Capacity for Stakeholder Participation in Recovery Planning

References

• Alesch, D. A., Arendt, L. A. & Holly, J. N. (2009) Managing for Long-term Community Recovery in the Aftermath of Disaster (Washington, DC: Public Entity Risk Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Ardalan, A., Naieni, K. H., Mahmoodi, M., Zanganeh, A. M., Keshtkar, A. A., Honarvar, M. R. & Kabir, M. J. (2010) Flash flood preparedness in Golestan province of Iran: A community intervention trial, American Journal of Disaster Medicine, 5(4), pp. 197–214.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berke, P. R. & Campanella, T. J. (2006) Planning for postdisaster resiliency, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604(1), pp. 192–207.10.1177/0002716205285533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berke, P. R., Cooper, J., Aminto, M., Grabich, S. & Horney, J. A. (2014) Adaptive planning for disaster recovery and resiliency: An evaluation of 87 local recovery plans in eight states, Journal of the American Planning Association, 80(4), pp. 310–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berke, P. R., Cooper, J., Salvesen, D., Spurlock, D. L. & Rausch, C. (2011) Building capacity for disaster resiliency in six disadvantaged communities, Sustainablity, 3(1), pp. 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berke, P. R., Crawford, J. & Dixon, J. (2002) Planning and indigenous people: Human rights and environmental protection in New Zealand, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(2), pp. 115–134.10.1177/0739456X02238442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berke, P. R. & Godschalk, D. R. (2009) Searching for the good plan: A meta-analysis of plan quality studies, Journal of Planning Literature, 23(3), pp. 227–240.10.1177/0885412208327014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I. & Wisner, B. (2014) At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Boersma, P. D., Kareiva, P., Fagan, W. F., Clark, J. A. & Hoekstra, J. M. (2001) How good are endangered species recovery plans? The effectiveness of recovery plans for endangered species can be improved through incorporation of dynamic, explicit science in the recovery process, such as strongly linking species’ biology to recovery criteria, BioScience, 51(8), pp. 643–649.10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0643:HGAESR]2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Bonafede, G. & Piccolo, F. L. (2010) Participative planning processes in the absence of the (public) space of democracy, Planning Practice and Research, 25(3), pp. 353–375.10.1080/02697459.2010.503430
   Google Scholar
• Burby, R. J. (2001) Involving citizens in hazard mitigation planning: Making the right choices, Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 16(3), pp. 45–51.
   Google Scholar
• Burby, R. J. (2003) Making plans that matter: Citizen involvement and government action, Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(1), pp. 33–49.10.1080/01944360308976292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. A., Hoekstra, J. M., Boersma, P. D. & Kareiva, P. (2002) Improving US Endangered Species Act recovery plans: Key findings and recommendations of the SCB recovery plan project, Conservation Biology, 16(6), pp. 1510–1519.10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01376.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, E., Cassar, L. F., Christie, M. & Fazey, I. (2011) Hearing but not listening? A participatory assessment of public participation in planning, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(5), pp. 761–782.10.1068/c10137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corburn, J. (2003) Bringing local knowledge into environmental decision making: Improving urban planning for communities at risk, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(4), pp. 420–433.10.1177/0739456X03022004008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutter, S. (1995) The forgotten casualties: Women, children, and environmental change, Global Environmental Change, 5(3), pp. 181–194.10.1016/0959-3780(95)00046-Q
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutter, S., Mitchell, J. & Scott, M. (2000) Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: A case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(4), pp. 713–737.10.1111/0004-5608.00219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derkzen, P., Franklin, A. & Bock, B. (2008) Examining power struggles as a signifier of successful partnership working: A case study of partnership dynamics, Journal of Rural Studies, 24(4), pp. 458–466.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., Phelps, G., Tortora, A., Swift, K., Kohrell, H., Berck, J. & Messer, B. L. (2009) Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response and the internet, Social Science Research, 38(1), pp. 1–18.10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Emergency Management Agency (2011) A whole community approach to emergency management: Principles, themes, and pathways for action. Available at http://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/23781?id=4941.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, H. & Roy, M. (1998) New approaches to citizen participation in endangered species management: Recovery in the Bitterroot ecosystem, Ursus, 10, pp. 603–606.
   Google Scholar
• Fothergill, A. & Peek, L. A. (2004) Poverty and disasters in the United States: A review of recent sociological findings, Natural Hazards, 32(1), pp. 89–110.10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000026792.76181.d9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganapati, N. & Ganapati, S. (2008) Enabling participatory planning after disasters: A case study of the Worlds Bank’s housing reconstruction in Turkey, Journal of the American Planning Association, 75(1), pp. 41–59.10.1080/01944360802546254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gershon, R. R., Rubin, M. S., Qureshi, K. A., Canton, A. N. & Matzner, F. J. (2008) Participatory action research methodology in disaster research: Results From the World Trade Center evacuation study, Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 2(3), pp. 142–149.10.1097/DMP.0b013e318184b48f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godschalk, D. R., Brody, S. & Burby, R. J. (2003) Public participation in natural hazard mitigation policy formation: Challenge for comprehensive planning, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 46(5), pp. 733–754.10.1080/0964056032000138463
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, S. (2005) The trapdoor of community, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(4), pp. 850–865.10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00490.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, D. (2010) The emancipatory limits of participation in planning: Equity and power in deliberative planmaking in Perth, Western Australia, Town Planning Review, 81(1), pp. 55–81.10.3828/tpr.2009.24
   Google Scholar
• Huang, S. C. L. (2010) The impact of public participation on the effectiveness of, and users’ attachment to, urban neighbourhood parks, Landscape Research, 35(5), pp. 551–562.10.1080/01426397.2010.504916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E. (1998) Information in communicative planning, Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(1), pp. 52–63.10.1080/01944369808975956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karanci, N. A. & Aksit, B. (1999) Strengthening community participation in disaster management by strengthening governmental and non-governmental organizations and networks: A case study from Dinar and Bursa, Turkey, Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 13(4), pp. 35–39.
   Google Scholar
• Kweit, M. G. & Kweit, R. W. (2004) Citizen participation and citizen evaluation in disaster recovery, The American Review of Public Administration, 34(4), pp. 354–373.10.1177/0275074004268573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell, M. K. & Perry, R. W. (2004) Communicating Environmental Risk in Multiethnic Communities (Thousand Oaks CA: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Manyena, S. (2006) The concept of resilience, Disasters, 30(4), pp. 433–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meheuz, K., Dominey-Howes, D. & Lloyd, K. (2010) Operational challenges to community participation in post-disaster damage assessments: Observations from Fiji, Disasters, 34(4), pp. 1102–1122.10.1111/disa.2010.34.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkler, M., Breckwich, V. B., Tajik, M. & Petersen, D. (2008) Promoting environmental justice through community-based participatory research: The role of community and partnership capacity, Health Education Behavior, 35(1), pp. 119–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, B. (1999) Identifying and mapping community vulnerability, Disasters, 23(1), pp. 1–18.10.1111/disa.1999.23.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojerio, R., Moseley, C., Lynn, K. & Bania, N. (2011) Limited involvement of socially vulnerable populations in federal programs to mitigate wildfire risk in Arizona, Natural Hazards Review, 12(1), pp. 28–36.10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olshansky, R. B., Hopkins, L. D. & Johnson, L. A. (2012) Disaster and recovery: Processes compressed in time, Natural Hazards Review, 13(3), pp. 173–178.10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olshansky, R. B. & Johnson, L. (2010) Clear as Mud: Planning for the Rebuilding of New Orleans (Washington, DC: Island Press).
   Google Scholar
• Peacock, W. G., Morrow, B. H. & Gladwin, H. (1997) Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender, and the Sociology of Disasters (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, L. (2003) Disaster management, community planning and public participation: How to achieve sustainable hazard mitigation, Natural Hazards, 28(2/3), pp. 211–228.10.1023/A:1022917721797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, B. D. (2009) Disaster Recovery (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press).
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action (New York, NY: Basic Books).
   Google Scholar
• Seattle Neighborhoods Actively Prepare (2007). Available at www.seattle.gov/emergency/library/snap/SNAP%20Brochure.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sirianni, C. (2007) Neighborhood planning as collaborative democratic design, Journal of the American Planning Association, 73(4), pp. 373–387.10.1080/01944360708978519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, M. R., Berke, P. R. & Song, Y. (2010) Public participation in local government review of development proposals in hazardous locations: Does it Matter, and what do local government planners have to do with it? Environmental Management, 45(2), pp. 320–335.10.1007/s00267-009-9397-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twigg, J., Bhatt, M., Eyre, A., Jones, R., Luna, E., Murwira, K., Sato, J., & Wisner, B. (2001) Guidance Notes on Participation and Accountability (London: Benfield Greig Hazard Research Centre, University College. Available at http://www.hapinternational.org/pool/files/participation-and-accountability.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, K. & Wolf-Wendel, L. (2000) Community-centered service learning: Moving from doing for to doing with, American Behavioral Scientist, 43(5), pp. 767–780.10.1177/00027640021955586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar