The Tradeoffs of Inclusionary Zoning: What Do We Know and What Do We Need to Know?

References

• AndersonL., St. CharlesJ., FulliloveM., ScrimshawS., FieldingJ., NormandJ. & The Task Force on Community Preventive Services, (2003) Providing affordable family housing and reducing residential segregation by income, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24(3), pp. 47–67. doi:10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00656-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BasoloV., & CalavitaN. (2004) Policy Claims with Weak Evidence: A Critique of the Reason Foundation Study on Inclusionary Housing Policy in the San Francisco Bay Area (Irvine: University of California, Irvine)
   Google Scholar
• BentoA., LoweS., KnaapG., & ChakrabortyA. (2009) Housing market effects of inclusionary zoning, Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 11(2), pp. 7–26.
   Google Scholar
• BrownK. (2001) Expanding Affordable Housing through Inclusionary Zoning: Lessons from the Washington Metropolitan Area (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy)
   Google Scholar
• BrunickN. (2004a) The inclusionary housing debate: The effectiveness of mandatory programs over voluntary programs, Zoning Practice, 9, pp. 2–7.
   Google Scholar
• BrunickN. (2004b) Inclusionary housing: Proven success in large cities, Zoning Practice, 10, pp. 2–9.
   Google Scholar
• BrunickN. (2007) Compensatory Benefits to Developers for Provision of Affordable Housing: Inclusionary Housing: Lessons from the National Experience (Trenton, NJ: New Jersey Council on Affordable Housing)
   Google Scholar
• BrunickN., GoldbergL., & LevineS. (2003) Large Cities and Inclusionary Zoning (Chicago, IL: Business and Professional People for the Public Interest)
   Google Scholar
• CalavitaN., & GrimesK. (1998) Inclusionary housing in California: The experience of two decades, Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(2), pp. 150–169. doi:10.1080/01944369808975973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CalavitaN., GrimesK., & MallachA. (1997) Inclusionary housing in California and New Jersey: A comparative analysis, Housing Policy Debate, 8(1), pp. 109–142. doi:10.1080/10511482.1997.9521249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CalavitaN., & MallachA. (2010) Inclusionary Housing in International Perspective: Affordable Housing, Social Inclusion, and Land Value Recapture (Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy)
   Google Scholar
• CCRH and NPH (2003) Inclusionary Housing in California: 30 Years of Innovation (Sacramento: California Coalition for Rural Housing and Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California)
   Google Scholar
• ClappJ. (1981) The impact of inclusionary zoning on the location and type of construction activity, Real Estate Economics, 9(4), pp. 436–456. doi:10.1111/1540-6229.00253.
   Google Scholar
• CowanS. (2006) Anti-snob land use laws, suburban exclusion, and housing opportunity, Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(3), pp. 295–313. doi:10.1111/j.1469-9906.2006.00293.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CullingworthB. (1997) Planning in the USA: Policies, Issues, and Processes (New York: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• DavidoffP., & DavidoffL. (1971) Opening the suburbs: Toward inclusionary land use controls, Syracuse Law Review, 22, pp. 509–536.
   Google Scholar
• EllicksonR. (1981) The irony of ‘inclusionary zoning’, Southern California Law Review, 54, pp. 1167–1216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EllicksonR. (2010) The false promise of the mixed-income housing project, UCLA Law Review, 57, pp. 983–1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FischelW. (2001) The Homevoter Hypothesis: How Home Values Influence Local Government Taxation, School Finance, and Land-Use Policies (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)
   Google Scholar
• FischelW. (2004) An economic history of zoning and a cure for its exclusionary effects, Urban Studies, 41(2), pp. 317–340. doi:10.1080/0042098032000165271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FoxR., & RoseK. (2003) Expanding Housing Opportunity in Washington, DC: The Case for Inclusionary Zoning (Oakland, CA: PolicyLink)
   Google Scholar
• GlaeserE., & GyourkoJ. (2002) The Impact of Zoning on Housing Affordability, National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w8835 (accessed 18 February 2014).
   Google Scholar
• HagmanD. (1982) Taking care of one's own through inclusionary zoning: Bootstrapping low- and moderate-income housing by local government, Urban Law and Policy, 5(2), pp. 169–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HochC. (2007) How planning mandates work: affordable housing in Illinois, Journal of the American Planning Association, 73(1), pp. 86–99. doi:10.1080/01944360708976138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IhlanfeldtK. (2004) Exclusionary land-use regulations within suburban communities: A review of the evidence and policy prescriptions, Urban Studies, 41(2), pp. 261–283. doi:10.1080/004209803200165244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KautzB. (2005) A Public Agency Guide to California Density Bonus Law, adapted from presentation for County Counsels' Association of California (Oakland, CA: Goldfarb & Lipman LLP)
   Google Scholar
• KnaapG., BentoA., & LoweS. (2008) Housing Market Impacts of Inclusionary Zoning (College Park: National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education, University of Maryland)
   Google Scholar
• KrollC., MunC., RosenthalL., & SingalV. (2010) Below Market-Rate Requirements in a Down Market: What Have We Learned from the Great Recession (Berkeley: Fisher Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics, University of California, Berkeley)
   Google Scholar
• MallachA. (1984) Inclusionary Housing Programs: Policies and Practices (New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers)
   Google Scholar
• MallakhN. (2001) Does the Costa-Hawkins act prohibit local inclusionary zoning programs?California Law Review, 89(6), pp. 1847–1880. doi:10.2307/3481250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MukhijaV., RegusL., SlovinS., & DasA. (2010) Can inclusionary zoning be an effective and efficient housing policy? Evidence from Los Angeles and Orange counties, Journal of Urban Affairs, 32(2), pp. 229–252. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2010.00495.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NPH (2007) Affordable by Choice: Trends in California Inclusionary Housing Programs (San Francisco: Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California)
   Google Scholar
• PendallR. (2008) From hurdles to bridges: Local land use regulations and the pursuit of affordable rental housing, in: N,Retsinas & E.Belsky (Eds) Revisiting Rental Housing: Policies, Programs and Priorities, pp. 191–224 (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press)
   Google Scholar
• PowellB., & StringhamE. (2004a) Housing Supply and Affordability: Do Affordable Housing Mandates Work? Reason Foundation Policy Study 318 (Los Angeles, CA: Reason Public Policy Institute)
   Google Scholar
• PowellB., & StringhamE. (2004b) Do Affordable Housing Mandates Work? Evidence from Los Angeles County and Orange County, Reason Foundation Policy Study 320 (Los Angeles, CA: Reason Public Policy Institute)
   Google Scholar
• RossL. (2003) Zoning affordability: The challenges of inclusionary housing, Zoning News. August, pp. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• RothwellJ., & MasseyD. (2010) Density zoning and class segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas, Social Science Quarterly, 91(5), pp. 1123–1143. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00724.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RyanS., & EnderleB. (2012) Examining spatial patterns in affordable housing: The case of California density bonus implementation, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 27(4), pp. 413–425. doi:10.1007/s10901-011-9259-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchuetzJ., MeltzerR., & BeenV. (2009) 31 Flavors of inclusionary zoning: Comparing policies from San Francisco, Washington, DC, and Suburban Boston, Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(4), pp. 441–456. doi:10.1080/01944360903146806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchuetzJ., MeltzerR., & BeenV. (2011) Silver bullet or Trojan Horse? The effects of inclusionary zoning on local housing markets in the United States, Urban Studies, 48(2), pp. 297–329. doi:10.1177/0042098009360683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchwartzA. (2006) Housing Policy in the United States: An Introduction (New York: Routledge)
   Google Scholar
• SchwartzH. (2011) Housing policy is school policy: Economically integrative housing promotes academic success in Montgomery County, Maryland, Education Digest, 76(6), pp. 42–48.
   Google Scholar
• SchwartzS., & JohnstonR. (1983) Inclusionary housing programs, Journal of the American Planning Association, 49(1), pp. 3–21. doi:10.1080/01944368308976192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar