Social Learning in Transnational Spatial Planning Processes: An Analysis of the ‘V4+2’ Cooperation on Spatial Development

References

• Armitage, D., Marschke, M., & Plummer, R. (2008) Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning, Global Environmental Change, 18, pp. 86–98. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BBR Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung. (2000) Vision Planet. Strategies for Integrated Spatial Development of the Central European, Danubian and Adriatic Area. Guidelines and Policy Proposals, (Bonn: BBR).
   Google Scholar
• Benson, D., Lorenzoni, I., & Cook, H. (2016) Evaluating social learning in England flood risk management: An ‘individual-community interaction’ perspective, Environmental Science & Policy, 55(2), pp. 326–334. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.013
   Google Scholar
• Brummel, R., Nelson, K., Grayzeck Souter, S., Jakes, P., & Williams, D. (2010) Social learning in a policy-mandated collaboration: Community wildfire protection planning in the eastern United States, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 53(6), pp. 681–699. doi:10.1080/09640568.2010.488090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, K., & Stern, M. (2018) Boundary spanners as trust ambassadors in collaborative natural resource management, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 61(2), pp. 291–308. doi:10.1080/09640568.2017.1303462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deas, L., & Lord, A. (2006) From a new regionalism to an unusual regionalism? The Emergence of non-standard regional spaces and lessons for the territorial reorganisation of the state, Urban Studies, 43(10), pp. 1847–1877. doi:10.1080/00420980600838143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dühr, S. (2011) Baltic Sea, Danube and Macro-regional Strategies: A Model for Transnational Cooperation in the EU? (Paris, Berlin: Jacques Delors Institute Notre Europe).
   Google Scholar
• Dühr, S. (2018) A Europe of ‘Petites Europes’: An evolutionary perspective on transnational cooperation on spatial planning, Planning Perspectives, 33(4), pp. 543–569. doi:10.1080/02665433.2018.1483262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dühr, S., Colomb, C., & Nadin, V. (2010) European Spatial Planning and Territorial Cooperation, (London, New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• EC European Commission. (2010) European Union Strategy for Danube Region. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions (COM(2010) 715 Final), (Brussels: EC).
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. (2008) The learning machine: European integration in the planning mirror, Environment and Planning A, 40(6), pp. 1470–1484. doi:10.1068/a39225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlak, A., Heikkila, T., Smolinski, S., Huitema, D., & Armitage, D. (2017) Learning our way out of environmental policy problems: A review of the scholarship, Policy Sciences, 51(3), pp. 335–371. doi:10.1007/s11077-017-9278-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2007) Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies: Towards a Relational Planning for Our Times, (London, New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. K. (2013) Building a conceptual approach to collective learning: Lessons for public policy scholars, The Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), pp. 484–512. doi:10.1111/psj.2013.41.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margerum, R. (2011) Beyond Consensus: Improving Collaborative Planning and Management, (Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
   Google Scholar
• Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2001) Informal and Incidental Learning, New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 89, pp. 25–34. doi:10.1002/ace.5
   Google Scholar
• Ministers responsible for regional development of the Visegrad Group countries (2010) Common spatial development document of the V4+2 countries. Available at https://www.nth.gov.hu/hu/media/download/391
   Google Scholar
• Ministry for Regional Development of the Czech Republic, & Ministry of Construction and Regional Development of the Slovak Republic (2009) Czecho-Slovak borderland development study. Available at https://www.uur.cz/images/publikace/metodickeprirucky/plnezneni/C-S-borderland-2009/CS-borderland.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Construction of the Republic of Poland, & Ministry of Regional Development of the Czech Republic (2006) Studium zagospodarowania przestrzennego pogranicza polsko-czeskiego – Synteza dokumentów krajowych [Spatial development study of the Polish-Czech border region]. Available at https://www.irt.wroc.pl/strona-74-studium_zagospodarowania_przestrzennego.html
   Google Scholar
• MMR Ministry of Regional Development of the Czech Republic. (2014) Common Spatial Development Strategy of the V4+2 Countries, (Brno: Institute for Spatial Development). Available at http://www.v4plus2.eu/pdf/Common-Spatial-Development-Strategy-of-the-V4-2-Countries-21032014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• MMR Ministry of Regional Development of the Czech Republic. (2016) Cooperation in Coordination of Spatial Development of V4+2 Countries. Information about the Common Spatial Development Strategy of the V4+2 Countries, (Brno: Institute for Spatial Development). Available at http://www.v4plus2.eu/pdf/NTCCP-07-2016/letak-v4plus2-06-2016-en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, T. (2004) The governance of land use in river basins: Prospects for overcoming problems of institutional interplay with the EU water framework directive, Land Use Policy, 21, pp. 85–94. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muro, M., & Jeffrey, P. (2008) A critical review of the theory and application of social learning in participatory natural resource management processes, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51(3), pp. 325–344. doi:10.1080/09640560801977190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2017) Land-use Planning Systems in the OECD: Country Fact Sheets, (Paris: OECD Publishing). doi:10.1787/9789264268579-en
   Google Scholar
• Olesen, K. (2014) The neoliberalisation of strategic spatial planning, Planning Theory, 13(3), pp. 288–303. doi:10.1177/1473095213499340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995) The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving, in: C. E. O’Malley (Ed) Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, pp. 69–197 (Berlin: Springer-Verlag).
   Google Scholar
• Schusler, T., Decker, D. J., & Pfeffer, M. J. (2003) Social learning for collaborative natural resource management, Society and Natural Resources, 16(4), pp. 309–326. doi:10.1080/08941920390178874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TA2020. (2011) Territorial Agenda 2020. Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions. Agreed at the Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers Responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development on 19th May 2011, (Gödöllő: Council of the European Union, Hungarian Presidency).
   Google Scholar
• van der Wal, M., De Kraker, J., Offermans, A., Kroeze, C., Kirschner, P. A., & van Ittersum, M. (2014) Measuring social learning in participatory approaches to natural resource management, Environmental Policy and Governance, 24, pp. 1–15. doi:10.1002/eet.v24.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VASAB 2010. (1994) Vision and Strategies around the Baltic Sea 2010: Towards a Framework for Spatial Development in the Baltic Sea Region, (Gdansk: VASAB).
   Google Scholar
• VASAB 2010. (1996) Vision and Strategies around the Baltic Sea 2010. From Vision to Action, (Gdansk: VASAB).
   Google Scholar
• VASAB 2010. (2001) VASAB 2010+. Spatial Development Action Programme, (Gdansk: VASAB).
   Google Scholar
• Visegrad Group (1991) Visegrad declaration: Declaration on cooperation between the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic, the Republic of Poland and the Republic of Hungary in Striving for European integration. Available at http://www.visegradgroup.eu/documents/visegrad-declarations/visegrad-declaration-110412-2
   Google Scholar
• Visegrad Group (2008) Conclusions from the Meeting of Ministers responsible for regional development of the Visegrad Group countries, Bulgaria and Romania, Prague. Available at http://www.visegradgroup.eu/2008/conclusions-from-the (accessed 3–4 June 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. H. (1996) European Union Spatial Policy and Planning, (London: Paul Chapman).
   Google Scholar
• Zonneveld, W. (2005) Expansive spatial planning: The New European transnational spatial visions, European Planning Studies, 13(1), pp. 137–155. doi:10.1080/0965431042000312442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar