e-Participation: Comparing Trends in Practice and the Classroom

References

• Afzalan, N., Evans-Cowley, J. S., & Barijough, M. (2014) From big to little data for natural disaster recovery: how online and on-the-ground activities are connected, Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2526177.
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Planning Association, 35, pp. 216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Association Of Collegiate Schools Of Planning (2012) The Guide to Graduate and Undergraduate Education in Urban and Regional Planning, 17th ed., pp. 12 (Tallahassee, FL: The Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning)
   Google Scholar
• Brabham, D. C. (2009) Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects, Planning Theory, 8, pp. 242–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabham, D. C. (2013) The four urban governance problem types suitable for crowdsourcing citizen participation, in: C. N. Silva (ed.) Citizen E-Participation in Urban Governance: Crowdsourcing and Collaborative Creativity (Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, IGI Global)
   Google Scholar
• Brabham, D. C., Sanchez, T. W., & Bartholomew, K. (2010) Crowdsourcing public participation in transit planning: preliminary results from the next stop design case. Transportation Research Board 89th Annual Meeting, January 10–14, pp. 1–15 (Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board)
   Google Scholar
• Brody, S. D., Godschalk, D. R., & Burby, R. J. (2003) Mandating citizen participation in plan making: six strategic planning choices, Journal of the American Planning Association, 69, pp. 245–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. (2012) Public participation GIS (PPGIS) for regional and environmental planning: reflections on a decade of empirical research, URISA Journal, 25, pp. 7–18.
   Google Scholar
• Bryer, T. A., & Nelson, K. L. (2013) Social media for civic engagement, in: C. N. Silva (ed.) Citizen E-Participation in Urban Governance: Crowdsourcing and Collaborative Creativity (Hershey PA: Information Science Reference, IGI Global)
   Google Scholar
• Bugs, G., Granell, C., Fonts, O., Huerta, J., & Painho, M. (2010) An assessment of public participation GIS and web 2.0 technologies in urban planning practice in Canela, Brazil, Cities, 27, pp. 172–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burby, R. (2003) Making plans that matter. citizen involvement and government action, Journal of the American Planning Association, 69, pp. 33–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, S., Evans, A., Kingston, R., & Turton, I. (2001) Public participation, GIS and cyberdemocracy: evaluating on-line spatial decision support systems, Environmental and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, pp. 907–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• City of Davis. ND (2013) DavisWiki. [Online]. Available at http://daviswiki.org/Front_Page (accessed 15 June).
   Google Scholar
• Connick, S., & Innes, J. (2001) Outcomes of Collaborative Water Policy Making: Applying Complexity Thinking to Evaluation (Berkeley, CA: Institute of Urban and Regional Development)
   Google Scholar
• Conroy, M. M., & Evans-Cowley, J. (2006) E-participation in planning; an analysis of cities adopting on-line citizen participation tools, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24, pp. 371–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy, M. M., & Evans-Cowley, J. (2013) Informing and Interacting, Journal of E-Government, 1, pp. 73–92.
   Google Scholar
• Creighton, J. L. (2005) The Public Participation Handbook (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass)
   Google Scholar
• Evans-Cowley, J. (2010) Planning in the age of Facebook: the role of social networking in planning processes, GeoJournal, 75, pp. 407–420.
   Google Scholar
• Evans-Cowley, J., & Conroy, M. M. (2004) E-Government (Chicago, IL: American Planning Association)
   Google Scholar
• Evans-Cowley, J. S., & Griffin, G. (2012) Micro-participation: community engagement in transportation planning with social media, Transportation Research Record, 8, pp. 90–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans-Cowley, J., & Hollander, J. (2010) The new generation of public participation: internet-based participation tools, Planning Practice & Research, 25, pp. 397–408.
   Google Scholar
• Evans-Cowley, J., & Kitchen, J. (2011) E-government, Revised ed. (Chicago, IL: American Planning Association)
   Google Scholar
• Harris, R. (2010) San Jose Envision 2040 Plan Wikiplanning On-Line Civic Engagement Campaign (Charlotte, NC: Wikiplanning)
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, C., & Muklay, M. (2002) The potential of public geographic systems in UK environmental planning: appraisals by active publics, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 45, pp. 841–863.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning (Vancouver: UBC Press)
   Google Scholar
• Hudson-Smith, A., & Crooks, A. (2008) The renaissance of geographic information: neogeography, gaming and second life, Analysis. CASA Working Papers, pp. 1–16 (London: University College London)
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (1999) Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: a framework for evaluating collaborative planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 65, pp. 412–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2004) Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century, Journal of Planning Theory and Practice, 5, pp. 419–436.
   Google Scholar
• Kingston, R., Carver, S., Evans, A., & Turton, I. (2000) Web-based public participation geographical information systems: an aid to local environmental decision-making, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24, pp. 109–125.
   Google Scholar
• Mandarano, L., Meenar, M., & Steins, C. (2010) Building social capital in the digital age of civic engagement, Journal of Planning Literature, 25, pp. 123–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meere, M. (2014) A Planner's Online Toolbox: An Evaluation of Online Tools for Enhancing Public Engagement in the Planning Process (Kingston, ON: School of Urban and Regional Planning, Queen's University)
   Google Scholar
• Obar, J. A., Zube, P., & Lampe, C. (2012) Advocacy 2.0: an analysis of how advocacy groups in the united states perceive and use social media as tools for facilitating civic engagement and collective action, Journal of Information Policy, 2, pp. 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Planning Accreditation Board (2012) PAB Accreditation Guidelines and Standards (Chicago, IL: Planning Accreditation Board)
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. (2004) Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation, American Review of Public Administration, 34, pp. 325–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seltzer, E., & Mahmoudi, D. (2013) Citizen participation, open innovation, and crowdsourcing: challenges and opportunities for planning, Journal of Planning Literature, 28, pp. 3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, C. N. (2013) Open source urban governance: crowdsourcing, neogeography, VGI and citizen science, in: C. N. Silva (ed.) Citizen E-Participation in Urban Governance: Crowdsourcing and Collaborative Creativity (Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference, IGI Global)
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, D. M. (2005) Use of web technology by U.S. planning agencies: results from a national benchmarking survey, Municipal Yearbook 2005, pp. 22–26 (Washington DC: International City/County Management Association)
   Google Scholar
• Stern, E., Gudes, O., & Svoray, T. (2009) Web-based and traditional public participation in comprehensive planning: a comparative study, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36, pp. 1067–1085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar