Modeling confrontation naming and discourse informativeness using structural equation modeling

References

• Andreetta, S., Cantagallo, A., & Marini, A. (2012). Narrative discourse in anomic aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 50, 1787–1793. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. (2000). Aphasic discourse analysis: The story so far. Aphasiology, 14, 875–892. doi:10.1080/02687030050127685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt, R. S., Haendiges, A. N., Mitchum, C. C., & Sandson, J. (1997). Verb retrieval in aphasia. 2. Relationship to sentence processing. Brain and Language, 56, 107–137. doi:10.1006/brln.1997.1728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equation modeling with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. (2014). Test–Retest stability of word retrieval in aphasic discourse. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 57, 966–978. doi:10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. (2015). Stability of word-retrieval errors with the aphasiabank stimuli. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24, S953–S960. doi:10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, L., Ferguson, A., & Spencer, E. (2016). Linguistic analysis of discourse in aphasia: A review of the literature. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 30, 489–518. doi:10.3109/02699206.2016.1145740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, R. M., Wambaugh, J. L., & Mauszycki, S. C. (2010). Individual variability on discourse measures over repeated sampling times in persons with aphasia. Aphasiology, 24, 671–684. doi:10.1080/02687030903443813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capilouto, G. J., Wright, H. H., & Wagovich, S. A. (2006). Reliability of main event measurement in the discourse of individuals with aphasia. Aphasiology, 20, 205–216. doi:10.1080/02687030500473122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlomagno, S., Giannotti, S., Vorano, L., & Marini, A. (2011). Discourse information content in non-aphasic adults with brain injury: A pilot study. Brain Injury, 25, 1010–1018. doi:10.3109/02699052.2011.605097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 462–494. doi:10.1177/0049124108314720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho-Reyes, S., & Thompson, C. K. (2012). Verb and sentence production and comprehension in aphasia: Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences (NAVS). Aphasiology, 26, 1250–1277. doi:10.1080/02687038.2012.693584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruice, M., Worrall, L., Hickson, L., & Murison, R. (2003). Finding a focus for quality of life with aphasia: Social and emotional health, and psychological well-being. Aphasiology, 17, 333–353. doi:10.1080/02687030244000707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Chang, F., & Griffin, Z. M. (1999). Connectionist models of language production: Lexical access and grammatical encoding. Cognitive Science, 23, 517–542. doi:10.1016/S0364-0213(99)00014-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, P. J., Tsironas, D., Goda, A. J., & Kalinyak, M. (1996). The relationship between objective measures and listeners’ judgments of the communicative informativeness of the connected discourse of adults with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5, 53. doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0503.53
   Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fergadiotis, G. (2011). Modeling Lexical Diversity Across Language Sampling and Estimation Techniques ( Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from ASU Electronic Dissertations and Theses.
   Google Scholar
• Fergadiotis, G., Kellough, S., & Hula, W. D. (2015). Item response theory modeling of the Philadelphia Naming Test. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58, 865–877. doi:10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fergadiotis, G., & Wright, H. H. (2015). Modelling confrontation naming and discourse performance in aphasia. Aphasiology, 30, 364–380. doi:10.1080/02687038.2015.1067288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fergadiotis, G., Wright, H. H., & West, T. M. (2013). Measuring lexical diversity in narrative discourse of people with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22, S397–S408. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0083)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., & Wingfield, A. (1997). Anomia: Neuroanatomical and cognitive correlates. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grimes, N. (2005). Walt Disney’s Cinderella. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (2001). Error monitoring in speech production: A computational test of the perceptual loop theory. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 113–157. doi:10.1006/cogp.2000.0744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert, R., Hickin, J., Howard, D., Osborne, F., & Best, W. (2008). Do picture‐naming tests provide a valid assessment of lexical retrieval in conversation in aphasia? Aphasiology, 22, 184–203. doi:10.1080/02687030701262613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickin, J., Best, W., Herbert, R., Howard, D., & Osborne, F. (2001). Treatment of word retrieval in aphasia: Generalisation to conversational speech. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 36, 13–18. doi:10.3109/13682820109177851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hula, W. D., Kellough, S., & Fergadiotis, G. (2015). Development and simulation testing of a computerized adaptive version of the Philadelphia naming test. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 1–13. doi:10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingles, J. L., Mate-Kole, C. C., & Connolly, J. F. (1996). Evidence for multiple routes of speech production in a case of fluent aphasia. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 32, 199–219. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(96)80047-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E., Goodlgass, H., & Weintraub, S. (2001). Boston naming test (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (2007). Western Aphasia battery – R. New York: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Kintz, S., Fergadiotis, G., & Wright, H. H. (2016). Aging effects on discourse production. In H. H., Wright (Ed.), Cognition, language, and aging (pp. 81–106). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linnik, A., Bastiaanse, R., & Höhle, B. (2016). Discourse production in aphasia: A current review of theoretical and methodological challenges. Aphasiology, 30, 765–800. doi:10.1080/02687038.2015.1113489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B., Fromm, D., Forbes, M., & Holland, A. (2011). Aphasiabank: Methods for studying discourse. Aphasiology, 25, 1286–1307. doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.589893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, L., & Warrington, E. K. (1996). Two routes to naming: A case study. Neuropsychologia, 34, 809–817. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(95)00166-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, A., Andreetta, S., Del Tin, S., & Carlomagno, S. (2011). A multi-level approach to the analysis of narrative language in aphasia. Aphasiology, 25, 1372–1392. doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.584690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuoka, K., Kotani, I., & Yamasato, M. (2012). Correct information unit analysis for determining the characteristics of narrative discourse in individuals with chronic traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 26, 1723–1730. doi:10.3109/02699052.2012.698789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, J., & Murray, L. (2003). Functional measures of naming in aphasia: Word retrieval in confrontation naming versus connected speech. Aphasiology, 17, 481–497. doi:10.1080/02687030344000148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menn, L., Reilly, K. F., Hayashi, M., Kamio, A., Fujita, I., & Sasanuma, S. (1998). The interaction of preserved pragmatics and impaired syntax in Japanese and English aphasic speech. Brain and Language, 61, 183–225. doi:10.1006/brln.1997.1838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myung, I. J. (2003). Tutorial on maximum likelihood estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47, 90–100. doi:10.1016/S0022-2496(02)00028-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas, L. E., & Brookshire, R. H. (1993). A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 338–350. doi:10.1044/jshr.3602.338
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nozari, N., & Faroqi-Shah, Y. (2017). Investigating the origin of nonfluency in aphasia: A path modeling approach to neuropsychology. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 95, 119–135. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oelschlaeger, M. L., & Thorne, J. C. (1999). Application of the correct information unit analysis to the naturally occurring conversation of a person with aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 636–648. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4203.636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashek, G. V., & Tompkins, C. A. (2002). Context and word class influences on lexical retrieval in aphasia. Aphasiology, 16, 261–286. doi:10.1080/02687040143000573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin, P. B., Heesacker, M., Stidham, B., Rittman, M. R., & Gonzalez-Rothi, L. J. (2008). Structural equation modeling of the relationship between caregiver psychosocial variables and functioning of individuals with stroke. Rehabilitation Psychology, 53, 54–62. doi:10.1037/0090-5550.53.1.54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prins, R., & Bastiaanse, R. (2004). Analysing the spontaneous speech of aphasic speakers. Aphasiology, 18, 1075–1091. doi: 10.1080/02687030444000534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, M., Hilari, K., Cocks, N., & Dipper, L. (2017). Reviewing the quality of discourse information measures in aphasia. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 52, 689–732. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, K. B., & Wertz, R. T. (1999). Comparison of impairment and disability measures for assessing severity of, and improvement in, aphasia. Aphasiology, 13, 113–124. doi:10.1080/026870399402235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, E. M., Berndt, R. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (1989). The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: Procedure and data. Brain and Language, 37, 440–479. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(89)90030-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. Van Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variable analysis in developmental research (pp. 285–305). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. F., Dell, G. S., Martin, N., Gahl, S., & Sobel, P. (2006). A case-series test of the interactive two-step model of lexical access: Evidence from picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 228–264. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. F., & Hodgson, C. (2002). A new multiword naming deficit: Evidence and interpretation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 263–288. doi:10.1080/02643290143000187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherratt, S. (2007). Multi‐level discourse analysis: A feasible approach. Aphasiology, 21, 375–393. doi:10.1080/02687030600911435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shewan, C. M. (1988). The Shewan Spontaneous Language Analysis (SSLA) system for aphasic adults: Description, reliability, and validity. Journal of Communication Disorders, 21, 103–138. doi:10.1016/0021-9924(88)90001-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spearman, C. (1904). The proof and measurement of association between two things. The American Journal of Psychology, 15, 72–101. doi:10.2307/1412159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spreen, O., & Risser, A. (2003). Assessment of aphasia. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 893–898. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Presented at the Annual spring meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson/Allyn & Bacon: Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Tatsumi, H., Nakaaki, S., Satoh, M., Yamamoto, M., Chino, N., & Hadano, K. (2016). Relationships among communication self-efficacy, communication burden, and the mental health of the families of persons with Aphasia. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 25, 197–205. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.09.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G. M., & Schwartz, M. F. (2012). Short-form Philadelphia naming test: Rationale and empirical evaluation. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, S140–S153. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0089)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Rose, T., Dorze, G. L., Cruice, M., Isaksen, J., … Gauvreau, C. A. (2017). Which outcomes are most important to people with aphasia and their families? an international nominal group technique study framed within the ICF. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39, 1364–1379. doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1194899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S. E., & Canter, G. J. (1982). The influence of situational context on naming performance in aphasic syndromes. Brain and Language, 17, 92–106. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(82)90007-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilshire, C. E. W., & McCarthy, R. A. (2002). Evidence for a context-sensitive word retrieval disorder in a case of nonfluent aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 165–186. doi:10.1080/02643290143000169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorkston, K. M., & Beukelman, D. R. (1980). An analysis of connected speech samples of aphasic and normal speakers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 45, 27. doi:10.1044/jshd.4501.27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar