Comparing patterns of familiar language use across spontaneous speech contexts in individuals with nonfluent aphasia and healthy controls

References

• Albert, M. L., Sparks, R. W., & Helm, N. (1973). Melodic Intonation Therapy for aphasia. Archives of Neurology, 29(2), 130–131. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1973.00490260074018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameka, F. (1992). Interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 18(2–3), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90048-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E., & Ferguson, A. (2010). Language, meaning, context, and functional communication. Aphasiology, 24(4), 480–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030902775157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, C., Varley, R., Zimmerer, V. C., Carragher, M., Brekelmans, G., & Beeke, S. (2018). “I don’t know”: A usage-based approach to familiar collocations in non-fluent aphasia. Aphasiology, 33(2), 140–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1535692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrol, G., & Conklin, K. (2019). Is all formulaic language created equal? Unpacking the processing advantage for different types of formulaic sequences. Language and Speech, 63(1), 95–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830918823230
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84(1), 73–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code, C. (1994). Speech automatism production in aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 8(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0911-6044(94)90021-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code, C., Tree, J. J., & Dawe, K. (2009). Opportunities to say “yes:” Rare speech automatisms in a case of progressive nonfluent aphasia and apraxia. Neurocase, 15(6), 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/13554790902911634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2012). The processing of formulaic language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, S. M., & Biber, D. (2005). The frequency and use of lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose. Lexicographica, 20(2004), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783484604674.56
   Google Scholar
• Crible, L., & Pascual, E. (2020). Combinations of discourse markers with repairs and repetitions in English, French and Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics, 156, 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M. (2008-). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA). https://www.english-corpora.org/coca
   Google Scholar
• Doedens, W. J., & Meteyard, L. (2019). Measures of functional, real-world communication for aphasia: A critical review. Aphasiology, 34(4), 492–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2019.1702848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C., Simpson-Vlach, R., & Maynard, C. (2008). Formulaic language in native and second language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 375–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00137.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erman, B., Denke, A., Fant, L., & Forsberg Lundell, F. (2015). Nativelike expression in the speech of long-residency L2 users: A study of multiword structure in L2 English, French and Spanish. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 160–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, J. M. (2000). The influence of speaker roles on discourse marker use. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00065-6
   Google Scholar
• Gholami, L., Karimi, M. N., & Atai, M. R. (2017). Formulaic focus-on-form episodes in adult EFL communicative interactions. System, 68, 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1978). Response cries. Language, 54(4), 787–815. https://doi.org/10.2307/413235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, S., Haley, K. L., & Jacks, A. (2012). Script training and generalization for people with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(3), 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0369(2012/11-0056)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallin, A., & Van Lancker Sidtis, D. (2017). A closer look at formulaic language: Prosodic characteristics of Swedish proverbs. Applied Linguistics, 38(1), 68–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks, N., Albert, M., & Nicholas, M. (2014). Manual of aphasia and aphasia therapy (3rd ed.). Pro-ed.
   Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks, N., & Nicholas, M. (2000). Sentence production program for aphasia. Pro-ed.
   Google Scholar
• House, J. (2013). Developing pragmatic competence in English as a lingua franca: Using discourse markers to express (inter)subjectivity and connectivity. Journal of Pragmatics, 59(Part A), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, H. (1878). On affections of speech from disease of the brain. Brain, 2(3), 323–356. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/2.3.323
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, H., & Jiang, N. (2019). Representation and processing of lexical bundles: Evidence from word monitoring. System, 80, 188–198 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.11.009
   Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (2007). Western aphasia battery-revised. Pearson Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Leaman, M. C., & Edmonds, L. A. (2020). “By the way” … How people with aphasia and their communication partners initiate new topics of conversation. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 29(1S), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_AJSLPCAC48-18-0198
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lum, C., & Ellis, A. W. (1999). Why do some aphasics show an advantage on some tests of nonpropositional (automatic) speech? Brain and Language, 70(1), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1999.2147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B., Fromm, D., Forbes, M., & Holland, A. (2011). AphasiaBank: Methods for studying discourse. Aphasiology, 25(11), 1286–1307. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.589893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marangolo, P., Marin, D., & Piras, F. (2008). Dissociation between nonpropositional and propositional speech: A single case study. Neurocase, 14(4), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/13554790802363753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcelduff, K. M., & Drummond, S. S. (1991). Communicative functions of automatic speech in non-fluent dysphasia. Aphasiology, 5(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039108248528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nekrasova, T. M. (2009). English L1 and L2 speakers’ knowledge of lexical bundles. Language Learning, 59(3), 647–686. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00520.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nykanen, A., Nyrkko, H., Nykanen, M., Brunou, R., & Rautakoski, P. (2013). Communication therapy for people with aphasia and their partners (APPUTE). Aphasiology, 27(10), 1159–1179. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2013.802284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rammell, C. S., Van Lancker Sidtis, D., & Pisoni, D. B. (2017). Perception of formulaic and novel expressions under acoustic degradation. The Mental Lexicon, 12(2), 234–262. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.16019.ram
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidtis, J. J., Van Lancker Sidtis, D., Dahwan, V., & Eidelberg, D. (2018). Switching language modes: Complementary brain patterns for formulaic and propositional language. Brain Connectivity, 8(3), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2017.0573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidtis, V. L. (2004). When novel sentences spoken or heard for the first time in the history of the universe are not enough: Toward a dual-process model of language. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 39(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820310001601080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidtis, V. L. (2018). Familiar phrases in language competence: Linguistics, psychological, and neurological observations that support a dual process model of language. In A. Haselow & K. Gunther (Eds.), Grammar and cognition: Dualistic models of language structure and language processing (pp. 29–57). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Springer, S. A., Levelt, W. J. M., & Kempen, G. (2006). Lexical access during the production of idiomatic phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(2), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, B., Mohr, B., Dreyer, F. R., Lucchese, G., & Pulvermüller, F. (2017). Communicative- pragmatic assessment is sensitive and time-effective in measuring the outcome of aphasia therapy. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, Article 223. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00223
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, B., & Van Lancker Sidtis, D. (2015). Tapping into neural resources of communication: Formulaic language in aphasia therapy. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1526. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01526
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T. (2019). How we manage social relationships through answers to questions: The case of interjections. Discourse Processes, 56(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2018.1441214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrington Eaton, C., & Newman, R. S. (2018). Heart and ___ or Give and ___? An exploration of variables that influence binomial completion for individuals with and without aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(2), 819–826. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lancker Sidtis, D., Choi, J., Alken, A., & Sidtis, J. J. (2015). Formulaic language in Parkinson’s Disease and Alzheimer’s Disease: Complementary effects of subcortical and cortical dysfunction. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 58(5), 1493–1507. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lancker Sidtis, D., & Postman, W. A. (2006). Formulaic expressions in spontaneous speech of left- and right-hemisphere-damaged subjects. Aphasiology, 20(5), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030500538148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lancker Sidtis, D., & Rallon, G. (2004). Tracking the incidence of formulaic expressions in everyday speech: Methods for classification and verification. Language & Communication, 24(3), 207–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2004.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lancker Sidtis, D., & Yeun, S. (2017). Formulaic language performance in left- and right- hemisphere damaged patients: Structured testing. Aphasiology, 31(1), 82–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2016.1157136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, N. (2004). Non-lexical conversational sounds in American English. Departmental Technical Reports (CS), Paper 307. http://digitalcommons.utep.edu/cs_techrep/307
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (2006). Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(2), 150–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250606900203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wray, A. (2001). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wray, A. (2008). Formulaic sequences and language disorder. In M. J. Ball, M. R. Perkins, N. Müller, S. Howard, & N. Miller (Eds.), The handbook of clinical linguistics (pp. 184–197). ProQuest Ebook Central.
   Google Scholar
• Wray, A. (2017). Formulaic sequences as a regulatory mechanism for cognitive perturbations during the achievement of social goals. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(3), 569–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuldashev, A., Julieta, F., & Thorne, S. L. (2012). Second language learners’ continuous and discontiguous multi-word unit use over time. The Modern Language Journal, 97(S1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01420.x
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerer, V. C., Newman, L., Thomson, R., Coleman, M., & Varley, R. A. (2018). Automated analysis of language production in aphasia and right-hemisphere damage: Frequency and collocation strength. Aphasiology, 32(11), 1267–1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1497138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerer, V. C., & Varley, R. (2016). Formulaic language in people with probable Alzheimer’s Disease: A frequency-based approach. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 53(3), 1145–1160. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-160099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar