Syntactic abilities in Malay adult speakers with aphasia: a study on passive sentences and argument structures

References

• Adelt, A., Hanne, S., & Stadie, N. (2016). Treatment of sentence comprehension and production in aphasia: Is there cross-modal generalisation? Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 28(6), 937–965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho-Reyes, S., & Thompson, C. K. (2012). Verb and sentence production and comprehension in aphasia: Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences (NAVS). Aphasiology, 26(10), 1250–1277. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2012.693584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, S. (2008). Indonesian clause structure from an Austronesian Perspective. Lingua, 118(10), 1554–1582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, S. F. (2005). Kena as third type of Malay passives. Oceanic Linguistics, 44(1), 194–214. https://doi.org/10.1353/ol.2005.0017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, P., & Hermon, G. (2005). Subject and non-subject relativization in Indonesian. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 14(1), 59–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-004-2703-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englebretson, R. (2008). From subordinate clause to noun-phrase: Yang constructions in colloquial Indonesian. In R. Laury (Ed.), Crosslinguistic studies of clause combining: The multifunctionality of conjunctions (pp. 1–33). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, M. C., & Cumming, S. (1998). Relative clauses in Indonesian discourse: Face to face and cyberspace interaction. In S. L. Chelliah & W. J. De Reuse (Eds.), Papers from the fifth annual meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society (pp. 79–96). Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Fink, R. B. (2001). Mapping treatment: An approach to treating sentence level impairments in agrammatism. Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders, 11(3), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1044/nnsld11.3.14
   Google Scholar
• Garraffa, M., & Grillo, N. (2008). Canonicity effects as a grammatical phenomenon. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21(2), 177–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2007.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Barresi, B. (2001). The boston diagnostic aphasia examination. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
   Google Scholar
• Grillo, N. (2008). Generalised Minimality [PhD dissertation]. Utrecht Institute of Linguistics, OTS.
   Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y. (1986). Language deficits and the theory of syntax. Brain and Language, 27(1), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(86)90009-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y. (1990). Theoretical perspectives on language deficit. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y. (1995). a restrictive theory of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language, 50(1), 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1995.1039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassall, T. (2005). Taboo object relative clauses in Indonesian. In P. Sidwell (Ed.), SEALSXV: Papers from the 15th meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society (pp. 1–18). Pacific Linguistic.
   Google Scholar
• Jap, B., Martinez-Ferreiro, S., & Bastiaanse, R. (2016). The effect of syntactic frequency on sentence comprehension in standard Indonesian Broca’s aphasia. Aphasiology, 30(11), 1325–1340. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2016.1148902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiran, S., Caplan, D., Sandberg, C., Levy, J., Berardino, A., Ascenso, E., & Tripodis, Y. (2012). Development of a theoretically based treatment for sentence comprehension deficits in individuals with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21, 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0106)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. C., & Miller, M. (2002). Sentence comprehension deficits: Independence and interaction of syntax, semantics and working memory. In Hillis, A.E. (ed.),  The handbook of adult language disorders: Integrating cognitive neuropsychology, neurology and rehabilitation (1st ed.). New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marantz, A. (2013). Verbal argument structure: Events and participants. Lingua, 130(130), 152–168. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martini, K., Belletti, A., Centorrino, S., & Garraffa, M. (2019). Syntactic complexity in the presence of an intervener: The case of an anomic Italian speaker. Aphasiology, 10. https://doi.org/1-27.10.1080/02687038.2019.1686744
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer-Asscher, A., Mack, J. E., Barbieri, E., & Thompson, C. K. (2015). How the brain processes different aspects of argument structure complexity: Evidence from fMRI. Brain & Language, 142, 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchum, C. C., Greenwald, M. L., & Berndt, R. S. (2000). Cognitive treatments of sentence processing disorders: What have we learned? Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10(3), 311–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/096020100389174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohd Azmarul, A. A., & Rogayah, A. R. (2017). Treatment of single word writing for a Malay patient with acquired dysgraphia following stroke: A single-case experimental study. Medical Journal of Malaysia, 72(Suppl. 2), 20.
   Google Scholar
• Mohd Azmarul, A. A., Shahidi, A. H., & Zulkifley, H. (2017). Imageability and familiarity effect on comprehension of nouns and verbs in Malay-Speaking adults with aphasia. Conference abstract: Academy of aphasia 55th Annual Meeting. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.  conf.fnhum.2017.223.00106.
   Google Scholar
• Nickels, L., Rapp, B., & Kohnen, S. (2015). Challenges in the use of treatment to investigate cognition. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 32(3–4), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2015.1056652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nomoto, H., & Shoho, I. (2007). Voice in relative clause in Malay: A comparison of written and spoken language. In Y. Kawaguchi, T. Takagaki, N. Tominmori, & Y. Tsuruga (Eds.), Corpus-based perspectives in Linguistics (pp. 353–370). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Nomoto, H. (2010). Making sense of the optionality of voice marking in Malay/Indonesian. In Proceedings of workshop on Indonesian-type voice system. 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Nomoto, H., & Kartini, W. (2014). Person restriction on passive agents in Malay: Information structure & syntax. In Siaw-Fong, C. & Nomoto, H. (eds). Current Trends in Malay Linguistics. Nusa, 57, 31–50. http://hdl.handle.net/10108/79284
   Google Scholar
• Norsofiah, A. B., Rogayah, A. R., Lim, H. W., & Marinis, T. (in press). The comprehension and production of passives among Malay children with specific language impairment.
   Google Scholar
• Nothofer, B. (2006). Malay in Schultz, F. & Warnk, H. Insular South East Asia: Linguistics & cultural studies in honour of Bernd Nothofer. Harrassowitz.
   Google Scholar
• Paauw, S. (2008). The Malay contacts varieties of Eastern Indonesia. PhD dissertation (unpublished). State University of New York at Buffalo.
   Google Scholar
• Platt, J. T. (1977). a model for polyglossia and multilinguals (with special reference to Singapore and Malaysia). Language & Society, 6(3), 301–375. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500005066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postman, W. A. (2004). Processing of complex sentences in a case of aphasia in Indonesian: Thematic vs. linear strategies. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 17(6), 455–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2004.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razak, A. R. (1997). Konsep kepala dan struktur argumen di dalam binaan kata majmuk bahasa Melayu [Headness & argument structure in compound words in Malay]. In N. Khaza’ai & K. S. Wong (Eds.), Monograf pengajian bahasa Melayu (pp. 91–106). Akademi Pengajian Melayu, Universiti Malaya.
   Google Scholar
• Rochon, E., & Reichman, S. (2004). a modular treatment for sentence processing impairments: Sentence comprehension. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, 28, 25–33.
   Google Scholar
• Salleh, R. (1989). Fronted constituents in Malay: Base structures and move alpha in a configurational non-Indo-European language. Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M., Saffran, O., Fink, R., Myers, J., & Martin, N. (1994). Mapping therapy: A treatment programme for agrammatism. Aphasiology, 8(1), 19–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039408248639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. F., Saffran, E. M., & Marin, O. S. M. (1980). The word order problem in Agrammatism. Brain and Language, 10(2), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(80)90055-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, K. S. (2005). The Peranakan Chinese Kelantan: A study of the culture, language, & communication of an assimilated group in Malaysia. Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Soceit, 78(2), 122–124.
   Google Scholar
• Yap, N. T., Razak, A., Haman, E., Luniewska, M., & Treffers-Daller, J. (2017). Construction of the malay cross-linguistic lexical task: A preliminary report. Language Studies Working Papers from DELAL (Department of English Language and Applied Linguistics), University of Reading.
   Google Scholar
• Yoder, B. (2010). Syntactic Underspecification in Riau Indonesian In Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics (pp. 1–15), University of North Dakota Session, SIL International. 50.
   Google Scholar