Measuring Verbal Reasoning and Executive Strategies in German Speaking People with Cognitive-Communication Disorders: Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Pilot Testing of the FAVRES-DE

References

• Arcara, G., & Bambini, V. (2016). A Test for the Assessment of Pragmatic Abilities and Cognitive Substrates (APACS): Normative Data and Psychometric Properties. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 70. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcara, G., Tonini, E., Muriago, G., Mondin, E., Sgarabottolo, E., Bertagnoni, G., Semenza, C., & Bambini, V. (2019). Pragmatics and figurative language in individuals with traumatic brain injury: Fine-grained assessment and relevance-theoretic considerations. Aphasiology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2019.1615033
   Google Scholar
• Avramović, P., Kenny, B., Power, E., McDonald, S., Tate, R., Hunt, L., MacDonald, S., Heard, R., & Togher, L. (2017). Exploring the relationship between cognition and functional verbal reasoning in adults with severe traumatic brain injury at six months post injury. Brain Injury, 31(4), 502–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2017.1280854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S., Bransby-Bell, J., Gallagher-Beverley, Z., Mullay, J., McNeil, R., & Taylor, C. (2021). Verbosity, traumatic brain injury, and conversation: A preliminary investigation. Aphasiology, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2021.1977233
   Google Scholar
• Baumgärtner, A., Büttner, J., Dressel, K., Glindemann, R., Heim, S., Hussmann, K., Jonas, K., Obrig, H., Quinting, J., Regenbrecht, F., Rosenkranz, A., & Thöne-Otto, A. (2019, November 1). AG Kognitive Kommunikationsstörungen: Arbeitsschwerpunkte, erste Ergebnisse der Pilotstudien und Ziele einer multizentrischen Studie [poster]. Leipzig. 19. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Aphasieforschung und -behandlung.
   Google Scholar
• Bischetti, L., Ceccato, I., Lecce, S., Cavallini, E., & Bambini, V. (2019). Pragmatics and theory of mind in older adults’ humor comprehension. Current Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00295-w
   Google Scholar
• Bogart, E., Togher, L., Power, E., & Docking, K. (2012). Casual conversations between individuals with traumatic brain injury and their friends. Brain Injury, 26(3), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2011.648711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosco, F. M [F. M.], Parola, A., Sacco, K [Katiuscia], Zettin, M., & Angeleri, R. (2017). Communicative-pragmatic disorders in traumatic brain injury: The role of theory of mind and executive functions. Brain and Language, 168, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2017.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büttner, J., & Glindemann, R. (2019). Kognitive Kommunikationsstörungen (1. Auflage). Fortschritte der Neuropsychologie: Band 19. Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Byom, L., & Turkstra, L. S. (2012). Effects of social cognitive demand on Theory of Mind in conversations of adults with traumatic brain injury. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 47(3), 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00102.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Channon, S., Pellijeff, A., & Rule, A. (2005). Social cognition after head injury: Sarcasm and theory of mind. Brain and Language, 93(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2004.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
   Google Scholar
• Cicerone, K. D., Goldin, Y., Ganci, K., Rosenbaum, A., Wethe, J. V., Langenbahn, D. M., Malec, J. F., Bergquist, T. F., Kingsley, K., Nagele, D., Trexler, L., Fraas, M., Bogdanova, Y., & Harley, J. P. (2019). Evidence-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation: Systematic Review of the Literature From 2009 Through 2014. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 100(8), 1515–1533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2019.02.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, C. A., Grela, B., Corso, M., Gamble, A., & Feinn, R. (2005). Microlinguistic deficits in the narrative discourse of adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 19(13), 1139–1145. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050500110678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, C. A., Ylvisaker, M., & Turkstra, L. S. (2005). Nonstandardized assessment approaches for individuals with traumatic brain injuries. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26(4), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-922102
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coelho, C. A. (2007). Management of discourse deficits following traumatic brain injury: Progress, caveats, and needs. Seminars in Speech and Language, 28(2), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-970570
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coelho, C. A., Lê, K., Mozeiko, J., Hamilton, M., Tyler, E., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2013). Characterizing discourse deficits following penetrating head injury: A preliminary model. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22(2), S438–S448. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0076)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• College of Audiologists and Speech-Language Pathologists of Ontario. (2015). Practice Standards and Guidelines for Acquired Cognitive Communication Disorders. http://www.caslpo.com/sites/default/uploads/files/PSG_EN_Acquired_Cognitive_Communication_Disorders.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Covington, N. V., & Duff, M. C. (2021). Heterogeneity Is a Hallmark of Traumatic Brain Injury, Not a Limitation: A New Perspective on Study Design in Rehabilitation Research. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 30(2S), 974–985. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00081
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crawford, J. R., & Howell, D. C. (1998). Comparing an Individual’s Test Score Against Norms Derived from Small Samples. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12(4), 482–486. https://doi.org/10.1076/clin.12.4.482.7241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. R., & Garthwaite, P. H. (2002). Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences. Neuropsychologia, 40(8), 1196–1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00224X)00224X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewan, M. C., Rattani, A., Gupta, S., Baticulon, R. E., Hung, Y.‑C., Punchak, M., Agrawal, A., Adeleye, A. O., Shrime, M. G., Rubiano, A. M., Rosenfeld, J. V., & Park, K. B. (2018). Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurosurgery, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.10.JNS17352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Docking, K., Murdoch, B. E., & Jordan, F. M. (2000). Interpretation and comprehension of linguistic humour by adolescents with head injury: A group analysis. Brain Injury, 14(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/026990500120952
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fussman, S., & Mashal, N. (2022). Initial Validation for the Assessment of Pragmatic Abilities and Cognitive Substrates (APACS) Hebrew Battery in Adolescents and Young Adults With Typical Development. Frontiers in Communication, 6, Article 758384. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.758384
   Google Scholar
• Gabbatore, I., Bosco, F. M[Francesca M.], Mäkinen, L., Ebeling, H., Hurtig, T., & Loukusa, S. (2019). Investigating pragmatic abilities in young Finnish adults using the Assessment Battery for Communication. Intercultural Pragmatics, 16(1), 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2019-0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glindemann, R. (2009). Wenn sich Themen unkontrolliert entwickeln Kognitiv-linguistische Überlegungen zu weitschweifigen Äußerungen. Neurolinguistik, 21(1–2), 59–99.
   Google Scholar
• Heidler, M.‑D. (2020). Kognitive Dysphasien: Erkennen und behandeln. memo verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Higginson, C. I., Thompson, T., Benjamin, A. E., Rosales, A. C., Zane, K. L., Valenti, M., Ibrahim, K., Rock, M. A., & Chaffee, T. A. (2017). Construct validity of the Functional Assessment of Verbal Reasoning and Executive Strategies (FAVRES). Brain Injury, 31(13–14), 1807–1812. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2017.1347278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second Edition) (2018). International Journal of Testing, 18(2), 101–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2017.1398166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, S. L., Theadom, A., Ellenbogen, R. G., Bannick, M. S., Montjoy-Venning, W., Lucchesi, L. R., Abbasi, N., Abdulkader, R., Abraha, H. N., Adsuar, J. C., Afarideh, M., Agrawal, S., Ahmadi, A., Ahmed, M. B., Aichour, A. N., Aichour, I., Aichour, M. T. E., Akinyemi, R. O., Akseer, N., … Murray, C. J. L. (2019). Global, regional, and national burden of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet Neurology, 18(1), 56–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(18)304150)304150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joanette, Y., Ansaldo, A. I., Lazaro, E., & Ska, B. (2018). L’aphasie: une réalité en évolution. Rééducation Orthophonique(274), 27–40.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. E., & Turkstra, L. S. (2012). Inference in conversation of adults with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 26(9), 1118–1126. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2012.666370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M., & DeRuyter, F. (1991). Cognitive and Language Bases for Communication Disorders. In D. R. Beukelman & K. M. Yorkston (Eds.), Communication Disorders Following Traumatic Brain Injury: Management of Cognitive, Language, and Motor Impairments (pp. 123–190). pro ed.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbarow, M. L. (Ed.). (2021). Cognitive Communication Disorders: Third Edition (3rd ed.). Plural Publishing Incorporated. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kxp/detail.action?docID=5839404
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, S. (2005). FAVRES: Functional Assessment of Verbal Reasoning and Executive Strategies. CCD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, S., & Johnson, C. J. (2005). Assessment of subtle cognitive-communication deficits following acquired brain injury: A normative study of the functional assessment of verbal reasoning and executive strategies (FAVRES). Brain Injury, 19(11), 895–902. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050400004294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, S. (2017). Introducing the model of cognitive-communication competence: A model to guide evidence-based communication interventions after brain injury. Brain Injury, 31(13–14), 1760–1780. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2017.1379613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, S. (2019). Checkliste für Kognitive Kommuniationsstörungen nach Erworbener Hirnschädigung (CCCABI-DE): German Translation by Kristina Jonas and Jana Quinting. CCD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Marcotte, K., McSween, M.‑P., Pouliot, M., Martineau, S., Pauzé, A.‑M., Wiseman-Hakes, C., & MacDonald, S. (2017). Normative study of the Functional Assessment of Verbal Reasoning and Executive Strategies (FAVRES) test in the French-Canadian population. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(8), 2217–2227. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-17-0012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, A., Zettin, M., & Galetto, V. (2014). Cognitive correlates of narrative impairment in moderate traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia, 64, 282–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, A., Zettin, M., Bencich, E., Bosco, F. M [F. M.], & Galetto, V. (2017). Severity effects on discourse production after TBI. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 44, 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, I., & McDonald, S. (2005). Evaluating the causes of impaired irony comprehension following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 19(8), 712–730. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030500172203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., Togher, L., & Code, C. (Eds.). (2014). Brain, behaviour and cognition. Social and communication disorders following traumatic brain injury (Second edition). Psychology Press Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., Honan, C., Kelly, M., Byom, L., & Rushby, J. A. (2014). Disorders of social cognition and social behaviour in adults with TBI. In S. McDonald, L. Togher, & C. Code (Eds.), Brain, behaviour and cognition. Social and communication disorders following traumatic brain injury. Psychology Press Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Meulenbroek, P., & Cherney, L. R. (2019). The Voicemail Elicitation Task: Functional Workplace Language Assessment for Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 62(9), 3367–3380. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponsford, J., Bayley, M [Mark], Wiseman-Hakes, C., Togher, L., Velikonja, D., McIntyre, A., Janzen, S., & Tate, R. (2014). Incog recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, part II: Attention and information processing speed. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 29(4), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prigatano, G. P., Roueche, J. R., & Fordyce, D. J. (1985). Nonaphasic language disturbances after closed head injury. Language Sciences, 7(1), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(85)800206)800206
   Google Scholar
• Purdy, M. H. (2021). Executive functions: Theory, assessment, and treatment. In M. L. Kimbarow (Ed.), Cognitive Communication Disorders: Third Edition (3rd ed., 93-51). Plural Publishing Incorporated. https://doi.org/10.1037/t05449-000
   Google Scholar
• Quinting, J., & Jonas, K. (2019). Die Checkliste für Kognitive Kommunikationsstörungen Die Checkliste für Kognitive Kommunikationsstörungen nach erworbener Hirnschädigung (CCCABI-DE) – Ein Screeningverfahren. Praxis-Beruf-Verband, 1(3), 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Regenbrecht, F., & Guthke, T. (2017). Kognitive Kommunikationsstörungen in der Sprachtherapie und der Neuropsychologie. Aphasie Und Verwandte Gebiete, 1, 16–30.
   Google Scholar
• Regenbrecht, F., Glindemann, R., & Büttner-Kunert, J. (2020). Rating-Verfahren in der Therapieplanung bei kognitiven Kommunikationsstörungen. Sprache · Stimme · Gehör, 44(02), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1043-7259
   Google Scholar
• Rietdijk, R., Simpson, G., Togher, L., Power, E., & Gillett, L. (2013). An exploratory prospective study of the association between communication skills and employment outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 27(7–8), 812–818. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2013.775491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothermich, K., Giorio, C., Falkins, S., Leonard, L., & Roberts, A. (2021). Nonliteral language processing across the lifespan. Acta Psychologica, 212, 103213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowley, D. A., Rogish, M., Alexander, T., & Riggs, K. J. (2017). Cognitive correlates of pragmatic language comprehension in adult traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analyses. Brain Injury, 31(12), 1564–1574. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2017.1341645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacco, K [K.], Angeleri, R., Bosco, F. M [F. M.], Colle, L., Mate, D., & Bara, B. G. (2008). Assessment Battery for Communication — ABaCo: A new Instrument for the Evaluation of Pragmatic Abilities. Journal of Cognitive Science, 9(2), 111–157. https://doi.org/10.17791/jcs.2008.9.2.111
   Google Scholar
• Sim, P., Power, E., & Togher, L. (2013). Describing conversations between individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and communication partners following communication partner training: Using exchange structure analysis. Brain Injury, 27(6), 717–742. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2013.775485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• statista. (2022). Germany: Average age of the population from 1950 to 2050. https://www.statista.com/statistics/624303/average-age-of-the-population-in-germany/
   Google Scholar
• Steel, J., Ferguson, A., Spencer, E., & Togher, L. (2017). Language and cognitive communication disorder during post-traumatic amnesia: Profiles of recovery after TBI from three cases. Brain Injury, 31(13–14), 1889–1902. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2017.1373200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struchen, M. A., Clark, A. N., Sander, A. M., Mills, M. R., Evans, G., & Kurtz, D. (2008). Relation of executive functioning and social communication measures to functional outcomes following traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation, 23(2), 185–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate, R., Kennedy, M., Ponsford, J., Douglas, J., Velikonja, D., Bayley, M [Mark], & Stergiou-Kita, M [Mary] (2014). INCOG Recommendations for Management of Cognition Following Traumatic Brain Injury, Part III: Executive Function and Self-Awareness. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 29 (4),338. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher, L., & Hand, L. (1998). Use of politeness markers with different communication partners: An investigation of five subjects with traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 12(7–8), 755–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039808249571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher, L., Wiseman-Hakes, C., Douglas, J., Stergiou-Kita, M [M.], Ponsford, J., Teasell, R., Bayley, M [M.], & Turkstra, L. S. (2014). INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, part IV: cognitive communication. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 29 (4). https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000071
   Google Scholar
• Togher, L., McDonald, S., & Code, C. (2014). Social and communication disorders following traumatic brain injury. In S. McDonald, L. Togher, & C. Code (Eds.), Brain, behaviour and cognition. Social and communication disorders following traumatic brain injury (pp. 1–25). Psychology Press Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Tran, S., Kenny, B., Power, E., Tate, R., McDonald, S., Heard, R., & Togher, L. (2018). Cognitive-communication and psychosocial functioning 12 months after severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 32(13–14), 1700–1711. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2018.1537006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher, L., McDonald, S., & Code, C. (2014). Social and communication disorders following traumatic brain injury. In S. McDonald, L. Togher, & C. Code (Eds.), Brain, behaviour and cognition. Social and communication disorders following traumatic brain injury (pp. 1–25). Psychology Press Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Turkstra, L. S., Coelho, C. A., & Ylvisaker, M. (2005). The use of standardized tests for individuals with cognitive-communication disorders. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26(4), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-922101
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turkstra, L. S., & Politis, A. M. (2017). Traumatic Brain Injury. In L. Cummings (Ed.), Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology: Vol. 11. Research in Clinical Pragmatics. Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Velikonja, D., Tate, R., Ponsford, J., McIntyre, A., Janzen, S., & Bayley, M [Mark] (2014). Incog recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, part V: Memory. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 29(4), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whelan, B.‑M. (2011). Assessment and Treatment of Cognitive-Linguistic Disorder in Parkinson Disease. In D. G. Theodoros & L. O. Ramig (Eds.), Communication and swallowing in Parkinson disease (pp. 179–198). Plural Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Willmes, K., & Fimm, B. (2020). Einzelfalldiagnostik (1. Auflage). Fortschritte der Neuropsychologie: Band 21. Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, N., Gindri, G., Oliveira, C. R.de, & Fonseca, R. P. (2011). Pragmatic and executive functions in traumatic brain injury and right brain damage: An exploratory comparative study. Dementia & Neuropsychologia, 5(4), 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-57642011DN05040013
   PubMedGoogle Scholar