Innovation, complementarity, and exporting. Evidence from German manufacturing firms

References

• Amara, N., R. Landry, N. Becheikh, and M. Ouimet. 2008. “Learning and Novelty of Innovation in Established Manufacturing SMEs.” Technovation 28: 450–463.10.1016/j.technovation.2008.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amir, R. 2005. “Supermodularity and Complementarity in Economics: An Elementary Survey.” Southern Economic Journal 71: 636–660.10.2307/20062066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athey, S., and A. Schmutzler. 1995. “Product and Process Flexibility in an Innovative Environment.” The Rand Journal of Economics 26: 557–574.10.2307/2556006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aw, B. Y., M. J. Roberts, and T. Winston. 2007. “Export Market Participation, Investments in R&D and Worker Training, and the Evolution of Firm Productivity.” The World Economy 30: 83–104.10.1111/twec.2007.30.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aw, B. Y., M. J. Roberts, and D. Y. Xu. 2008. “R&D Investments, Exporting and the Evolution of Firm Productivity.” American Economic Review 98: 451–456.10.1257/aer.98.2.451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, R. E., D. J. Bartholomew, H. M. Bremner, and H. D. Brunk. 1972. Statistical inference under order restrictions. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, S. O., and P. H. Egger. 2013. “Endogenous Product Versus Process Innovation and a Firm’s Propensity to Export.” Empirical Economics 44: 329–354.10.1007/s00181-009-0322-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, A. B., J. Eaton, J. B. Jensen, and S. Kortum. 2003. “Plants and Productivity in International Trade.” American Economic Review 93: 1268–1290.10.1257/000282803769206296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, A. B., and J. B. Jensen. 1999. “Exceptional Exporter Performance: Cause, Effect, or Both?” Journal of International Economics 47: 1–25.10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00027-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, A. B., and J. B. Jensen. 2004. “Why Some Firms Export?” Review of Economics and Statistics 86: 561–569.10.1162/003465304323031111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, A. B., J. B. Jensen, S. J. Redding, and P. K. Schott. 2007. “Firms in International Trade.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 21: 105–130.10.1257/jep.21.3.105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocquet, R., O. Brossard, and M. Sabatier. 2007. “Complementarities in Organizational Design and the Diffusion of Information Technologies: An Empirical Analysis.” Research Policy 36 (3): 367–386.10.1016/j.respol.2006.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bustos, P. 2011. “Trade Liberalization, Exports, and Technology Upgrading: Evidence on the Impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinian Firms.” American Economic Review 101: 304–340.10.1257/aer.101.1.304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldera, A. 2010. “Innovation and Exporting: Evidence from Spanish Manufacturing Firms.” Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv) 146: 657–689.
   Google Scholar
• Carrée, M., B. Lokshin, and R. Belderbos. 2011. “A Note on Testing for Complementarity and Substitutability in the Case of Multiple Practices.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 35: 263–269.10.1007/s11123-010-0189-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., and E. Golovko. 2011. “Innovation and Internationalization Through Exports.” Journal of International Business Studies 42: 56–75.10.1057/jibs.2010.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., E. Golovko, and E. Martínez-Ros. 2010. “Innovation, Exports and Productivity.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 28: 372–376.10.1016/j.ijindorg.2010.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., and R. Veugelers. 2006. “In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition.” Management Science 52 (1): 68–82.10.1287/mnsc.1050.0470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantini, J. A., and M. Melitz. 2007. “The Dynamics of Firm-level Adjustment to Trade Liberalization.” In The Organization of Firms in a Global Economy, edited by E. Helpman, D. Marin, and T. Verdier, 107–141. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cozzarin, B. P., and J. C. Percival. 2006. “Complementarities between Organisational Strategies and Innovation.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15 (3): 195–217.10.1080/10438590500222691
   Google Scholar
• Damijan, J. P., Č. Kostevc, and S. Polanec. 2010. “From Innovation to Exporting or Vice Versa?” World Economy 33: 374–398.10.1111/twec.2010.33.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb, P., and P. K. Trivedi. 2006. “Specification and Simulated Likelihood Estimation of a Non-normal Treatment-outcome Model with Selection: Application to Health Care Utilization.” The Econometrics Journal 9: 307–331.10.1111/ectj.2006.9.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron, B., and R. J. Tibshirani. 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, D. A., and J. S. Sekhon. 2010. “Endogeneity in Probit Response Models.” Political Analysis 18: 138–150.10.1093/pan/mpp037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freel, M. 2005. “Patterns of Innovation and Skills in Small Firms.” Technovation 25: 123–134.10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00082-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, J., and P. Vargas. 2009. “The Effect of Financial Constraints, Absorptive Capacity and Complementarities on the Adoption of Multiple Process Technologies.” Research Policy 38 (1): 106–119.10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z. 1998. R&D and Productivity the Econometric Evidence. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guellec, D., and B. van Pottelsberghe. 2000. “Applications, Grants and the Value of Patent.” Economics Letters 69: 109–114.10.1016/S0165-1765(00)00265-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H. 2002. “The Financing of Research and Development.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 18: 35–51.10.1093/oxrep/18.1.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J., H. Ichimura, and P. E. Todd. 1998. “Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator.” Review of Economic Studies 65: 261–294.10.1111/roes.1998.65.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J., and S. Navarro-Lozano. 2004. “Using Matching, Instrumental Variables, and Control Functions to Estimate Economic Choice Models.” Review of Economics and Statistics 86: 30–57.10.1162/003465304323023660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodde, D. A., and F. C. Palm. 1986. “Wald Criteria for Jointly Testing Equality and Inequality Restrictions.” Econometrica 54: 1243–1248.10.2307/1912331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., and N. J. Foss. 2003. “New Human Resource Management Practices, Complementarities and the Impact on Innovation Performance.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 27 (2): 243–263.10.1093/cje/27.2.243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lileeva, A., and D. Trefler. 2010. “Improved Access to Foreign Markets Raises Plant-Level Productivity…for Some Plants.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 125: 1051–1099.10.1162/qjec.2010.125.3.1051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mairesse, J., and P. Mohnen. 2010. “Using Innovation Surveys for Econometric Analysis.” Handbook of the Economics of Innovation 2: 1129–1155.10.1016/S0169-7218(10)02010-1
   Google Scholar
• Melitz, M. 2003. “The Impact of Trade on Intra-industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity.” Econometrica 71: 1695–1725.10.1111/ecta.2003.71.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. 1990. “The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy and Organization.” American Economic Review 80: 511–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. 1995. “Complementarities and Fit Strategy, Structure, and Organizational Change in Manufacturing.” Journal of Accounting Economics 19: 179–208.10.1016/0165-4101(94)00382-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgrom, P., and C. Shannon. 1994. “Monotone Comparative Statics.” Econometrica 62: 157–180.10.2307/2951479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda, A., and S. Rabe-Hesketh. 2006. “Maximum likelihood Estimation of Endogenous Switching and Sample Selection Models for Binary, Ordinal, and Count Variables.” The Stata Journal 6: 285–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohnen, P., and L. H. Roller. 2005. “Complementarities in Innovation Policy.” European Economic Review 49: 1431–1450.10.1016/j.euroecorev.2003.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, A. 2007. “Causal Inference with Observational Data.” Stata Journal 7: 507–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, A. 2011. “Causal Inference for Binary Regression with Observational Data.” CHI11 Stata Conference 6, Stata Users Group, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Percival, J. C., and B. P. Cozzarin. 2008. “Complementarities Affecting the Returns to Innovation.” Industry and Innovation 15 (4): 371–392.10.1080/13662710802273249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichstein, T., and A. Salter. 2006. “Investigating the Sources of Process Innovation Among UK Manufacturing Firms.” Industrial and Corporate Change 15 (4): 653–682.10.1093/icc/dtl014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. 2006. The Modern Firm. Organizational Design for Performance and Growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, T., F. T. Wright, and R. L. Dykstra. 1988. Order restricted statistical inference. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., and D. B. Rubin. 1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrika 70: 41–55.10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., and D. B. Rubin. 1985. “Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity Score.” The American Statistician 39: 33–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savin, N. E. 1980. “The Bonferroni and the Scheffé multiple comparison procedures.” The Review of Economic Studies 47: 255–273.10.2307/2297112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmiedeberg, C. 2008. “Complementarities of Innovation Activities: An Empirical Analysis of the German Manufacturing Sector.” Research Policy 37 (9): 1492–1503.10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvapulle, M. J., and P. K. Sen. 2004. Constrained Statistical Inference: Order, Inequality, and Shape Constraints. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Stock, James H., and Motohiro Yogo. 2005. “Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression.” Chap. 5 in Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas J. Rothenberg, edited by J. H. Stock and D. W. K. Andrews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Topkis, D. M. 1995. “Comparative Statics of the Firm.” Journal of Economic Theory 67: 370–401.10.1006/jeth.1995.1078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topkis, D. M. 1998. Super Modularity and Complementarity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Beveren, I., and H. Vandenbussche. 2010. “Product and Process Innovation and Firms’ Decision to Export.” Journal of Economic Policy Reform 13: 3–24.10.1080/17487870903546267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Long, N., H. Raff, and M. Stahler. 2011. “Innovation and Trade with Heterogeneous Firms.” Journal of International Economics 84: 149–159.10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vega-Jurado, J., A. Gutierrez-Gracia, and I. Fernandez-de-Lucio. 2009. “Does External Knowledge Sourcing Matter for Innovation? Evidence from the Spanish Manufacturing Industry.” Industrial and Corporate Change 18: 637–670.10.1093/icc/dtp023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veugelers, R., and B. Cassiman. 1999. “Make and Buy in Innovation Strategies: Evidence from Belgian Manufacturing Firms.” Research Policy 28 (1): 63–80.10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00106-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, J. 2007. “Exports and Productivity: A Survey of the Evidence from Firm-level Data.” The World Economy 30: 60–82.10.1111/twec.2007.30.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeaple, S. R. 2005. “A Simple Model of Firm Heterogeneity, International Trade, and Wages.” Journal of International Economics 65: 1–20.10.1016/j.jinteco.2004.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar