AI-Testimony, Conversational AIs and Our Anthropocentric Theory of Testimony

References

• Albrecht, J., E. Kitanidis, and A. J. Fetterman. 2022. “Despite‘ Super-human’ Performance, Current LLMs are Unsuited for Decisions About Ethics and Safety.” ML Safety Workshop, 36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2022), arXiv Preprint arXiv: 2212.06295.
   Google Scholar
• Alfano, M., and G. Skorburg. 2018. “Extended Knowledge, the Recognition Heuristic, and Epistemic Injustice.” In Extended Epistemology, edited by Adam J. Carter, Andy Clark, Jesper Kallestrup, Orestis S. Palermos, Duncan Pritchard. 239–265. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarado, R. 2023. “AI as an Epistemic Technology.” Science and Engineering Ethics 29 (5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-023-00451-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anscombe, G. E. M. 1963. Intention. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Baier, A. 1986. “Trust and Antitrust.” Ethics 96 (2): 231–260. https://doi.org/10.1086/292745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behdadi, D., and C. Munthe. 2020. “A Normative Approach to Artificial Moral Agency.” Minds and Machines 30 (2): 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09525-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendel, O. 2017. “The Synthetization of Human Voices.” AI & Society 34 (1): 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0748-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender, E. M. 2023. “Policy Makers: Please Don’t Fall for the Distractions of #AIhype.” https://medium.com/@emilymenonbender/policy-makers-please-dont-fall-for-the-distractions-of-aihype-e03fa80ddbf1.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, E. M., T. Gebru, A. McMillan-Major, and S. Shmitchell 2021, March. “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big?.” In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, March 3–10, 2021, Virtual Event, Canada, 610–623.
   Google Scholar
• Bloor, D. 1999. “Anti-Latour.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 30 (1): 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(98)00038-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, M., H. Bleher, and P. Hummel. 2021. “A Leap of Faith: Is There a Formula for ‘Trustworthy’ AI?” The Hastings Center Report 51 (3): 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. 2022. ”One Day, AI Will Seem as Human as Anyone. What Then?” Wired, Accessed June 26, 2022. https://www.wired.com/story/lamda-sentience-psychology-ethics-policy/.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B., Lohn, A., and Musser, M. 2021. “Truth, Lies, and Automation: How Language Models Could Change Disinformation.” Center for Security and Emerging Technology, https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/truth-lies-and-automation.
   Google Scholar
• Burrell, J. 2016. “How the Machine ‘Thinks’: Understanding Opacity in Machine Learning Algorithms.” Big Data & Society 3 (1): 205395171562251. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for AI Safety. (2023). “Statement on AI Risk.” https://www.safe.ai/statement-on-ai-risk.
   Google Scholar
• Clément, F. 2010. “To Trust or Not to Trust? Children’s Social Epistemology.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (4): 531–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-010-0022-3.
   Google Scholar
• Coady, C. A. J. 1992. Testimony: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coeckelbergh, M. 2012. “Can We Trust Robots?” Ethics and Information Technology 14 (1): 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-011-9279-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, H. M. 2010. “Humans Not Instruments.” Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science 4 (1): 138–147. https://doi.org/10.4245/sponge.v4i1.11354.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. M., and M. Kusch. 1998. The Shape of Actions: What Humans and Machines Can Do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• DAIR. 2023. “Statement from the Listed Authors of Stochastic Parrots on the ‘AI Pause’ Letter.” https://www.dair-institute.org/blog/letter-statement-March2023/.
   Google Scholar
• Danaher, J. 2020. “Robot Betrayal: A Guide to the Ethics of Robotic Deception.” Ethics and Information Technology 22 (2): 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-019-09520-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Descartes, R. 1985. “Discourse on the Method.” In The Philosophical Works of Descartes, edited by J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, and D. Murdoch, pp. 111–151. Vol. I. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• D-ID. 2023. “Experience the Future of Conversational AI with D-ID.” https://www.d-id.com.
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, P. R. 2011. Knowledge on Trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Firt, E. 2023. “Ought We Align the Values of Artificial Moral Agents?” AI and Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00264-x.
   Google Scholar
• Floridi, L. 2023. “AI as Agency without Intelligence: On ChatGPT, Large Language Models, and Other Generative Models.” Philosophy and Technology 36 (1): 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00621-y.
   Google Scholar
• Floridi, L., and J. W. Sanders. 2004. “On the Morality of Artificial Agents.” Minds and Machines 14 (3): 349–379. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MIND.0000035461.63578.9d.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freiman, O. 2014. “Towards the Epistemology of the Internet of Things Techno-Epistemology and Ethical Considerations Through the Prism of Trust.” The International Review of Information Ethics 22: 6–22. https://doi.org/10.29173/irie124.
   Google Scholar
• Freiman, O. 2021. The Role of Knowledge in the Formation of Trust in Technologies. Dissertation, Bar-Ilan University.
   Google Scholar
• Freiman, O. 2022. “Making Sense of the Conceptual Nonsense ‘Trustworthy AI’.” AI & Ethics 3 (4): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00241-w.
   Google Scholar
• Freiman, O. 2023. “Instrument-Based Beliefs, Testimony-Based Beliefs, and Technology-Based Beliefs: Analysis of Beliefs Acquired from a Conversational AI.” Episteme 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2023.12.
   Google Scholar
• Freiman, O., and N. Geslevich Packin. 2022. “Artificial Intelligence Products Cannot Be Moral Agents.” Toronto Star. Accessed August 7. https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/2022/08/07/artificial-intelligence-products-cannot-be-moral-agents-the-tech-industry-must-be-held-responsible-for-what-it-develops.html.
   Google Scholar
• Freiman, O., and B. Miller. 2021. “Can Artificial Entities Assert?” In Oxford Handbook of Assertion, edited by S. C. Goldberg, 415–434. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, E. 2002. “Trusting Others in the Sciences: A Priori or Empirical Warrant?” Studies in History & Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (2): 373–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-3681(02)00006-7.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, E. 2015. “How to Make Invidious Distinctions Amongst Reliable Testifiers.” Episteme 12 (2): 173–202. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2015.6.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frost-Arnold, K. 2019. “Epistemic Injustice and the Challenges of Online Moderation”, Invited Keynote Lecture at Knowledge in a Digital World: Epistemic Injustice in Bias and Other Challenges in the Age of Artificial Intelligence, Canadian Society for Epistemology, Montreal, 14-15 November, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Future of Life Institute. 2023. “Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter.” https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/pause-giant-ai-experiments.
   Google Scholar
• Gelfert, A. 2014. A Critical Introduction to Testimony. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gelfert, A. 2018. “Testimony.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London: Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/0123456789-P049-2.
   Google Scholar
• Gerken, M. 2022. Scientific Testimony: Its Roles in Science and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, S. C. 2012. “Epistemic Extendedness, Testimony, and the Epistemology of Instrument-Based Belief.” Philosophical Explorations: An International Journal for the Philosophy of Mind and Action 15 (2): 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2012.670719.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, S. C. 2016. “Epistemically Engineered Environments.” Synthese 197 (7): 2783–2802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1413-0.
   Google Scholar
• Google AI Blog. (2018). “Google Duplex: An AI System for Accomplishing Real-World Tasks Over the Phone”. Google AI Blog, Accessed May 8, 2018. https://ai.googleblog.com/2018/05/duplex-ai-system-for-natural-conversation.html.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, P. J. 1997. “What is Testimony?” The Philosophical Quarterly 47 (187): 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, C. R. 2008. “Epistemology of Testimony.” In Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://iep.utm.edu/ep-testi/.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P. 1971. “Intention and Uncertainty”, Proceedings of the British Academy 5: 263–279.
   Google Scholar
• Hao, K., and A. P. Hernández 2022. “How the AI Industry Profits from Catastrophe.” MIT Technology Review, Accessed April 20, 2022. https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/04/20/1050392/ai-industry-appen-scale-data-labels/.
   Google Scholar
• Harrer, S. 2023. “Attention is Not All You Need: The Complicated Case of Ethically Using Large Language Models in Healthcare and Medicine.” E Bio Medicine 90. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104512.
   Google Scholar
• Hatherley, J. J. 2020. “Limits of Trust in Medical AI.” Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (7): 478–481. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2019-105935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurst, L. 2022. “ChatGPT: Why the Human-Like AI Chatbot Suddenly Has Everyone Talking”, EuroNews, Accessed December 14, 2022. https://www.euronews.com/next/2022/12/14/chatgpt-why-the-human-like-ai-chatbot-suddenly-got-everyone-talking.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. 1996. “Trust as an Affective Attitude.” Ethics 107 (1): 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/233694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusch, M. 2002. Knowledge by Agreement: The Programme of Communitarian Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lackey, J. 2006. “It Takes Two to Tango: Beyond Reductionism and Non-Reductionism in the Epistemology of Testimony.” In The Epistemology of Testimony, edited by J. Lackey and E. Sosa, 160–189. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lackey, J. 2008. Learning from Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lackey, J., and E. Sosa, Eds. 2006. The Epistemology of Testimony. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1988. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. M. 2008. “Media Equation Theory.” In The International Encyclopedia of Communication, edited by W. Donsbach. Wiley Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecm035.
   Google Scholar
• Licklider, J. C. R., and R. W. Taylor. 1968. “The Computer as a Communication Device.” Science and Technology 76 (2): 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Z., H. Akin, R. Rao, B. Hie, Z. Zhu, W. Lu Smetanin, N. et al., A. Rives. 2023. “Evolutionary-Scale Prediction of Atomic-Level Protein Structure with a Language Model.” Science 379 (6637): 1123–1130. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ade2574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Lira, A., and Y. Tang. 2023. “Can Chatgpt Forecast Stock Price Movements? Return Predictability and Large Language Models.” SSRN Electronic Journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07619. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4412788.
   Google Scholar
• Metzinger, T. 2019. “Ethics Washing Made in Europe (Der Tagesspiegel, 2019).” https://www.tagesspiegel.de/politik/eu-guidelines-ethics-washing-made-in-europe/24195496.html.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, B., and O. Freiman. 2021. “Trust and Distributed Epistemic Labor.” In The Routledge Handbook of Trust and Philosophy, edited by J. Simon, 341–353. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, B., and I. Record. 2013. “Justified Belief in a Digital Age: On the Epistemic Implications of Secret Internet Technologies.” Episteme 10 (2): 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2013.11.
   Google Scholar
• Mökander, J., J. Schuett, H. R. Kirk, and L. Floridi. 2023. “Auditing Large Language Models: A Three-Layered Approach.” AI and Ethics 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00289-2.
   Google Scholar
• Mollman, S. 2022. “ChatGPT Gained 1 Million Users in Under a Week. Here’s Why the AI Chatbot is Primed to Disrupt Search as We Know It”, Yahoo! Finance, December 9, 2022. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/chatgpt-gained-1-million-followers-224523258.html.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, Y., and C. Nass. 1996. “How ‘Real’ are Computer Personalities? Psychological Responses to Personality Types in Human-Computer Interaction.” Communication Research 23 (6): 651–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023006002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, V. C. 2020. “Ethics of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. Zalta. Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Neges, K. S. 2018. Instrumentation. A Study in Social Epistemology. PhD Dissertation, University of Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Nickel, P. J. 2013a. “Artificial Speech and Its Authors.” Minds and Machines 23 (4): 489–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-013-9303-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickel, P. J. 2013b. “Trust in Technological Systems.” In Norms in Technology, edited by M. J. De Vries, S. O. Hansson, and A. W. Meijers, 223–237. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nieva, R. 2018. “Exclusive: Google’s Duplex Could Make Assistant the Most Lifelike AI Yet.” CNET News, Accessed May 9, 2018. https://www.cnet.com/news/google-assistant-duplex-at-io-could-become-the-most-lifelike-ai-voice-assistant-yet.
   Google Scholar
• Nissenbaum, H. 1996. “Accountability in a Computerized Society.” Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (1): 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02639315.
   Google Scholar
• Open AI. 2022. “ChatGPT: Optimizing Language Models for Dialogue.” Accessed November 30, 2022. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt/.
   Google Scholar
• Origgi, G. 2008. Qu’est-ce que la confiance?. Paris: VRIN.
   Google Scholar
• Pasquale, F. 2015. The Black Box Society: The Secrgorithms That Control Money and Information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, J. C. 1983. “The Epistemological Engine.” Philosophica 32 (2): 77–95. https://doi.org/10.21825/philosophica.82574.
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, J. C. 2010. “It’s Not About Technology.” Knowledge, Technology & Policy 23 (3–4): 445–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-010-9125-5.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, D. 2004. “The Epistemology of Testimony.” Philosophical Issues 14 (1): 326–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-6077.2004.00033.x.
   Google Scholar
• Ruane, E., A. Birhane, and A. Ventresque 2019. “Conversational AI: Social and Ethical Considerations.” AICS, (pp. 104–115). https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2563/aics_12.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Salinga, M., and M. Wuttig. 2011. “Phase-Change Memories on a Diet.” Science 332 (6029): 543. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setiya, K. 2018. “Intention.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/intention.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, M. 2022. “Talking About Large Language Models.” Communications of the ACM 76 (2): 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1145/3624724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapin, S. 1994. A Social History of Truth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapin, S., and S. Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, J. 2015. “Distributed Epistemic Responsibility in a Hyperconnected Era.” In The Onlife Manifesto, edited by L. Floridi, 145–159, Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Slota, S. C., K. R. Fleischmann, S. Greenberg, N. Verma, B. Cummings, L. Li, and C. Shenefiel. 2021. “Many Hands Make Many Fingers to Point: Challenges in Creating Accountable AI.” AI & Society 38 (4): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01302-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strasser, A. 2023. “On Pitfalls (And Advantages) of Sophisticated Large Language Models.” In Ethics in Online AI-Based Systems: Risks and Opportunities in Current Technological Trends, edited by J. Casas-Roma, S. Caballe, and J. Conesa. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.17511.
   Google Scholar
• Tiku, N. 2022. “The Google Engineer Who Thinks the Company’s AI Has Come to Life.” The Washington Post, https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/06/11/google-ai-lamda-blake-lemoine/.
   Google Scholar
• Turing, A. M. 1950. “Computing Machinery and Intelligence.” Mind 59 (236): 433–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433.
   Google Scholar
• Véliz, C. 2023. “Chatbots Shouldn’t Use Emojis.” Nature 615 (7952): 375. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00758-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vipra, J., and A. Korinek 2023. “Market Concentration Implications of Foundation Models: The Invisible Hand of ChatGPT.” Brookings Institute, Accessed September 7, 2023. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/market-concentration-implications-of-foundation-models-the-invisible-hand-of-chatgpt.
   Google Scholar
• VoiceBot AI. 2019. Voice Assistant Consumer Adoption Report 2018. https://voicebot.ai/voice-assistant-consumer-adoption-report-2018.
   Google Scholar
• Waddell, K. 2019. “Defending Against Audio Deepfakes Before It’s Too Late.” Axios, Accessed April 3, 2019. https://www.axios.com/deepfake-audio-ai-impersonators-f736a8fc-162e-47f0-a582-e5eb8b8262ff.html.
   Google Scholar
• Wallach, W., and C. Allen. 2008. Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, B. 2020. “Reliabilism and the Testimony of Robots.” Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 24 (3): 332–356. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne202049123.
   Google Scholar
• Yee, A. K. 2023. “Information Deprivation and Democratic Engagement.” Philosophy of Science 90 (5): 1110–1119. https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2023.9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar