Comprehension of word order in Turkish aphasia

References

• Arantzeta, M., Bastiaanse, R., Burchert, F., Wieling, M., Martinez-Zabaleta, M., & Laka, I. (2017). Eye-tracking the effect of word order in sentence comprehension in aphasia: Evidence from Basque, a free word order ergative language. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32, 1320–1343. doi:10.1080/23273798.2017.1344715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arslan, S., Bamyacı, E., & Bastiaanse, R. (2016). A characterization of verb use in Turkish agrammatic narrative speech. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 30, 449–469. doi:10.3109/02699206.2016.1144224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arslan, S., Gür, E., & Felser, C. (2017). Predicting the sources of impaired wh-question comprehension in non-fluent aphasia: A cross-linguistic machine learning study on Turkish and German. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 34, 312–331. doi:10.1080/02643294.2017.1394284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin, Ö. (2007). The comprehension of Turkish relative clauses in second language acquisition and agrammatism. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 295–315. doi:10.1017/S0142716407070154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R., & Edwards, S. (2004). Word order and finiteness in Dutch and English Broca’s and Wernicke’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 89, 91–107. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00306-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R., & van Zonneveld, R. (2005). Sentence production with verbs of alternating transitivity in agrammatic Broca’s aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 18, 57–66. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2004.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R., & van Zonneveld, R. (2006). Comprehension of passives in Broca’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 96, 135–142. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2005.06.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, E., Wulfeck, B., & MacWhinney, B. (1991). Cross-linguistic research in aphasia: An overview. Brain and Language, 41, 123–148. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(91)90149-U.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, E. A., Friederici,A. D., Wulfeck, B. B., & Juarez, L. A. (1988). On the preservation of word order in aphasia: Cross-linguistic evidence. Brain and Language, 33, 323–364. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(88)90072-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beretta,A., Piñango, M., Patterson, J., & Harford, C. (1999). Recruiting comparative crosslinguistic evidence to address competing accounts of agrammatic aphasia. Brain and Language, 67, 149–168. doi:10.1006/brln.1999.2051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., Baker, C., & Dehaut, F. (1985). Syntactic determinants of sentence comprehension in aphasia. Cognition, 21, 117–175. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(85)90048-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Zurif, E. B. (1976). Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 3, 572–582. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(76)90048-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on binding and government. Dordrecht: Foris Publications..
   Google Scholar
• Drai, D., & Grodzinsky, Y. (2006). A new empirical angle on the variability debate: Quantitative neurosyntactic analyses of a large data set from Broca’s Aphasia. Brain and Language, 96, 117–128. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.10.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druks, J. (2016). Contemporary and emergent theories of agrammatism: A neurolinguistic approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Erguvanli, E. E. (1984). The function of word order in Turkish grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erkü, F. (1983). Discourse pragmatics and word order in Turkish. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis), University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 164–203. doi:10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00005-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N., Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L. (2009). Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua, 119, 67–88. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N., Reznick, J., Dolinski-Nuger, D., & Soboleva, K. (2010). Comprehension and production of movement-derived sentences by Russian speakers with agrammatic aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 23, 44–65. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N., Rizzi, L., & Belletti, A. (2017). No case for case in locality: Case does not help interpretation when intervention blocks A-bar chains. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 2(1). doi:10.5334/gjgl.165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garraffa, M., & Grillo, N. (2008). Canonicity effects as grammatical phenomena. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21, 177–197. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2007.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillo, A. (2008). Generalized minimality: Syntactic underspecification in Broca’s aphasia. Utrecht: LOT.
   Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y. (1995). Trace deletion, θ-roles, and cognitive strategies. Brain and Language, 51, 469–497. doi:10.1006/brln.1995.1072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y. (2000). The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca’s area. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 1–21. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00002399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y. (2006).A blueprint for a brain map of syntax. In Y. Grodzinsky & K. Amunts (Eds.), Broca’s region (pp. 83–107). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• İşsever, S. (2003). Information structure in Turkish: The word order–Prosody interface. Lingua, 113, 1025–1053. doi:10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00012-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• İşsever, S. (2007). Towards a unified account of clause-initial scrambling in Turkish: A feature analysis. Turkic Languages, 11, 93–123.
   Google Scholar
• Jap, B. A., Martinez-Ferreiro, S., & Bastiaanse, R. (2016). The effect of syntactic frequency on sentence comprehension in standard Indonesian Broca’s aphasia. Aphasiology, 30, 1325–1340. doi:10.1080/02687038.2016.1148902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennelly, S. D. (2003). The implications of quantification for the role of focus in discourse structure. Lingua, 113, 1055–1088. doi:10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00013-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kljajevic, V., & Murasugi, K. (2010). The role of morphology in the comprehension of wh-dependencies in Croatian aphasic speakers. Aphasiology, 24, 1354–1376. doi:10.1080/02687030903515347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornfilt, J. (2003). Scrambling, subscrambling, and case in Turkish. In S. Karimi (Ed.), Word order and scrambling (pp. 125–155). Cornwall, UK: Whiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kornfilt, J. (2005). Asymmetries between pre-verbal and post-verbal scrambling in Turkish. In J. Sabel & M. Saito (Eds.), The free word order phenomenon, its syntactic sources and diversity (pp. 163–179). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kükürt, D. (2004). Comprehension of Turkish Relative Clauses in Broca's Aphasics and Children. (Unpublished MA thesis), Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Kural, M. (1992). Properties of scrambling in Turkish. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis), University of California Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B., Osmán-Sági, J., & Slobin, D. I. (1991). Sentence comprehension in aphasia in two clear case-marking languages. Brain and Language, 41, 234–249. doi: 10.1016/0093-934X(91)90154-S.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauner, G., Fromkin, V. A., & Cornell, T. L. (1993). Comprehension and acceptability judgments in agrammatism: Disruptions in the syntax of referential dependency. Brain and Language, 45(3), 340–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maviş, İ., & Toğram, B. (2009). Afazi Dil Değerlendirme Testi (ADD) kullanım yönergesi. Ankara: Detay Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• Menn, L., & Duffield, C. J. (2013). Aphasias and theories of linguistic representation: Representing frequency, hierarchy, constructions, and sequential structure. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science, 4, 651–663. doi:10.1002/wcs.1257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Grady, W., & Lee, M. (2005). A mapping theory of agrammatic comprehension deficits. Brain and Language, 92, 91–100. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.05.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öztürk, B. (2005). Case, referentiality and phrase structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. F., Saffran, E. M., & Marin, O. S. (1980). The word order problem in agrammatism: I. Comprehension. Brain and Language, 10, 249–262. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(80)90055-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, S. M., Walenski, M., Love, T., & Shapiro, L. P. (2015). The auditory comprehension of Wh-questions in aphasia: Support for the intervener hypothesis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58, 781–797. doi:10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slobin, D. I., & Bever, T. G. (1982). Children use canonical sentence schemas: A crosslinguistic study of word order and inflections. Cognition, 12, 229–265. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(82)90033-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, N., Walenski, M., Love, T., & Shapiro, L. P. (2017). The comprehension of sentences with unaccusative verbs in aphasia: A test of the intervener hypothesis. Aphasiology, 31, 67–81. doi:10.1080/02687038.2016.1154499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temürcü, C. (2005). The interaction of syntax and discourse in word order: Data from Turkish. In G. König, I. Özyıldırım, D. Aydin, & A. Altan (Eds.), Dilbilim ve Uygulamaları (pp. 123–159). Istanbul: Multilingual.
   Google Scholar
• Yarbay-Duman, T., Altınok, N., Özgirgin, N., & Bastiaanse, R. (2011). Sentence comprehension in Turkish Broca’s aphasia: An integration problem. Aphasiology, 25, 908–926. doi:10.1080/02687038.2010.550629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özge, D., Kuntay, A., & Snedeker, J. (2019). Why wait for the verb? Turkish speaking children use case markers for incremental language comprehension. Cognition, 183, 152–180. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar