What Determines the Substantive Influence of Public Participation? An Investigation of Planners’ Views on Conditions for Participatory Practices in Denmark

References

• Arnstein, S. R. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), pp. 216–224.10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beierle, T. C. & Cayford, J. (2002) Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions. (Washington, DC: Resources for the Future).
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, P. & Davis, G. (2002) Mapping public participation in policy choices, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61(1), pp. 14–29. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.00255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhme, K. (2002) Nordic Echoes of European Spatial Planning: Discursive Integration in Practice. (Stockholm: Nordregio).
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. & Chin, S. Y. W. (2013) Assessing the effectiveness of public participation in neighbourhood planning, Planning Practice & Research, 28(5), pp. 563–588. doi:10.1080/02697459.2013.820037.
   Google Scholar
• Brownill, S. & Carpenter, J. (2007) Increasing participation in planning: Emergent experiences of the reformed planning system in England, Planning Practice & Research, 22(4), pp. 619–634. doi:10.1080/02697450701770134.
   Google Scholar
• Brownill, S. & Parker, G. (2010) Why bother with good works? The relevance of public participation(s) in planning in a post-collaborative era, Planning Practice & Research, 25(3), pp. 275–282. doi:10.1080/02697459.2010.503407.
   Google Scholar
• Buono, F., Pediaditi, K. & Carsjens, G. J. (2012) Local community participation in Italian National Parks management: Theory versus practice, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 14(2), pp. 189–208. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2012.683937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (2008) Public Participation Guide (No. En106-80/2008E-PDF). (Ottawa: Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency).
   Google Scholar
• Cashmore, M., Gwilliam, R., Morgan, R., Cobb, D. & Bond, A. (2004) The interminable issue of effectiveness: Substantive purposes, outcomes and research challenges in the advancement of environmental impact assessment theory, Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 22(4), pp. 295–310. doi:10.3152/147154604781765860.
   Google Scholar
• Chilvers, J. (2008) Deliberating competence: Theoretical and practitioner perspectives on effective participatory appraisal practice, Science, Technology & Human Values, 33(2), pp. 155–185. doi:10.1177/0162243907307594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commissie voor de milieueffectrapportage (2011) Guidance for Public Participation in Planning and Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) (Utrecht: Commissie voor de milieueffectrapportage).
   Google Scholar
• Conroy, M. M. (2011) Influences on public participation in watershed planning: Why is it still a struggle? Planning Practice & Research, 26(4), pp. 467–479. doi:10.1080/02697459.2011.585571.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests, Psychometrika, 16, pp. 297–334.10.1007/BF02310555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Furia, L. & Wallace-Jones, J. (2000) The effectiveness of provisions and quality of practices concerning public participation in EIA in Italy, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20(4), pp. 457–479. doi:10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00035-4.10.1016/S0195-9255(00)00035-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, T. & Stern, P. C. (Eds) (2008) Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. Panel on Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. Committee on the Human Dimension of Global Change. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. The National Research Council (Washington, DC: The National Academies Press).
   Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D. (2000) Policy transfer: A new framework of policy analysis, in: D. Dolowitz, R. Hulme, M. Nellis & F. O’Neill (Eds) Policy Transfer and British Social Policy: Learning from the USA? p. 9 (Buckingham: Open University Press).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2003) Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC), Guidance Document No 8, Public Participation in Relation to the Water Framework Directive (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities).
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1999) Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1992) Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory, Town Planning Review, 63(2), pp. 143–162.10.3828/tpr.63.2.422x602303814821
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J. & Minkov, M. (2010) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 3rd ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill).
   Google Scholar
• Honadle, G. (1999) How Context Matters. Linking Environmental Policy to People and Place (West Hartford, CT: Kumarin Press).
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E. & Booher, D. E. (2004) Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century, Planning Theory & Practice, 5(4), pp. 419–436. doi:10.1080/1464935042000293170.
   Google Scholar
• Involve and Togetherwecan (2005) The True Costs of Public Participation (London: Involve).
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2011) Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Jewell, W., Grossardt, T., Bailey, K. & Gill, R. S. (2009) A new method for public involvement in electric transmission-line routing, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 24(4), pp. 2240–2247. doi:10.1109/TPWRD.2009.2027490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knieling, J. & Othengrafen, F. (Eds) (2009) Planning Cultures in Europe. Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning (Surrey: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Lafferty, W. (Ed) (1999) Implementing LA21 in Europe (Oslo: Prosus).
   Google Scholar
• Lane, M. B. (2005) Public participation in planning: An intellectual history, Australian Geographer, 36(3), pp. 283–299. doi:10.1080/00049180500325694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauber, T. B. (1999) Measuring fairness in citizen participation: A case study of moose management, Society & Natural Resources, 12(1), pp. 19–37. doi:10.1080/089419299279867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurian, L. (2003) A prerequisite for participation: Environmental knowledge and what residents know about local toxic sites, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(3), pp. 257–269. doi:10.1177/0739456X02250316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurian, L. & Shaw, M. M. (2009) Evaluation of public participation: The practices of certified planners, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(3), pp. 293–309. doi:10.1177/0739456X08326532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyhne, I. (2011) Between policy-making and planning, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 13(3), pp. 319–341.10.1142/S1464333211003912
   Google Scholar
• Lyhne, I., Cashmore, M., Runhaar, H. & van Laerhoven, F. (2015) Quality control for environmental policy appraisal tools: An empirical investigation of relations between quality, quality control and effectiveness, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(1), pp. 121–140. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2015.1053438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyhne, I. & Kørnøv, L. (2013) How do we make sense of significance?: Indications and reflections on an experiment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 31(3), pp. 180–189. doi:10.1080/14615517.2013.795694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, F. M. & Busenberg, G. J. (1995) Citizen advisory committees and environmental policy: What we know, what’s left to discover, Risk Analysis, 15(2), pp. 147–162. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00309.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, M. (2012) Environmental Democracy: A Contextual Approach (New York: Taylor & Francis).
   Google Scholar
• Mccool, S. F. (2001) Mapping the dimensions of successful public participation in messy natural resources management situations, Society & Natural Resources, 14(4), pp. 309–323. doi:10.1080/713847694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minogue, M. (2006) Apples and oranges: Comparing international experiences in regulatory reform, in: L. Minogue & L. Cariño (Eds) Regulatory Governance in Developing Countries, pp. 61–81 (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).10.4337/9781847203076
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, H. (2013) Offentlighed mellem deltagelse og legitimering: Et demokratiteoretisk perspektiv på vandplanlægningen i Danmark [Openness between Participation and Legitimation – A Democracy Theory Perspective on Water Planning in Denmark], Doctoral dissertation, Roskilde University, Denmark, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, H. & Lyhne, I. (2015) Adding action to the interview: Conceptualizing an interview approach inspired by action research elements, Action Research, 14(1), pp. 54–71. doi:10.1177/1476750315573591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (2007) OECD Environmental Reviews: Denmark (Paris: OECD).
   Google Scholar
• O’Faircheallaigh, C. (2010) Public participation and environmental impact assessment: Purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(1), pp. 19. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2009.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Othengrafen, F. & Reimer, M. (2013) The embeddedness of planning in cultural contexts: Theoretical foundations for the analysis of dynamic planning cultures, Environment and Planning A, 45(6), pp. 1269–1284. doi:10.1068/a45131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, K. (1895) Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (1854-1905), 58, pp. 240–242.10.1098/rspl.1895.0041
   Google Scholar
• Petts, J. (1995) Waste management strategy development: A case study of community involvement and consensus-building in Hampshire, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 38(4), pp. 519–536. doi:10.1080/09640569512797.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Government (2011) Engaging Queenslanders: A Guide to Community Engagement Methods and Techniques (Brisbane: Queensland Government, Department of Communities).
   Google Scholar
• Rosener, J. B. (1981) User-oriented evaluation: A new way to view citizen participation, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 17(4), pp. 583–596. doi:10.1177/002188638101700412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, G. & Frewer, L. J. (2000) Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation, Science, Technology & Human Values, 25(01), pp. 3–29.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, G. & Frewer, L. J. (2004) Evaluating public-participation exercises: A research agenda, Science, Technology & Human Values, 29(4), pp. 512–556. doi:10.1177/0162243903259197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal Town Planning Institute (2005) Guidelines on Effective Community Involvement and Consultation (No. RTPI Good Practice Note 1) (London: Royal Town Planning Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. & Pennington, M. (2000) Public participation and local environmental planning: The collective action problem and the potential of social capital, Local Environment, 5(2), pp. 153–169. doi:10.1080/13549830050009328.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, T. & Sander, A. (2012) Beyond Public Opposition, Lessons Learned across Europe. European Grid Report (Berlin: Renewable Grid Initiatives).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. L. (2003) Public Policy and Public Participation: Engaging Citizens and Community in the Development of Public Policy (Halifax: Population and Public Health Branch, Health Canada).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (2005) Beyond the Ballot: 57 Democratic Innovations from Around the World. Report for the Power Inquiry (London: The POWER Inquiry).
   Google Scholar
• Spyke, N. (1999) Public participation in environmental decisionmaking at the new millennium: Structuring new spheres of public influence, Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 26, pp. 263–313.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D., de Vries, J. & Tasan-Kok, T. (2015) Planning cultures and histories: Influences on the evolution of planning systems and spatial development patterns, European Planning Studies, 23(11), pp. 2127–2132. doi:10.1080/09654313.2015.1016402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturzaker, J. (2011) Can community empowerment reduce opposition to housing? Evidence from rural England, Planning Practice & Research, 26(5), pp. 555–570. doi:10.1080/02697459.2011.626722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnpenny, J., Nilsson, M., Russel, D., Jordan, A., Hertin, J. & Nykvist, B. (2008) Why is integrating policy assessment so hard? A comparative analysis of the institutional capacities and constraints, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51(6), pp. 759–775. doi:10.1080/09640560802423541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. & Wan Wart, M. (2007) When public participation in administration leads to trust: An empirical assessment of managers’ perceptions, Public Administration Review, 67(2), pp. 265–278. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00712.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K. (2005) Public administrators’ trust in citizens: A missing link in citizen involvement efforts, Public Administration Review, 65(3), pp. 273–285. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00453.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Christensen, P. & Kørnøv, L. (2013) Review of critical factors for SEA implementation, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 38, pp. 88–98. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2012.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoellner, J., Schweizer-Ries, P. & Wemheuer, C. (2008) Public acceptance of renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany, Energy Policy, 36(11), pp. 4136–4141. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar