International Comparative Planning Methodology: Introduction to the Theme Issue

References

• Alterman , R. 2010 . Takings International: A Comparative Perspective on Land Use Regulations and Compensation Rights , Chicago : American Bar Association .
   Google Scholar
• Böhme , K. and Waterhout , B. 2008 . “ The Europeanisation of planning ” . In European Spatial Research and Planning , Edited by: Faludi , A. 225 – 248 . Cambridge , MA : Lincoln Institute of Land Policy .
   Google Scholar
• Booth , P. 2011 . Culture, planning and path dependence: Some reflections on the problems of comparison . Town Planning Review , 82 ( 1 ) : 13 – 28 .
   Google Scholar
• Buitelaar , E. and Sorel , N. 2010 . Between the rule of law and the quest for control: Legal certainty in the Dutch planning system . Land Use Policy , 27 ( 3 ) : 983 – 989 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEC – Commission of the European Communities . 1997 . The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies. Regional Development Studies , Luxembourg : Office for Official Publications of the European Communities .
   Google Scholar
• De Vries , J. and Van den Broeck , J. 1997 . Belelux: A microcosm of planning cultures . Built Environment , 23 ( 1 ) : 58 – 69 .
   Google Scholar
• Dühr , S., , Colomb , C. and Nadin , V. 2010 . European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation , London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Dühr , S. and Nadin , V. 2007 . Europeanization through transnational territorial cooperation? The case of INTERREG IIIB North-west Europe . Planning Practice and Research , 22 ( 3 ) : 373 – 394 .
   Google Scholar
• Faludi , A. 2005 . “ The Netherlands: A culture with a soft spot for planning ” . In Comparative Planning Cultures , Edited by: Sanyal , B. 285 – 307 . London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Farinós Dasí , J. 2006 . “ ESPON Project 2.3.2: Governance of Territorial and Urban Policies from EU to Local Level ” . Esch-sur-Alzette : ESPON Coordination Unit . Final Report
   Google Scholar
• Fürst , D. 2009 . “ Planning cultures en route to a better comprehension of ‘planning processes’? ” . In Planning Cultures in Europe: Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning , Edited by: Knieling , J. and Othengrafen , F. 23 – 38 . Aldershot : Ashgate .
   Google Scholar
• Hantrais , L. 2009 . International Comparative Research: Theory, Methods and Practice , Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan .
   Google Scholar
• Howard , E. 1898 . Tomorrow: A Peaceful Path to Real Reform , London : Swan Sonnenschein .
   Google Scholar
• Knieling , J. and Othengrafen , F. 2009 . Planning Cultures in Europe: Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning , Aldershot : Ashgate .
   Google Scholar
• Kunzmann , K. R. Unconditional surrender: The gradual demise of European diversity in planning . keynote paper presented to the 18th AESOP Congress . July , Grenoble . Available at http://www.planum.net/topics/documents/kunzmann_epp_01.pdf (accessed 1 July 2009)
   Google Scholar
• Masser , I. 1986 . “ Some methodological considerations ” . In Learning from Other Countries , Edited by: Masser , I. and Williams , R. H. 15 – 25 . Norwich : Geo Books .
   Google Scholar
• Nadin , V. and Stead , D. 2008 . European spatial planning systems, social models and learning . Disp , 172 : 35 – 47 .
   Google Scholar
• Stead , D. and Cotella , G. 2011 . Differential Europe: Domestic actors and their role in shaping spatial planning systems . Disp , 186 : 13 – 21 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward , S. 2002 . Planning the Twentieth-century City: The Advanced Capitalist World , Chichester : John Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Zweigert , K. and Kötz , H. 1998 . An Introduction to Comparative Law , , 3rd ed , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar