542
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentary

Discourse measurement in aphasia research: have we reached the tipping point? A core outcome set … or greater standardisation of discourse measures?

ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon

References

  • Dietz, A., & Boyle, M. (This issue). Discourse measurement in aphasia research: Have we reached the tipping point? Aphasiology.
  • Prinsen, C. A. C., Vohra, S., Rose, M. R., Boers, M., Tugwell, P., Clarke, M., … Terwee, C. B. (2016). How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – A practical guideline. Trials, 17, 1–10. doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1555-2
  • Pritchard, M., Hilari, K., Cocks, N., & Dipper, L. (In press). Reviewing the quality of discourse information measures in aphasia. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12318
  • Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Le Dorze, G., & Rose, T. (2017). Report from ROMA: An international consensus meeting to establish a core outcome set for aphasia treatment research. Manuscript in preparation.
  • Wallace S. J., Worrall L., Rose T., & Le Dorze G. (In press). Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health to identify outcome domains for a core outcome set for aphasia: A comparison of stakeholder perspectives. Disability & Rehabilitation.
  • Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Rose, T., & Le Dorze, G. (2014a). A good outcome for aphasia. Aphasiology, 28, 1400–1404. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.935119
  • Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Rose, T., & Le Dorze, G. (2014b). Measuring outcomes in aphasia research: A review of current practice and an agenda for standardisation. Aphasiology, 28, 1364–1384. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.930262
  • Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Rose, T., & Le Dorze, G. (2016a). Core outcomes in aphasia treatment research: An e-Delphi consensus study of international aphasia researchers. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 25, S729–S742. doi:10.1044/2016_AJSLP-15-0150
  • Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Rose, T., & Le Dorze, G. (2016b). Which treatment outcomes are most important to aphasia clinicians and managers? An international e-Delphi consensus study. Aphasiology, 1–31. doi:10.1080/02687038.2016.1186265
  • Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Rose, T., Le Dorze, G., & Brandenburg, C. (2017). A scoping review of standardised aphasia outcome instruments. Manuscript in preparation.
  • Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Rose, T., Le Dorze, G., Cruice, M., Isaksen, J., … Gauvreau, C. A. (2016). Which outcomes are most important to people with aphasia and their families? An international nominal group technique study framed within the ICF. Disability and Rehabilitation., 1–16. doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1194899
  • Williamson, P. R., Altman, D. G., Blazeby, J. M., Clarke, M., Devane, D., & Gargon, E. (2012). Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: Issues to consider. Trials, 13. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-13-132

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.