“Accountability” in interaction-focused intervention for aphasia: a conversation-analytic study of therapeutic effects

References

• Aaltonen, T., & Laakso, M. (2010). Halting aphasic interaction: Creation of intersubjectivity and spousal relationship in situ. Communication & Medicine, 7, 95–106. doi:10.1558/cam.v7i2.95
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. (2017, early online). The challenges of consensus and validity in establishing core outcome set. Aphasiology. DOI:10.1080/02687038.2017.1398804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, E. (2012). Optimal intervention intensity. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 401–409. DOI:10.3109/17549507.2012.700323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S. (2014). Managing intersubjectivity in aphasia. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47, 130–150. DOI:10.1080/08351813.2014.900216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S., & Bloch, S. ( accepted, 5 July 2018). Why is measuring communication difficult? A critical review of current speech pathology concepts and measures. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 1–18. DOI:10.1080/02699206.2018.1498541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S., & Ferguson, A. (2015). Conversation partner responses to problematic talk produced by people with aphasia: Some alternatives to initiating, completing, or pursuing repair. Aphasiology, 29, 315–336. DOI:10.1080/02687038.2013.874547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S., & Nickels, L. (2017, early online). Interaction-focussed therapy for aphasia: Effects on communication and quality of life. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 1–13. DOI:10.1080/17549507.2017.1329851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, A., & Kulke, F. (2004). Language exercises for dinner: Aspects of aphasia management in family settings. Aphasiology, 18, 1135–1160. DOI:10.1080/02687030444000570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckley, F., Best, W., Johnson, F., Edwards, S., Maxim, J., & Beeke, S. (2013). Conversation therapy for agrammatism: Exploring the therapeutic process of engagement and learning by a person with aphasia. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 48, 220–239. DOI:10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00204.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeke, S., Beckley, F., Best, W., Johnson, F., Edwards, S., & Maxim, J. (2013). Extended turn construction and test question sequences in the conversations of three speakers with agrammatic aphasia. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 27, 784–804. DOI:10.3109/02699206.2013.808267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeke, S., Beckley, F., Johnson, F., Heilemann, C., Edwards, S., Maxim, J., & Best, W. (2015). Conversation focused aphasia therapy: Investigating the adoption of strategies by people with agrammatism. Aphasiology, 29, 355–377. DOI:10.1080/02687038.2014.881459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, W., Maxim, J., Heilemann, C., Beckley, F., Johnson, F., Edwards, S. I., … Beeke, S., (2016). Conversation therapy with people with aphasia and conversation partners using video feedback: A group and case series investigation of changes in interaction. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10(NOV2016). 10. DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00562
   Google Scholar
• Bolden, G. B. (2008). “So what’s up?”: Using the discourse marker so to launch conversational business. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 41, 302–337. DOI:10.1080/08351810802237909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherney, L. R. (2012). Aphasia treatment: Intensity, dose parameters, and script training. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14, 424–431. DOI:10.3109/17549507.2012.686629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2004). Prosody and sequence organization in English conversation. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & C. E. Ford (Eds.), Sound patterns in interaction (pp. 335–376). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Cruice, M., Blom Johansson, M., Isaksen, J., & Horton, S. (2018, early online). Reporting interventions in communication partner training: A critical review and narrative synthesis of the literature. Aphasiology, 32, 1135–1166. DOI:10.1080/02687038.2018.1482406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curl, T. S., Local, J., & Walker, G. (2006). Repetition and the prosody-pragmatics interface. Journal of Pragmatics, 38, 1721–1751. DOI:10.1016/j.pragma.2006.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dignam, J., Copland, D., McKinnon, E., Burfein, P., O’Brien, K., Farrell, A., & Rodriguez, A. D. (2015). Intensive versus distributed aphasia therapy: A nonrandomized, parallel-group, dosage-controlled study. Stroke, 46, 2206–2211. DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M., Blythe, J., & Dirksmeyer, T. (2014). Formats for other-initiation of repair across languages: An exercise in pragmatic typology. Studies in Language, 38, 5–43. DOI:10.1075/sl
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. (2013). Relationship thinking: Agency, enchrony, and human sociality. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Enfield, N., & Sidnell, J. (2017). The concept of action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, K., Bergström, S., Carlsson, E., Hartelius, L., Johansson, C., Schwarz, A., & Saldert, C. (2014). Aspects of rating communicative interaction: Effects on reliability and agreement. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 5, 245–267. DOI:10.1558/jircd.v5i2.245
   Google Scholar
• Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A. (2010). Responses to wh-questions in English conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 43, 133–156. DOI:10.1080/08351811003751680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, H. (2002). Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Hengst, J. A., Duff, M. C., & Dettmer, A. (2010). Rethinking repetition in therapy: Repeated engagement as the social ground of learning. Aphasiology, 24, 887–901. DOI:10.1080/02687030903478330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepburn, A., & Bolden, G. B. (2013). The conversation analytic approach to transcription. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 57–76). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hilari, K., Cruice, M., Sorin-Peters, R., & Worrall, L. (2015). Quality of life in aphasia: State of the art. Folia Phoniatrica Et Logopaedica, 67, 114–118. DOI:10.1159/000440997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, S. (2008). Learning-in-interaction: Resourceful work by people with aphasia and therapists in the course of language impairment therapy. Aphasiology, 22, 985–1014. DOI:10.1080/02687030802066582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, S., & Pound, C. (2018). Communication partner training: Re-imagining community and learning. Aphasiology, 32, 1250–1265. DOI:10.1080/02687038.2018.1482407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. (1987). On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social organization (pp. 86–100). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, F. M., Best, W., Beckley, F. C., Maxim, J., & Beeke, S. (2017). Identifying mechanisms of change in a conversation therapy for aphasia using behaviour change theory and qualitative methods. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 52, 374–387. DOI:10.1111/1460-6984.12279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justice, L. M. (2018). Conceptualising “dose” in paediatric language interventions: Current findings and future directions. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20, 318–323. DOI:10.1080/17549507.2018.1454985
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (2007). The western aphasia battery - revised. San Antonio, TX: PsychCorp.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2009). The learning way: Meta-cognitive aspects of experiential learning. Stimulation and Gaming, 40, 297–327. DOI:10.1177/1046878108325713
   Google Scholar
• Lausberg, H., & Sloetjes, H. (2009). Coding gestural behavior with the NEUROGES-ELAN system. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 41, 841–849. DOI:10.3758/BRM.41.3.591
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. (2012). Interrogative intimations: On a possible social economics of interrogatives. In J. P. De Ruiter (Ed.), Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives (pp. 11–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, J., & Wilkinson, R. (1999). Repair sequences in aphasic talk: A comparison of aphasic-speech and language therapist and aphasic-spouse conversations. Aphasiology, 13, 305–325. DOI:10.1080/026870399402118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, G. (2003). Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68, 939–967. DOI:10.2307/1519752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, G. (2004). Prompting action: The stand-alone “so” in ordinary conversation. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 37, 185–218. DOI:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3702_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. D. (2014). What “what?” tells us about how conversationalists manage intersubjectivity. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47, 109–129. DOI:10.1080/08351813.2014.900214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldert, C., Jensen, L. R., Blom Johansson, M., & Simmons-Mackie, N. (2018). Complexity in measuring outcomes after communication partner training: Alignment between goals of intervention and methods of evaluation. Aphasiology, 32, 1167–1193. DOI:10.1080/02687038.2018.1470317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldert, C., Johansson, C., & Wilkinson, R. (2015). An interaction-focused intervention approach to training everyday communication partners: A single case study. Aphasiology, 29, 378–399. DOI:10.1080/02687038.2014.948803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Analyzing single episodes of interaction: An exercise in conversation analysis. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50, 101–114. DOI:10.2307/2786745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996a). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. The American Journal of Sociology, 102, 161–216. DOI:10.1086/230911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996b). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff, & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and grammar (pp. 52–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2000). Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29, 1–63. DOI:10.1017/S0047404500001019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2004). On dispensibility. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 37, 95–149. DOI:10.1207/s15327973rlsi3702_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2006). Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language and the arena in which culture is enacted. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 70–96). London, UK: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, N., Raymer, A., & Cherney, L. R. (2016). Communication partner training in aphasia: An updated systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 97, 2202–2221.e2208. DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevanovic, M., & Peräkylä, A. (2014). Three orders in the organization of human action: On the interface between knowledge, power, and emotion in interaction and social relations. Language in Society, 43, 185–207. DOI:10.1017/S0047404514000037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Robinson, J. D. (2006). A preference for progressivity in interaction. Language in Society, 35, 367–392. DOI:10.1017/S0047404506060179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, T., & Benjamin, T. (2017). Phonetic and sequential differences of other-repetitions in repair initiation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50, 330–347. DOI:10.1080/08351813.2017.1340717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Rose, T., & Le Dorze, G. (2017). Which treatment outcomes are most important to aphasia clinicians and managers? An international e-Delphi consensus study. Aphasiology, 31, 643–673. DOI:10.1080/02687038.2016.1186265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (2007). Managing linguistic incompetence as a delicate issue in aphasic talk-in-interaction: On the use of laughter in prolonged repair sequences. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 542–569. DOI:10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (2010). Interaction-focused intervention: A conversation analytic approach to aphasia therapy. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 1, 45–68. DOI:10.1558/jircd.v1i1.45
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R. (2015). Conversation and aphasia: Advances in analysis and intervention. Aphasiology, 29, 257–268. DOI:10.1080/02687038.2014.974138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., Lock, S., Bryan, K., & Sage, K. (2011). Interaction-focused intervention for acquired language disorders: Facilitating mutual adaptation in couples where one partner has aphasia. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 74–87. DOI:10.3109/17549507.2011.551140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, R., & Wielaert, S. (2012). Rehabilitation targeted at everyday communication: Can we change the talk of people with aphasia and their significant others within conversation? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93, S70–S76. DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.07.206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar