Filling reference libraries with diatom environmental sequences: strengths and weaknesses

References

• Abarca N., Jahn R., Zimmermann J., & Enke N. 2014. Does the cosmopolitan diatom Gomphonema parvulum (Kutzing) Kutzing have a biogeography? PLoS ONE 9: 1–18. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afnor. 2003. Norme française NF EN 13946. Qualite de l’eau - Guide Pour l’echantillonnage En Routine et Le Pretraitement Des Diatomees Benthiques de Rivieres., 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Afnor. 2016. Norme française NF T90–354 Avril 2016. Qualité de l’eau – Échantillonnage, traitement et analyse de diatomées benthiques en cours d’eau et canaux. La Plaine Saint-Denis Cedex: Association Française de Normalisation (AFNOR); p. 1–119.
   Google Scholar
• Altschul F.S., Gish W., Miller W., Myers W.E. & Lipman J.D. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology 215: 403–410. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour M.T., Gerritsen J., Snyder B.D. & Stribling J.B. 1999. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish. Second edition. – EPA 841–B–99–002. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Bourrelly P. & Manguin E. 1952. Algues d'eau douce de la Guadeloupe et dépendances. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Société d'Edition d'Enseignement Supérieur, Paris: 98–100.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan B.J., McMurdie P.J., Rosen M.J., Han A.W., Johnson A.J.A. & Holmes S.P. 2016. DADA2: high high-resolution sample inference from illumina amplicon data. Nature Methods 13: 581–583. http://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canino A., Bouchez A., Laplace-Treyture C., Domaizon I. & Rimet F. 2021. Phytool, a ShinyApp to homogenise taxonomy of freshwater microalgae from DNA barcodes and microscopic observations. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 5: 199–205. http://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.5.74096
   Google Scholar
• Cen. 2014. EN 13946. Water quality—Guidance standard for the routine sampling and pretreatment of benthic diatoms from rivers. CEN-CEN ELEC, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Cen. 2018. Water quality – CEN/TR 17245 – Technical report for the routine sampling of benthic diatoms from rivers and lakes adapted for metabarcoding analyses. CEN standard. CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels, pages 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Chonova T, Rimet F, Bouchez A, & Keck F. 2021. Revisiting global biogeography of freshwater diatoms: new insights from molecular data. ARPHA Conference Abstracts 4: e65129. http://doi.org/10.3897/aca.4.e65129
   Google Scholar
• Dayrat B. 2005. Towards integrative taxonomy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 85: 407–415. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00503.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg C.G. 1843. Verbreitung und Einfluss des mikroskopischen Lebens in Süd-und Nord-Amerika. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin: 291–445, 4 pls.
   Google Scholar
• Eulin A., Lefrançois E., Delmas F., Coste M., Gueguen J. & Rosebery J. 2017a. Flore des diatomées des Antilles françaises. Volume 1. Agence française pour la biodiversité, Office de l’eau Guadeloupe, Office de l’eau Martinique, Irstea, DEAL Martinique, DEAL Guadeloupe. 145 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Eulin A., Lefrançois E., Delmas F., Coste M., Gueguen J. & Rosebery J. 2017b. Flore des diatomées des Antilles françaises. Volume 2. Agence française pour la biodiversité, Office de l’eau Guadeloupe, Office de l’eau Martinique, Irstea, DEAL Martinique, DEAL Guadeloupe. 147 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Eulin A., Lefrançois E., Delmas F., Coste M., Gueguen J., & Rosebery J. 2017c. Flore des diatomées des Antilles françaises. Volume 3. Agence française pour la biodiversité, Office de l’eau Guadeloupe, Office de l’eau Martinique, Irstea, DEAL Martinique, DEAL Guadeloupe. 132 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Eulin A., Lefrançois E., Delmas F., Coste M., Gueguen J. & Rosebery J. 2017d. Flore des diatomées des Antilles françaises. Volume 4. Agence française pour la biodiversité, Office de l’eau Guadeloupe, Office de l’eau Martinique, Irstea, DEAL Martinique, DEAL Guadeloupe. 133 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Eulin A., Lefrançois E., Delmas F., Coste M., Gueguen J. & Rosebery J. 2017e. Flore des diatomées des Antilles françaises. Volume 5. Agence française pour la biodiversité, Office de l’eau Guadeloupe, Office de l’eau Martinique, Irstea, DEAL Martinique, DEAL Guadeloupe. 170 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Eulin A., Lefrançois E., Delmas F., Coste M., Gueguen J. & Rosebery J. 2017f. Flore des diatomées des Antilles françaises. Volume introductif. Agence française pour la biodiversité, Office de l’eau Guadeloupe, Office de l’eau Martinique, Irstea, DEAL Martinique, DEAL Guadeloupe. 44 pp.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 23rd October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities 327: 1–72.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardisation 2014a. EN 13946 – Water quality – Guidance for the routine sampling and preparation of benthic diatoms from rivers and lakes. – 18 pp., Afnor, La Plaine St Denis, France.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardisation 2014b. EN 14407 – Water quality – Guidance for the identification and enumeration of benthic diatom samples from rivers and lakes. – 13 pp., Afnor, La Plaine St Denis, France.
   Google Scholar
• Evans K.M., Chepurnov V.A., Sluiman H.J., Thomas S.J., Spears B.M. & Mann D.G. 2009. Highly differentiated populations of the freshwater diatom Sellaphora capitata suggest limited dispersal and opportunities for allopatric speciation. Protist 160: 386-396. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2009.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans K.M., Wortley A.H. & Mann D.G. 2007. An assessment of potential diatom “barcode” genes (cox1, rbcL, 18S and ITS rDNA) and their effectiveness in determining relationships in Sellaphora (Bacillariophyta). Protist 158: 349–364. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2007.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez F., Lopez–Garcia P., Dolan J.R. & Moreira D. 2012. Molecular phylogeny of the marine dinoflagellate genus Heterodinium (Dinophyceae). European Journal of Phycology 47: 95–104. http://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2012.662722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillou L., Bachar D., Audic S., Bass D., Berney C. & Bittner L. 2013. The protist ribosomal reference database (PR2): A catalog of unicellular eukaryote small sub-unit rrna sequences with curated taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Research 41: D597–D604. http://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall T.A. 1999. Bioedit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/Nt. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95-98.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton P. B., Lefebvre K. E. & Bull R. D. 2015. Single cell PCR amplification of diatoms using fresh and preserved samples. Frontiers in Microbiology 6: 1084. http://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton P. B., Savoie A. M., Sayre C. M., Skibbe O., Zimmermann J. & Bull R. D. 2019. Novel neidium Pfizer species from western Canada based upon morphology and plastid DNA sequences. Phytotaxa 419: 39-62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausmann S., Charles D. F., Gerritsen J. & Belton T. J. 2016. A diatom-based biological condition gradient (BCG) approach for assessing impairment and developing nutrient criteria for streams. Science of the Total Environment 562: 914–927. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert P. D. & Gregory T. R. 2005. The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Systematic Biology 54: 852–859. http://doi.org/10.1080/10635150500354886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaramillo A., Osman, D., Caputo, L., & Cardenas, L. 2015. Molecular evidence of a Didymosphenia geminata (Bacillariophyceae) invasion In Chilean freshwater systems. Harmful Algae 49: 117–123. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2015.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahlert M., Albert R. L., Anttila E. L., Bengtsson R., Bigler C., Eskola T., Galman V., Gottschalk S., Herlitz E., Jarlman A., Kasperoviciene J., Kokocinski M., Luup H., Miettinen J., Paunksnyte I., Piirsoo K., Quintana I., Raunio J., Sandell B., Simola H., Sundberg I., Vilbaste S. & Weckstrom J. 2009. Harmonization is more important than experience-results of the first Nordic–Baltic diatom intercalibration exercise 2007 (stream monitoring). Journal of Applied Phycology 21: 471–482. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-008-9394-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keck F., Vasselon V., Rimet F., Bouchez A. & Kahlert M. 2018. Boosting DNA metabarcoding for biomonitoring with phylogenetic estimation of operational taxonomic units’ ecological profiles. Molecular Ecology Resources 18(6): 1299–1309. http://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly M. G., Trobajo R., Rovira L. & Mann D. G. 2015. Characterizing the niches of two very similar Nitzschia species and implications for ecological assessment. Diatom Research 30: 27–33. http://doi.org/10.1080/0269249X.2014.951398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly M., Urbanic G., Acs E., Bennion H., Bertrin V., Burgess A., Denys L., Gottschalk S., Kahlert M., Karjalainen S. M., Kennedy B., Kosi G., Marchetto A., Morin S., Picinska-Fałtynowicz J., Poikane S., Rosebery J., Schoenfelder I., Schoenfelder J. & Varbiro G. 2014. Comparing aspirations: intercalibration of ecological status concepts across European lakes for littoral diatoms. Hydrobiologia 734: 125–141. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-1874-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kermarrec L., Bouchez A., Rimet F. & Humbert J. F. 2012. First evidence of the existence of semi-cryptic species and of a phylogeographic structure in the Gomphonema parvulum (Kutzing) Kutzing complex (Bacillariophyta). Protist 164: 686–705. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.protis.2013.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kermarrec L., Franc A., Rimet F., Chaumeil P., Humbert J. F. & Bouchez A. 2013. Next-generation sequencing to inventory taxonomic diversity in eukaryotic communities: a test for freshwater diatoms. Molecular Ecology Resources 13: 607–619. http://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kermarrec L., Franc A., Rimet F., Chaumeil P., Frigerio J. M., Humbert J. F. & Bouchez A. 2014. A next-generation sequencing approach to river biomonitoring using benthic diatoms. Freshwater Science 33: 349–363. http://doi.org/10.1086/675079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan–Bureau D. A., Morales E. A., Ector L., Beauchene M. S. & Lewis L. A. 2016. Characterization of a new species in the genus Didymosphenia and of Cymbella janischii (Bacillariophyta) from Connecticut, USA. European Journal of Phycology 51(2): 203–216. http://doi.org/10.1080/09670262.2015.1126361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krammer, K. 1988. The gibberula-group in the genus Rhopalodia O. Müller (Bacillariophyceae). II. Revision of the group and new taxa. Nova Hedwigia 47: 159–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasske, G. 1939. Zur Kieselalgenflora Südchiles. Archiv für hydrobiologie 35: 349–468.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S., Stecher G. & Tamura K. 2016. Mega7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology And Evolution 33(7): 1870–1874. http://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange–Bertalot H., Külbs K., Lauser T., Nörpel–Schempp M. & Willmann M. 1996. Diatom taxa introduced by Georg Krasske. Documentation and revision. Dokumentation und Revision der von Georg Krasske beschriebenen Diatomeen-Taxa. Iconographia Diatomologica 3: 1–358.
   Google Scholar
• Lange–Bertalot H. & Krammer K. 1987. Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae. Neue und wenig bekannte Taxa, neue Kombinationen und Synonyme sowie Bemerkungen und Ergänzungen zu den Naviculaceae. Bibliotheca Diatomologica 1: 1–289.
   Google Scholar
• Lange-Bertalot H. & Moser G. 1994. Brachysira. Monographie der Gattung. Bibliotheca Diatomologica 29: 1–212.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre K. E., Hamilton P. B. & Pick F. R. 2017. A comparison of molecular markers and morphology for Neidium taxa (Bacillariophyta) from Eastern North America. Journal of Phycology 53: 680–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levkov Z., Krstic S., Metzeltin D. & Nakov T. 2007. Diatoms of lakes Prespa and Ohrid (Macedonia). Iconographia Diatomologica 16: 1–603.
   Google Scholar
• Mann D.G. & Vanormelingen P. 2013. An inordinate fondness? the number, distributions, and origins of diatom species. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 60(4): 414-420. http://doi.org/10.1111/jeu.12047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moresco C., Tremarin P. I., Ludwig T. A. V. & Rodrigues L. 2011. Abundant periphytic diatoms in three streams with different anthropic influences in Maringá, Paraná State, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Botany 34: 359–373. http://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-84042011000300010
   Google Scholar
• Oksanen J., Blanchet F. G., Kindt R., Legendre P., Minchin P. R., O’hara R. B. & Oksanen M. J. 2013. Package ‘Vegan’. Community Ecology Package, Version 2(9): 1–295.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer F., Gröber C., Blank M., Händler K., Beyer M., Schultze J. L. & Mayer G. 2018. Systematic evaluation of error rates and causes in short samples in next-generation sequencing. Scientific Reports 8: 10950. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29325-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pinseel E., Janssens S. B., Verleyen E., Vanormelingen P., Kohler T. J., Biersma E. M., Sabbe K., Van De Vijver B. & Vyverman, W. 2020. Global radiation in a rare biosphere soil diatom. Nature Communications 11(1): 1–12. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16181-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pompanon F., Coissac E. & Taberlet P. 2011. Metabarcoding, une nouvelle façon d'analyser la biodiversité. Biofutur 319: 30–32.
   Google Scholar
• Potapova, M. 2011. New species and combinations in the genus Nupela from the USA. Diatom Research 26: 73–87. http://doi.org/10.1080/0269249X.2011.575111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potapova M. 2013. Transfer of Achnanthes decipiens to the genus Nupela. Diatom Research 28: 139–142. http://doi.org/10.1080/0269249X.2012.753114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potapova M. & Charles D. F. 2007. Diatom metrics for monitoring eutrophication in rivers of the United States. Ecological Indicators 7: 48–70. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potapova M. G., Ponader K. C., Lowe R. L., Clason T. A. & Bahls L. L. 2003. Small-Celled Nupela species from North America. Diatom Research 18: 293–306. http://doi.org/10.1080/0269249X.2003.9705593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichardt E. 1988. Neue Diatomeen aus Bayerischen und Nordtiroler Alpenseen. Diatom Research 3: 237–244.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer C. W. 1966. Consideration of fifteen diatom taxa (Bacillariophyta) from the Savannah River, including seven described as new. Notulae Naturae 397: 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Rimet F., Abarca N., Bouchez A., Kusber W.H., Jahn R., Kahlert M., Keck F., Kelly M.G., Mann D.G., Piuz A., Trobajo R., Tapolczai K., Vasselon V. & Zimmerman, J. 2018. The potential of high throughput sequencing (HTS) of natural samples as a source of primary taxonomic information for reference libraries of diatom barcodes. Fottea 18: 37–54. http://doi.org/10.5507/Fot.2017.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimet F., Aylagas E., Borja A., Bouchez A., Canino A., Chauvin C., Chonova T., Jr F. C., Costa F. O., Ferrari B. J. D., Gastineau R., Goulon C., Gugger M., Holzmann M., Jahn R., Kahlert M., Kusber W.-H., Laplace-Treyture C., Leese F., Leliaert F., Mann D. G., Marchand F., Méléder V., Pawlowski J., Rasconi S., Rivera S., Rougerie R., Schweizer M., Trobajo R., Vasselon V., Vivien R., Weigand A., Witkowski A., Zimmermann J. & Ekrem T. 2021a. Metadata standards and practical guidelines for specimen and DNA curation when building barcode reference libraries for aquatic life. Metabarcoding And Metagenomics 5: E58056. Pensoft Publishers. http://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.5.58056
   Google Scholar
• Rimet F. & Bouchez A. 2012. Life-forms, cell-sizes and ecological guilds of diatoms in European rivers. Knowledge And Management Of Aquatic Ecosystems 406: 1–14. http://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2012018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimet F., Chonova T. & Bouchez A. 2021b. Barcoding ADN diatomées: Complétion de la bibliothèque de référence Diat.barcode. report INRAE OFB, UMR Carrtel. Recherche Data Gouv, Version 1: 1–52. http://doi.org/10.57745/3ei00b
   Google Scholar
• Rimet F., Gusev E., Kahlert M., Kelly M. G., Kulikovskiy M., Maltsev Y., Mann D. G., Pfannkuchen M., Trobajo R., Vasselon V., Zimmermann J. & Bouchez A. 2019. Diat.barcode, an open-access curated barcode library for diatoms. Scientific Reports 9: 1–12. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51500-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimet F., Pinseel E., Bouchez A., Japoshvili B. & Mumladze L. 2023. Diatom endemism and taxonomic turnover: assessment in high-altitude alpine lakes covering a large geographical range. Science of the Total Environment 871: 161970. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera S. F., Vasselon V., Bouchez A. & Rimet F. 2020. Diatom metabarcoding applied to large scale monitoring networks: Optimization of bioinformatics strategies using Mothur software. Ecological indicators 109: 105775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera S. F., Vasselon V., Ballorain K., Carpentier A., Wetzel C. E., Ector L., Rimet F. 2018a. DNA metabarcoding and microscopic analyses of sea turtles biofilms: complementary to understand turtle behavior. PLoS One 13: E0195770. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera S. F., Vasselon V., Jacquet S., Bouchez A., Ariztegui D. & Rimet, F. 2018b. Metabarcoding of lake benthic diatoms: from structure assemblages to ecological assessment. Hydrobiologia 807: 37–51. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-017-3381-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruck E. C., Nakov T., Alverson A. J. & Theriot E. C. 2016. Phylogeny, ecology, morphological evolution, and reclassification of the diatom orders Surirellales and Rhopalodiales. Molecular Phylogenetics And Evolution 103: 155–171. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.07.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumrich U., Lange–Bertalot, H. & Rumrich M. 2000. Diatoms of the Andes (from Venezuela to Patagonia/Tierra del fuego). Iconographia Diatomologica 9: 1–673. http://doi.org/10.1016/J.Scitotenv.2016.03.173
   Google Scholar
• Schneck F., Torgan L.C. & Schwarzbold A. 2008. Diatomáceas epilíticas Em riacho de altitude no sul do brasil. Rodriguésia 59: 325–338.
   Google Scholar
• Silvestro D. & Michalak I. 2012. Raxmlgui: a graphical front-end for RAXML. Organisms Diversity & Evolution 12: 335–337. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-011-0056-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skibbe O., Zimmermann J., Kusber W.H., Abarca N., Buczko K. & Jahn R. 2018. Gomphoneis Tegelensis Sp. nov.(Bacillariophyceae): a morphological and molecular investigation based on selected single cells. Diatom Research 33: 251–262. http://doi.org/10.1080/0269249X.2018.1518835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamatakis A., Ludwig T. & Meier H. 2005. Raxml-III: a fast program for maximum likelihood-based inference of large phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 21: 456–463. http://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takano Y. & Horiguchi T. 2006. Acquiring scanning electron microscopical, light microscopical and multiple gene sequence data from a single dinoflagellate cell 1. Journal of Phycology 42: 251–256. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2006.00177.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapolczai K., Vasselon V., Bouchez A., Stenger-Kovács C., Padisák J. & Rimet F. 2019. The impact of OTU sequence similarity threshold on diatom-based bioassessment: a case study of the rivers of Mayotte (France, Indian Ocean). Ecology and Evolution 9: 166–179. http://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremarin P.I., Freire E.G. Bertolli L.M. & Ludwig T.A.V. 2009. Catálogo das diatomáceas (Ochrophyta– Diatomeae) continentais do estado do paraná. iheringia, Série Botânica 64: 79–107.
   Google Scholar
• Tremarin P. I., Straube A. & Ludwig T. A. 2015. Nupela (bacillariophyceae) in littoral rivers from south Brazil, and description of six new species of the genus. Fottea 15: 77–93. http://doi.org/10.5507/fot.2015.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trobajo R., Clavero E., Chepurnov V. A., Sabbe K., Mann D. G., Ishihara S. & Cox E. J. 2009. Morphological, genetic and mating diversity within the widespread bioindicator Nitzschia palea (Bacillariophyceae). Phycologia 48: 443–459. http://doi.org/10.2216/08-69.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasselon V., Domaizon I., Rimet F., Kahlert M. & Bouchez A. 2017a. Application of high throughput sequencing (HTS) metabarcoding to diatom biomonitoring: so DNA extraction methods matter? Freshwater Science 36: 162–177. http://doi.org/10.1086/690649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasselon V., Rimet F., Domaizon I., Monnier O., Reyjol Y. & Bouchez A. 2019. Assessing pollution of aquatic environments with diatoms’ DNA metabarcoding: experience and developments from France water framework directive networks. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 3: E39646. http://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.3.39646
   Google Scholar
• Vasselon V., Rimet F., Tapolczai K. & Bouchez A. 2017b. Assessing ecological status with diatoms DNA metabarcoding: scaling-up on a WFD monitoring network (Mayotte Island, France). Ecological Indicators 82: 1–12. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verleyen E., Van De Vijver B., Tytgat B., Pinseel E., Hodgson A. D., Kopalova K., Chown L. S., Van Ranst E., Imura S., Kudoh S., Van Nieuwenhuyze W., Antdiat Consortium, Sabbe K. & Vyverman W. 2021. Diatoms define a novel freshwater biogeography of the Antarctic. Ecography 44: 548–560. http://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.05374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visco J. A., Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L., Cordonier A., Esling P., Pillet L. & Pawlowski J. 2015. Environmental monitoring: inferring the diatom index from next-generation sequencing data. Environmental Science & Technology 49: 7597–7605. http://doi.org/10.1021/es506158m
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetzel C. E., Potapova M., & Williams D. M. 2022. Synedra phantasma M.H.Hohn (Bacillariophyta, Fragilariaceae) from the Amazon river (South America): its typification and transfer to the genus fragilaria. Notulae Algarum 252: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Youn B. D. & Wang P. 2008. Bayesian reliability-based design optimization using eigenvector dimension reduction (EDR) method. Structural And Multidisciplinary Optimization 36: 107–123. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-007-0202-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann J., Abarca N., Enke N., Skibbe O., Kusber W.H. & Jahn R. 2014. Taxonomic reference libraries for environmental barcoding: a best practice example from diatom research. PLoS One 9: 1–24. http://doi.org/10.1371/Journal.Pone.0108793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann J., Glöckner G., Jahn R., Enke N. & Gemeinholzer B. 2015. Metabarcoding vs. morphological identification to assess diatom diversity in environmental studies. Molecular Ecology Resources 15: 526–542. http://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar