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0043208/.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice‐Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kemper, S., Schmalzried, R., Hoffman, L., & Herman, R. (2010). Aging and the vulnerability of speech to dual task demands. Psychology and Aging, 25, 949. doi:10.1037/a0020000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (2006). The western aphasia battery-revised. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Koul, R. K. (2011). Augmentative and alternative communication for adults with aphasia. United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Koul, R. K., Arvidson, H. H., & Pennington, G. S. (1997). Intervention for persons with acquired disorders. In L. L. Lloyd, D. R. Fuller, & H. H. Arvidson (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: A handbook of principles and practices (pp. 340–366). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Koul, R. K., & Corwin, M. (2003). Efficacy of AAC intervention in individuals with chronic severe aphasia. In R. W. Schlosser (Ed.), The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Toward evidence-based practice (pp. 449–470). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koul, R. K., Corwin, M., & Hayes, S. (2005). Production of graphic symbol sentences by individuals with aphasia: Efficacy of a computer-based augmentative and alternative communication intervention. Brain and Language, 92, 58–77. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koul, R. K., Corwin, M., Nigam, R., & Oetzel, S. (2008). Training individuals with severe Broca’s aphasia to produce sentences using graphic symbols: Implications for AAC intervention. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 2, 23–34. doi:10.1108/17549450200800004
   Google Scholar
• Koul, R. K., & Lloyd, L. L. (1998). Comparison of graphic symbol learning in individuals with aphasia and right hemisphere brain damage. Brain and Language, 62, 398–421. doi:10.1006/brln.1997.1908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koul, R. K., Petroi, D., & Schlosser, R. (2010). Systematic review of speech generating devices for aphasia. In J. W. Mullennix & S. Stern (Eds.), Computer synthesized speech technologies: Tools for aiding impairment (pp. 148–160). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2012). The changing face of augmentative and alternative communication: Past, present, and future challenges. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 197–204. doi:10.3109/07434618.2012.737024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, J., & McNaughton, D. (2014). Communicative competence for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication: A new definition for a new era of communication? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 1–18. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.885080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, N., & Ayala, J. (2004). Measurements of auditory-verbal STM span in aphasia: Effects of item, task, and lexical impairment. Brain and Language, 89, 464–483. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2003.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, N., & Saffran, E. M. (1997). Language and auditory-verbal short-term memory impairments: Evidence from common underlying processes. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 641–682. doi:10.1080/026432997381402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer-Johnson. (2014). GoTalk20+. Pittsburgh, PA: Mayer-Johnson, A Tobii DynaVox Company.
   Google Scholar
• McKelvey, M., Dietz, A., Hux, K., Weissling, K., & Beukelman, D. (2007). Performance of a person with chronic aphasia using personal and contextual pictures in a VSD prototype. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 15, 305–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKelvey, M. L., Hux, K., Dietz, A., & Beukelman, D. R. (2010). Impact of personal relevance and contextualization on word-picture matching by people with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 22–33. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2009/08-0021)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, D., & Light, J. (2013). The iPad and mobile technology revolution: Benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 107–116. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.784930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, M.R., & Pratt, S.R. (2001). Defining aphasia: Some theoretical and clinical implications of operating from a formal definition. Aphasiology, 15, 901–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, M.R., Odell, K., & Tseng, C. (1991). Toward the integration of resource allocation into a general theory of aphasia. Clinical Aphasiology, 20, 21–39.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, E., & Soto, G. (2002). Conversation patterns of three adults using aided speech: Variations across partners. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 77–90. doi:10.1080/07434610212331281181
   Google Scholar
• Murray, L. L. (1999). Review attention and aphasia: Theory, research and clinical implications. Aphasiology, 13, 91–111. doi:10.1080/026870399402226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, L.L., Holland, A., & Beeson, P.M. (1998). Spoken language of individuals with fluent aphasia under focused and divided-attention conditions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 213–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Aphasia Association (2015). National Aphasia Association Frequently Asked Questions. Retrieved from http://www.aphasia.org/
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas, L. E., & Brookshire, R. H. (1993). A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 36(2), 338–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2007). The role of context in object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 520–527. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, J., Davis, M., Carroll, B., & Asher, W. Director Producer. (September 15 1952). Job switching [I Love Lucy]. In D. Arnaz, Ed., Hollywood, CA: CBS Television Distribution.
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, J., Davis, M., Carroll, B., & Asher, W. Director Producer. (March 30 1953). Lucy changes her mind [I Love Lucy]. In D. Arnaz, Ed., Hollywood, CA: CBS Television Distribution.
   Google Scholar
• Petroi, D., Koul, R. K., & Corwin, M. (2014). Effect of number of graphic symbols, levels, and listening conditions on symbol identification and latency in persons with aphasia. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 30, 40–54. doi:10.3109/07434618.2014.882984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdy, M., & Dietz, A. (2010). Factors influencing AAC usage by individuals with aphasia. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 70–78. doi:10.1044/aac19.3.70
   Google Scholar
• Rostron, A., Ward, S., & Plant, R. (1996). Computerised augmentative communication devices for people with dysphasia: Design and evaluation. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 31, 11–30. doi:10.3109/13682829609033149
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, J. R., Weinrich, M., McCall, D., & Cox, D. M. (1996). Differentiating globally aphasic patients: Data from in-depth language assessments and production training using C-VIC. Aphasiology, 10, 319–342. doi:10.1080/02687039608248415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, R. (2008). Social approaches to aphasia intervention. In R. Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (pp. 290–318). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Thistle, J. J., & Wilkinson, K. M. (2013). Working memory demands of aided augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 235–245. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.815800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobii Dynavox (2016). Retrieved from http://www.tobiidynavox.com/software/.
   Google Scholar
• Tobii Dynavox (2007). Retrieved from http://www.tobiidynavox.com/devices/.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. E., & Hux, K. (2014). Effect of two layouts on high technology AAC navigation and content location by people with aphasia. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 9(2),173–182.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., & Jagaroo, V. (2004). Contributions of principles of visual cognitive science to AAC system display design. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 123–136. doi:10.1080/07434610410001699717
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. M., Light, J., & Drager, K. (2012). Considerations for the composition of visual scene displays: Potential contributions of information from visual and cognitive sciences. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28, 137–147. doi:10.1080/07434610410001699717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinrich, M., Boser, K.I., McCall, D., & Bishop, V. (2001). Training agrammatic subjects on passive sentences: Implications for syntactic deficit theories. Brain and Language, 76, 45–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar