Let the Citizens Map—Public Participation GIS as a Planning Support System in the Helsinki Master Plan Process

References

• Al-Kodmany, K. (1999) Using visualization techniques for enhancing public participation in planning and design: process, implementation, and evaluation, Landscape and Urban Planning, 45, pp. 37–45.10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00024-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäcklund, P. & Mäntysalo, R. (2010) Agonism and institutional ambiquity: ideas on democracy and the role of participation in the development of planning theory and practice – the case of Finland, Planning Theory, 9(4), pp. 333–350. doi:10.1177/1473095210373684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beierle, T. C. & Cayford, J. (2002) Democracy in Practice. Public Participation in Environmental Decisions. (Washington, DC: Resources for the Future).
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. & Hoban, M. (2005) Participation in Anti-poverty and Regeneration Work and Research. Overcoming Barriers and Creating Opportunities (New York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation). Available at http://www.jrf.org.uk/bookshop/eBooks/1859353738.pdf (accessed 10 January 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Brail, R. K. & Klosterman, R. E. (2001) Planning Support Systems: Integrating Geographic Information Systems, Models, and Visualization Tools (Redlands, CA: Esri Press).
   Google Scholar
• te Brömmelstroet, M. (2012) Transparency, flexibility, simplicity: from buzzwords to strategies for real PSS improvement, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 36(1), pp. 96–104.10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2011.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• te Brömmelstroet, M. (2013) Performance of planning support systems: What is it, and how do we report on it? Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 41, pp. 299–308.10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2012.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• te Brömmelstroet, M. & Bertolini, L. (2008) Developing land use and transport PSS: Meaningful information through a dialogue between modelers and planners, Transport Policy, 15(4), pp. 251–259.10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. (2012) Public participation GIS (PPGIS) for regional and environmental planning: reflections on a decade of empirical research. URISA Journal, 25, p. 7–18.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. (2014) Engaging the wisdom of crowds and public judgment for land use planning using public participation GIS (PPGIS), Australian Planner ( Manuscript accepted for publication (10 November 2014)).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. & Chin, S. Y. W. (2013) Assessing the effectiveness of public participation in neighbourhood planning, Planning Practice and Research, 28(5), pp. 563–588.10.1080/02697459.2013.820037
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. & Kyttä, M. (2014) Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): a synthesis based on empirical research, Applied Geography, 46, pp. 122–136. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G. & Raymond, C. M. (2014) Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping. Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, pp. 196–208. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, G., Donovan, S., Pullar, D., Pocewicz, A., Toohey, R. & Ballesteros-Lopez, R. (2014) An empirical evaluation of workshop versus survey PPGIS methods, Applied Geography, 48, pp. 42–51. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corburn, J. (2003) Bringing local knowledge into environmental decision making: improving urban planning for communities at risk, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(4), pp. 420–433. doi:10.1177/0739456X03022004008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1999) The logistics of public participation in environmental assessment, International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 11(3), pp. 316–330.10.1504/IJEP.1999.002264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1992) Empowerment: The Politics of Alternative Development (Oxford: Blackwell).
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1998) The new political economy of planning: the rise of the civil society, in: M. Douglass & J. Friedmann (Eds) Cities for Citizens, pp. 19–38 (Chichester: Wiley).
   Google Scholar
• Geertman, S. (2006) Potentials for planning support: a planning-conceptual approach, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33(6), pp. 863–880.10.1068/b31129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertman, S. & Stillwell, J. (2004) Planning support systems: an inventory of current practice, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 28(4), pp. 291–310. doi:10.1016/S0198-9715(03)00024-3.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F. (2007) Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography, GeoJournal, 69(4), pp. 211–221. doi:10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, G. B., Chipeniuk, R., Feick, R. D., Leahy, M. G. & Deparday, V. (2010) Community-based production of geographic information using open source software and Web 2.0, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24(5), pp. 761–781. doi:10.1080/13658810903213288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvorsen, K. E. (2001) Assessing public participation techniques for comfort, convenience, satisfaction, and deliberation, Environmental Management, 28(2), pp. 179–186. doi:10.1007/s002670010216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1992) Planning through debate, Town Planning Review, 63(2), pp. 143–162.10.3828/tpr.63.2.422x602303814821
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997) Collaborative Planning. Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies (Hampshire: McMillan Press Limited).
   Google Scholar
• Heikkinen, H. L., Rovio, E. & Syrjälä, L. (2006) Toiminnasta tietoon: Toimintatutkimuksen Menetelmät Ja Lähestymistavat [From action to knowledge]. pp. 144–162. (Helsinki: Kansanvalistusseura).
   Google Scholar
• Horelli, L. (2002) A Methodology of Participatory Planning. Handbook of environmental psychology, pp. 607–628 (New York: Wiley).
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. & Booher, D. E. (2004) Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century, Planning Theory & Practice, 5(4), pp. 419–436. doi:10.1080/1464935042000293170.
   Google Scholar
• Irvin, R. A. & Stansbury, J. (2004) Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), pp. 55–65. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahila, M. (2013) SoftGIS development process as a trading zone: challenges in implementing a participatory planning support system, in: A. Balducci & R. Mäntysalo (Eds), Urban Planning as a Trading Zone, pp. 75–94 (Dordrecht: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Kahila, M. & Kyttä, M. (2009) SoftGIS as a bridge builder in collaborative urban planning, in: S. Geertman & J. Stillwell (Eds) Planning Support Systems: Best Practices and New Methods, pp. 389–411 (Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media B.V.).
   Google Scholar
• Kingston, R. (2007) Public participation in local policy decision-making: the role of web-based mapping, The Cartographic Journal, 44(2), pp. 138–144. doi:10.1179/000870407X213459.
   Google Scholar
• Klosterman, R. E. (1999) The what if? Collaborative planning support system, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26(3), pp. 393–408. doi:10.1068/b260393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M., Thomas, C. W. (2006) What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Administration Review, 66(s1), pp. 111–121. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00671.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyttä, M., Kahila, M. & Broberg, A. (2011) Perceived environmental quality as an input to urban infill policy-making, Urban Design International, 16(1), pp. 19–35. doi:10.1057/udi.2010.19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyttä, M., Broberg, A., Haybatollahi, M. & Schmidt-Thomé, K. (2015) Urban happiness – context-sensitive study of the social sustainability of urban settings, Environment and Planning B 2015, 47, pp. 1–24. doi:10.1177/0265813515600121
   Google Scholar
• Laurian, L. (2004) Public participation in environmental decision making: findings from communities facing toxic waste cleanup, Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(1), pp. 53–65. doi:10.1080/01944360408976338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurian, L. & Shaw, M. (2009) Evaluation of public participation: the practices of certified planners, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28, pp. 293–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leino, H. (2006) Kansalaisosallistuminen ja kaupunkisuunnittelun dynamiikka: Tutkimus tampereen vuoreksesta [Public participation and the dynamics of the urban planning: Study on Tampere, Vuores]. (Tampere: Tampere University Press).
   Google Scholar
• McCrea, R. & Walters, P. (2012) Impacts of urban consolidation on urban liveability: comparing an inner and outer suburb in Brisbane, Australia, Housing, Theory and Society, 29(2), pp. 190–206. doi:10.1080/14036096.2011.641261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzel, S., Nordström, E.-M., Buchecker, M., Marques, A., Saarikoski, H. & Kangas, A. (2012) Decision support systems in forest management: requirements from a participatory planning perspective, European Journal of Forest Research, 131(5), pp. 1367–1379. doi:10.1007/s10342-012-0604-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monno, V. & Khakee, A. (2011) More of the same or just right and robust? Evaluating participatory planning, in: A. Hull, E. R. Alexander, A. Khakee & J. Woltjer (Eds), Evaluation for Participation and Sustainability in Planning, pp. 297–314 (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Pelzer, P. Geertman, S., Heijden, R., van der Rouwette, E. (2014) The added value of planning support systems: a practitioner’s perspective, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 48, pp. 16–27.10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, G. & Frewer, L. J. (2004) Evaluating public-participation exercises: a research agenda, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 29(4), pp. 512–555. doi:10.1177/0162243903259197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, G. & Frewer, L. J. (2000) Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation, Science Technology Human Values, 25(1), pp. 3–29. doi:10.1177/016224390002500101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrijnen, P. M. (2010) From planning support systems to mediated planning support: a structured dialogue to overcome the implementation gap, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(1), pp. 3–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staffans, A. (2004) Vaikuttavat asukkaat. Vuorovaikutus ja paikallinen tieto kaupunkisuunnittelun haasteina. Yhdyskuntasuunnittelun tutkimus- ja koultuskeskuksen julkaisuja A 29. (Espoo: Teknillinen korkeakoulu, Yhdyskuntasuunnittelun tutkimus- ja koulutuskeskus).
   Google Scholar
• Sui, D., Elwood, S. & Goodchild, M. (Eds) (2013) Volunteered Geographic Information, the Exaflood, and the Growing Digital Divide. Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice (Netherlands: Springer). doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_1
   Google Scholar
• Tulloch, D. (2008) Public participation GIS (PPGIS), in: K. Kemp (ed.), Encyclopedia of geographic information science, pp. 352–355 (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Vonk, G., Geertman, S. & Schot, P. (2005) Bottlenecks blocking widespread usage of planning support systems. Environment and Planning A, 37(5), pp. 909–924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. & Fung, T. (2013) A model of conflict resolution in public participation GIS for land-use planning, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 40, pp. 550–568. doi:10.1068/b37033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar