6,418
Views
121
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Using Social Media and Mobile Technologies to Foster Engagement and Self-Organization in Participatory Urban Planning and Neighbourhood Governance

References

  • Adams, D. (2013) Volunteered geographic information: Potential implications for participatory planning, Planning Practice and Research, 28(4), pp. 464–469. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.725549.
  • Bonsón, E., Royo, S., & Ratkai, M. (2015) Citizens’ engagement on local governments’ Facebook sites. An empirical analysis: The impact of different media and content types in Western Europe, Government Information Quarterly, 32(1), pp. 52–62.
  • Brabham, D. (2009) Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects, Planning Theory, 8(3), pp. 242–262. doi:10.1177/1473095209104824.
  • Brenner, N. (2004) New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
  • Brown, G., & Chin, S. (2013) Assessing the effectiveness of public participation in neighbourhood planning, Planning Practice and Research, 28(5), pp. 563–588. doi:10.1080/02697459.2013.820037.
  • Brownill, S., & Parker, G. (2010) Why bother with good works? The relevance of public participation(s) in planning in a post-collaborative era, Planning Practice and Research, 25(3), pp. 275–282. doi:10.1080/02697459.2010.503407.
  • Buccoliero, L., & Bellio, E. (2010) Citizens web empowerment in European municipalities, Journal of E-Governance, 33(4), pp. 225–236.
  • Clark, B., Brudney, J., & Jang, S. (2013) Coproduction of government services and the new information technology: Investigating the distributional biases, Public Administration Review, 73(5), pp. 687–701. doi:10.1111/puar.12092.
  • Ertiö, T. (2015) Participatory apps for urban planning – space for improvement, Planning Practice and Research, 30(3), pp. 303–321.
  • Evans-Cowley, J., & Hollander, J. (2010) The new generation of public participation: Internet-based participation tools, Planning Practice and Research, 25(3), pp. 397–408. doi:10.1080/02697459.2010.503432.
  • Finn, D. (2014) Introduction to the special issue on DIY urbanism, Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 7(4), pp. 331–332.
  • Friedmann, J. (1973) Retracking America: A Theory of Transactive Planning (New York: Anchor Press)
  • Goodchild, M. (2007) Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography, GeoJournal, 69(4), pp. 211–221. doi:10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y.
  • Gordon, E., & Koo, G. (2008) Placeworlds: Using virtual worlds to foster civic engagement, Space and Culture, 11(3), pp. 204–221. doi:10.1177/1206331208319743.
  • Gordon, E., Schirra, S., & Hollander, J. (2011) Immersive planning: a conceptual model for designing public participation with new technologies, Environment and Planning B, 38(3), pp. 505–519.
  • Greenfield, A. (2013) Against the Smart City (The City is Here for You to Use). Kindle Edition.
  • Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2004) Why Deliberative Democracy? (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)
  • Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in a Fragmented Society (London: Macmillan)
  • Horelli, L., Saad-Sulonen, J., Wallin, S., & Botero, A. (2015) When self-organization intersects with urban Planning: Two cases from Helsinki, Planning Practice and Research, 30(3), pp. 286–302.
  • Höffken, S., & Streich, B. (2013) Mobile participation: Citizen engagement in urban planning via smartphones, in: C. Silva (ed.) Citizen E-Participation in Urban Governance: Crowdsourcing and Collaborative Creativity, pp. 199–225 (Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference)
  • Innes, J., & Booher, D. (2004) Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century, Planning Theory and Practice, 5(4), pp. 419–436. doi:10.1080/1464935042000293170.
  • Irvin, R., & Stansbury, J. (2004) Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), pp. 55–65. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x.
  • Iveson, K. (2013) Cities within the City: Do-It-Yourself Urbanism and the Right to the City, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), pp. 941–956.
  • Jessop, B. (2002) The Future of the Capitalist State (Cambridge: Polity Press)
  • Jones, P., Layard, A., Speed, C., & Lorne, C. (2015) MapLocal: use of smartphones for crowdsourced planning, Planning Practice and Research, 30(3), pp. 322–336.
  • Mergel, I. (2013a) Social media adoption and resulting tactics in the U.S. federal government, Government Information Quarterly, 30(2), pp. 123–130. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.12.004.
  • Mergel, I. (2013b) A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector, Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), pp. 327–334. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.015.
  • Morozov, E. (2013) To Save Everything, Click Here: Technology, Solutionism, and the Urge to Fix Problems That Don't Exist (New York: Allen Lane)
  • Mossberger, K., Wu, Y., & Crawford, J. (2013) Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities, Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), pp. 351–358. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.016.
  • Painter, J., Orton, A., MacLeod, D., Dominelli, L., & Pande, R. (2011) Connecting Localism and Community Empowerment: Research Review and Critical Synthesis for the AHRC Connected Community Programme  Available at http://www.dro.dur.ac.uk/9244/1/9244.pdf (accessed 4 March 2015) (Durham: Durham University)
  • Patten, S. (2001) Democratizing the institutions of policy-making: Democratic consultation and participatory administration, Journal of Canadian Studies, 35, pp. 221–239.
  • Raco, M. (2013) The new contractualism, the privatization of the welfare state, and the barriers to open source planning, Planning Practice and Research, 28(1), pp. 45–64. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.694306.
  • Roberts, N. (2004) Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation, American Review of Public Administration, 34(4), pp. 315–353. doi:10.1177/0275074004269288.
  • Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. (2000) Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation, Science, Technology, and Human Values, 25(1), pp. 3–29. doi:10.1177/016224390002500101.
  • Sawhney, N., De Klerk, C., & Malhotra, S. (2015) Civic engagement through DIY urbanism and collective networked action, Planning Practice and Research, 30(3), pp. 337–354.
  • Seltzer, E., & Mahmoudi, D. (2013) Citizen participation, open innovation, and crowdsourcing: Challenges and opportunities for planning, Journal of Planning Literature, 28(1), pp. 3–18. doi:10.1177/0885412212469112.
  • Shipley, R., & Utz, S. (2012) Making it count: A review of the value and techniques for public consultation, Journal of Planning Literature, 27(1), pp. 22–42. doi:10.1177/0885412211413133.
  • Sieber, R. (2006) Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(3), pp. 491–507. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x.
  • Stiver, A., Barroca, L., Minocha, S., Richards, M., & Roberts, D. (2015) Civic crowdfunding research: Challenges, opportunities, and future agenda, New Media and Society, 17(2), pp. 249–271. doi:10.1177/1461444814558914.
  • Sui, D., Elwood, S. & Goodchild, M. (Eds) (2013) Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge. Volunteered Geographic Information in Theory and Practice (Dordrecht: Springer)
  • Townsend, A. (2013) Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia (London: WW Norton)
  • Wells, P. (2011) Prospects for a big society? Special issue of people place and policy online guest editorial, People, Place and Policy Online, 5(2), pp. 50–54. doi:10.3351/ppp.0005.0002.0001.
  • Williamson, W., & Parolin, B. (2012) Review of web-based communications for town planning in local government, Journal of Urban Technology, 19(1), pp. 43–63. doi:10.1080/10630732.2012.626702.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.