Bypassing Publicity for Getting Things Done: Between Informal and Formal Planning Practices in Finland

References

• Aarsæther, N., Nyseth, T. & Bjørnå, H. (2011) Two networks, one city: Democracy and governance networks in urban transformation, European Urban and Regional Studies, 18(3), pp. 306–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abels, G. (2007) Citizen involvement in public policy-making: Does it improve democratic legitimacy and accountability? The case of pTA, Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, 13, pp. 103–116.10.4036/iis.2007.103
   Google Scholar
• Airaksinen, J., Härkönen, H. & Haveri, A. (2013) Perceptions of legitimacy in nordic regional development networks, Public Organization Review, 14, pp. 457–476.
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L., Healey, P. & Kunzmann, K. R. (2003) Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe, Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(2), pp. 113–129.10.1080/01944360308976301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P. & Haughton, G. (2010) Spatial planning, devolution, and new planning spaces, Environment and Planning C, Government & Policy, 28(5), pp. 803–818.10.1068/c09163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allmendinger, P. & Haughton, G. (2012) Post-political spatial planning in England: A crisis of consensus? Transactions of Institute of British Geographers, 37, pp. 89–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäcklund, P. & Mäntysalo, R. (2010) Agonism and institutional ambiguity: Ideas on democracy and the role of participation in the development of planning theory and practice – the case of Finland, Planning Theory, 9(4), pp. 333–350.10.1177/1473095210373684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäcklund, P., Kallio, K. P. & Häkli, J. (2014) Residents, customers or citizens? Tracing the idea of youthful participation in the context of administrative reforms in Finnish public administration, Planning Theory & Practice, 15(3), pp. 311–327.
   Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K. (2006) Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Rethinking legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness, European Environment, 16(5), pp. 290–306.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0976
   Google Scholar
• Balducci, A. (2011) Strategic planning as exploration, Town Planning Review, 82(5), pp. 529–546.10.3828/tpr.2011.31
   Google Scholar
• Bassoli, M. (2010) Local governance arrangements and democratic outcomes (with some evidence from the Italian case), Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 23(3), pp. 485–508.10.1111/(ISSN)1468-0491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beveridge, R. (2012) Consultants, depoliticization and arena-shifting in the policy process: Privatizing water in Berlin, Policy Sciences, 45(1), pp. 47–68.10.1007/s11077-011-9144-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. (2006) Democratic governance: Systems and radical perspectives, Public Administration Review, 66(3), pp. 426–436.10.1111/puar.2006.66.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. (2011) Governance and governmentality after neoliberalism, Policy & Politics, 39(4), pp. 457–471.10.1332/030557310X550141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohman, J. (1999) Citizenship and norms of publicity: Wide public reason in cosmopolitan societies, Political Theory, 27(2), pp. 176–202.10.1177/0090591799027002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, S. (2011) Negotiating a ‘democratic ethos’: Moving beyond the agonistic–communicative divide, Planning Theory, 10(2), pp. 161–186.10.1177/1473095210383081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. (2012) ‘Planning ethics’ and rediscovering the idea of planning, Planning Theory, 11(4), pp. 379–399.10.1177/1473095212442159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristiano, T. (2004) The Authority of Democracy, Journal of Political Philosophy, 12(3), pp. 266–290.10.1111/jopp.2004.12.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copus, C., Sweeting, D. & Wingfield, M. (2013) Repoliticising and redemocratising local democracy and the public realm: why we need councillors and councils, Policy & Politics, 41(3), pp. 389–408.10.1332/030557313X670136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremer-Schulte, D. (2014) With or Without You? Strategic Spatial Planning and Territorial Re-Scaling in Grenoble Urban Region, Planning Practice & Research, 29(3), pp. 287–301.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, J. (2001) Publicity’s Secret, Political Theory, 29(5), pp. 624–650.10.1177/0090591701029005002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkkilä, T. (2010) Reinventing Nordic Openness: Transparency and State Information in Finland, Acta Politica (Helsinki: University of Helsinki).
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Government. (2009) Valtioneuvoston selonteko kunta- ja palvelurakenneuudistuksesta [Government Briefing on Municipal and Service Structure Reform], Valtioneuvoston selontekoja, VNS 9/2009 vp. (Helsinki: The Parliament of Finland).
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2001) Making social science matter. Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).10.1017/CBO9780511810503
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2004) Phronetic planning research: Theoretical and methodological reflections, Planning Theory & Practice, 5(3), pp. 283–306.10.1080/1464935042000250195
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1984) Bounded rationality and the politics of muddling through, Public Administration Review, 44(1), pp. 23–31.10.2307/975658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2012) Learning to improve practice: Lessons from practice stories and practitioners’ own discourse analyses (or why only the loons show up), Planning Theory & Practice, 13(1), pp. 11–26.10.1080/14649357.2012.649905
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2013) On the theory and practice of critical pragmatism: Deliberative practice and creative negotiations, Planning Theory, 12(1), pp. 5–22.10.1177/1473095212448750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972). The archeology of knowledge London: Tavistock Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1987) Planning in the public domain. From knowledge to action (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (2005) Globalization and the emerging culture of planning, Progress in Planning, 64, pp. 183–234.10.1016/j.progress.2005.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griggs, S. & Howard, D. (2007) Airport governance, politics and protest networks, in: M. Marcussen & J. Torfing (Eds) Democratic network governance in Europe, pp. 66–88 (Basingstoke: Palgrave).10.1057/9780230596283
   Google Scholar
• Gunder, M. & Hillier, J. (2007) Planning as urban therapeutic, Environment and Planning A, 39(2), pp. 467–486.10.1068/a38236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häikiö, L. (2007) Expertise, representation and the common good: Grounds for legitimacy in the urban governance network, Urban Studies, 44(11), pp. 2147–2162.10.1080/00420980701518982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häikiö, L. (2010) The diversity of citizenship and democracy in local public management reform, Public Management Review, 12(3), pp. 363–384.10.1080/14719030903286649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (2009) Authoritative governance. Policy-making in the age of mediatization (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. & Laws, D. (2006) Ordering through discourse, in: M. Moran, M. Rein & R. E. Goodie (Eds) The Oxford handbook of public policy, pp. 249-266 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. & Wagenaar, H. (2003) Deliberative policy analysis. Understanding governance in the network society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).10.1017/CBO9780511490934
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., Kettunen, P., Löfgren, K. & Ringholm, T. (2009) Is there a Nordic approach to questions of democracy in studies of network governance? Local Government Studies, 35(5), pp. 515–538.10.1080/03003930903411675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haveri, A., Nyholm, I., Røiseland, A. & Vabo, I. (2009) Governing collaboration: Practices of meta-governance in finnish and norwegian local governments, Local Government Studies, 35(5), pp. 539–556.10.1080/03003930903227360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2004) The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(1), pp. 45–67.10.1111/ijur.2004.28.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2007) Urban complexity and spatial strategies: Towards a relational planning for our times (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. (2009) The democratic soup: Mixed meanings of political representation in governance networks, Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 22(4), pp. 689–715.10.1111/gove.2009.22.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrschel, T. (2013) Competitiveness AND sustainability: can ‘smart city regionalism’ square the circle? Urban Studies, Epub ahead of print, 50, pp. 2332–2348. doi: 10.1177/0042098013478240.
   Google Scholar
• Heurkens, E. & Hobma, F. (2014) Private sector-led urban development projects: Comparative insights from planning practices in the Netherlands and the UK, Planning Practice & Research, 29(4), pp. 350–369.10.1080/02697459.2014.932196
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. (2000) Going round the back? Complex networks and informal action in local planning processes, Environment and Planning A, 32(1), pp. 33–54.10.1068/a321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. (2003) Agon’izing over consensus: Why Habermasian ideals cannot be ‘real’, Planning Theory, 2, pp. 37–59.10.1177/1473095203002001005
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, P. (2000) Democracy and governance in: Pierre, Jon (Ed) Debating governance: Authority, steering and democracy, pp. 13–25 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Inch, A. (2015) Ordinary citizens and the political cultures of planning: In search of the subject of a new democratic ethos, Planning Theory, 14(4), pp. 404–424.10.1177/1473095214536172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. & Booher, D. (2010) Planning with complexity (New York, NY: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Kanninen, V. (2016). Yhdyskuntarakenteen ohjaaminen ja kaupunkiseutujen kehittäminen [Steering Urban Structure and Developing City-regions], in: S. Puustinen, R. Mäntysalo & I. Karppi (Eds) Strateginen eheyttäminen kaupunkiseuduilla. Näkökulmia kestävän maankäytön ja julkisen talouden kysymyksiin [Strategic Consolidation in City-regions. Viewpoints to Issues of Sustainable Land Use and Public Finance], Valtioneuvoston selvitys- ja tutkimustoiminnan julkaisusarja 4/2016, pp. 17–30 (Helsinki: Prime Minister’s Office).
   Google Scholar
• Kanninen, V., Bäcklund, P. & Mäntysalo, R. (2013). Trading zone and the complexity of planning, in: A. Balducci, & R. Mäntysalo (Eds) Urban planning as a trading zone, pp. 159–177, Springer Urban and Landscape Perspectives 13 (Dordrecht: Springer).10.1007/978-94-007-5854-4
   Google Scholar
• Karppi, I., Henriksson, A., Andersson, S., Jordan, T. & Niininen, T. (2008) Yhteistä visiota etsimässä. Kehittämiskohteena Lempäälän keskusta [Searching for Mutual Vision. Centre of Lempäälä as a Focus for Development] (Tampere: Tampere University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.-H. & Koppenjan, J. (2012) Governance network theory: Past, present and future, Policy & Politics, 40(4), pp. 587–606.10.1332/030557312X655431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laitio, M. & Maijala, O. (2010) Alueidenkäytön strateginen ohjaaminen [Strategic Guidance of Land Use], Suomen ympäristö 28/2010 (Helsinki: Ympäristöministeriö).
   Google Scholar
• Legacy, C., Curtis, C. & Neuman, M. (2014) Adapting the deliberative democracy ‘template’ for planning practice, Town Planning Review, 85(3), pp. 319–340.10.3828/tpr.2014.20
   Google Scholar
• Leino, H. (2012) Boundary interaction in emerging scenes: Two participatory planning cases from Finland, Planning Theory & Practice, 13(3), pp. 383–396.10.1080/14649357.2012.706629
   Google Scholar
• Leino, H. & Laine, M. (2012) Do matters of concern matter? Bringing issues back to participation, Planning Theory, 11(1), pp. 89–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, W. & Reckhow, S. (2012) Network governance and regional equity: Shared agendas or problematic partners? Planning Theory, 12(2), pp. 115–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luban, D. (1996) The publicity principle, in: R. Goodin (Ed) The theory of institutional design, pp. 154–198 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).10.1017/CBO9780511558320
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, G. (2011) Urban politics reconsidered Urban Studies, 48(12), pp. 2629–2660.10.1177/0042098011415715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, G. & Jones, M. (2011) Renewing urban politics, Urban Studies, 48(12), pp. 2443–2472.10.1177/0042098011415717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAL-verkosto. (2010) Seudullisen MAL-toiminnan organisointi. Kooste MALkyselystä/osa B [Organising Regional MAL Activity. Compilation of MALquestionnaire/part B] (Tampere: MAL-verkosto).
   Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, R. & Saglie, I.-L. (2010) Private influence preceding public involvement: Strategies for legitimizing preliminary partnership arrangements in urban housing planning in Norway and Finland, Planning Theory & Practice, 11(3), pp. 317–338.10.1080/14649357.2010.500123
   Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, R., Jarenko, K., Nilsson, K.-L. & Saglie, I.-L. (2014a) Legitimacy of informal strategic urban planning – observations from Finland, Sweden and Norway, European Planning Studies, 23(2), pp. 349–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, R., Kangasoja, J. K. & Kanninen, V. (2014) Rakennemallit kaupunkiseutujen suunnittelussa—Strategisen maankäytön suunnittelun paradoksi [Structural Schemes in City-regional Planning – A Paradox of Strategic Spatial Planning]. Ympäristöhallinnon raportteja 18/2014 (Helsinki: Ympäristöministeriö).
   Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, R., Kangasoja, J. K. & Kanninen, V. (2015) The paradox of strategic spatial planning: A theoretical outline with a view on Finland, Planning Theory & Practice, 16(2), pp. 169–183.10.1080/14649357.2015.1016548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClymont, K. (2014) Stuck in the process, facilitating nothing? Justice, capabilities and planning for value-led outcomes, Planning Practice & Research, 29(2), pp. 187–201.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, J. (2011) Neither revolution, nor resignation: (Re)Democratizing contemporary planning praxis: A commentary on Allmendinger and Haughton’s “spatial planning, devolution, and new planning spaces”, Environment and Planning C, Government and Policy, 29(2), pp. 191–196.10.1068/c10210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P. & Rose, N. (2008) Governing the present: Administering the economic, social and personal life (Cambridge: Polity Press).
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2000) The democratic paradox (London: Verso).
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2005) On the political (Abingdon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Nurse, A. (2015) Bridging the gap? The role of regional governance in delivering effective local public services: Evidence from England, Planning Practice & Research, 30(1), pp. 69–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojaniemi, N. (2014) MAL(PE) – aiesopimusten sitoutumiseen vaikuttavat tekijät [Factors Affecting Adherence to MAL(PE)-Letters of Intent] (Tampere: MAL-verkosto).
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, J. & Hysing, E. (2012) Theorizing inside activism: Understanding policymaking and policy change from below, Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), pp. 257–273.10.1080/14649357.2012.677123
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, J. (2013) The right to the city: the struggle for democracy in the urban public realm, Policy & Politics, 41(3), pp. 311–327.10.1332/030557312X655639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranciere, J. (1995) On the shores of politics (London: Verso).
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1971) A theory of justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1997) The idea of public reason revisited, The University of Chicago Law Review, 64(3), pp. 765–807.10.2307/1600311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosol, M. (2013) Vancouver’s “EcoDensity” planning initiative: A struggle over hegemony? Urban Studies, 50(11), pp. 2238–2255.10.1177/0042098013478233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager, T. (2009) Planners’ role: Torn between dialogical ideals and neo-liberal realities, European Planning Studies, 17(1), pp. 65–84.10.1080/09654310802513948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sam, M. P. & Scherer, J. (2006) The steering group as policy advice instrument: A case of “consultocracy” in stadium subsidy deliberations, Policy Sciences, 39, pp. 169–181.10.1007/s11077-006-9014-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, A., Burgess, S. & Croft, N. (2015) Information is power: Public disclosure of information in the planning decision-making process, Planning Practice & Research, 30(4), pp. 443–456.10.1080/02697459.2015.1045225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C., Klijn, E. H., Kübler, D., Sørensen, E. & Sullivan, H. (2011) Explaining the democratic anchorage of governance networks. Evidence from four European Countries, Administrative Theory & Praxis, 33(1), pp. 7–38.10.2753/ATP1084-1806330100
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. (2012) Best practices and policy transfer in spatial planning, Planning Practice & Research, 27(1), pp. 103–116.10.1080/02697459.2011.644084
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. & Nadin, V. (2009) Planning cultures between models of society and planning systems, in: F. Othengraften & J. Knieling (Eds) Planning cultures in Europe: Diversity and convergence, pp. 283–300 (Abington: Ashgate).
   Google Scholar
• Sweeting, D. & Copus, C. (2012) Whatever happened to local democracy? Policy & Politics, 40(1), pp. 21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. (2011) Meaning in action‬: Interpretation and dialogue in policy analysis‬ (New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe).‬‬
   Google Scholar
• Waterhout, B., Othengrafen, F. & Sykes, O. (2013) Neo-liberalization processes and spatial planning in France, Germany, and the Netherlands: An exploration, Planning Practice & Research, 28(1), pp. 141–159.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, C. (2011) Strategic navigation: In search of an adaptable mode of strategic spatial planning practice, Town Planning Review, 82(5), pp. 595–613.10.3828/tpr.2011.34
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D & Schwartz-Shea, P. (Eds) (2006) Interpretation and method. Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn (New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe).
   Google Scholar
• Zizek, S (2000) Holding the place, in: Butler, J., Laclau, E. & Zizek, S. (Eds) Contingency, hegemony, universality: Contemporary dialogues on the Left, pp. 308–329 (London:Verso).
   Google Scholar