499
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Word retrieval in aphasia: From naming tests to connected speech and the impact on well-being

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 738-757 | Received 13 Feb 2023, Accepted 16 Jun 2023, Published online: 10 Jul 2023

References

  • Armstrong, D. (2000). A survey of community gardens in upstate New York: Implications for health promotion and community development. Health & Place, 6(4), 319–327.
  • Barnay, J. L., Wauquiez, G., Bonnin-Koang, H. Y., Anquetil, C., Pérennou, D., Piscicelli, C., … & Benaim, C. (2014). Feasibility of the Cognitive Assessment scale for Stroke Patients (CASP) vs. MMSE and MoCA in aphasic left hemispheric stroke patients. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 57(6–7), 422–435. ‏
  • Bastiaanse, R., & Jonkers, R. (1998). Verb retrieval in action naming and spontaneous speech in agrammatic and anomic aphasia. Aphasiology, 12(11), 951–969.
  • Benaim C, Wauquiez G, Pérennou D, Piscicelli C, Lucas-Pineau B, Bonnin-Koang HY, Vuadens P, Binquet C, Bourredjem A, Devilliers H. (2022). Cognitive assessment scale for stroke patients (CASP): A multicentric validation study. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 65 (3).101594.
  • Ben-Or, G., & Biran, M. (2021). Aphasia Impact Questionnaire 21 (AIQ-21): Hebrew version. Ezra Le-Marpe Rehabilitation Center.
  • Best, W., Greenwood, A., Grassly, J., Herbert, R., Hickin, J., & Howard, D. (2013). Aphasia rehabilitation: Does generalisation from anomia therapy occur and is it predictable? A case series study. Cortex, 49(9), 2345–2357.
  • Biran, M., & Friedmann, N. (2004). SHEMESH: Naming a hundred objects. Tel Aviv University.
  • Biran, M., & Friedmann, N. (2005). From phonological paraphasias to the structure of the phonological output lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 589–616.
  • Biran, M., Novogrodsky, R., Harel-Nov, A., Gil, M., & Bloch, A. (2018). What we can learn from naming errors of children with language impairment at preschool age. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 32(4), 298–315.
  • Boucher, J., Marcotte, K., Brisebois, A., Courson, M., Houzé, B., Desautels, A., … & Brambati, S. M. (2022). Word-finding in confrontation naming and picture descriptions produced by individuals with early post-stroke aphasia. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 36(6), 1422–1437.
  • Boyle, M. (2014). Test-retest stability of word retrieval in aphasic discourse. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 966–978.
  • Bryant, L., Ferguson, A., & Spencer, E. (2016). Linguistic analysis of discourse in aphasia: A review of the literature. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 30(7), 489–518.
  • Butterworth, B. (1992). Disorders of phonological encoding. Cognition, 42, 261–286.
  • Charalambous, M., Phylactou, P., Kountouri, A., Serafeim, M., Psychogios, L., Annoni, J. M., & Kambanaros, M. (2022). Adaptation of the Aphasia Impact Questionnaire-21 into Greek: A Reliability and Validity Study. Clinical and Translational Neuroscience, 6(4), 24.
  • Conroy, P., Sage, K., & Ralph, M. L. (2009). Improved vocabulary production after naming therapy in aphasia: can gains in picture naming generalise to connected speech? International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 44(6), 1036–1062.
  • Doedens, W. J., & Meteyard, L. (2020). Measures of functional, real-world communication for aphasia: A critical review. Aphasiology, 34(4), 492–514.
  • Doedens, W. J., & Meteyard, L. (2022). What is functional communication? A theoretical framework for real-world communication applied to aphasia rehabilitation. Neuropsychology Review, 1–37.
  • Doesborgh, S. J., van de Sandt-Koenderman, M. W., Dippel, D. W., van Harskamp, F., Koudstaal, P. J., & Visch-Brink, E. G. (2004). Effects of semantic treatment on verbal communication and linguistic processing in aphasia after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Stroke, 35(1), 141–146.
  • Ellis, A. W., & Young, A. W. (1996). Human Cognitive Neuropsychology. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Fergadiotis, G., Hula, W. D., Swiderski, A. M., Lei, C. M., & Kellough, S. (2019). Enhancing the efficiency of confrontation naming assessment for aphasia using computer adaptive testing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(6), 1724–1738.
  • Fergadiotis, G., & Wright, H. H. (2016). Modelling confrontation naming and discourse performance in aphasia. Aphasiology, 30(4), 364–380.
  • Friedmann, N., Biran, M., & Dotan, D. (2013). Lexical retrieval and breakdown in aphasia and developmental language impairment. In C. Boeckx & K. K. Grohmann (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Biolinguistics (pp. 350–374). Cambridge University Press.
  • Gagarina, N. V., Klop, D., Kunnari, S., Tantele, K., Välimaa, T., Balčiūnienė, I., … & Walters, J. (2012). MAIN: Multilingual assessment instrument for narratives. ZAS Papers in Linguistics, 56, 155–155.
  • Herbert, R., Hickin, J., Howard, D., Osborne, F., & Best, W. (2008). Do picture‐naming tests provide a valid assessment of lexical retrieval in conversation in aphasia? Aphasiology, 22(2), 184–203.
  • Hilari, K., & Byng, S. (2009). Health‐related quality of life in people with severe aphasia. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 44(2), 193–205.
  • Hilari, K., Byng, S., Lamping, D. L., & Smith, S. C. (2003). Stroke and aphasia quality of life scale-39 (SAQOL-39): Evaluation of acceptability, reliability and validity. Stroke, 34, 1944–1950.
  • Hilari, K., Needle, J. J., & Harrison, K. L. (2012). What are the important factors in health-related quality of life for people with aphasia? A systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 93(1), S86–S95.
  • Holland, A., Frattali, C., & Fromm, D. (1999). CADL-2: Communication Activities of Daily Living. Pro-ed.
  • Kagan, A., Simmons‐Mackie, N., Rowland, A., Huijbregts, M., Shumway, E., McEwen, S., … & Sharp, S. (2008). Counting what counts: A framework for capturing real‐life outcomes of aphasia intervention. Aphasiology, 22(3), 258–280.
  • Kagan, A., Simmons-Mackie, N., & Shumway, E. (2018). A set of observational measures for rating support and participation in conversation between adults with aphasia and their conversation partners. Aphasia Institute.
  • Kagan, A., Winckel, J., Black, S., Felson Duchan, J., Simmons-Mackie, N., & Square, P. (2004). A set of observational measures for rating support and participation in conversation between adults with aphasia and their conversation partners. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 11(1), 67–83.
  • Kambanaros, M. (2010). Action and object naming versus verb and noun retrieval in connected speech: Comparisons in late bilingual Greek–English anomic speakers. Aphasiology, 24(2), 210–230.
  • Kavé, G., & Goral, M. (2017). Do age-related word retrieval difficulties appear (or disappear) in connected speech?. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 24(5), 508–527.
  • Kertesz, A. (1982). Western Aphasia Battery. Grune & Stratton.
  • Levelt, W. J. M. (1992). Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 42, 1–22.
  • Linnik, A., Bastiaanse, R., & Höhle, B. (2016). Discourse production in aphasia: A current review of theoretical and methodological challenges. Aphasiology, 30(7), 765–800.
  • Long, A. F., Hesketh, A., Paszek, G., Booth, M., & Bowen, A. (2008). Development of a reliable self-report outcome measure for pragmatic trials of communication therapy following stroke: The communication outcome after stroke (COAST) scale. Clinical Rehabilitation, 22, 1083–1094.
  • Manning, L., & Warrington, E. K. (1996). Two routes to naming: A case study. Neuropsychologia, 34, 809–817.
  • Mason, C., & Nickels, L. (2022). Are single-word picture naming assessments a valid measure of word retrieval in connected speech?. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24(1), 97–109.
  • Mayer, J., & Murray, L. (2003). Functional measures of naming in aphasia: Word retrieval in confrontation naming versus connected speech. Aphasiology, 17 (5), 481–497.
  • Nicholas, L. E., & Brookshire, R. H. (1993). A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 36(2), 338–350.
  • Nickels, L. (1997). Spoken Word Production and its Breakdown in Aphasia. Psychology Press.
  • Nickels, L. (2002). Theoretical and methodological issues in the cognitive neuropsychology of spoken word production. Aphasiology, 16, 3–19.
  • Pashek, G. V., & Tompkins, C. A. (2002). Context and word class influences on lexical retrieval in aphasia. Aphasiology, 16 (3), 261–286.
  • Prins, R., & Bastiaanse, R. (2004). Analyzing the spontaneous speech of aphasic speakers. Aphasiology, 18(12), 1075–1091.
  • Pritchard, M., Hilari, K., Cocks, N., & Dipper, L. (2018). Psychometric properties of discourse measures in aphasia: Acceptability, reliability, and validity. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 53(6), 1078–1093.
  • Ribeiro Lima, R., Rose, M. L., Lima, H. N., Guarinello, A. C., Santos, R. S., & Massi, G. A. (2021). Socio-demographic factors associated with quality of life after a multicomponent aphasia group therapy in people with sub-acute and chronic post-stroke aphasia. Aphasiology, 35(5), 642–657.
  • Richardson, J. D., Hudspeth Dalton, S. G., Fromm, D., Forbes, M., Holland, A., & MacWhinney, B. (2018). The relationship between confrontation naming and story gist production in aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(1S), 406–422.
  • Rosenheck, N., Biran, M., & Ben-Or, G. (2021). Cognitive Assessment for Stroke Patients (CASP): Hebrew version. Ezra Le-Marpe Rehabilitation Center.
  • Schwartz, M. F., & Hodgson, C. (2002). A new multiword naming deficit: Evidence and interpretation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 263–288.
  • Simmons-Mackie, N. (2013). Frameworks for managing communication support for people with aphasia. In N. Simmons-Mackie, J. M. King, & D. R. Beukelman (Eds.), Supporting Communication for Adults with Acute and Chronic Aphasia (pp. 11–50). Paul H. Brookes Pub.
  • Simmons-Mackie, N., Kagan, A., Victor, J. C., Carling-Rowland, A., Mok, A., Hoch, J. S., … & Streiner, D. L. (2014a). The assessment for living with aphasia: Reliability and construct validity. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(1), 82–94.
  • Simmons-Mackie, N., Savage, M. C., & Worrall, L. (2014b). Conversation therapy for aphasia: A qualitative review of the literature. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 49, 511–526.
  • Simmons-Mackie, N., Threats, T. T., & Kagan, A. (2005). Outcome assessment in aphasia: A survey. Journal of Communication Disorders, 38(1), 1–27.
  • Soroker, N. (1997). Hebrew Western Aphasia Battery. Loewenstein Hospital Rehabilitation Center.
  • Stark, B. C., Dutta, M., Murray, L. L., Bryant, L., Fromm, D., MacWhinney, B., … & Sharma, S. (2021). Standardizing assessment of spoken discourse in aphasia: A working group with deliverables. American journal of speech-language pathology, 30(1S), 491–502.
  • Swinburn, K., Best, W., Beeke, S., Cruice, M., Smith, L., Pearce Willis, E., & McVicker, S. J. (2019). A concise patient reported outcome measure for people with aphasia: The aphasia impact questionnaire 21. Aphasiology, 33, 1035–1060.
  • Swinburn, K. & Byng, S. (2006). The Communication Disability Profile. Connect Press.
  • Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Rose, T., Le Dorze, G., Cruice, M., Isaksen, J., Gauvreau, C. A. (2017). Which outcomes are most important to people with aphasia and their families? An international nominal group technique study framed within the ICF. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39, 1364–1379.
  • Wilshire, C. E. W., & McCarthy, R. A. (2002). Evidence for a context-sensitive word retrieval disorder in a case of nonfluent aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 165–186.
  • World Health Organization. (‎2001)‎. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. World Health Organization.
  • Worrall, L., Sherratt, S., Rogers, P., Howe, T., Hersh, D., Ferguson, A., & Davidson, B. (2011). What people with aphasia want: Their goals according to the ICF. Aphasiology, 25(3), 309–322.
  • Yaşar, E., Günhan Şenol, N. E., Ertürk Zararsız, G., & Birol, N. Y. (2022). Adaptation of the Aphasia Impact Questionnaire-21 into Turkish: Reliability and validity study. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 32(7), 1550–1575.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.