References
- Chisholm, Roderick. 1973. The problem of the criterion. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.
- DeRose, Keith. 1992. Contextualism and knowledge attributions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52: 913–929.10.2307/2107917
- Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1976. Witchcraft, oracles, and magic among the Azande. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Goldman, Alvin. 1992. What is justified belief? In his Liaisons: Philosophy meets the cognitive and social sciences, pp. 105–126. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Goldman, Alvin. 2010. Epistemic relativism and reasonable disagreement. In Disagreement, edited by R. Feldman and T. A. Warfield, pp. 187–215. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226078.001.0001
- Kornblith, Hilary. 1993. Inductive inference and its natural ground. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Kuhn, Thomas S. 1996. The structure of scientific revolutions. 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001
- Laudan, Larry. 1996. Beyond positivism and relativism. Boulder, Co: Westview Press.
- Lehrer, Keith. 1990. Theory of knowledge. London: Routledge.
- Perin, Casey. 2010. The demands of reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557905.001.0001
- Rysiew, Patrick. 2011. Relativism and contextualism. In A companion to relativism, edited by S. D. Hales, pp. 286–305. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444392494
- Sankey, Howard. 2000. Methodological pluralism, normative naturalism and the realist aim of science. In After Popper, Kuhn and Feyerabend, edited by R. Nola and H. Sankey, pp. 211–229. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-3935-9
- Sankey, Howard. 2010. Witchcraft, relativism and the problem of the criterion. Erkenntnis 72: 1–16.10.1007/s10670-009-9193-7
- Sankey, Howard. 2011. Epistemic relativism and the problem of the criterion. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42: 562–570.10.1016/j.shpsa.2011.09.012
- Sankey, Howard. 2012. Scepticism, relativism and the argument from the criterion. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43: 182–190.10.1016/j.shpsa.2011.12.026
- Sankey, Howard. 2013a. How the epistemic relativist may use the sceptic’s strategy: A reply to Markus Seidel. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44: 140–144.10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.10.003
- Sankey, Howard. 2013b. Methodological incommensurability and epistemic relativism. Topoi 32: 33–41.10.1007/s11245-012-9139-6
- Seidel, Markus. 2013. Why the epistemic relativist cannot use the sceptic’s strategy. A comment on Sankey. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44: 134–139.10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.06.004
- Williams, Michael. 2007. Why (Wittgensteinian) contextualism is not relativism. Episteme 4: 93–114.10.3366/epi.2007.4.1.93