Attentive Reading with Constrained Summarization-Written, a multi-modality discourse-level treatment for mild aphasia

References

• Altman, C., Goral, M., & Levy, E. S. (2012). Integrated narrative analysis in multilingual aphasia: The relationship among narrative structure, grammaticality, and fluency. Aphasiology, 26, 1029–1052. doi:10.1080/02687038.2012.686103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardila, A. (2004). There is not any specific brain area for writing: From cave‐paintings to computers. International Journal of Psychology, 39, 61–67. doi:10.1080/00207590344000295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E., Fox, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2013). Mild aphasia: Is this the place for an argument? American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22, S268–S278. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2012/12-0084)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson, P. M., & Robey, R. R. (2006). Evaluating single-subject treatment research: Lessons learned from the aphasia literature. Neuropsychology Review, 16, 161–169. doi:10.1007/s11065-006-9013-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrns, I., Ahlsén, E., & Wengelin, Å. (2008). Aphasia and the process of revision in writing a text. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 22, 95–110. doi:10.1080/02699200701699603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrns, I., Hartelius, L., & Wengelin, Å. (2009). Aphasia and computerised writing aid supported treatment. Aphasiology, 23, 1276–1294. doi:10.1080/02687030802436892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrns, I., Wengelin, Å., Broberg, M., & Hartelius, L. (2009). A comparison between written and spoken narratives in aphasia. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 23, 507–528. doi:10.1080/02699200902916129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. (2011). Discourse treatment for word retrieval impairment in aphasia: The story so far. Aphasiology, 25, 1308–1326. doi:10.1080/02687038.2011.596185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookshire, R. H., & Nicholas, L. E. (1994). Speech sample size and test-retest stability of connected speech measures for adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 37, 399–407. doi:10.1044/jshr.3702.399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookshire, R. H., & Nicholas, L. E. (1997). Discourse comprehension test: Test manual. Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Busk, P. L., & Serlin, R. C. (1992). Meta-analysis for single-case research. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research designs and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 187–212). Hillsdale, NK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Capilouto, G., Wright, H. H., & Wagovich, S. A. (2005). CIU and main event analyses of the structured discourse of older and younger adults. Journal of Communication Disorders, 38, 431–444. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2005.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capilouto, G. J., Wright, H. H., & Wagovich, S. A. (2006). Reliability of main event measurement in the discourse of individuals with aphasia. Aphasiology, 20, 205–216. doi:10.1080/02687030500473122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, J. A. (1995). Coherence violations and propositional usage in the narratives of fluent aphasics. Brain and Language, 51, 291–317. doi:10.1006/brln.1995.1062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, A., Ball, A., & Griffith, J. (2011). Reading and writing with aphasia in the 21st century: Technological applications of supported reading comprehension and written expression. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 18, 758–769. doi:10.1310/tsr1806-758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, P., & Hula, W. (2012). The Aphasia Communication Outcome Measure: Highlighting patient-reported outcomes in the context of clinical outcome measures, limitations of measures and issues of construct dimensionality, and results from development of an item bank and computer adaptive test. CREd Library, 1. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1082882
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, P. J., McNeil, M. R., Spencer, K. A., Goda, A. J., Cottrell, K., & Lustig, A. P. (1998). The effects of concurrent picture presentations on retelling of orally presented stories by adults with aphasia. Aphasiology, 12, 561–574. doi:10.1080/02687039808249558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druks, J., & Masterson, J. (2000). An object & action naming battery. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds, L. A., Nadeau, S. E., & Kiran, S. (2009). Effect of Verb Network Strengthening Treatment (VNeST) on lexical retrieval of content words in sentences in persons with aphasia. Aphasiology, 23, 402–424. doi:10.1080/02687030802291339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman, R. J., & Bernstein-Ellis, E. (1995). What is functional? American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4, 115–117. doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0404.115
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, T., Penn, C., & Ormond‐Brown, D. (2007). Executive dysfunction as an explanatory basis for conversation symptoms of aphasia: A pilot study. Aphasiology, 21, 814–828. doi:10.1080/02687030701192448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromm, D., Forbes, M., Holland, A., Dalton, S. G., Richardson, J., & MacWhinney, B. (2017). Discourse characteristics in aphasia beyond the western aphasia battery cutoff. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26, 762–768. doi:10.1044/2016_AJSLP-16-0071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furnas, D. W., & Edmonds, L. A. (2014). The effect of computerised verb network strengthening treatment on lexical retrieval in aphasia. Aphasiology, 28, 401–420. doi:10.1080/02687038.2013.869304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, R. A., & Caramazza, A. (1986). The Johns Hopkins University dyslexia and dysgraphia batteries. [Published in Beeson, P. M., & Hillis, A. E. (2001). Comprehension and production of written words. In R. Chapey (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in adult Aphasia (pp. 572–595). Baltimore: Lippencott, Williams, & Williams.
   Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks, N. (2001). CLQT: Cognitive Linguistic Quick Test. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Hilari, K., & Northcott, S. (2006). Social support in people with chronic Aphasia. Aphasiology, 20, 17–36. doi:10.1080/02687030500279982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hula, W. D., Doyle, P. J., Stone, C. A., Hula, S. N. A., Kellough, S., Wambaugh, J. L., … Jacque, A. S. (2015). The Aphasia Communication Outcome Measure (ACOM): Dimensionality, item bank calibration, and initial validation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58, 906–919. doi:10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall, D. L., Rosenbek, J. C., Heilman, K. M., Conway, T., Klenberg, K., Rothi, L. J. G., & Nadeau, S. E. (2008). Phoneme-based rehabilitation of anomia in aphasia. Brain and Language, 105, 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (2006). Western Aphasia Battery–Revised (WAB-R). Pro-Ed. Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, R. P., Jr, Rogers, R. L., & Chissom, B. S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas. (automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel (No. RBR-8-75). Millington, TN: Naval Technical Training Command Millington TN Research Branch.
   Google Scholar
• LaPointe, L. L., & Horner, J. (1998). RCBA-2: Reading comprehension battery for Aphasia. Pro-Ed. Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Loban, W. (1976). Language development: Kindergarten through grade twelve (Research Report No. 18). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Lomas, J., Pickard, L., Bester, S., Elbard, H., Finlayson, A., & Zoghaib, C. (1989). The communicative effectiveness index: Development and psychometric evaluation of a functional communication measure for adult aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 54, 113–124. doi:10.1044/jshd.5401.113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marini, A., & Urgesi, C. (2012). Please get to the point! A cortical correlate of linguistic informativeness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 2211–2222. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Aphasia Association. Aphasia Definitions (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.aphasia.org/aphasia-definitions/.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas, L. E., & Brookshire, R. H. (1993). A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 36, 338–350. doi:10.1044/jshr.3602.338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obermeyer, J. A., & Edmonds, L. A. (2018). Attentive reading with constrained summarization adapted to address written discourse in people with mild aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27, 392–405. doi:10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peach, R. K., & Reuter, K. A. (2010). A discourse-based approach to semantic feature analysis for the treatment of aphasic word retrieval failures. Aphasiology, 24, 971–990. doi:10.1080/02687030903058629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. D., & Dalton, S. G. (2016). Main concepts for three different discourse tasks in a large non-clinical sample. Aphasiology, 30, 45–73. doi:10.1080/02687038.2015.1057891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robey, R. R. (2004). A five-phase model for clinical-outcome research. Journal of Communication Disorders, 37, 401–411. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2004.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robey, R. R., Schultz, M. C., Crawford, A. B., & Sinner, C. A. (1999). Single-subject clinical-outcome research: Designs, data, effect sizes, and analyses. Aphasiology, 13, 445–473. doi:10.1080/026870399402028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogalski, Y., & Edmonds, L. A. (2008). Attentive Reading and Constrained Summarization (ARCS) treatment in primary progressive aphasia: A case study. Aphasiology, 22, 763–775. doi:10.1080/02687030701803796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogalski, Y., Edmonds, L. A., Daly, V. R., & Gardner, M. J. (2013). Attentive Reading and Constrained Summarization (ARCS) discourse treatment for chronic Wernicke’s aphasia. Aphasiology, 27, 1232–1251. doi:10.1080/02687038.2013.810327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulatowska, H. K., Allard, L., & Chapman, S. B. (1990). Narrative and procedural discourse in Aphasia. In Y. Joanette & H. H. Brownell (Eds.), Discourse ability and brain damage (pp. 180–198). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ulatowska, H. K., Baker, T., & Stern, R. F. (1979). Disruption of written language in aphasia. In Studies in Neurolinguistics, 4, 241–268. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-746304-9.50013-6
   Google Scholar
• Ulatowska, H. K., Hildebrand, B. H., & Haynes, S. M. (1978). A comparison of written and spoken language in Aphasia. In Clinical Aphasiology: Proceedings of the Conference 1978 (pp. 223–235). Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gelderen, A., & Oostdam, R. (2002). Improving linguistic fluency for writing: Effects of explicitness and focus of instruction. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 2, 239–270. doi:10.1023/A:1021304027877
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, C. P. (2010). Social networks after the onset of aphasia: The impact of aphasia group attendance. Aphasiology, 24, 902–913. doi:10.1080/02687030903438532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilshire, C. E., Lukkien, C. C., & Burmester, B. R. (2014). The sentence production test for aphasia. Aphasiology, 28, 658–691. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.893555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, H. H., & Capilouto, G. J. (2012). Considering a multi-level approach to understanding maintenance of global coherence in adults with aphasia. Aphasiology, 26, 656–672. doi:10.1080/02687038.2012.676855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, H. H., Capilouto, G. J., & Koutsoftas, A. (2013). Evaluating measures of global coherence ability in stories in adults. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48, 249–256. doi:10.1111/jlcd.2013.48.issue-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, H. H., Koutsoftas, A. D., Capilouto, G. J., & Fergadiotis, G. (2014). Global coherence in younger and older adults: Influence of cognitive processes and discourse type. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 21, 174–196. doi:10.1080/13825585.2013.794894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youse, K. M., & Coelho, C. A. (2005). Working memory and discourse production abilities following closed-head injury. Brain Injury, 19, 1001–1009. doi:10.1080/02699050500109951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar