Queensland's Coastal Planning Regime: The Extent of Participation in Coastal Governance

References

• Areizaga, J., Sanò, M., Medina, R., & Juanes, J. (2012) Improving public engagement in ICZM: A practical approach, Journal of Environmental Management,109, pp. 123–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Institute of Planners,35(4), pp. 216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, M., Coaffee, J., & Sherriff, G. (2007) Achieving successful participation in the new UK spatial planning system, Planning Practice & Research,22(1), pp. 79–93.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C., & Twyford, V. (2007) Enhancing public participation on dams and development: A case for evaluation based on multiple case studies, The International Journal of Public Participation,1(2), pp. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Belfiore, S. (2003) Editorial: The growth of integrated coastal management and the role of indicators in integrated coastal management: Introduction to the special issue, Ocean & Coastal Management,46, pp. 225–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouamrane, M. (Ed.) (2006) Biodiversity and Stakeholders: Concertation Itineraries, Biosphere Reserves, Technical Notes 1, UNESCO. Available at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001465/146566e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Breton, F. (2006) Report on the use of the ICZM indicators from the WG-ID: A contribution to the ICZM evaluation, European Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Brody, S. D. (2003) Measuring the effects of stakeholder participation on the quality of local plans based on the principles of collaborative ecosystem management, Journal of Planning Education and Research,22(4), pp. 407–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, P. (2010) Growing pains: The challenges of planning for growth in South East Queensland, Australian Planner,47(3), pp. 118–125.
   Google Scholar
• CAFNEC (2012) Submission on the Draft Coastal State Planning Regulatory Provision (SPRP). Available at http://cafnec.org.au/download/submissions/121115%20CAFNEC%20Sub_Coastal%20SPRP.pdf (accessed 7 March 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Chuenpagdee, R. (2011) InteractIve governance for marIne conservatIon: An illustration, Bulletin of Marine Science,87(2), pp. 197–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy, M. M., & Berke, P. R. (2004) What makes a good sustainable development plan? An analysis of factors that influence principles of sustainable development, Environment and Planning A,36, pp. 1381–1396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, V. A., & Kopke, K. (2011) Editorial: Reflections from Ireland, Marine Policy,35(6), pp. 737–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, S. (1998) Spinning the wheel of empowerment, Planning,1262(3), pp. 14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency (2011) Climate Change Risk to Coastal Buildings and Infrastructure: A Supplement to the First Pass National Assessment, Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• DERM (Department of Environment and Resource Management) (2009) State Coastal Management Plan Review, Department of Environment and Resource Management, Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• DERM (2011a) Queensland Coastal Plan, Department of Environment and Resource Management, Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• DERM (2011b) Queensland Coastal Plan: Consultation Report, Department of Environment and Resources Management, Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003) The struggle to govern the commons, Science,302(5652), pp. 1907–1912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning (2012) Temporary State Planning Policy 2/12: Planning for Prosperity (Queensland: State Development, Infrastructure and Planning)
   Google Scholar
• Duit, A., Galaz, V., Eckerberg, K., & Ebbesson, J. (2010) Governance, complexity, and resilience, Global Environmental Change,20(3), pp. 363–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehler, C. N. (2003) Indicators to measure governance performance in integrated coastal management, Ocean & Coastal Management,46(3–4), pp. 335–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, S. (2003) Stakeholder representation and the democratic basis of coastal partnerships in the UK, Marine Policy,27(3), pp. 229–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems, Annual Review of Environment and Resources,30, pp. 441–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, N., & Caton, B. (2003) Coastal Management in Australia (Adelaide, South Australia: University of Adelaide Press).
   Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. (2009) From government to governance: Explaining and assessing new approaches to NRM, in: M.Lane, C.Robinson & B.Taylor (Eds) Contested Country: Local and Regional Natural Resources Management in Australia, pp. 26–28 (Australia: CSIRO Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Jentoft, S. (2007) Limits of governability: Institutional implications for fisheries and coastal governance, Marine Policy,31(4), pp. 360–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jentoft, S., & Chuenpagdee, R. (2009) Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem, Marine Policy,33(4), pp. 553–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karadimitriou, N., & Mironowicz, I. (2012) Reshaping public participation institutions through academic workshops: The ‘gardens of art’ international urban workshop in Wroclaw, Poland, Planning Practice & Research,27(5), pp. 595–612.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, R. C., & Alder, J. (1999) Coastal Planning and Management (London and New York: E & FN Spon).
   Google Scholar
• King, G. (2003) The role of participation in the European demonstration projects in ICZM, Coastal Management,31(2), pp. 137–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooiman, J. (2000) Levels of governing: Interactions as a central concept, in: J.Pierre (ed.) Debating Governance: Authority, Steering, and Democracy, pp. 138–166 (New York: Oxford University Press)
   Google Scholar
• Lane, M. B. (2006) Coastal Governance in Solomon Islands: An Evaluation of the Strategic Governance Issues Relating to Coastal Management, IWP - Pacific Technical Report (International Waters Project), 29 (Samoa: SPREP).
   Google Scholar
• Lazarow, N. (2006) Community participation in ICZM: Lessons and areas for improvement in governance, In: N. Lazarow et al. (Eds) Coastal Management in Australia: Key Institutional and Governance Issues for Coastal Natural Resource Management and Planning, pp. 79–88 (Australia: CRC for Coastal Zone, Estuary and Waterway Management).
   Google Scholar
• Leach, S., Lowndes, V., Cowell, R., & Downe, J. (2005) Stakeholder Engagement – A Progress Summary from Meta-Evaluation of the Local Government Modernisation Agenta (London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister).
   Google Scholar
• Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2009) Playing it forward: Path dependency, progressive incrementalism, and the “super wicked” problem of global climate change. IOP Conference series: Earth and Environmental Science, 6, pp. 1–2 (IOP Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• LGAQ (Local Government Association of Queensland) (2012) Submission to the State Government on the Queensland Coastal Plan ReviewLocal Government Association of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Mette, A. (2011) Bridging the gap between science and society, in: P.Tett, A.Sandberg & A.Mette (Eds) Sustaining Coastal Zone Systems, pp. 103–136 (Scotland: Dunedin Academic Press Ltd.).
   Google Scholar
• Morf, A. (2005) Public participation in municipal planning as a tool for coastal management: Case studies from western Sweden, Ambio,34(2), pp. 74–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (2001) A Citizen's Guide to the Oregon Coastal Management Program, (Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development)
   Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes, Global Environmental Change,19(3), pp. 354–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Property Council of Australia and Urban Development Institute of Australia (2011) Major Concerns with the Queensland Coastal Plan (Queensland: Property Council of Australia and Urban Development Institute of Australia)
   Google Scholar
• Pickaver, A. H., Gilbert, C., & Breton, F. (2004) An indicator set to measure the progress in the implementation of integrated coastal zone management in Europe, Ocean & Coastal Management,47(9–10), pp. 449–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomeroy, R., & Douvere, F. (2008) The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process, Marine Policy,32(5), pp. 816–822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning, Policy Sciences,4(2), pp. 155–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockloff, S., & Lockie, S. (2004) Participatory tools for coastal zone management: Use of stakeholder analysis and social mapping in Australia, Journal of Coastal Conservation,10(1), pp. 81–92.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. L. (2012) Toward inclusive co-management: Factors influencing stakeholder participation, Coastal Management,40(3), pp. 327–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stojanovic, T., Ballinger, R. C., & Lalwani, C. S. (2004) Successful integrated coastal management: Measuring it with research and contributing to wise practice, Ocean & Coastal Management,47(5–6), pp. 273–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stojanovic, T., & Barker, N. (2008) Improving governance through local coastal partnerships in the UK, Geographical Journal,174(4), pp. 344–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taussik, J. (1997) The influence of institutional systems on planning the coastal zone: Experience from England/Wales and Sweden, Planning Practice & Research,12(1), pp. 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Tompkins, E. L., Few, R., & Brown, K. (2008) Scenario-based stakeholder engagement: Incorporating stakeholders preferences into coastal planning for climate change, Journal of Environmental Management,88(4), pp. 1580–1592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (1992) The RIO Declaration on environment and development, United Nations Conference on Environment and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, J. P., & Kemp, R. (2006) Sustainability and reflexive governance: Introduction, in: J. P.Voss, D.Bauknecht & R.Kemp (Eds) Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, pp. 3–28 (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar).
   Google Scholar
• Webbe, S., & Weller, P. (2009) Brokering Balance: A Public Interest Map for Queensland Government Bodies, An Independent Review of Queensland Government Boards, Committees and Statutory Authorities, Part B Report.
   Google Scholar
• Wescott, G. (2004) The theory and practice of coastal area planning: Linking strategic planning to local communities, Coastal Management,32(1), pp. 95–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wever, L., Glaser, M., Gorris, P., & Ferrol-Schulte, D. (2012) Decentralization and participation in integrated coastal management: Policy lessons from Brazil and Indonesia, Ocean & Coastal Management,66, pp. 63–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar