A decade of change in regional head injury care: a retrospective review

References

• DOH. National Service framework for long-term conditions. DOH, London 2005
   Google Scholar
• The Royal College of Surgeons of England. Report of the Working Party on Head Injuries, circulated with Executive Letter 1986, 93: 115
   Google Scholar
• Harrogate Seminar Report 8. The Management of Acute Head Injury. DHSS, London 1983
   Google Scholar
• Briggs M, Clark P, Crockard A, et al. Guidelines for initial management of head injury. Suggestions from a group of neurosurgeons. BMJ 1984; 288: 983–985
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wallace S, Gullan R, Byrne P, Bennett J, Perez-Avila C. Use of a pro forma for head injuries in the accident and emergency department—the way forward. J Accid Emerg Med 1994; 11: 33–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matta B, Menon D. Severe head injury in the UK and Ireland: a survey of practice and the implications for management. Crit Care Med 1996; 24: 1743–1748
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seeley H, Maimaris C, Carroll G, Kellerman J, Pickard J. Implementing the Galasko Report on the management of head injuries: the Eastern Region approach. Emerg Med J 2001; 18(5)358–365
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pickard J. Paediatric neurosurgery in the United Kingdom: reports and models for provision. Br J Neurosurg 2002; 16(3)206–207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson P. Future perspectives in the acute management of head injury. Br J Surg 2003; 90: 769–771, EHIG
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seeley H, Maimaris C. Standards for head injury and the NSF for Long-term Conditions. HSJ, London May, 2005, Eastern Head Injury Group
   Google Scholar
• Seeley H, Maimaris C, Hutchinson P, et al. Standards for Head Injury management in acute hospitals: evidence from the 6 million population of the Eastern Region. Emerg Med J 2006; 23: 128–132
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Royal College of Surgeons of England. Report of the working party on the management of patients with head injuries. RCS, London 1999
   Google Scholar
• British Association of Accident and Emergency Medicine. Implementing the Galasko Report on Head Injury Care—implications for A&E departments. BAEM, London 2000
   Google Scholar
• Society of British Neurological Surgeons. Safe Neurosurgery 2000. SBNS, London 2000
   Google Scholar
• Society of British Neurological Surgeons. Safe Paediatric Neurosurgery 2001. SBNS, London 2001
   Google Scholar
• The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Guidelines on the early management of patients with a head injury. SIGN, Edinburgh 2000, SIGN No. 46
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Clinical Excellence. Head injury. Triage, assessment, investigation and early management of head injury in infants, children and adults. NICE, London 2003
   Google Scholar
• British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine. Standards for specialist in-patient and community rehabilitation services. BRSM, London 2002
   Google Scholar
• British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine and Royal College of Physicians. Rehabilitation following acquired brain injury: national clinical guidelines. BRSM, London 2003
   Google Scholar
• The Health Committee Head Injury: Rehabilitation. Third Report of the Health Committee 2000 – 1. House of Commons, London 2001
   Google Scholar
• Pickard J, Seeley H, Kirker S, et al. Mapping rehabilitation resources for head injury. J R Soc Med 2004; 97: 384–389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley L, Kirker S, Corteen E, et al. Inappropriate acute neurosurgical bed occupancy and shortfalls in rehabilitation: implications for the National Service Framework. Emerg Med J 2006; 23: 128–132
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Department of Health. Reforming emergency care—first steps to a new approach. DOH, London 2001
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Physicians. Working party report: interface of A&E and Acute Medicine. RCP, London 2002 Available at: www.rcplondon.ac.uk
   Google Scholar
• Trauma Audit and Research Network. Developing effective care for injured patients through process and outcome analysis and dissemination. TARN, University of Manchester, Manchester 2003
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. Improving emergency care in England. NAO, London 2004
   Google Scholar
• Alberti G. Transforming emergency care in England. DOH, London 2004
   Google Scholar
• FAEM and BAEM. Workforce in emergency medicine. 2004, Available at: www.emergena/med.org.UK/CEM/Background/Workforce
   Google Scholar
• Alberti G. The emergency department: medicine and surgery interface problems and solutions. DOH, London 2004
   Google Scholar
• Stiell A, Wells G, Vandemheen L, et al. The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet 2001; 357: 1391–1396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultan H, Boyle A, Pereira M, Antoun N, Maimaris C. Application of the Canadian CT head rules in managing minor head injuries in a UK emergency department. Emerg Med J 2004; 21: 420–425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle A, Santarius L, Maimaris C. Evaluation of the impact of the Canadian CT head rule on British practice. Emerg Med J 2004; 21: 426–428
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilkins I, Menon D, Matta B. Management of comatose head-injured patients: are we getting any better?. Anaesth 2001; 56(4)350–369
   Google Scholar
• Patel H, Menon D, Tebbs S, et al. Specialist neurocritical care and outcome from head injury. Intens Care Med 2002; 28: 547–553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel H, Bouamra O, Woodford M, et al. Trends in head injury outcome from 1989 to 2003 and the effect of neurosurgical care: an observational study. Lancet 2005; 336: 1538–1543, on behalf of the Trauma and Research Network
   Google Scholar
• Website of the Eastern Head Injury Group, containing electronic copies of HI Standards and Rehabilitation Codes and other work of the EHIG, Available at: www.ehig.org.uk
   Google Scholar