Topic selection sequences in aphasia conversation groups

References

• Archer, B. (2016). Facilitated conversation groups for people with aphasia: A cognitive ethnographic study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Louisiana, Lafayette: Lafayette, Louisiana.
   Google Scholar
• Aten, J., Caligiuri, M., & Holland, A. (1982). The efficacy of functional communication therapy for chronic aphasic patients. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 93–96. doi:10.1044/jshd.4701.93
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atkinson, D., Churchill, E., Nishino, T., & Okada, H. (2007). Alignment and interaction in a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 169–188. doi:10.1111/modl.2007.91.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S., & Ferguson, A. (2012). Speakership asymmetry during topic talk involving a person with aphasia. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 3, 27. doi:10.1558/jircd.v3i1.27
   Google Scholar
• Basch, C. E. (1987). Focus group interview: An underutilized research technique for improving theory and practice in health education. Health Education & Behavior, 14, 411–448. doi:10.1177/109019818701400404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeke, S., Beckley, F., Johnson, F., Heilemann, C., Edwards, S., Maxim, J., & Best, W. (2015). Conversation focused aphasia therapy: Investigating the adoption of strategies by people with agrammatism. Aphasiology, 29, 355–377. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.881459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeke, S., Wilkinson, R., & Maxim, J. (2007). Grammar without sentence structure: A conversation analytic investigation of agrammatism. Aphasiology, 21, 256–282. doi:10.1080/02687030600911344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein-Ellis, E., & Elman, R. (2007). Aphasia group communication treatment: The aphasia center of California approach. In E. Bernstein-Ellis & R. Elman (Eds.), Group treatment of neurogenic communication disorders: The expert clinician’s approach (pp. 71–94). San Diego: Plural Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman, D. R., Fager, S., Ball, L., & Dietz, A. (2007). AAC for adults with acquired neurological conditions: A review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 230–242. doi:10.1080/07434610701553668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollinger, R., Musson, N., & Holland, A. (1993). A study of group communication intervention with chronically aphasic persons. Aphasiology, 7, 301–313. doi:10.1080/02687039308249512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button, G., & Casey, N. (1985). Topic nomination and topic pursuit. Human Studies, 8, 3–55. doi:10.1007/BF00143022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button, G., & Casey, N. (1988). Topic initiation: Business-at-hand. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 22, 61–91. doi:10.1080/08351818809389298
   Google Scholar
• Carmien, S., & Koene, R. (2009). Distributed intelligence and scaffolding in support of cognitive health. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), Universal access in human-computer interaction: Addressing diversity (pp. 334–343). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (1998). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Boston: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Croteau, C., Vychytil, A., Larfeuil, C., & Le Dorze, G. (2004). “Speaking for” behaviours in spouses of people with aphasia: A descriptive study of six couples in an interview situation. Aphasiology, 18, 291–312. doi:10.1080/02687030344000616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damico, J., Tetnowski, J., Lynch, K., Hartwell, J., Weill, C., Heels, J., & Simmons-Mackie, N. (2015). Facilitating authentic conversation: An intervention employing principles of constructivism and conversation analysis. Aphasiology, 29, 400–421. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.945388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damico, J. S, Oelschlaeger, M, & Simmons-Mackie, N. (1999). Qualitative methods in aphasia research: conversation analysis. Aphasiology, 13(9–11), 667–679. doi:10.1080/026870399401777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damico, J. S., Oelschlaeger, M., & Simmons-Mackie, N. (1999b). Qualitative methods in aphasia research: Conversation analysis. Aphasiology, 13, 667–679. doi:10.1080/026870399401777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff, M. C., Hengst, J. A., Gupta, R., Tranel, D., & Cohen, N. J. (2011). Distributed impact of cognitive-communication impairment: Disruptions in the use of definite references when speaking to individuals with amnesia. Aphasiology, 25, 675–687. doi:10.1080/02687038.2010.536841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggins, S., & Slade, D. (2005). Analysing casual conversation. London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Elman, R. (2010). The increasing popularity of aphasia groups: Some reasons why. SIG 2 Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders, 20, 120–124. doi:10.1044/nnsld20.4.120
   Google Scholar
• Elman, R., & Bernstein-Ellis, E. (1999). The efficacy of group communication treatment in adults with chronic aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 411–419. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4202.411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folch-Lyon, E., & Trost, J. F. (1981). Conducting focus group sessions. Studies in Family Planning, 12, 443–449. doi:10.2307/1965656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, L. E., Sohlberg, M. M., & Fried-Oken, M. (2001). Effects of conversational topic choice on outcomes of augmentative communication intervention for adults with aphasia. Aphasiology, 15, 171–200. doi:10.1080/02687040042000133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. (1996). Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics, 6, 167–190. doi:10.1075/prag.6.2.03fra
   Google Scholar
• Giere, R., & Moffatt, B. (2003). Distributed cognition: Where the cognitive and the social merge. Social Studies of Science, 33, 301–310. doi:10.1177/03063127030332017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1980). Restarts, pauses, and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at Turn‐Beginning. Sociological Inquiry, 50, 272–302. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00023.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1995). Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 233–260. doi:10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2004). A competent speaker who can’t speak: The social life of aphasia. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14, 151–170. doi:10.1525/jlin.2004.14.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society, 18, 53–73. doi:10.1177/0957926507069457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2003a). Conversational frameworks for the accomplishment of meaning in aphasia. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 90–116). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., Goodwin, M., & Olsher, D. (2002). Producing sense with nonsense syllables. In C. Ford, A. Fox, & S. Thompson (Eds.), The language of turn and sequence (pp. 56–80). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 283–307. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2003b). Pointing as situated practice. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture and cognition meet (pp. 217–241). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., Cekaite, A., & Goodwin, C. (2012). Emotion as stance. In L. Sorjonen & A. Perakyla (Eds.), Emotion in interaction (pp. pp.16-41). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heeschen, C., & Schegloff, E. (2003). Aphasic agrammatism as an interactional artefact and achievement. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 231–283). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heeschen, C., & Schegloff, E. A. (1999). Agrammatism, adaptation theory, conversation analysis: On the role of so-called telegraphic style in talk-in-interaction. Aphasiology, 13, 365–405. doi:10.1080/026870399402145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2008). Conversation analysis as social theory. In B. Turner (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 300–320). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. (2001). Goffman, Garfinkel and conversation analysis. In E. Wetherall, S. Taylor, & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 47–56). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hoen, B., Thelander, M., & Worsley, J. (1997). Improvement in psychological well-being of people with aphasia and their families: Evaluation of a community-based programme. Aphasiology, 11, 681–691. doi:10.1080/02687039708249415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, S. (2007). Topic generation in aphasia language therapy sessions: Issues of identity. Aphasiology, 21, 283–298. doi:10.1080/02687030600911377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Boston: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1984). On stepwise transitions from talk about a trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matters. In J. Atkinson (Ed.), Structures of social interaction: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 191–222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, A. (1998). Supported conversation for adults with aphasia: Methods and resources for training conversation partners. Aphasiology, 12, 816–830. doi:10.1080/02687039808249575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, A. (2010) Supported conversation for aphasia: Why and how? Paper presented at the American Speech-Language and Hearing Association Convention, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, A., & Gailey, G. (1993). Functional is not enough: Training conversation partners for aphasic adults. In M. Forbes & A. Holland (Eds.), Aphasia treatment: World perspectives (pp. 199–225). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Klippi, A. (2015). Pointing as an embodied practice in aphasic interaction. Aphasiology, 29, 337–354. doi:10.1080/02687038.2013.878451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laakso, M. (2003). Collaborative construction of repair in aphasic conversation. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 163–188). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laakso, M., & Klippi, A. (1999). A closer look at the ‘hint and guess’ sequences in aphasic conversation. Aphasiology, 13, 345–363. doi:10.1080/026870399402136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasker, J., Hux, K., Garrett, K., Moncrief, E., & Eischeid, T. (1997). Variations on the written choice communication strategy for individuals with severe aphasia. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 13, 108–116. doi:10.1080/07434619712331277908
   Google Scholar
• Lock, S., Wilkinson, R., Bryan, K., Maxim, J., Edmundson, A., Bruce, C., & Moir, D. (2001). Supporting partners of people with aphasia in relationships and conversation (SPPARC). International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 36(S1), 25–30. doi:10.3109/13682820109177853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackay, R. (2003). ‘Tell them who i was’[1]: The social construction of aphasia. Disability & Society, 18, 811–826. doi:10.1080/0968759032000119532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, C. (1991). An aphasia group intensive efficacy study. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 26, 275–291. doi:10.3109/13682829109012015
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manzo, J., Blonder, L., & Bums, A. (1995). The social-interactional organisation of narrative and narrating among stroke patients and their spouses. Sociology of Health & Illness, 17, 307–327. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.ep10933323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, N., & Mok, Z. (2012). Applying systemic functional linguistics to conversations with dementia: The linguistic construction of relationships between participants. Seminars in Speech and Language, 33, 5. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1301159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, G. (1998). Displaying opinions: Topics and disagreement in focus groups. Language in Society, 27, 85–111. doi:10.1017/S0047404500019734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardi, B. (1996). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 35–52). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. (1993). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. San Diego: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, L., Crisp, J., & Walshaw, D. (1999). Exploring conversation analysis as an assessment tool for aphasia: The issue of reliability. Aphasiology, 13, 259–281. doi:10.1080/026870399402091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purves, B. (2009). The complexities of speaking for another. Aphasiology, 23, 914–925. doi:10.1080/02687030802514946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, A., Winslow, I., Marchant, P., & Brumfitt, S. (2006). Evaluation of communication, life participation and psychological well‐being in chronic aphasia: The influence of group intervention. Aphasiology, 20, 427–448. doi:10.1080/02687030500532786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotherham, A., Howe, T., & Tillard, G. (2015). “We just thought that this was Christmas”: Perceived benefits of participating in aphasia, stroke, and other groups. Aphasiology, 29, 965–982. doi:10.1080/02687038.2015.1016887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735. doi:10.1353/lan.1974.0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1295–1345. doi:10.1086/229903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. (1990). On the organization of sequences as a source of “coherence” in talk-in-interaction. In B. Dorval (Ed.), Conversational organization and its development (pp. 51–77). Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327. doi:10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. (2011). Conversation analysis: An introduction. London: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, N., & Damico, J. (1997). Reformulating the definition of compensatory strategies in aphasia. Aphasiology, 11, 761–781. doi:10.1080/02687039708250455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, N., & Damico, J. (2008). Exposed and embedded corrections in aphasia therapy: Issues of voice and identity. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 43, 5–17. doi:10.1080/13682820701697889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, N., & Damico, J. S. (2009). Engagement in group therapy for aphasia. Seminars in Speech and Language, 30, 18–26. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1104531
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, N., & Elman, R. J. (2011). Negotiation of identity in group therapy for aphasia: The Aphasia Café. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 46, 312–323. doi:10.3109/13682822.2010.507616
   Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, N., Elman, R., Holland, A., & Damico, J. (2007). Management of discourse in group therapy for aphasia. Topics in Language Disorders, 27, 5–23. doi:10.1097/00011363-200701000-00003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Gaag, A., Smith, L., Davis, S., Moss, B., Cornelius, V., Laing, S., & Mowles, C. (2005). Therapy and support services for people with long-term stroke and aphasia and their relatives: A six-month follow-up study. Clinical Rehabilitation, 19, 372–380. doi:10.1191/0269215505cr785oa
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertz, R., Collins, M., Weiss, D., Kurtzke, J., Friden, T., Brookshire, R., … Porch, B. E. (1981). Veterans administration cooperative study on aphasia: A comparison of individual and group treatment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 24, 580–594. doi:10.1044/jshr.2404.580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (1999). Sequentiality as a problem and resource for intersubjectivity in aphasic conversation: Analysis and implications for therapy. Aphasiology, 13, 327–343. doi:10.1080/026870399402127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., Beeke, S., & Maxim, J. (2010). Formulating actions and events with limited linguistic resources: Enactment and iconicity in agrammatic aphasic talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43, 57–84. doi:10.1080/08351810903471506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., Bryan, K., Lock, S., Bayley, K., Maxim, J., Bruce, C., … Moir, D. (1998). Therapy using conversation analysis: Helping couples adapt to aphasia in conversation. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 33, 144–149. doi:10.3109/13682829809179412
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., Bryan, K., Lock, S., & Sage, K. (2010). Implementing and evaluating aphasia therapy targeted at couples’ conversations: A single case study. Aphasiology, 24, 869–886. doi:10.1080/02687030903501958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar