Dealing with Conspiracy Theory Attributions

References

• Basham, L. 2018. “Joining the Conspiracy.” Argumenta 3 (2): 271–290.
   Google Scholar
• Bjerg, O., and T. Presskorn-Thygesen. 2017. “Conspiracy Theory: Truth Claim or Language Game?” Theory, Culture & Society 34 (1): 137–159. doi:10.1177/0263276416657880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blume, S. 2017. Immunization: How Vaccines Became Controversial. London: Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bratich, J. Z. 2008. Conspiracy Panics: Political Rationality and Popular Culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, A. 2016. “The Annihilation of Memory and Silent Suffering: Inhibiting Outrage at the Injustice of Torture in the War on Terror in Australia.” PhD Thesis, University of Wollongong. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/4865/
   Google Scholar
• Buenting, J., and J. Taylor. 2010. “Conspiracy Theories and Fortuitous Data.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 40 (4): 567–578. doi:10.1177/0048393109350750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cernic, M. 2018. Ideological Constructs of Vaccination. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Vega Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coady, D. 2006. Conspiracy Theories: The Philosophical Debate. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Colgrove, J. 2006. State of Immunity: The Politics of Vaccination in Twentieth-Century America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conis, E. 2015. Vaccine Nation: America’s Changing Relationship with Immunization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• deHaven-Smith, L. 2013. Conspiracy Theory in America. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X. 2014. The Philosophy of Conspiracy Theories. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M R. X., ed. 2018. Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Ehreth, J. 2003. “The Value of Vaccination: A Global Perspective.” Vaccine 21 (27–30): 4105–4107. doi:10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00377-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, S., and B. Martin. 2015. “Challenging Economic Inequality: Tactics and Strategies.” Economic and Political Weekly 50 (49): 42–48.
   Google Scholar
• Goertzel, T. 2010. “Conspiracy Theories in Science.” EMBO Reports 11 (7): 493–499. doi:10.1038/embor.2010.84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goertzel, T. 2019. “The Conspiracy Theory Pyramid Scheme.” In Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them, edited by J. Uscinski, 226–242. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, T., and B. Martin. 2006. “Defamation and the Art of Backfire.” Deakin Law Review 11 (2): 115–136. doi:10.21153/dlr2006vol11no2art238.
   Google Scholar
• Grimes, D. R. 2016. “On the Viability of Conspiratorial Beliefs.” PLoS One 11 (1): e0147905. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147905.
   Google Scholar
• Habakus, L. K., and M. Holland, eds. 2011. Vaccine Epidemic: How Corporate Greed, Biased Science, and Coercive Government Threaten Our Human Rights, Our Health, and Our Children. New York: Skyhorse.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, K. 2018. “Conspiracy Theories and the Paranoid Style: Do Conspiracy Theories Posit Implausibly Vast and Evil Conspiracies?” Social Epistemology 32 (1): 24–40. doi:10.1080/02691728.2017.1352625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harambam, J. 2020. Contemporary Conspiracy Culture: Truth and Knowledge in an Era of Epistemic Instability. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harambam, J., and S. Aupers. 2015. “Contesting Epistemic Authority: Conspiracy Theories on the Boundaries of Science.” Public Understanding of Science 24 (4): 466–480. doi:10.1177/0963662514559891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harambam, J., and S. Aupers. 2017. “‘I Am Not a Conspiracy Theorist’: Relational Identifications in the Dutch Conspiracy Milieu.” Cultural Sociology 11 (1): 113–129. doi:10.1177/1749975516661959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson-West, P. 2007. “‘Trusting Blindly Can Be the Biggest Risk of All’: Organised Resistance to Childhood Vaccination in the UK.” Sociology of Health & Illness 29 (2): 198–215. doi:10.1111/shil.2007.29.issue-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husting, G., and M. Orr. 2007. “Dangerous Machinery: ‘Conspiracy Theorist’ as a Transpersonal Strategy of Exclusion.” Symbolic Interaction 30 (2): 127–150. doi:10.1525/si.2007.30.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolley, D., and K. M. Douglas. 2014. “The Effects of Anti-vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions.” PLoS One 9 (2): e89177. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089177.
   Google Scholar
• Kitta, A. 2012. Vaccinations and Public Concern in History: Legend, Rumor, and Risk Perception. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, M., and J. Fairhead. 2007. Vaccine Anxieties: Global Science, Child Health & Society. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Leask, J., P. Kinnersley, C. Jackson, F. Cheater, H. Bedford, and G. Rowles. 2012. “Communicating with Parents about Vaccination: A Framework for Health Professionals.” BMC Pediatrics 12 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1186/1471-2431-12-154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, N. 2007. “Radically Socialized Knowledge and Conspiracy Theories.” Episteme 4 (2): 181–192. doi:10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.181.
   Google Scholar
• Loussikian, K. 2016. “Uni Accepts Thesis on Vaccine ‘Conspiracy’.” The Australian, January 13, 1, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B. 1999. “Suppression of Dissent in Science.” Research in Social Problems and Public Policy 7: 105–135.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B. 2007. Justice Ignited: The Dynamics of Backfire. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B. 2009. “Managing Outrage over Genocide: Case Study Rwanda.” Global Change, Peace & Security 21 (3): 275–290. doi:10.1080/14781150903168978.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B. 2011. “Debating Vaccination.” Living Wisdom 8: 14–40.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B. 2015. “Censorship and Free Speech in Scientific Controversies.” Science and Public Policy 42 (3): 377–386. doi:10.1093/scipol/scu061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, B. 2016. “News with a Negative Frame: A Vaccination Case Study.” March 3. http://www.bmartin.cc/pubs/16Loussikian.html
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B. 2017. “Defending University Integrity.” International Journal for Educational Integrity 13 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1007/s40979-016-0012-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, B. 2018a. Vaccination Panic in Australia. Sparsnäs, Sweden: Irene Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B. 2018b. “Persistent Bias on Wikipedia: Methods and Responses.” Social Science Computer Review 36 (3): 379–388. doi:10.1177/0894439317715434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, B. 2019. “Uptake of a Conspiracy Theory Attribution.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (6): 16–30.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B. 2020. “Dealing with Conspiracy Theory Attributions.” Social Epistemology [This paper].
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B., and T. Gray. 2005. “How to Make Defamation Threats and Actions Backfire.” Australian Journalism Review 27 (1): 157–166.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, P., T. Graham, and B. Martin. 2010. “Outrage Management in Cases of Sexual Harassment as Revealed in Judicial Decisions.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 34 (2): 165–180. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01559.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, E. O., and T. J. Wood. 2014. “Conspiracy Theories and the Paranoid Style(s) of Mass Opinion.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (4): 952–966. doi:10.1111/ajps.12084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigden, C. 2007. “Conspiracy Theories and the Conventional Wisdom.” Episteme 4 (2): 219–232. doi:10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.219.
   Google Scholar
• Plotkin, S. A., W. A. Orenstein, P. A. Offit, and K. M. Edwards. 2017. Plotkin’s Vaccines. 7th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Räikkä, J., and L. Basham. 2019. “Conspiracy Theory Phobia.” In Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them, edited by J. E. Uscinski, 178–186. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• reasonable hank. 2012. “Of Publication, and Sleights of Hand.” September 18. https://reasonablehank.com/2012/09/18/of-publication-and-sleights-of-hand/
   Google Scholar
• Reich, J. A. 2016. Calling the Shots: Why Parents Reject Vaccines. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R., and A. Vermeule. 2009. “Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures.” Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (2): 202–227. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00325.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thalmann, K. 2019. The Stigmatization of Conspiracy Theory since the 1950s: ‘A Plot to Make Us Look Foolish’. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Uscinski, J. E., ed. 2019a. Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uscinski, J. E. 2019b. “Down the Rabbit Hole We Go!” In Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them, edited by J. E. Uscinski, 1–32. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uscinski, J. E. 2019c. “Are Conspiracy Theories ‘Anti-science’?” In Conspiracy Theories and the People Who Believe Them, edited by J. E. Uscinski, 199–200. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, K. E., J. Leask, M. A. Burgess, and P. B. McIntyre. 2019. “PhD Thesis Opposing Immunisation: Failure of Academic Rigour with Real-world Consequences.” Vaccine 37 (12): 1541–1545. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.12.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilyman, J. 2015. “A Critical Analysis of the Australian Government’s Rationale for Its Vaccination Policy.” PhD thesis, University of Wollongong. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/4541/
   Google Scholar
• Wilyman, J. 2019. “PhD Thesis on Vaccination Policy: Scholarly and Socially Relevant.” Vaccination Decisions. https://www.vaccinationdecisions.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Response-final-to-the-Vaccine-Article-by-Wiley-et-al190417.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M. J. 2016. “Some Dare Call It Conspiracy: Labeling Something a Conspiracy Theory Does Not Reduce Belief in It.” Political Psychology 37 (5): 695–705. doi:10.1111/pops.12285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, M. J., and K. M. Douglas. 2013. “‘What about Building 7?’ A Social Psychological Study of Online Discussion of 9/11 Conspiracy Theories.” Frontiers in Psychology 4 (article 409): 1–9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2019. “Ten Threats to Global Health in 2019.” https://www.who.int/emergencies/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019
   Google Scholar