Does facilitation by phonological cuing in picture naming depend on the modality of the cue?

References

• Abrams, L., White, K. K., & Eitel, S. L. (2003). Isolating phonological components that increase tip-of-the-tongue resolution. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1153–1162. doi:10.3758/BF03195798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alario, F.-X., & Ferrand, L. (1999). A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 531–552. doi:10.3758/BF03200732
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Auer, E. T. (2002). The influence of the lexicon on speech read word recognition: Contrasting segmental and lexical distinctiveness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 341–347. doi:10.3758/BF03196291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D, Maechler, M, Bolker, B, & Walker, S. (2014). Lme4: linear mixed-effects models using eigen and s4. R Package Version, 1, 7.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, L., Mohamedi, T., & Abry. (1990). Ninteen French viseme. Présented at The ESCA Workshop on Speech Synthesis, Autrans, France.
   Google Scholar
• Best, W., Herbert, R., Hickin, J., Osborne, F., & Howard, D. (2002). Phonological and orthographic facilitation of word-retrieval in aphasia: Immediate and delayed effects. Aphasiology, 16, 151–168. ISSN 02687038. doi:10.1080/02687040143000483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonin, P., Peereman, R., Malardier, N., Méot, A., & Chalard, M. (2003). A new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 158–167. doi:10.3758/BF03195507
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bowles, N. L., & Poon, L. W. (1985). Effects of priming in word retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 272–283. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.11.2.272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1989). Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology, 6, 201–251. doi:10.1017/S0952675700001019
   Google Scholar
• Brunet, D., Murray, M. M., & Michel, C. M. (2011). Spatiotemporal analysis of multichannel EEG: CARTOOL. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, (2011, 813–870. doi:10.1155/2011/813870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., & Riggio, L. (2004). The mirror neuron system and action recognition. Brain and Language, 89, 370–376. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00356-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callan, D., Jones, J. A., Munhall, K., Kroos, C., Callan, A. M., & Vatikiotis-Bateson, E. (2004). Multisensory integration sites identified by perception of spatial wavelet filtered visual speech gesture information. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 805–816. doi:10.1162/089892904970771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvert, G., Bullmore, E. T., Brammer, M. J., Campbell, R., Williams, S. C. R., McGuire, P. K., & David, A. S. (1997). Activation of auditory cortex during silent lipreading. Science, 276, 593–596. doi:10.1126/science.276.5312.593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvert, G., Campbell, R., & Brammer, M. (2000). Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex. Current Biology, 10, 649–657. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00513-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvert, G. A., Brammer, M. J., Bullmore, E. T., Campbell, R., Iversen, S. D., & David, A. S. (1999). Response amplification in sensory-specific cortices during crossmodal binding. Neuroreport, 10, 2619–2623. doi:10.1097/00001756-199908200-00033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, R. (2008). The processing of audio-visual speech: Empirical and neural bases. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 363, 1001–1010. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, R. (1990). Lipreading, neuropsychology, and immediate memory. In G. Vallar & T. Shallice ( Éd.), Neuropsychological impairments of short-term memory (pp. 268–286). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Changeux, J. P., & Michel, C. (2006).Microcircuits: The interface between neurons and global brain function. In Mechanisms of neural integration at the brain-scale level. The neuronal workspace and microstate models. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., & Dumay, N. (2009). Exploring phonological encoding through repeated segments. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 685–712. doi:10.1080/01690960802351260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., Martin, R. C., & Martin, I. C. (1999). Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 345–361. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erber, N. P. (1972). Auditory, visual, and auditory-visual recognition of consonants by children with normal and impaired hearing. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 15, 413. doi:10.1044/jshr.1502.413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., Buccino, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (2002). Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: A TMS study. European Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 399–402. doi:10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01874.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, J. L., & Landauer, T. K. (2014). Retrieval of long-term memory: « Tip-of-the-tongue » phenomenon. Psychonomic Science, 4, 309–310. doi:10.3758/BF03342310
   Google Scholar
• Green, K. P. (1996). Studies of the Mcgurk effect: Implications for theories of speech perception. In Spoken Language, 1996. ICSLP 96. Proceedings., Fourth International Conference on (Vol. 3, pp. 1652-1655). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., Kolk, H. H., & Martensen, H. (2005).The division of labor between internal and external speech monitoring. In Phonological encoding and monitoring in normal and pathological speech (pp. 187-205). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heine, M. K., Ober, B. A., & Shenaut, G. K. (1999). Naturally occurring and experimentally induced tip-of-the-tongue experiences in three adult age groups. Psychology and Aging, 14, 445–457. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.14.3.445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickin, J., Best, W., Herbert, R., Howard, D., & Osborne, F. (2002). Phonological therapy for word-finding difficulties: A re-evaluation. Aphasiology, 16, 981–999. doi:10.1080/02687030244000509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D., & Harding, D. (1998). Self-cueing of word retrieval by a woman with aphasia: Why a letter board works. Aphasiology, 12, 399–420. doi:10.1080/02687039808249540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hula, W. D., & McNeil, M. R. (2008). Models of attention and dual-task performance as explanatory constructs in aphasia. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29, 169–187. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1082882
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Indefrey, P. (2011). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: A critical update. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 255. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, 101–144. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F., Furth, K., & Hilliard, C. (2012). Incremental phonological encoding during unscripted sentence production. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. E., & Burke, D. M. (2000). Phonological priming effects on word retrieval and tip-of-the-tongue experiences in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1378–1391. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (2001). Priming effects from phonologically related distractors in picture-word interference. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 54, 371–382. doi:10.1080/713755981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerzel, D., & Bekkering, H. (2000). Motor activation from visible speech: Evidence from stimulus response compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 634–647. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer, M., & Pulvermüller, F. (2012). Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex, 48, 805–825. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koukkou, M., & Lehmann, D. (1987). An information-processing perspective of psychophysiological measurements. Journal of Psychophysiology, 1, 109–112.
   Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M. (2014). ERP topographic analyses from concept to articulation in word production studies. Language Sciences, 5, 493. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine, M. (2013). Anomia: Theoretical and clinical aspects. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Thompson, C. K. (2015). Phonological facilitation effects on naming latencies and viewing times during noun and verb naming in agrammatic and anomic aphasia. Aphasiology, 29, 1164–1188. doi:10.1080/02687038.2015.1035225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann, D., Strik, W. K., Henggeler, B., Koenig, T., & Koukkou, M. (1998). Brain electric microstates and momentary conscious mind states as building blocks of spontaneous thinking: I. Visual imagery and abstract thoughts. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 29, 1–11. doi:10.1016/S0167-8760(97)00098-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. (1993). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M.. (1999). Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 223–232. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01319-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, E. C., & Canter, G. J. (1983). Phonemic cuing: An investigation of subject variables. In R. Brookshire (Ed.), Clinical Aphasiology: Conferenceproceedings (pp. 96–103). Minneapolis, MN : BRK Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Li, E. C., & Williams, S. E. (1989). The efficacy of two types of cues in aphasic patients. Aphasiology, 3, 619–626. doi:10.1080/02687038908249028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1–36. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90021-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz, A., & Nickels, L. (2007). Orthographic cueing in anomic aphasia: How does it work?. Aphasiology, 21, 670–686. doi:10.1080/02687030701192182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupker, S. J. (1982). The role of phonetic and orthographic similarity in picture “word interference.. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne De Psychologie, 36, 349–367. doi:10.1037/h0080652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29–63. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(78)90018-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 186. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGurk, H., & MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746–748. doi:10.1038/264746a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. S., & Bock, K. (1992). The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Blocking or partial activation?. Memory & Cognition, 20, 715–726. doi:10.3758/BF03202721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. S., & Schriefers, H. (1991). Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 1146–1160. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.17.6.1146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, C. M. (2009). Electrical neuroimaging. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michel, C. M., & Murray, M. M. (2012). Towards the utilization of EEG as a brain imaging tool. NeuroImage, 61, 371–385. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortensen, L., Meyer, A. S., & Humphreys, G. W. (2008). Speech planning during multiple-object naming: Effects of ageing. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1217–1238. doi:10.1080/17470210701467912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, M. M., Brunet, D., & Michel, C. M. (2008). Topographic ERP analyses: A step-by-step tutorial review. Brain Topography, 20, 249–264. doi:10.1007/s10548-008-0054-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., & Ferrand, L. (2004). Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 516–524. doi:10.3758/BF03195598
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nickels, L. (2002). Therapy for naming disorders: Revisiting, revising, and reviewing. Aphasiology, 16, 935–979. doi:10.1080/02687030244000563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pease, D. M., & Goodglass, H. (1978). The effects of cuing on picture naming in aphasia. Cortex, 14, 178–189. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(78)80043-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertnard, O., Giard, M. H., & Echallier, J. F. (1987). Mapping of scalp potentials by surface spline interpolation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 66, 75–81. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(87)90141-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peterson, R. R., & Savoy, P. (1998). Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: Evidence for cascaded processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 539–557. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.3.539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podraza, B. L., & Darley, F. L. (1977). Effect of auditory prestimulation on naming in aphasia. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 20, 669. doi:10.1044/jshr.2004.669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postma, A. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production: A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77, 97–132. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00090-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postma, A., & Kolk, H. (1993). The covert repair hypothesis: Prearticulatory repair processes in normal and stuttered disfluencies. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 36, 472. doi:10.1044/jshr.3603.472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protopapas, A. (2007). CheckVocal: A program to facilitate checking the accuracy and response time of vocal responses from DMDX. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 859–862. doi:10.3758/BF03192979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Python, G., Bischof, S., Probst, M., & Laganaro, M. (2012). Élaboration et normalisation d’un test informatisé de compréhension syntaxique en français. Revue De Neuropsychologie, 4, 206–215. doi:10.3917/rne.043.0206
   Google Scholar
• Rascaol, A., & Beland, R., Ortho-édition, Isbergues. ( édition révisée en 1992). Édition originale par Cot F, Joannette Y, Lafond D, Lemay A, Nespoulous J.L, Puel M, Roch Lecours A. (1986), « Protocole Montréal–Toulouse d’examen linguistique de l’aphasie » (MT 86). Isbergues: ortho-edition
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1996). Interaction between semantic and orthographic factors in conceptually driven naming: Comment on Starreveld and La Heij (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 246–251. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.1.246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, G., & Ziegler, W. (2006). Audio–visual matching of speech and non-speech oral gestures in patients with aphasia and apraxia of speech. Neuropsychologia, 44, 546–555. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
   Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86–102. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(90)90011-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slevc, L. R., & Ferreira, V. S. (2006). Halting in single word production: A test of the perceptual loop theory of speech monitoring. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 515–540. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starreveld, P. A. (2000). On the interpretation of onsets of auditory context effects in word production. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 497–525. doi:10.1006/jmla.1999.2693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1995). Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 686–698. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starreveld, P. A., & La Heij, W. (1996). Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 896–918. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.22.4.896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stimley, M. A., & Noll, J. D. (1991). The effects of semantic and phonemic prestimulation cues on picture naming in aphasia. Brain and Language, 41, 496–509. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(91)90170-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuillard Colombo, F., & Et Assal, G. (1992). Adaptation française du test de dénomination de Boston. Versions abrégées. European Review Of Applied Psychology, 42, 67–73.
   Google Scholar
• Wunderlich, A., & Ziegler, W. (2011). Facilitation of picture-naming in anomic subjects: Sound vs mouth shape. Aphasiology, 25, 202–220. doi:10.1080/02687038.2010.489255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar