A Collaborative Methodology for Local Strategic Planning: Insights from Four Plans in Portugal

References

• Albrechts, L. (2004). Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31(5), pp. 743–758. doi:10.1068/b3065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2006). Shifts in strategic spatial planning? Some evidence from Europe and Australia, Environment and Planning A, 38(6), pp. 1149–1170. doi:10.1068/a37304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. (2015). Ingredients for a more radical strategic spatial planning, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 42(3), pp. 510–525. doi:10.1068/b130104p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bache, I. (2008). Europeanization and Multilevel Governance: Coheion Policy in the European Union and Britain. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Baixinho, A. (2011). Educação e autarquias: Lógicas de acção do poder autárquico face ao poder central e aos micropoderes locais, Revista Lusófona De Educação, 18, pp. 81–95.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M., & Wong, C. (2013). The delusion of strategic spatial planning: What’s left after the labour government’s English regional experiment? Planning, Practice & Research, 28(1), pp. 83–103. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.694314
   Google Scholar
• Berke, P. R., & Conroy, M. M. (2000). Are we planning for sustainable development? An evaluation of 30 comprehensive plans, Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(1), pp. 21–33. doi:10.1080/01944360008976081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, S. D. (2003). Measuring the effects of stakeholder participation on the quality of local plans based on the principles of collaborative ecosystem management, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(4), pp. 407–419. doi:10.1177/0739456X03022004007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso, R., & Breda-Vázquez, I. (2007). Social justice as a guide to planning theory and practice: Analyzing the Portuguese planning system, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(2), pp. 384–400. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00729.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, A. (2012). Recognizing uncertainty and linked decisions in public participation: A new framework for collaborative urban planning, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 29(2), pp. 131–148. doi:10.1002/sres.2102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Rosa Pires, A. (2005). The fragile foundations of European spatial planning in Portugal, European Planning Studies, 13(2), pp. 237–252. doi:10.1080/0965431042000321802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, D. (1997). Citizen participation in the planning process: An essentially contested concept? Journal of Planning Literature, 11(3), pp. 421–434. doi:10.1177/088541229701100309
   Google Scholar
• Doberstein, C. (2016). Designing collaborative governance decision-making in search of a ‘collaborative advantage’, Public Management Review, 18(6), pp. 819–841. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1045019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingues, A. (2017). A cidade-providência, Revista da faculdade de letras da universidade do porto, 13, pp. 171–183.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2002). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052510000129
   Google Scholar
• Fainstein, S. S. (2009). Spatial justice and planning, Justice Spatiale/Spatial Justice, 1, pp. 1–13. doi:10.1002/9781119084679.ch13
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1982). Planning in the face of power, Journal of the American Planning Association, 48(1), pp. 1–80. doi:10.1080/01944368208976167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox-Rogers, L., & Murphy, E. (2014). Informal strategies of power in the local planning system, Planning Theory, 13(3), pp. 244–268. doi:10.1177/1473095213492512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunder, M. (2010). Planning as the ideology of (neoliberal) space, Planning Theory, 9(4), pp. 298–314. doi:10.1177/1473095210368878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1996). The communicative turn in planning theory and its implication for planning strategy-making, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 23(2), pp. 217–234. doi:10.1068/b230217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1998). Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning, Environment and Planning A, 30(9), pp. 1531–1546. doi:10.1068/a301531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2004). The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(1), pp. 45–67. doi:10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00502.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2006). Relational complexity and the imaginative power of strategic spatial planning, European Planning Studies, 14(4), pp. 525–546. doi:10.1080/09654310500421196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2012). Performing place governance collaboratively: Planning as a communicative process, in:F. Fischer & H. Gottwise (Eds) The Argumentative Turn Revisited: Public Policy as Communicative Practice, pp. 58–82. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helling, A. (1998). Collaborative visioning: Proceed with caution!: Results from evaluating Atlanta’s Vision 2020 project, Journal of the American Planning Association, 3(64), pp. 335–349. doi:10.1080/01944369808975990
   Google Scholar
• Holliday, I. (2000). Is the British state hollowing out? Political Quarterly, 71(2), pp. 167–176. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.00291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppe, R. (2011). Institutional constraints and practical problems in deliberative and participatory policy making, Policy and Politics, 39(2), pp. 163–186. doi:10.1332/030557310X519650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2009). Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design, Policy Sciences, 42(1), pp. 73–89. doi:10.1007/s11077-009-9079-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E. (1996). Planning through consensus building: a new view of the comprehensive planning ideal. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(4), 460–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369608975712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Irvin, R., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? European Political Science, 64(1), pp. 55–65. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (1997). Capitalism and its future: Remarks on regulation, government and governance, Review of International Political Economy, 4(3), pp. 561–581. doi:10.1080/096922997347751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordana, J., Mota, F., & Noferini, A. (2012). The role of social capital within policy networks: Evidence from EU cohesion policy in Spain, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(4), pp. 642–664. doi:10.1177/0020852312455577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokx, A., & van Kempen, R. (2010). Dutch urban governance: Multi-level or multi-scalar? European Urban and Regional Studies, 17(4), pp. 355–369. doi:10.1177/0969776409350691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunzmann, K. (2013). Strategic planning: A chance for spatial innovation and creativity, DisP-The Planning Review, 49(3), pp. 28–31. doi:10.1080/02513625.2013.859003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lourenço Marques, J., Tufail, M., Wolf, J., & Madaleno, M. (2020). Population growth and the local provision of services: The role of primary schools in Portugal, Population Research and Policy Review. doi:10.1007/s11113-020-09573-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, G., & Goodwin, M. (1999). Space, scale and state strategy: Rethinking urban and regional governance, Progress in Human Geography, 23(4), pp. 503–527. doi:10.1191/030913299669861026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnette, P. (2003). European governance and civic participation: Beyond elitist citizenship? Political Studies, 51(1), pp. 144–160. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinetto, M. (2003). Governing beyond the centre: A critique of the anglo-governance school, Political Studies, 51(3), pp. 592–608. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E. J. (2001). Collaborative visioning or urban planning as therapy? The politics of public-private policy making, Professional Geographer, 53(2), pp. 207–218. doi:10.1111/0033-0124.00280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClymont, K. (2014). Stuck in the process, facilitating nothing? Justice, capabilities and planning for value-led cutcomes, Planning Practice & Research, 29(2), pp. 187–201. doi:10.1080/02697459.2013.872899
   Google Scholar
• Monteiro, S. (2016). Mudanças recentes nos processos de governança territorial em Portugal, Finisterra, 44(88), pp. 165–173. doi:10.18055/finis1372
   Google Scholar
• Neill, W. J. V. (1999). Whose city? Can a place vision for Belfast avoid the issue of identity? European Planning Studies, 7(3), pp. 269–281. doi:10.1080/09654319908720517
   Google Scholar
• Nogueira, F., Borges, M., & Wolf, J. H. (2017). Collaborative decision-making in non-formal planning settings, Group Decision and Negotiation, 26(5), pp. 875–890. doi:10.1007/s10726-016-9518-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, C., & Breda-Vázquez, I. (2010). Contradictory rescaling: Confronting state restructuring and the building of new spatial policies, European Urban and Regional Studies, 17(4), pp. 401–415. doi:10.1177/0969776409356213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, Y. (2010). Accountability and multi-level governance: More accountability, less democracy? West European Politics, 33(5), pp. 1030–1049. doi:10.1080/01402382.2010.486126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, T., & Minnery, J. (2012). Scale and public participation: Issues in metropolitan regional planning, Planning, Practice & Research, 27(2), pp. 249–262. doi:10.1080/02697459.2012.661670
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A. (2003). Freedom to choose and democracy, Economics and Philosophy, 19(2), pp. 265–279. doi:10.1017/S0266267103001159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. (2009). Resisting neoliberalization: Communicative planning or counter-hegemonic movements? Planning Theory, 8(2), pp. 140–165. doi:10.1177/1473095209102232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdy, J. M. (2012). A Framework for assessing power in collaborative governance processes, Public Administration Review, 72(3), pp. 409–417. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02525.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn, O., Webler, T., Rakel, H., Dienel, P., & Johnson, B. (1993). Public participation in decision making: A three-step procedure, Policy Sciences, 26(3), pp. 189–214. doi:10.1007/BF00999716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (2007). Understanding governance: Ten years On, Organization Studies, 28(8), pp. 1243–1264. doi:10.1177/0170840607076586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. (2007). Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory, Planning Theory, 6(1), pp. 52–68. doi:10.1177/1473095207075161
   Google Scholar
• Salet, W. (2008). Rethinking urban projects: Experiences in Europe, Urban Studies, 45(11), pp. 2343–2363. doi:10.1177/0042098008095871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, B. D. S. (2005). A crítica da governação neoliberal: O Fórum Social Mundial como política e legalidade cosmopolita subalterna, Revista Crítica De Ciências Sociais, 72, pp. 7–44. doi:10.4000/rccs.979
   Google Scholar
• Silva, C. N., & Syrett, S. (2006). Governing Lisbon: Evolving forms of city governance, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(1), pp. 98–119. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00646.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar