The morphology and phylogeny of the diatom genera Rhizosolenia, Proboscia, Pseudosolenia and Neocalyptrella from Gulf of Thailand and the Andaman Sea, with description of Rhizosolenia loanicola sp. nov., Proboscia siamensis sp. nov. and Probosciales ord. nov.

References

• Anonymous. 1975. Proposals for a standardization of diatom terminology and diagnoses. Nova Hedwigia Beiheft 53: 323–354.
   Google Scholar
• Balech E. 1964. El plancton de Mar del Plata durante el período 1961—62 (Buenos Aires, Argentina). Boletín del Instituto Biologia Marina Mar del Plata 7: 1–49.
   Google Scholar
• Balech E. 1971. Microplancton de la campaña oceanográ­fica Productividad III. Revista del museo Argentino de Ciencìas Naturales ‘Bernardino Rivadavia’ e Instituto Nacional de Investigación de las Ciencias Naturales. Hidrobiologia 3: 1–202.
   Google Scholar
• Balech E. 1979. Dinoflagelados. Campaña Oceanográfica Argentina Islas Orcadas, 06/75. Servicio de Hidrografía Naval (Buenos Aires) H 655: 1–76.
   Google Scholar
• Boonyapiwat S., 1987. Species and distribution of phytoplankton in the Andaman Sea. Proceedings of the 25th Kasetsart University Conference, Fisheries Section, February 3—5, Bangkok, Thailand: 163 —174. (in Thai).
   Google Scholar
• Boonyapiwat S., 1997. Distribution, abundance and species composition of phytoplankton in the South China Sea, area I: Gulf of Thailand and East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia. Proceedings of the first Technical seminar on marine Fishery resources survey in the South China Sea, area I, Gulf of Thailand and East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia, 24—26 November 1997, Bangkok, Thailand: 111–134.
   Google Scholar
• Boonyapiwat S., Rugpan S., Chuthachan P. & Tongyoo N, 2001. Phytoplankton ecology during 2 monsoon seasons in the Thailand-Vietnam joint survey area in the Gulf of Thailand. Technical Paper No. 74/2011. Department of Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives. 43 pp. (in Thai).
   Google Scholar
• Brightwell T. 1858. Remarks on the genus ‘Rhizosolenia’ of Ehrenberg. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 6: 93–95.
   Google Scholar
• Brun J. 1891. Diatomées, espèces nouvelles marines, fossiles ou pélagiques. Mémoires de la Société de physique et d'Histoire naturelle de Genève 31(seconde partie 1): 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Brunel J. 1962. Le phytoplancton de la Baie des Chaleurs. Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal. 365 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Chamnansinp A., Yang L., Lundholm N. & Moestrup Ø. 2013. Global diversity of two widespread, colony-forming diatoms of the marine plankton, Chaetoceros socialis (syn. C. radians) and Chaetoceros gelidus sp. nov. Journal of Phycology 49: 1128–1141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleve P.T. 1873. On diatoms from the Arctic Sea. Bihang Till Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar 1: 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• Cleve P.T. 1881. On some new and little known diatoms. Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar, 18(5): 1–28, 6 pl.
   Google Scholar
• Cleve P.T. 1897. A treatise on the phytoplankton of the Atlantic and its tributaries and on the periodical change of the plankton of Skagerrak. Upsala Nya Tidnings Aktiebolags Tryckeri. 28 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Cleve P.T. 1901. Plankton from the Indian Ocean and the Malay Archipelago. Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar 35: 1–58.
   Google Scholar
• Cleve-Euler A. 1937. Undersökningar över Öresund. 24. Sundets plankton. I. Sammansättning och fördelning. Lunds Universitets Årsskrift N. F. Avdelning 2 33(9): 1–51.
   Google Scholar
• Cox E.J. 1999. Variation in patterns of valve morphogenesis between representatives of six biraphid diatom genera (Bacillariophyceae). Journal of Phycology 35: 1297–1312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cupp E.E. 1943. Marine plankton diatoms of the West Coast of North America. University of California Press, Berkeley. 237 pp.
   Google Scholar
• De Toni G.B. 1890. Osservazioni sulla tassonomia delle bacillariee (Diatomee): sequita da un prospetto dei generi delle medesime. Notarisia 5: 885–922.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle J.J. & Doyle J.L. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19: 11–15.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg C.G. 1843. Verbreitung und Einfluss des mikroskopischen lebens in Süd- und Nord-Amerika. Abhandlungen der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin, Physikalische Klasse 1841: 291–445.
   Google Scholar
• Ekelund F., Nielsen L.F. & Daugbjerg, N. 2004. The phylogenetic position of the genus Cercomonas. European Journal of Protistology 40: 119–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrario M.E. & Galvàn N.M. 1989. Catálogo de las diatomeas marinas citadas entre los 36° y los 60° S con espe­cial referencia al Mar Argentino. Publicationes Instituto Antártico Argentino 20: 1–327.
   Google Scholar
• Gaarder K.R. 1951. Bacillariophyceae from the ‘Michael Sars’ North Atlantic Deep­Sea Expedition 1910. Results of the Scientific Results of the ‘Michael Sars’ North Atlantic Deep Sea Expedition 2: 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Gran H.H. 1905. Diatomeen. In: Nordisches plankton. (Ed. by K. Brandt & C. Apstein), Botanischer Teil 19: 1–146. Lip­sius and Tischer, Kiel and Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• Guillard R.R.L. & Hargraves P.E. 1993. Stichochrysis immobilis is a diatom, not a chrysophyte. Phycologia 32: 234–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall T.A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hasle G.R. 1975. Some living marine species of the diatom family Rhizosoleniaceae. Nova Hedwigia, Beihefte 53: 99–153.
   Google Scholar
• Hasle G.R. & Syvertsen E.E. 1997. Marine diatoms. In: Identifying marine phytoplankton (Ed. by C.R. Tomas), pp. 5–385. Academic Press, San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Hendey N.I. 1937. The plankton diatoms of the southern seas. Discovery Reports 16: 151–364.
   Google Scholar
• Hendey N.I. 1964. An introductory account of the smaller algae of British coastal waters. Fishery Investigations. Series IV, Part V. Bacillariophyceae (Diatoms). Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London. 317 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Hensen V. 1887. Über die Bestimmung des Planktons. Bericht der Kommision zur wissenschaftlichen Untersuchung der deutschen Meere bei Kiel für die Jahre 1882–86, 5: 1–108.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Becerril D.U. 1995. Planktonic diatoms from the Gulf of California and coasts off Baja California: the genera Rhizosolenia, Proboscia, Pseudosolenia, and for­mer Rhizosolenia species. Diatom Research 10: 251–267.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Becerril D.U., Herrera-Hernández A., Pérez-Mendoz, G. & Ceballos-Corona J.A., 2010. Marine planktonic diatoms of the Order Rhizosolenia (Bacillariophyta) from the tropical Mexican pacific. Vie et milieu - Life and Environment 60(2): 95–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Becerril D.U. & Meave Del Castillo M.E. 1996. The marine planktonic diatom Rhizosolenia robusta (bacillariophyta): morphological studies support its transfer to a new genus, calyptrella gen. nov. Phycologia 35: 198–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Becerril D.U. & Meave Del Castillo M.E. 1997. Neocalyptrella, gen. nov., a new name to replace calyptrella Hernández-Becerril et meave. Phycologia 36: 329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustedt F. 1914. Atlas der Diatomaceenkunde, pls 317—320. In: Dr. A. Schmidt’s Atlas der Diatomaceenkunde. Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• Hustedt F. 1930. Die Kieselalgen Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz unter Berücksichtigung der übrigen Länder Europas sowie der angrenzenden Meeresgebiete. In: Kryptogamen Flora von deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz (Ed. by L. Rabenhorst), pp. 609–920. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft m.b.h. Leipzig 7 (Teil 1, Lieferung 4—5).
   Google Scholar
• Jordan R.W., Ligowski R., Nöthig E.M. & Priddle J. 1991. The diatom genus Proboscia in Antarctic waters. Diatom Research 6: 63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan R.W., Ashworth M., Uezato Y. & Mannin S.R., 2019. Polyphyly and homoplasic structures in rhizosolenioid diatom genera: a review. Plant Ecology and Evolution 152: 142–149. doi:https://doi.org/10.5091/plecevo.2019.1599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan R.W. & Ligowski R. 2004. New observations on Proboscia auxospores, and validation of the family Probosciaceae fam. nov. Vie et Milieu 54: 91–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan R.W. & Ligowski R. 2006. Observations on the auxospores, initial cells and vegetative cells of Proboscia truncata (Bacillariophyta). Nova Hedwigia, Beihefte 130: 201–212.
   Google Scholar
• Karpinsky M.G. 2010. Pseudosolenia calcar-avis (Bacillariophyta, Centrophyceae) in the Caspian Sea. Russian Journal of Biological Invasions 1: 81–86.
   Google Scholar
• Karsten G. 1905. Das Phytoplankton des antarktischen Meeres nach dem Material der deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition, 1898—1899. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition 2: 1—136, 137—219, 223—544.
   Google Scholar
• Karsten G. 1907. Das indische Phytoplankton nach dem Material der deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition 1898—1899. Russian Journal of Biological Invasions 2(2): 221–548.
   Google Scholar
• Lange K.B. 1985. Spatial and seasonal variations of diatom assemblages off the Argentinian coast (South Western Atlantic). Oceanologica Acta 8: 361–370.
   Google Scholar
• Lebour M. 1930. The planktonic diatoms of northern seas. The Ray Society, London. 244 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig W., Strunk O., Westram R., Richter L., Meier H., Kumar Y., Buchner A., Lai T., Steppi S., Jobb G., Förster W., Brettske I., Gerber S., Ginhart A.W., Gross O., Grumann S., Hermann S., Jost R., König A., Liss T., Lüssmann R., May M., Nonhoff B., Reichel B., Strehlow R., Stamatakis A., Stuckmann N., Vilbig A., Lenke M., Ludwig T., Bode A. & Schleifer K.H., 2004. ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Research 32: 1363–1371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manguin E. 1960. Les diatomées de la Terre Adélie. Campagne du ‘Commandant harcot’ 1949–1950. Annales Scientifique Naturelles Botaniques 12: 223–363.
   Google Scholar
• Marques Da Cunha, A. & Da Fonseca O. 1917. O microplancton do Atlantico nas imediações de Mar del Plata. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 9: 3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Medlin L.K., Boonprakob A., Lundholm N. & Moestrup Ø. 2021. On the morphology and phylogeny of the diatom species Rhizosolenia setigera: comparison of the type material to modern cultured strains, and a taxonomic revision. Nova Hedwigia Beiheft 151: 219–243.
   Google Scholar
• Miller M.A., Pfeiffer W. & Schwartz T. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 14 Nov. 2010, New Orleans, LA, pp. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira-Filho H., Eskinazi-Leça E., Valenta-Moreira I.M. & Cunha J.A. 1999. Avalçào taxonômica e ecológica das diatomáceas (Chrysophyta-Bacillariophyceae) marinhas e estuarinas nos estados de Pernambuco, Paríba, Rio Grande do Norte, Cearà, Piauí, Maranghao, Pará e Amapá, Brasil. Travalhos Oceanográficos dea Universidada Federal de Pernambuco Recife 27: 55–90.
   Google Scholar
• Norman G. 1861. On some undescribed species of Diatomaceae. Transactions of the Microscopical Society of London, New Series 9: 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Nunn G.B., Theisen B.F., Christensen B. & Arctander P. 1996. Simplicity correlated size growth of the nuclear 28S ribosomal RNA D3 expansion segment in the crustacean order isopoda. Journal of Molecular Evolution 42: 211–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostenfeld C.H. 1902. Marine plankton diatoms. In: Flora of Koh Chang: Contribution to the knowledge of the vegetation in the Gulf of Siam (Ed. by J. Schmidt). Botanisk Tidsskrift 25: 219–245.
   Google Scholar
• Ostenfeld C.H. 1913. On the distribution of Bacillariales (diatoms) in the plankton of the North European waters according to the international sea investigations, with special relation to hydrographical conditions. Conseil Permanent International pour l’Exploration de la Mèr, Resumé Planktonique,. Bulletin Trimestrie 3: Partie: 403–508.
   Google Scholar
• Ostenfeld C.H. & Schmidt J. 1901. Plankton fra det Røde Hav og Adenbugten. Videnskabelige Meddelelserfra Naturhistorisk Forening København 1901: 141–190.
   Google Scholar
• Patarajinda S., Teanpisut K. & Panchote A. 2005. Species composition of marine diatom genera rhizosolenia, Pseudosolenia and Proboscia in Tungka Bay, Chumporn province. Proceedings of 43rd Kasetsart University Annual Conference 43: 90–99 (in Thai).
   Google Scholar
• Peragallo H. 1888. Diatomées du Midi de la France. Diatomées de la Baie de Villefranche (Alpes Maritimes). Bulletin de la Société d’Histoire Naturelle de Toulouse 22: 5–100.
   Google Scholar
• Peragallo H. 1892. Monographie du genre Rhizosolenia et de quelques genres voisins. Le Diatomiste 1: 79–82.
   Google Scholar
• Peragallo H. & Peragallo M. 1897–1908. Diatomées marines de France et des districts maritimes voisins (Ed. by M. J. Tempère), Grez-sur-Loing. Text: 493 plus 48 pp., Atlas: 137 pl.
   Google Scholar
• Phuriputr H. 2008. Biodiversity of marine plankton at Mu Ko Ra—Ko Phra Thong National Park, Phangnga Province. M.Sc. thesis, Kasetsart University, Thailand. 219 pp. (in Thai).
   Google Scholar
• Posada D. & Crandall K.A. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 14: 817–818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard A., 1861. A history of Infusoria, including the Desmidiaceae and Diatomaceae, British and foreign. Whittaker & Co., London. 968 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Romero O. & Hensen C. 2002. Oceanographic control of biogenic opal and diatoms in surface sediments of the southwestern Atlantic. Marine Geology 186: 263–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronquist F. & Huelsenbeck J.P. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 19: 1572–1574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross R., Cox E.J., Karayeva N.I., Mann D.G., Paddock T.B.B., Simonsen R. & Sims P.A. 1979. An amended terminology for the siliceous components of the diatom cell. Nova Hedwigia, Beihefte 64: 513–533.
   Google Scholar
• Round F.E., Crawford R.M. & Mann D.G. 1990. The diatoms. biology and morphology of the genera. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 747 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Scholin C.A., Herzog M., Sogin M. & Anderson D.M. 1994. Identification of group- and strain-specific genetic markers for globally distributed alexandrium (Dinophyceae). 2. Sequence analysis of a fragment of the LSU rRNA gene. Journal of Phycology 30: 999–1011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröder B. 1906. Beiträge zur kenntnis des Phytoplanktons Warmer Meere. Vierteljahres Schrift der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich 51: 319–377.
   Google Scholar
• Schultze M. 1858. Innere Bewegungserscheinungen bei Diatomeen der Nordsee aus den Gattungen coscinodiScus, Denticella, Rhizosolenia. Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und Wissenschaftliche Medicin 1858: 330–342 plus Tafel XIII.
   Google Scholar
• Schultze M. 1859. Phenomena of internal movements in Diatomaceæ of the North Sea, belonging to the genera Coscinodiscus, Denticella, and Rhizosolenia. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 7: 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Schütt F. 1900. Centrifugale und simultane Membranverdickungen. Jahrbücher für Wissenschaftliche Botanik 35: 470–534.
   Google Scholar
• Stamatakis A., Hoover P. & Rougemont J. 2008. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web-servers. Systematic Biology 75: 758–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subrahmanyan R. 1946. A systematic account of the marine plankton diatoms of the Madras coast. Proceedings of Indian Academy of Sciences 24 B: 85–197.
   Google Scholar
• Sundström B.G. 1984. Observations on Rhizosolenia clevei Ostenfeld (Bacillariophyceae) and Richelia intracellularis Schmidt (Cyanophyceae). Botanica Marina 27: 345–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundström B.G. 1986. The marine diatom genus Rhizosolenia: a new approach to the taxonomy. Doctoral Dissertation, Lund University, Sweden.117 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Sunesen I. & Sar E.A. 2007. Marine diatoms from Buenos Aires coastal waters (Argentina). IV. Rhizosolenia s. str., Neocalyptrella, Pseudosolenia, Proboscia. Phycologia 46: 628–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swofford D.L. 2001. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi K., Jordan R. & Priddle J. 1994. The diatom genus Proboscia in subarctic waters. Diatom Research 9: 411–428.
   Google Scholar
• Teanpisut K. 2006. Species diversity of marine planktonic diatoms around Chang Islands, Trat Province. M.Sc.thesis, Kasetsart University, Thailand. 236 pp. (in Thai).
   Google Scholar
• Thompson J.D., Higgins, D.G. & Gibson T.J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22: 4673–4680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vouilloud A.A. 2003. Catálogo de diatomeas continentales y marinas de Argentina. Versión 1.0. Asociación Argentina de Ficologia, La Plata. 304 pp.
   Google Scholar
• White T.J., Bruns T., Lee S. & Taylor J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: PCR protocols. A guide to methods and applications (Ed. by M.A. Innis, D.H. Gelfand, J. J. Smimsky & T.J. White), pp. 315–322. Academic Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Wongrat L., Chalermsiri Y., Wuticharenmamkol N., Kamwachirapitak P., Hanpongkittikul A., Chitlang I. & Teanpisut K., 2003. Marine plankton survey in Chumporn and Trad province. Proceeding of Thai Resourses 18–68 (in Thai).
   Google Scholar
• Yun S.M. & Lee J.H. 2010. Morphology and distribution of some marine diatoms, family Rhizosoleniaceae, in Korean coastal waters: a genus Rhizosolenia 1. Algae 25: 173–182.
   Google Scholar
• Yun S.M. & Lee J.H. 2011. Morphology and distribution of some marine diatoms, family rhizosoleniaceae, genus Proboscia, Neocalyptrella, Pseudosolenia, Guinardia and Dactyliosolen in Korean coastal waters. Algae 26: 299–315.
   Google Scholar
• Yun S.M., Lee S.D. & Lee J.H. 2011. Morphology and distribution of some marine diatoms, family Rhizosoleniaceae genus Rhizosolenia in Korean coastal waters. Algae 26: 141–152.
   Google Scholar