Pragmatics and figurative language in individuals with traumatic brain injury: fine-grained assessment and relevance-theoretic considerations

References

• Adamczyk, P., Daren, A., Sułecka, A., Błądziński, P., Cichocki, Ł., Kalisz, A., … Cechnicki, A. (2016). Do better communication skills promote sheltered employment in schizophrenia? Schizophrenia Research, 176, 331–339. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2016.08.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angeleri, R., Bosco, F. M., Zettin, M., Sacco, K., Colle, L., & Bara, B. G. (2008). Communicative impairment in traumatic brain injury: A complete pragmatic assessment. Brain and Language, 107, 229–245. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2008.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcara, G., & Bambini, V. (2016). A test for the assessment of pragmatic abilities and cognitive substrates (APACS): Normative data and psychometric properties. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 70. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics.  Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bambini, V., Arcara, G., Bechi, M., Buonocore, M., Cavallaro, R., & Bosia, M. (2016). The communicative impairment as a core feature of schizophrenia: Frequency of pragmatic deficit, cognitive substrates, and relation with quality of life. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 71, 106–120. doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bambini, V., Arcara, G., Martinelli, I., Bernini, S., Alvisi, E., Moro, A., … Ceroni, M. (2016). Communication and pragmatic breakdowns in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. Brain and Language, 153–154, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2015.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bambini, V., Bertini, C., Schaeken, W., Stella, A., & Di Russo, F. (2016). Disentangling metaphor from context: An ERP study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 559. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bambini, V., Ghio, M., Moro, A., & Schumacher, P. B. (2013). Differentiating among pragmatic uses of words through timed sensicality judgments. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 938. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D. M., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., & Baayen, H. (2015). Parsimonious mixed models. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1506.04967, 1–27. http://doi.org/arXiv:1506.04967
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D. M., Machler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57, 289–300. doi:10.1111/rssb.1995.57.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Body, R., Perkins, M., & McDonald, S. (1999). Pragmatics, cognition, and communication in traumatic brain injury. In S. McDonald, L. Togher, & C. Code (Eds.), Communication disorders following traumatic brain injury (pp. 81-112). UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohrn, I. C., Altmann, U., & Jacobs, A. M. (2012). Looking at the brains behind figurative language–a quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on metaphor, idiom, and irony processing. Neuropsychologia, 50, 2669–2683. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosco, F. M., Parola, A., Sacco, K., Zettin, M., & Angeleri, R. (2017). Communicative-pragmatic disorders in traumatic brain injury: The role of theory of mind and executive functions. Brain and Language, 168, 73–83. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2017.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosia, M., Arcara, G., Buonocore, M., Bechi, M., Moro, A., Cavallaro, R., & Bambini, V. (2016). Communication in schizophrenia, between pragmatics, cognition and social cognition. In Di Sciullo, A. M. (ed.), Biolinguistic investigations on the language faculty (pp. 213–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:10.1075/la.235.10bos
   Google Scholar
• Braun, C. M. J., Lussier, F., Baribeau, J. M. C., & Ethier, M. (1989). Does severe traumatic closed head injury impair sense of humour? Brain Injury, 3, 345–354. doi:10.3109/02699058909004559
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brownell, H., Lundgren, K., Cayer-Meade, C., Milione, J., Katz, D. I., & Kearns, K. (2013). Treatment of metaphor interpretation deficits subsequent to traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 28, 446–452. doi:10.1097/HTR.0b013e31825b5e85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brüne, M., & Bodenstein, L. (2005). Proverb comprehension reconsidered - “Theory of mind” and the pragmatic use of language in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 75, 233–239. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2004.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappelli, G., Noccetti, S., Arcara, G., & Bambini, V. (2018). Pragmatic competence and its relationship with the linguistic and cognitive profile of young adults with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 24, 294–306. doi:10.1002/dys.v24.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carotenuto, A., Arcara, G., Orefice, G., Cerillo, I., Giannino, V., Rasulo, M., … Bambini, V. (2018). Communication in multiple sclerosis: Pragmatic deficit and its relation with cognition and social cognition. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 33, 194–205. doi:10.1093/arclin/acx061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carotenuto, A., Cocozza, S., Quarantelli, M., Arcara, G., Lanzillo, R., Brescia Morra, V., … Iodice, R. (2018). Pragmatic abilities in multiple sclerosis: The contribution of the temporo-parietal junction. Brain and Language, 185, 47–53. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2018.08.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carston, R. (2010). XIII - Metaphor: Ad hoc concepts, literal meaning and mental images. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 110, 295–321. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9264.2010.00288.x
   Google Scholar
• Carston, R. (2012). Metaphor and the literal/nonliteral distinction. In K.Allan & K.Jaczszolt (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of pragmatics (pp. 469–492). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139022453.025
   Google Scholar
• Carston, R., & Wearing, C. (2011). Metaphor, hyperbole and simile: A pragmatic approach. Language and Cognition, 3, 283–312. doi:10.1515/langcog.2011.010
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty, M., Sarkar, S., Chatterjee, A., Ghosal, M., Guha, P., & Deogaonkar, M. (2014). Metaphor comprehension deficit in schizophrenia with reference to the hypothesis of abnormal lateralization and right hemisphere dysfunction. Language Sciences, 44, 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2014.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Channon, S., & Watts, M. (2003). Pragmatic language interpretation after closed head injury: Relationship to executive functioning. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 8, 243–260. doi:10.1080/135468000344000002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chiappe, D. L., & Chiappe, P. (2007). The role of working memory in metaphor production and comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 56, 172–188. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy_a critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335–359. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80014-3
   Google Scholar
• Coelho, C. (2007). Management of discourse deficits following traumatic brain injury: Progress, caveats, and needs. Seminars in Speech and Language, 28, 122–135. doi:10.1055/s-2007-970570
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Columbus, G., Sheikh, N. A., Côté-Lecaldare, M., Häuser, K., Baum, S. R., & Titone, D. (2014). Individual differences in executive control relate to metaphor processing: An eye movement study of sentence reading. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1057. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.01057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, L. (2014). Pragmatic disorders. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Demir, S. Ö., Görgülü, G., & Köseoǧlu, F. (2006). Comparison of rehabilitation outcome in patients with aphasic and non-aphasic traumatic brain injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 38, 68–71. doi:10.1080/16501970510041262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, M., & Barnes, M. A. (1990). Knowing the meaning, getting the point, bridging the gap, and carrying the message: Aspects of discourse following closed head injury in childhood and adolescence. Brain and Language, 39, 428–446. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(90)90149-B
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbourn, E., Kenny, B., Power, E., Honan, C., McDonald, S., & Tate, R., … Togher, L. (2019). Discourse recovery after severe traumatic brain injury: Exploring the first year. Brain Injury, 33, 143–159. doi:10.1080/02699052.2018.1539246
   Google Scholar
• Evans, K., & Hux, K. (2011). Comprehension of indirect requests by adults with severe traumatic brain injury: Contributions of gestural and verbal information. Brain Injury, 25, 767–776. doi:10.3109/02699052.2011.576307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauconnier, G., & Lakoff, G. (2009). On metaphor and blending. Cognitive Semiotics, 5, 393–399. doi:10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.393
   Google Scholar
• Flexner, S. B., & Hauck, L. (Eds.). (1987). The Random House dictionary of the English language (2nd ed.). New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2011). An R companion to applied regression (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gabbatore, I., Sacco, K., Angeleri, R., Zettin, M., Bara, B. G., & Bosco, F. M. (2015). Cognitive pragmatic treatment: A rehabilitative program for traumatic brain injury individuals. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 30, E14–E28. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W. (2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 48, 529–562. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2011.606103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W. (2012). Idioms and formulaic language. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 697-725). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738632.013.0027
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W., & Beitel, D. (1995). What proverb understanding reveals about how people think. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 133–154. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding figurative language: From metaphors to idioms. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S. (2003). The psycholinguistics of metaphor. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 92–96. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00040-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grindrod, C. M., & Raizen, A. L. (2018). Age-related changes in processing speed modulate context use during idiomatic ambiguity resolution. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 1–23. doi:10.1080/13825585.2018.1537437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guazzotti, P., & Oddera, M. F. (2006). Il Grande Dizionario dei Proverbi Italiani. Bologna: Zanichelli
   Google Scholar
• Harrow, M. (1974). Abstract and concrete thinking in schizophrenia during the prechronic phases. Archives of General Psychiatry, 31, 27-33. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1974.01760130013002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartig, F. (2017). DHARMa: residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models. R Package version 0.1.5. Retrieved from: https://CRAN.R-Project.Org/Package=DHARMa
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, F. M., Cremona-Meteyard, S., & King, A. (1996). High-level linguistic disturbances subsequent to childhood closed head injury. Brain Injury, 10, 729–738. doi:10.1080/026990596123990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalandadze, T., Bambini, V., & Næss, K.-A. (submitted). A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on metaphor comprehension in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: do task properties matter?
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Lenth, R. V. (2016). Least-squares means: the R package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software, 69, 1-33. doi:10.18637/jss.v069.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, A., Zettin, M., Bencich, E., Bosco, F. M., & Galetto, V. (2017). Severity effects on discourse production after TBI. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 44, 91–106. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, I., & McDonald, S. (2003). Weak coherence, no theory of mind, or executive dysfunction? Solving the puzzle of pragmatic language disorders. Brain and Language, 85, 451–466. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00070-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, I., & McDonald, S. (2005). Evaluating the causes of impaired irony comprehension following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 19, 712–730. doi:10.1080/02687030500172203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashal, N., Gavrieli, R., & Kavé, G. (2011). Age-related changes in the appreciation of novel metaphoric semantic relations. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 18, 527–543. doi:10.1080/13825585.2011.575202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S. (1992). Differential pragmatic language loss after closed head injury: Ability to comprehend conversational implicature. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 295-312. doi:10.1017/S0142716400005658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., Gowland, A., Randall, R., Fisher, A., Osborne-Crowley, K., & Honan, C. (2014). Cognitive factors underpinning poor expressive communication skills after traumatic brain injury: Theory of mind or executive function? Neuropsychology, 28, 801–811. doi:10.1037/neu0000089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., & Sommers, P. V. (1993). Pragmatic language skills after closed head injury: ability to negotiate requests. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 297-315. doi:10.1080/02643299308253466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWilliams, J., & Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (2008). Semantic memory organization during the early stage of recovery from traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 22, 243–253. doi:10.1080/02699050801935252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messer, R. (2015). Pragmatic Language changes during normal aging: implications for health care - proQuest. Healthy Aging & Clinical Care in the Elderly, 7, 1–7. doi:10.4137/HACCE.S22981
   Google Scholar
• Mondini, S., Mapelli, D., Vestri, A., Arcara, G., & Bisiacchi, P. S. (2011). Esame neuropsicologico breve 2 (ENB-2): Una batteria di test per lo screening neuropsicologico. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Monetta, L., & Pell, M. D. (2007). Effects of verbal working memory deficits on metaphor comprehension in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Brain and Language, 101, 80–89. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2006.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, C. A., & Gillon, G. (2004). Language and memory profiles of adolescents with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 18, 273–288. doi:10.1080/02699050310001617415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, C. A., Nippold, M. A., & Gillon, G. T. (2006). Working memory and proverb comprehension in adolescents with traumatic brain injury: A preliminary investigation. Brain Injury, 20, 417–423. doi:10.1080/02699050500488223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norrick, N. R. (1994). Proverbial perlocutions: How to do things with proverbs. In W. Mieder (Ed.), Wise words: Essays on proverbs (pp. 143–157). New York, N.Y.: Garland Publishing Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ortony, A. (1993). Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CB09781139173865
   Google Scholar
• Papagno, C. (2010). Idiomatic language comprehension: Neuropsychological evidence. In M. Balconi (Ed.), Neuropsychology of Communication (pp. 111–129). Milano: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-88-470-1584-5_6
   Google Scholar
• Papagno, C., & Caporali, A. (2007). Testing idiom comprehension in aphasic patients: The effects of task and idiom type. Brain and Language, 100, 208–220. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2006.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papagno, C., & Romero Lauro, L. J. (2010). The neural basis of idiom processing: Neuropsychological, neurophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 22, 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Papagno, C., Tabossi, P., Colombo, M. R., & Zampetti, P. (2004). Idiom comprehension in aphasic patients. Brain and Language, 89, 226–234. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00398-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlini, C., Bellani, M., Finos, L., Lasalvia, A., Bonetto, C., Scocco, P., … Brambilla, P. (2018). Non literal language comprehension in a large sample of first episode psychosis patients in adulthood. Psychiatry Research, 260, 78–89. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.11.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, A. M., Felsenheimer, A. K., Langohr, K., & Klupp, M. (2018). The comprehension of familiar and novel metaphoric meanings in schizophrenia: A pilot study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2251. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowley, D. A., Rogish, M., Alexander, T., & Riggs, K. J. (2017). Cognitive correlates of pragmatic language comprehension in adult traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analyses. Brain Injury, 31, 1564–1574. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.08.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubio-Fernández, P., Wearing, C., & Carston, R. (2015). Metaphor and hyperbole: Testing the continuity hypothesis. Metaphor and Symbol, 30, 24–40. doi:10.1080/10926488.2015.980699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, P. C., & Douglas, J. (2017). Psychosocial aspects of pragmatic disorders. In L. Cummings (Ed.), Research in clinical pragmatics (pp. 617–649). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47489-2_23
   Google Scholar
• Snow, P. C., Douglas, J. M., & Ponsford, J. (1998). Conversational discourse abilities following severe traumatic brain injury: A follow up study. Brain Injury, 12, 911–935. doi:10.1080/026990598121981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2008). A deflationary account of metaphors. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 84–105). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139028370.007
   Google Scholar
• Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Blackwell: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss Hough, M., & Barrow, I. (2003). Descriptive discourse abilities of traumatic brain-injured adults. Aphasiology, 17, 183–191. doi:10.1080/729255221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabossi, P., Arduino, L., & Fanari, R. (2011). Descriptive norms for 245 Italian idiomatic expressions. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 110–123. doi:10.3758/s13428-010-0018-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tendahl, M., & Gibbs, R. W. (2008). Complementary perspectives on metaphor: Cognitive linguistics and relevance theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 1823–1864. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher, L., Wiseman-Hakes, C., Douglas, J., Stergiou-Kita, M., Ponsford, J., Teasell, R., & INCOG Expert Panel. (2014). INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, part IV: Cognitive communication. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 29, 353–368. doi:10.1097/HTR.0000000000000071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C. A., Boada, R., & McGarry, K. (1992). The access and processing of familiar idioms by brain-damaged and normally aging adults. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 35, 626-637. doi:10.1044/jshr.3503.626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkstra, L. S., & Politis, A. M. (2017). Traumatic brain injury. In L. Cummings (Ed.), Research in clinical pragmatics (pp. 291–322). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Uekermann, J., Thoma, P., & Daum, I. (2008). Proverb interpretation changes in aging. Brain and Cognition, 67, 51–57. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2007.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vega Moreno, R. E. (2007). Creativity and convention: The pragmatics of everyday figurative speech. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. (2011). Parallels and differences in relevance theory and cognitive linguistics. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, 128, 195–213. doi:10.2478/v10148-011-0025-1
   Google Scholar
• Yang, F. G., Fuller, J., Khodaparast, N., & Krawczyk, D. C. (2010). Figurative language processing after traumatic brain injury in adults: A preliminary study. Neuropsychologia, 48, 1923–1929. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar