How Do Philosophical Positions Influence the Social Science Research Process? A Classification and Metaphor Analysis of Researchers’ Descriptions

References

• Andriessen, Daniel. 2006. “On the Metaphorical Nature of Intellectual Capital: A Textual Analysis.” Journal of Intellectual Capital 7 (1): 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930610639796.
   Google Scholar
• Aplin, Rachael. 2017. “Exploring the Role of Mothers in ‘Honour’ Based Abuse Perpetration and the Impact on the Policing Response.” Women’s Studies International Forum 60: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2016.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boroditsky, Lera. 2001. “Does Language Shape Thought?: Mandarin and English Speakers’ Conceptions of Time.” Cognitive Psychology 43 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2001.0748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugman, Britta C., Christian Burgers, and Barbara Vis. 2019. “Metaphorical Framing in Political Discourse through Words vs. Concepts: A Meta-Analysis.” Language and Cognition 11 (1): 41–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2019.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, Alan. 2006. “Paradigm Peace and the Implications for Quality.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 9 (2): 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570600595280.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, Alan. 2016. Social Research Methods. 5th ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casasanto, Daniel. 2009. “Embodiment of Abstract Concepts: Good and Bad in Right- and Left-Handers.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 138 (3): 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, Adam. 2021. “How Often are Basic Details of the Research Process Mentioned in Social Science Research Papers?” Learned Publishing 34 (2): 128–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, Kathleen M. T., Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie, and R. B. Johnson. 2012. “Securing a Place at the Table.” American Behavioral Scientist 56 (6): 849–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764211433799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deem, Rosemary, and Lisa Lucas. 2006. “Learning about Research: Exploring the Learning and Teaching/Research Relationship Amongst Educational Practitioners Studying in Higher Education.” Teaching in Higher Education 11 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510500400040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deignan, Alice, and Lynne Cameron. 2009. “A Re-Examination of Understanding is Seeing.” Cognitive Semiotics 5 (1–2): 220–243. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.220.
   Google Scholar
• DeMarrais, Kathleen, Lauren Moret, and Elizabeth M. Pope. 2018. ““I Found a Fit”: Doctoral Student Narratives of Coming to a Theoretical Home in a Qualitative Research Class.” International Research in Higher Education 3 (2): 83. https://doi.org/10.5430/irhe.v3n2p83.
   Google Scholar
• Denscombe, Martyn. 2008. “Communities of Practice: A Research Paradigm for the Mixed Methods Approach.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 2 (3): 270–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808316807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, Norman K, and Yvonna S. Lincoln, eds. 2011. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dodge, Ellen K. 2016. “A Deep Semantic Corpus-Based Approach to Metaphor Analysis: A Case Study of Metaphoric Conceptualizations of Poverty.” Constructions and Frames 8 (2): 256–294. https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.8.2.05dod.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Vyvyan. 2004. The Structure of Time: Language, Meaning and Temporal Cognition. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Fàbregues, Sergi, Marie-Hélène Paré, and Julio Meneses. 2019. “Operationalizing and Conceptualizing Quality in Mixed Methods Research: A Multiple Case Study of the Disciplines of Education, Nursing, Psychology, and Sociology.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 13 (4): 424–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817751774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, Jerome. 2006. From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3135.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Flusberg, Stephen J., Teenie Matlock, and Paul H. Thibodeau. 2017. “Metaphors for the War (Or Race) against Climate Change.” Environmental Communication 11 (6): 769–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1289111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, Raymond W. 1994. “Figurative Thought and Figurative Language.” In Handbook of Psycholinguistics, edited by Morton Ann Gernsbacher, 411–446. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, Raymond W. 2011. “Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory.” Discourse Processes 48 (8): 529–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2011.606103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grady, Joseph E. 1997. “Theories are Buildings Revisited.” Cognitive Linguistics 8 (4): 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1997.8.4.267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, Jennifer C., and Jori N Hall. 2010. “Dialectics and Pragmatism: Being of Consequence.” In SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, edited by Abbas Tashakkori and Charles Teddlie, 119–144. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193.n5
   Google Scholar
• Guba, Egon G., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 1981. Effective Evaluation. 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, Egon G., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 1982. “Epistemological and Methodological Bases of Naturalistic Inquiry.” Educational Technology Research and Development 30 (4): 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765185.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, Egon G., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 1989. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, Egon G., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 1994. “Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 105–117. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, Egon G., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 2005. “Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitatvie Research, edited by Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 191–215. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Harrits, Gitte Sommer. 2011. “More than Method?: A Discussion of Paradigm Differences within Mixed Methods Research.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 5 (2): 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811402506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hathcoat, John D., and Cara Meixner. 2017. “Pragmatism, Factor Analysis, and the Conditional Incompatibility Thesis in Mixed Methods Research.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 11 (4): 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815622114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hathcoat, John D., Cara Meixner, and M. C. Nicholas. 2018. “Ontology and Epistemology.” In Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences, edited by P. Liamputtong, 99–116. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann, J. Berenike. 2013. “Metaphor in Academic Discourse: Linguistic Forms, Conceptual Structures, Communicative Functions and Cognitive Representations.” PhD thesis, VU University.
   Google Scholar
• Koro-Ljungberg Mirka, Diane Yendol-Hoppey, Jason Jude Smith, and Sharon B. Hayes. 2009. “(E)pistemological Awareness, Instantiation of Methods, and Uninformed Methodological Ambiguity in Qualitative Research Projects.” Educational Researcher 38 (9): 687–699. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09351980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovář, Jan. 2019. “Variations of Metaphors in Party Manifestos About EU Finality: Assessing Party Positions through Conceptual Metaphors.” In Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, edited by Julien Perrez, Min Reuchamps, and Paul H. Thibodeau, 151–176. Vol. 85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.85.07kov.
   Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Zoltán. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, George. 1993. “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.” In Metaphor and Thought, edited by Andrew Ortony, 202–205. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, George. 2008. “The Neural Theory of Metaphor.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, edited by Raymond W. Gibbs Jr., 17–38. 1st ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.003.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lather, Patti. 2006. “Paradigm Proliferation as a Good Thing to Think with: Teaching Research in Education as a Wild Profusion.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 19 (1): 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390500450144.
   Google Scholar
• Leavy, Patricia. 2017. Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Yvonna S., Susan A. Lynham, and Egon G. Guba. 2018. “Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences, Revisited.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 108–150. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Low, Graham. 1999. ‘This Paper Thinks … ’: Investigating the Acceptability of the Metaphor “AN ESSAY IS A PERSON.” In Researching and Applying Metaphor, edited by Lynne Cameron and Graham Low, 221–248. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macmillan Education Limited. 2019. “Macmillan Dictionary.” https://www.macmillandictionary.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, Philipp. 2014. Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution. Klagenfurt, Austria. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173.
   Google Scholar
• McLachlan, Christopher J. and Reece J. Garcia. 2015. “Philosophy in Practice? Doctoral Struggles with Ontology and Subjectivity in Qualitative Interviewing.” Management Learning 46 (2): 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507615574634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, Cornelia. 2008. Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking: A Dynamic View. Chicago: Univeristy of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nacey, Susan. 2020. “Figurative Production in a Computer-Mediated Discussion Forum.” In Producing Figurative Expression, edited by John Barnden and Andrew Gargett, 363–388. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, William Lawrence. 2012. Basics of Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Pallas, Aaron M. 2001. “Preparing Education Doctoral Students for Epistemological Diversity.” Educational Researcher 30 (5): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030005006.
   Google Scholar
• Plowright, David. 2013. “To What Extent do Postgraduate Students Understand the Principles of Mixed Methods in Educational Research?” International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 7 (1): 66–82. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2013.7.1.66.
   Google Scholar
• Radden, Günter. 2018. “Molly Married Money: Reflections on Conceptual Metonymy.” In Conceptual Metonymy, edited by Olga Blanco-Carrión, Antonio Barcelona, and Rosella Pannain, 161–182. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Schoonenboom, Judith. 2019. “A Performative Paradigm for Mixed Methods Research.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research 13 (3): 284–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817722889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinew, Dawn, and Tami Moore. 2010. “Exploring Epistemological Diversity in a Doctoral Seminar.” In On Becoming a Scholar: Socialization and Development in Doctoral Education, edited by Susan K. Gardner and Pilar Mendoza, 243–264. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, Gerard J. 2011. “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor — Now New and Improved!” Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9 (1): 26–64. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.9.1.03ste.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, Gerard J., Aletta G. Dorst, J. Berenike Herrmann, Anna A. Kaal, Tina Krennmayr, and Trijntje Pasma. 2010. A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Thibodeau, Paul H., and Lera Boroditsky. 2011. “Metaphors We Think with: The Role of Metaphor in Reasoning.” PLoS ONE 6 (2): e16782. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibodeau, Paul H., Teenie Matlock, and Stephen J. Flusberg. 2019. “The Role of Metaphor in Communication and Thought.” Language and Linguistics Compass 13 (5): 5. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar