The impact of demand on innovation and research intensity

References

• Abramovitz, M. 1986. “Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind.” The Journal of Economic History 66 (2): 385–406. doi:10.1017/S0022050700046209.
   Google Scholar
• Aghion, P., P. Askenazy, N. Berman, G. Cette, and L. Eymard. 2012. “Credit Constraints and the Cyclicality of R&D Investment: Evidence from France.” Journal of the European Economic Association 10 (5): 1001–1024. doi:10.1111/j.1542-4774.2012.01093.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aghion, P., and G. Saint-Paul. 1998. “Virtues of Bad Times: Interaction Between Productivity Growth and Economic Fluctuations.” Macroeconomic Dynamics 2 (3): 322–344. doi:10.1017/S1365100598008025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albuquerque, E. M. 1999. “National System of Innovation and Non-OECD Countries: Notes About a Rudimentary and Tentative “Typology.” Brazilian Journal of Political Economy 19 (4): 35–52. doi:10.1590/0101-31571999-1089.
   Google Scholar
• Antonelli, C., and A. Gehringer. 2015. “The Competent Demand Pull Hypothesis: Which Sectors Do Play a Role?” Economia Politica 32: 97–134. doi:10.1007/s40888-015-0003-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archibugi, D., and A. Coco. 2005. “Measuring Technological Capabilities at the Country Level: A Survey and a Menu of Choice.” Research Policy 34: 175–194. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arellano, M., and S. Bond. 1991. “Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations.” The Review of Economic Studies 58: 277–297. doi:10.2307/2297968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvanitis, S., and M. Woerter. 2013. “Firm Characteristics and the Cyclicality of R&D Investments.” Industrial and Corporate Change 23 (5): 1141–1169. doi:10.1093/icc/dtt013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blundell, R., and S. Bond. 2000. “GMM Estimation with Persistent Panel Data: An Application to Production Functions.” Econometric Review 19 (3): 321–340. doi:10.1080/07474930008800475.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, E., and A. Kleinknecht. 1999. “Keynes-Plus? Effective Demand and Changes in Firm-Level R&D: An Empirical Note.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 23: 385–391. doi:10.1093/cje/23.3.385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dosi, G. 1982. “Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories.” Research Policy 11: 147–162. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrizio, K. R., and U. Tsolmon. 2014. “An Empirical Examination of the Procyclicality of R&D Investment and Innovation.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 96 (4): 662–675. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foellmi, R., and J. Zweimüller. 2016. “Is Inequality Harmful for Innovation and Growth? Price versus Market Size Effects.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 27: 359–378. doi:10.1007/s00191-016-0451-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana, R., and M. Guerzoni. 2008. “Incentives and Uncertainty: An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Demand on Innovation.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 32: 927–946. doi:10.1093/cje/ben021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, C. 1995. ”The National System of Innovation in Historical Perspective.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 19 (1): 5–24; ( reprinted in D. Archibugi and J. Michie (eds), Technology, Globalisation and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, Chapter 2, pp. 24-49).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Quevedo, J., G. Pellegrino, and M. Savona. 2016. “Reviving Demand-Pull Perspectives: The Effect of Demand Uncertainty and Stagnancy on R&D Strategy.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 41 (4): 1087–1122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geroski, P. A., and C. F. Walters. 1995. “Innovative Activity Over the Business Cycle.” Economic Journal 105: 916–928. doi:10.2307/2235158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha, J., and P. Howitt. 2007. “Accounting for Trends in Productivity and R&D: A Schumpeterian Critique of Semi-Endogenous Growth Theory.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 9 (4): 733–774. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4616.2007.00045.x.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., P. Moncada-Paternò-Castello, S. Montresor, and A. Vezzani. 2016. “Financing Constraints, R&D Investments and Innovative Performances: New Empirical Evidence at the Firm Level for Europe.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 25 (3): 183–196. doi:10.1080/10438599.2015.1076194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inklaar, R., and M. Timmer (2008). GGDC Productivity Level Database: International Comparisons of Output, Inputs and Productivity at the Industry Level. GGDC Research Memorandum No. GD-104, Groningen Growth and Development Centre, 1–81.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. I. 1995. “R&D-Based Models of Economic Growth.” The Journal of Political Economy 103 (4): 759–784. doi:10.1086/262002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaldor, N. 1966. Causes of the Slow Rate of Economic Growth of the United Kingdom: An Inaugural Lecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinknecht, A., and B. Verspagen. 1990. “Demand and Innovation: Schmookler Re-Examined.” Research Policy 19: 387–394. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(90)90022-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• León-Ledesma, M. A. 2002. “Accumulation, Innovation and Catching-Up: An Extender Cumulative Growth Model.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 26: 201–216. doi:10.1093/cje/26.2.201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. A, edited by. 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Lybbert, T. J., and N. J. Zolas. 2014. “Getting Patents & Economic Data to Speak to Each Other: An ‘Algorithmic Links with Probabilities’ Approach for Joint Analyses of Patenting and Economic Activity.” Research Policy 43 (3): 530–542. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madsen, J. B. 2008. “Semi-Endogenous versus Schumpeterian Growth Models: Testing the Knowledge Production Function Using International Data.” Journal of Economic Growth 13 (1): 1–26. doi:10.1007/s10887-007-9024-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombie, J, M Pugno, and B Soro, edited by. 2002. Productivity Growth and Economic Performance: Essays on Verdoorn’s Law. London: Palgrave Mcmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• McCombie, J. S. L., and A. Thirlwall. 1994. Economic Growth and the Balance-Of-Payments Constraint. London: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mowery, D., and N. Rosenberg. 1979. “The Influence of Market Demand Upon Innovation: A Critical Review of Some Recent Empirical Studies.” Research Policy 8: 102–153. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(79)90019-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, S., and D. G. Marquis. 1969. Successful Industrial Innovation:A Study of Factors Underlying Innovation in Selected Firms. Washington DC: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Nagaoca, S., M. Kazuyuki, and A. Goto. 2010. ”Patent Statistics as an Innovation Indicator.” In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edited by B. H. Hall and N. Rosenberg, Vol. 2, chap. 25, 1083–1127. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R, edited by. 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2003. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2003. Paris: OECD Publishing
   Google Scholar
• O’Mahony, M., and M. P. Timmer. 2009. “Output, Input and Productivity Measures at the Industry Level: The EU KLEMS Database.” The Economic Journal 119 (538): F374–F403. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02280.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang, M. 2011. “On the Cyclicality of R&D.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 93 (2): 542–553. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez, C., L. Soete, et al. 1988. ”Catching Up in Technology: Entry Barriers and Windows of Opportunity.” In Technical Change and Economic Theory, edited by G. Dosi, 458–479. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Piva, M., and M. Vivarelli. 2007. “Is Demand-Pulled Innovation Equally Important in Different Groups of ?rms?” Cambridge Journal of Economics 31: 691–710. doi:10.1093/cje/bem010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, J. P., and G. Britto. 2017. “Increasing Returns to Scale, Technological Catch-Up and Research Intensity: Endogenising the Verdoorn Coefficient.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 41: 391–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, J. P., and J. S. L. McCombie. 2016a. “The Multi-Sectoral Thirlwall’s Law: Evidence from 14 Developed European Countries Using Product-Level Data.” International Review of Applied Economics 30 (3): 301–325. doi:10.1080/02692171.2015.1102207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, J. P., and J. S. L. McCombie. 2016b. “Differences in Increasing Returns Between Technological Sectors: A Panel Data Investigation Using the EU KLEMS Database.” Journal of Economic Studies 43 (5): 863–878. doi:10.1108/JES-03-2015-0045.
   Google Scholar
• Roodman, D. 2009. “How to Do Xtabond2: An Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata.” The Stata Journal 9 (1): 86–136. doi:10.1177/1536867X0900900106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, F. M. 1982. “Demand-Pull and Technological Invention: Schmookler Revisited.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 30 (3): 225–237. doi:10.2307/2098216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmookler, J. 1966. Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soete, L. 1981. “A General Test of Technological Gap Trade Theory.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 117 (4): 638–660. doi:10.1007/BF02708115.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Ende, J., and W. Dolfsma. 2019. “Technology-Push, Demand-Pull and the Shaping of Technological Paradigms – Patterns in the Development of Computing Technology.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 15: 83–99. doi:10.1007/s00191-004-0220-1.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E. 1978. “Successful Industrial Products from Customer Ideas.” Journal of Marketing 42 (1): 39–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Tunzelmann, N., and Q. Wang. 2003. “An Evolutionary View of Dynamic Capabilities.” Economie Appliquee 56 (3): 33–64.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, V. 1984. “Invention and Innovation in the Chemical Industry: Demand-Pull or Discovery-Push?” Research Policy 13: 211–234. doi:10.1016/0048-7333(84)90015-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar